scholarly journals Determining Adequate Averaging Periods and Reference Coordinates for Eddy Covariance Measurements of Surface Heat and Water Vapor Fluxes over Mountainous Terrain

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Ying Chen ◽  
Ming-Hsu Li
2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
HuiZhi Liu ◽  
JianWu Feng ◽  
JiHua Sun ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
AnLun Xu

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz M. Zawilski

Abstract. Eddy Covariance (EC) technique is one of the most used technique monitoring Green House Gases (GHG) fluxes such as H2O, CO2, CH4. Water vapor movement and corresponding air density fluctuations were corrected by Webb et al. (1980) but not water vapor formation. Classic EC technique supposes mean air vertical speed nullity when it cannot be the case because of water evaporation. Water is falling as a liquid, evaporating directly from soil surface, from shallow soil subsurface or either through vegetation transpiration and becomes a gas which corresponds to a notable volume expansion. Water vapor is mounting through atmosphere, compensating in a cloud and falling as a rain (liquid) again. Evaporation and corresponding volume expansion make mean vertical air speed positive (upgoing) and influence more or less a flux balance following concerned gas or energy. A simple accessing and corresponding correction for the half hourly summation is given and applied to a 11-month real set of data. These corrections allow to explain, in part, most observed eddy covariance discrepancies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Sun ◽  
Wenfeng Hu ◽  
Nai’ang Wang ◽  
Liqiang Zhao ◽  
Ran An ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 635-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujit Kunwor ◽  
Gregory Starr ◽  
Henry W. Loescher ◽  
Christina L. Staudhammer

2008 ◽  
Vol 148 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 1174-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva van Gorsel ◽  
Ray Leuning ◽  
Helen A. Cleugh ◽  
Heather Keith ◽  
Miko U.F. Kirschbaum ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 301-302 ◽  
pp. 108351
Author(s):  
Suraj Reddy Rodda ◽  
Kiran Chand Thumaty ◽  
MSS Praveen ◽  
Chandra Shekhar Jha ◽  
Vinay Kumar Dadhwal

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 697-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hoffmann ◽  
H. Nieto ◽  
R. Jensen ◽  
R. Guzinski ◽  
P. Zarco-Tejada ◽  
...  

Abstract. Estimating evaporation is important when managing water resources and cultivating crops. Evaporation can be estimated using land surface heat flux models and remotely sensed land surface temperatures (LST), which have recently become obtainable in very high resolution using lightweight thermal cameras and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In this study a thermal camera was mounted on a UAV and applied into the field of heat fluxes and hydrology by concatenating thermal images into mosaics of LST and using these as input for the two-source energy balance (TSEB) modelling scheme. Thermal images are obtained with a fixed-wing UAV overflying a barley field in western Denmark during the growing season of 2014 and a spatial resolution of 0.20 m is obtained in final LST mosaics. Two models are used: the original TSEB model (TSEB-PT) and a dual-temperature-difference (DTD) model. In contrast to the TSEB-PT model, the DTD model accounts for the bias that is likely present in remotely sensed LST. TSEB-PT and DTD have already been well tested, however only during sunny weather conditions and with satellite images serving as thermal input. The aim of this study is to assess whether a lightweight thermal camera mounted on a UAV is able to provide data of sufficient quality to constitute as model input and thus attain accurate and high spatial and temporal resolution surface energy heat fluxes, with special focus on latent heat flux (evaporation). Furthermore, this study evaluates the performance of the TSEB scheme during cloudy and overcast weather conditions, which is feasible due to the low data retrieval altitude (due to low UAV flying altitude) compared to satellite thermal data that are only available during clear-sky conditions. TSEB-PT and DTD fluxes are compared and validated against eddy covariance measurements and the comparison shows that both TSEB-PT and DTD simulations are in good agreement with eddy covariance measurements, with DTD obtaining the best results. The DTD model provides results comparable to studies estimating evaporation with similar experimental setups, but with LST retrieved from satellites instead of a UAV. Further, systematic irrigation patterns on the barley field provide confidence in the veracity of the spatially distributed evaporation revealed by model output maps. Lastly, this study outlines and discusses the thermal UAV image processing that results in mosaics suited for model input. This study shows that the UAV platform and the lightweight thermal camera provide high spatial and temporal resolution data valid for model input and for other potential applications requiring high-resolution and consistent LST.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document