scholarly journals Beginning of a Journey of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Combined Military Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-180
Author(s):  
Mohammed Mosleh Uddin ◽  
Huque Mahfuz ◽  
Md Mostafil Karim

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) involves the intravenous infusion of autologous or allogenic stem cells collected from bone marrow, peripheral blood or umbilical cord to re-establish haematopoietic function in patients whose bone marrow or immune system is damaged or defective. HSCT are mainly of two types –autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and allogenic SCT. Autologous SCT is mainly performed in multiple myeloma, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and less commonly in acute myeloid leukaemia. Haematopoietic stem cells are mobilized from bone marrow to the peripheral blood after the use of mobilizing agents, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor. Then the mobilized stem cells are collected from peripheral blood by apheresis and cryo-preserved. The patient is prepared by giving conditioning regimen (high dose melphelan). Stem cells, which are already collected, are re-infused into patient’s circulation by a blood transfusion set. Engraftment happens 7-14 days after auto SCT. Common side effects of this procedure include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis, infections etc. The first case of SCT performed in Combined Military Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh is presented here.Birdem Med J 2018; 8(2): 177-180

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 5084-5084
Author(s):  
Quanyi Lu ◽  
Xiaoqing Niu ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Delong Liu

Abstract Increasing number of patients in China have difficulty of finding sibling donors due to limited number of siblings. We therefore explored the feasibility using haploidentical parent donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eight leukemia patients were studied in our hospital. These included 2 CML-BC, 2 MDS-RAEB, 3 relapsed ALL and 1 relapsed AML. The median age was 12 (7–17). GCSF- mobilized bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells were collected from parents (1 to 3 locus mismatched). The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (30mg/m2/d x5), bulsulfan (4mg/kg/d x3) and cyclophosphamide (50mg/kg/d x2). Cyclosporin A, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, and ATG were used for GVHD prophylaxis. The total number of CD34+ cell in the grafts ranged between 5–10 x 106/kg. The median follow- up was 13 months (6–24). One patient failed to engraft, the other 7 patients achieved full donor chimerism at day 28. The incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV) was 57.1% (4 of 7). The incidence of chronic GVHD of limited stage occurred in the same 4 patients. One patient died of lung complication at 17th month, another patient with CML-BC relapsed 10 months after transplantation. The rest 6 patients are alive without disease. These results suggested that parents could be considered as stem cell donors in the absence of alternative donors for young patients with high-risk diseases. GCSF-primed bone marrow plus peripheral blood stem cells might be beneficial to reduce the risk of GVHD for leukemia children in China. More patients are needed to further study this approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pokpong Piriyakhuntorn ◽  
Adisak Tantiworawit ◽  
Thanawat Rattanathammethee ◽  
Sasinee Hantrakool ◽  
Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4515-4515
Author(s):  
Patrycja Zielinska ◽  
Malgorzata Krawczyk-Kulis ◽  
Miroslaw Markiewicz ◽  
Monika Dzierzak-Mietla ◽  
Anna Koclega ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4515 Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable disease when treated with standard chemotherapy. The only possibility to provide cure is allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). CLL patients aged less than 55 account for about 15% of patients and these cases allo-SCT should be taken into consideration. The indications for allo-SCT are as follows: del17p, resistance to chemoimmunotherapy, Richter’s syndrome or recurrent disease. A retrospective analysis of allo-SCT in 18 patients (10 males, 8 females) with CLL transplanted in years 2000–2010 was performed. The aim of the study was to assess of long term follow-up outcome of allo-SCT in CLL patients. The median age at diagnosis was 41ys (range: 35–51). The sibling donor was available in 16 cases (2 pts were mismatched), unrelated donors were in 2 cases (1 mismatched). Most of the pts (16 out of 18) were MRD positive when allotransplanted. Median lymphocytosis preceeding allo-SCT was 5.9G/l. Peripheral blood was the source of stem cells in 9 cases (50%), and bone marrow in the remaining 9 cases, 2 pts were transplanted with stem cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood. 4 pts (22%) underwent the allograft procedure twice or more. Reduced intensity conditioning with alemtuzumab was performed in 9 pts (50%), myeloablative regimen in 4 cases and RIC with rituximab in one case.The median number of CD34+cellsx10^6/kg was 4.1 (range: 0.86–9.64). All but one patient engrafted (this pt was transplanted again successfully in one year time). Acute graft-versus host disease (GvHD) was noted in 46% of pts (only in 2 pts grade IV). Extensive GvHD was observed only in 2 pts. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was performed in 8 pts (44%). With a median follow-up of 73 months (range: 9–89) for surviving patients, the five-year Kaplan-Meier of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was 55,5% and 34%, respectively. At five years, the cumulative probability of non-relapse mortality was 15%. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the effective treatment in CLL for selected group of patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4413-4413
Author(s):  
Line Nederby ◽  
Lea Bjerre Hokland ◽  
Katrine Nielsen ◽  
Erik Kay Segel ◽  
Peter Hokland ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4413 Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; Neupogen) is by far the most commonly used agent for mobilization of stem cells for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, up to 30% of the patients will fail to mobilize the targeted amount of CD34+ cells. The addition of plerixafor has been shown to mobilize the stem cells when G-CSF fails to do so. However, no reports have hitherto addressed and compared the biology of the CD34+ stem cells obtained from an inadequate G-CSF mobilization and a subsequent plerixafor administration. Given these considerations, this study was aimed at assessing the proportion of stem cells by means of phenotype and colony-forming potential. Given that CD34 is at best only a surrogate marker for stemness, we here included the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity, an emerging crucial marker in stem cell biology, to evaluate the stem cell pool in paired samples obtained after G-CSF and plerixafor administration. Cryopreserved samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients diagnosed with NHL (n=3), MM (n=4), and HL (n=1,) were directly compared. All patients were heavily treated with at least 3 cytoreductive regimens prior to the decision to proceed with ASCT. Different mobilizing regimens were applied, but all received one dose of plerixafor (0.24mg/kg sc) as a result of failed G-CSF mobilization (12mg/kg sc twice daily for 3–5 days). The PBMCs were obtained from the morning CD34+ screening sample taken 1) during G-CSF mobilization, typically 1–2- days before it was substituted with plerixafor, and 2) the morning after the plerixafor injection. The percentages of CD34+CD38+ and CD34+CD38- cells and the percentage of ALDHbright CD34+ cells in the samples of the suboptimal G-CSF mobilization and the matched plerixafor/G-CSF mobilization were analyzed and calculated as percentage of PBMC. These samples were also subjected to semisolid culturing and colonies were quantified after 14 days, where CFU-GEMM, BFU-E, and CFU-GM were enumerated. We found no significant difference in the percentage of CD34+CD38+ and CD34+CD38- cells in the cell pools recovered from G-CSF (mean 0.68%, SD 0.281 and mean 0.183%, SD 0.095, respectively) and plerixafor mobilization (mean 1.123%, SD 1.143 and mean 0.361%, SD 0.316, respectively) (n=8, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, p=0.46 and p=0.15, respectively). Importantly, when comparing the percentage of ALDHbright CD34+ cells (G-CSF: mean 0.071%, SD 0.048. Plerixafor: mean 0.261%, SD 0.298) in the same matching samples the difference between them was not significant (p=0.11). Finally, the numbers of CFU-GEMM (G-CSF: mean 12.13, SD 16.65. Plerixafor: mean 12.5, SD 14.23), BFU-E (G-CSF: mean 2.375, SD 3.926. Plerixafor: mean 4.125, SD 7.06), and CFU-C colonies (G-CSF: mean 9, SD 13.68. Plerixafor: mean 10.5, SD 11.45) originating from the matching G-CSF and plerixafor-mobilized cells were not significantly different (p=0.93, p=0.29, p=1, respectively). Collectively, these data reveal that in poor G-CSF mobilizers, the ratios of CD34+CD38+ and CD34+CD38- cells to PBMCs were equal in the matching samples recovered from G-CSF and plerixafor mobilization clearly suggesting that successful plerixafor mobilization is the consequence of increased cell release only in otherwise poor mobilizers. Notably, plerixafor and G-CSF caused the release of stem cells with equal degrees of stemness and commitment as measured by ALDH activity, percentages of CD34+ cells, and colony forming potential. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document