scholarly journals A 26-year-old female with faulty existing restorations

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Ram Udgar Yadav ◽  
Sageer Ahmed ◽  
Mozammal Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Proximal Surface ◽  
Mobility Test ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
History Of ◽  
Ionomer Cement

This article has no abstract. The first 100 words appear below: A 26-year-old female came with unaesthetic restorations on the upper four anterior teeth. She gave a history of the restoration of the teeth 6 months ago that underwent progressive marginal discoloration. On clinical examination, two upper central and two lateral incisor teeth were restored by Glass Ionomer cement and Secondary caries were present beneath restorations. Teeth were vital and did not respond to percussion and mobility test. Radiographic examination revealed that the four maxillary anterior teeth (2 central and 2 laterals) had the existing restoration which showed a radioopaque area in the proximal surface but radiolucent areas were also seen beneath the radioopaque area that extends to the dentin.

scholarly journals Gambaran Penggunaan Resin Komposit dan Semen Ionomer Kaca Sebagai Bahan Restorasi di Poli Gigi Rumah Sakit Gunung Maria Tomohon Tahun 2012

e-GIGI ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sumolang
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Dental Resin ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Restorations

Gigi yang terserang kariesdapatdirawatdenganmenggunakanbahanrestorasi. Resin komposit dan semen ionomer kacamerupakanbahanyangdigunakanuntukperawatanrestorasi di poli gigi RS Gunung Maria Tomohon.Tujuanpenelitianiniuntukmengetahuigambaranpenggunaanbahanrestorasi resin kompositdan semen ionomerkaca di poligigi RSGunung Maria Tomohontahun 2012. Penelitianinimerupakanpenelitiandeskrpitif, data diambildarirekammedispasienrestorasidenganmetodetotal sampling.Data yang didapatyaitujumlah rekammedis pasien restorasi pada tahun 2012 sebanyak 268 danjumlahgigi yang direstorasisebanyak 387.Gigi yang direstorasimenggunakanbahan resin kompositsebanyak 207 gigi, sedangkangigi yang direstorasimenggunakan semen ionomerkacasebanyak 180 gigi.Hasilpenelitianinidibagiberdasarkanusia, jeniskelamin, elemengigidandiagnosa. Hasilpenelitianmenunjukankategoriusiadewasalebihseringmelakukanperawatanretorasi resin komposit dengan 145 gigi (70%) dan semen ionomerkaca dengan 106 gigi (58,8%) yang direstorasi, pasienperempuanlebihseringmelakukanperawatanrestorasiresin komposit dengan 117 (59,4%) dan semen ionomerkaca dengan 101 (56%) gigi yang direstorasi. Gigi bagian anterior seringdirestorasidengan menggunakan resin komposit dan gigibagian posterior seringdirestorasimenggunakan semen ionomerkaca.Hiperemiapulpamerupakanpenyakit yang paling didiagnosadan paling seringmendapatkanperawatanrestorasi resin komposit dengan 179 kasus (86%)dan semen ionomerkaca 157 kasus (87,3%).Kata Kunci:bahan restorasi, resin komposit, semen ionomerkacaABSTRACT Dental caries infected can be treated with restorative materials. Resin composites and glass ionomer cement is a material used for dental restorative treatment on poly Hospital Gunung Maria Tomohon. The purpose of this study to describe the use of composite resin restorations and glass ionomer cement in the teeth poly Hospital Gunung Maria Tomohon in 2012. This research is deskrpitif , data extracted from medical records of patients with restoration of total sampling.Data method obtained the restoration of the patient's medical record number in 2012 as many as 268 and the number of restored teeth as much as 387. Restored teeth using composite resin materials as much as 207 teeth, whereas the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement as many as 180 teeth. The results are divided based on age, sex, dental and diagnostic elements. The results showed the adult age category more often retorasi care dental resin composite with 145 (70 %) and glass ionomer cement with 106 teeth (58,8 %) were restored, female patients were more frequent maintenance of composite resin restorations with 117 (59,4 %) and glass ionomer cement with 101(56 %) restored teeth. Anterior teeth are restored using gigibagian posterior composite resin and glass ionomer cement seringdirestorasimenggunakan. Pulp hyperemia is the most diagnosed diseases and most often get care composite resin restorations with 179 cases (86 %) and glass ionomer cement 157 cases (87,3%). Keywords : restorative materials, composite resin, glass ionomer cement

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of Glass-Lonomer Cement and Giomer for the Management of Cervical Caries

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
Nurun Nahar ◽  
Tareq Hassan ◽  
Mohammed Kamal Uddin
Keyword(s):  
Patient Group ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
P Value ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Secondary Caries ◽  
History Of ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Group 1

Background: Giomer is a unique class of restorative material has been introduced as the true hybridization of Glass Ionomer (GI) and composite resin and has the distinguishing feature of a stable surface pre-reacted glass ionomer. Glass Ionomer Cements (GIC) are also unique restorative materials with many uses in clinical practice and provide for caries-protective fluoride releasing at the margins of restorations, as well as their ability to have the fluoride within their chemical matrix recharged by outside exposure to other fluoride-containing materials. The present study aim at clinically evaluate the comparison between the glass Ionomer cement and Giomer for the management of cervical caries. Materials and methods: The study was a cross sectional comparative study which was carried out from 01 December 2018 to 31 November 2019 in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bangladesh Dental College, Dhanmondi, Dhaka. Total number of cases was 80. The patients were divided into two groups, half of the patient (Group-1) was treated with Glass Ionomer cement and half of the patient (Group-2) was treated with Giomer restoration. The post-operative sensitivity discoloration, dislodgement of filling material and secondary caries formation were recorded. All the patients were assigned and the data were analyzed statistically by SPSS version 21. p-value < 0.05 was taken as significant. Results: The study reveals 60% of the study population was within 41 to 50 years of age group (Group-1) and 62.5% were 51 to 60 years (Group-2) 45% in (Group-1) and 10% in (Group-2) had history of post filling sensitivity, 12% in (Group-1) and 5% in (Group-2) had discoloration after restoration, 2.5% had history of dislodgement of the filling in (Group-1), no history of dislodgement of the filling in (Group-2), 2.5% had history of secondary caries formation in (Group-1) and no history of Secondary caries formation in (Group-2). Conclusion: Patients were more approachable for Giomer restoration than Glass ionomer for the management of cervical caries over a period of 12 month. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.20 (2); July 2021; Page 60-64

scholarly journals An In Vitro Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Bioactivity between Neo MTA Plus, Pro Root MTA, BIODENTINE & Glass Ionomer Cement Using Dye Penetration Method

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3159
Author(s):  
Mohmed Isaqali Karobari ◽  
Syed Nahid Basheer ◽  
Fazlur Rahman Sayed ◽  
Sufiyan Shaikh ◽  
Muhammad Atif Saleem Agwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Methylene Blue ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Dye Penetration ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The ideal root end filling material should form a tight seal in the root canal by adhering to the cavity walls. Several materials have been used for root end filling. The present study aims to find out and compare the bioactivity of Neo MTA Plus, Pro Root MTA White, BIODENTINE & glass ionomer cement as root end filling materials using 1% methylene blue as tracer. Materials and methods: 80 extracted human permanent maxillary anterior teeth were used in the study. They were divided into four groups. Specimens were sectioned transversely in the cervical area to separate the crown from the root. The root canal was obturated with gutta percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealers. Thereafter, each sample was resected apically by removing 3 mm of the apex and filled with different materials. Samples were kept in buffering solution at 37 °C until the recommended evaluation periods. The specimens were then suspended in 1% methylene blue for 24 h, prior to the analysis. The teeth were then sectioned, and dye penetration was examined, photographed, and evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Results: Vertical dye penetration showed significant differences across different groups. The minimum dye penetration was seen in Neo MTA plus followed by BIODENTINE, Pro Root MTA and maximum in GIC. There was no significant difference in dye penetration between Neo MTA plus and BIODENTINE both at fifteen days and one-month intervals. Conclusion: The present study suggests Neo MTA plus and BIODENTINE should be the preferred material for root end filling.

scholarly journals Sealing Ability of Three Different Surface Coating Materials on Conventional and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Anterior Teeth: An In vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anshula Deshpande ◽  
Chirag Macwan ◽  
Steffi Dhillon ◽  
Medha Wadhwa ◽  
Neelam Joshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Coating ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Coating Materials ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: Microleakage is an important property that has been used in assessing the success of any restorative material used in restoring a tooth. Immediate application of a surface coating agent is suggested to protect glass ionomer cement against moisture contamination and dehydration during early setting. Aim: To compare marginal microleakage of two different Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC)- Conventional GIC and Resin Modified GIC in primary anterior teeth using three surface coating materials. Materials and Methods: An in vitro study was conducted between January 2014 to October 2017 on freshly extracted 40 anterior primary teeth which were randomly assigned into two main groups (Fuji II GIC and Fuji II LC GIC) with four subgroups (control-no surface coating, A=GC Fují Varnish II, B=GC G-Coat Plus, C=Icon). A standardised Class V cavity preparation was prepared on the labial surface of each tooth. Specimens were coated with two layers of nail varnish, leaving a 1 mm window around the cavity margins and placed in a solution of Methylene blue Dye for 24 hour at 37°C. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally in a buccolingual direction of the restorations and evaluated under stereomicroscope to check extent of dye penetration. The results were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p≤0.05). Results: It was found that maximum microleakage was seen in group 1 (Fuji II GIC) as compared to group 2 (Fuji II LC GIC) and it was non-significant (p=0.53). Ascending order for mean microleakage for Group 1 was as follows: Control >GC Fuji Varnish >Icon DMG >GC G-Coat and for Group 2: Control >GC Fuji Varnish >Icon DMG >GC G-Coat. Icon when compared with Gc coat and Varnish also showed non-significant (p=0.137) difference in Group 2. Conclusion: All three different surface coatings can seal glass ionomer restorations. The GC G-Coat Plus has the least microleakage on Resin-Modified GIC (RMGIC) compared to the other surface coatings. This would aid the clinicians to make appropriate decision regarding the choice of material to be used for restoration and coating in anterior primary teeth.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN MIKRO PADA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT MIKROFILLER DENGAN RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT (RMGIC) PADA KAVITAS KLAS V GIGI ANTERIOR

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-91
Author(s):  
Thesi Kurnia Ayudia ◽  
Kuswardani Susari Putri ◽  
Ivony Fitria
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Base Material ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Class V ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Group I ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Microleakage defined as the clinically undetectable passage of bacteria, fluids, molecules or ions between a cavity wall and the restorative material. Microleakage tends to occur in Class V cavities. It is caused by  marginal adaptation  which is more difficult in class  V cavities. Microfiller composite resin is developed and indicated for areas that not require a large pressure. As the development of dental materials, it has been developed a composite resin base material that is known as resin-modified glass ionomer cement. This material has purposed to reduce the limitation of conventional glass ionomer cement and take the advantage of the composite resin material. The aim of this study was   to evaluate microleakage difference of microfiler composite resin restoration with resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in class V anterior teeth cavities.  The methode of this  study used experimental laboratory through in vitro process . Thirty two class V cavities were prepared on labial surfaces of extracted human anterior teeth. Samples were divided into two groups. Group I included sixteen samples that have had   restorated with microfiller composite. Group II included sixteen samples that have had restorated with resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The samples were immersed into aquabides solution for 24 hours. After that, the samples were immersed into 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. All samples sectioned longitudinally and analyzed for microleakage as dye penetration using a stereomicroscope. Student t-test were used for statistical analysis. The resulting data showed no significantly difference between two groups. Key Word : Microleakage, microfiller composite resin, resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), class V cavities.

scholarly journals Fracture Strength of Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth after Restoration with Composite Resin and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Mehrsa Paryab ◽  
Hoseain Afshar ◽  
Bahman Seraj ◽  
Salar Shakibapoor ◽  
Mohammad Javad Kharazifard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Developmental Disturbance of a Maxillary Permanent Lateral Incisor Following Trauma at the Age of 16 Months: A 6-Year Follow-Up

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-210
Author(s):  
Sreekanth K Mallineni ◽  
Hessa Al-Mulla ◽  
Robert P Anthonappa ◽  
Joseph CY Chan ◽  
Nigel M King
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Germ ◽  
Permanent Tooth ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Enamel Hypoplasia ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Developmental Disturbance ◽  
History Of

A 3 year and 8 months old Chinese boy was referred for a consultation regarding his missing maxillary anterior teeth. He had a history of trauma to his primary maxillary anterior teeth due to a fall at the age of 16 months. Clinical examination of the patient indicated multiple carious lesions and inadequate oral hygiene. Radiographic examination revealed intrusion of the primary left lateral incisor, with evidence of damage to the permanent tooth germ. Subsequently, the patient was followed-up for almost six years during which his permanent maxillary left lateral incisor erupted exhibiting an unusual morphology. Clinically enamel hypoplasia and radiographically dens invaginatus were evident in affected tooth.

Microleakage of class II restoration with zirconia inlay: An in vitro study

2019 ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Xuan Anh Ngoc Ho ◽  
Anh Chi Phan ◽  
Toai Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Group 1 ◽  
Composite Restoration

Background: Class II restoration with zirconia inlay is concerned by numerous studies about the luting coupling between zirconia inlay and teeth. The present study was performed to evaluate the microleakage of Class II zirconia inlayusing two different luting agents and compare to direct restoration using bulk fill composite. Aims: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II restorations using three different techniques. Materials and methods: The study was performed in laboratory with three groups. Each of thirty extracted human teeth was prepared a class II cavity with the same dimensions, then these teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups restored by 3 different approaches. Group 1: zirconia inlay cemented with self-etch resin cement (Multilink N); Group 2: zirconia inlay cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji Plus); Group 3: direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite(Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill). All restorations were subjected to thermal cycling (100 cycles 50C – 55 0C), then immersed to 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The microleakage determined by the extent of dye penetration along the gingival wall was assessed using two methods: quantitative and semi-quantitative method. Results: Among three types of restorations, group 1 demonstrated the significantly lower rate of leakage compared to the others, while group 2 and 3 showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Zirconia inlay restoration cemented with self-etch resin cement has least microleakage degree when compare to class II zirconia inlay restoration cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite. Key words: inlay, zirconia ceramic, class II restoration, microleakage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document