Survival Rates and Risk Factors for Cephalad and L5-S1 Adjacent Segment Degeneration after L5 Floating Lumbar Fusion : A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Object During the past decades, lumbar fusion has increasingly become a standard treatment for degenerative spinal disorders. However, it has also been associated with an increased incidence of adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD). Previous studies have reported less ASD in anterior fusion surgeries; thus, the authors hypothesized that the integrity of the posterior complex plays an important role in ASD. This study was designed to investigate the effect of the posterior complex on adjacent instability after lumbar instrumentation and the development of ASD. Methods To evaluate different surgical interventions, 120 patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups of 40 patients each who were statistically similar with respect to demographic and clinical data. Patients in Group A were allocated for facet joint resection and L4–5 fusion, Group B for semilaminectomy and fusion, and Group C for complete laminectomy and fusion. All of the patients were followed up for 5–7 years (mean 5.9 years). The disc height, intervertebral disc angle, dynamic intervertebral angular range of motion (ROM), L3–4 slip, and the total lordosis angle were each measured before the operation and at the final follow-up. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was determined before surgery and at the final follow-up to evaluate the clinical results. Results Among the 3 groups, no significant differences were detected in all clinical and demographic assessments before surgery. At 3 months after surgery, the JOA score of all groups improved significantly and showed no significant differences among the groups. At the final follow-up, Group C had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower JOA score than the other 2 groups. Moreover, the disc height and total lumbar lordosis in patients of Group C were significantly decreased compared with disc height and total lumbar lordosis in the other 2 groups. In contrast, disc angle, dynamic angular ROM, and listhesis were significantly higher in Group C than in the other 2 groups. Twenty-four patients showed signs of ASD after the operation (3 patients in Group A, 4 in B, and 17 in C). The number of patients in Group C showing ASD was significantly different from that in Groups A and B. Conclusions During follow-up for 6 years, a significantly higher number of patients with ASD were noted in the complete-laminectomy group. The number of reoperations for treating ASD was much higher in this patient group than in the patients undergoing facet joint resection and L4–5 fusion or semilaminectomy and fusion. Therefore, preserving the posterior complex as much as possible during surgery plays an important role in preventing ASD and in reducing the reoperation rate.

Download Full-text

11:007. The treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up

The Spine Journal ◽

10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.009 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. S4

Author(s):

James Yue ◽

Rudolf Bertagnoli ◽

Frank Pfeiffer ◽

Regina Nanieva ◽

Andrea Fenk-Mayer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prospective Study ◽

Lumbar Fusion ◽

Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽

Adjacent Segment ◽

Total Disc Arthroplasty ◽

Disc Arthroplasty ◽

A Prospective Study

Download Full-text

Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion surgery in treatment for degenerative lumbar disorders: a meta-analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-020-02032-7 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Tao Wang ◽

Wenyuan Ding

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Lumbar Fusion ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Adjacent Segment ◽

Fusion Surgery ◽

Posterior Lumbar Fusion ◽

Lumbar Fusion Surgery ◽

History Of

Abstract Study design A meta-analysis. Objective We performed a meta-analysis to explore the incidence and risk factors of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after posterior lumbar fusion surgery. Methods An extensive search of the literature was performed in English database of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and Chinese database of CNKI and WANFANG (up to May 2020). We collected factors including demographic data, surgical factor, and sagittal parameters. Data analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 and STATA 12.0. Results Finally, 19 studies were included in the final analysis. In our study, the rate of ASD after posterior lumbar fusion surgery was 18.6% (540 of 2896). Our data also showed that mean age, body mass index (BMI), the history of smoking and hypertension, preoperative adjacent disc degeneration, long-segment fusion, preoperative superior facet violation, high lumbosacral joint angle, pre- and post-operative L1-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), post-operative lumbar lordosis (LL), and preoperative pelvic incidence (PI) were associated with the development of ASD. However, gender, history of diabetes, bone mineral density (BMD), preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), the type of fusion (PLIF vs TLIF), type of bone graft (auto- vs allograft), fusion to S1(vs non-fusion to S1), diagnose (lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar spondylolisthesis), preoperative pelvic tilt (PT), LL and sacral slope (SS), post-operative SS, PT and PI were not associated with the development of ASD. Conclusions In our study, many factors were correlated with the risk of ASD after posterior lumbar fusion surgery. We hope this article can provide a reference for spinal surgeons in treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases.

Download Full-text

Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/spi.1999.90.2.0163 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 90 (2) ◽

pp. 163-169 ◽

Cited By ~ 57

Author(s):

Shahin Etebar ◽

David W. Cahill

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Postmenopausal Women ◽

Calcium Supplementation ◽

Lumbar Fusion ◽

Adjacent Segment ◽

Content Type ◽

Adjacent Vertebral Body ◽

Canal Stenosis ◽

Fine Print

Object. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 125 consecutive patients in whom instrumentation was placed to promote lumbar fusion for the treatment of degenerative instability. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. The authors sought to determine the risk factors for next-segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion with rigid instrumentation. Methods. Thirty-one of 125 fusion procedures were performed in women who were postmenopausal. A total of 18 of 125 patients developed symptomatic next-segment degeneration at a previously asymptomatic level; 15 were postmenopausal women. Data were obtained in patients with next-segment failure based on radiographic studies, neurological assessment, demographic factors, and sequential follow-up examinations. The mean follow-up period for this group was 44.8 months. All women were postmenopausal, and 53% received biphosphonate drugs and calcium supplementation preoperatively for osteopenia. Twenty percent of all patients with next-segment failure were cigarette smokers. Next-segment diseases included spondylolisthesis (39%), spinal canal stenosis due to disc herniation and/or facet hypertrophy (33%), stress fracture of the adjacent vertebral body (28%), and scoliosis (17%). Patients frequently had more than one degenerative process at the next segment. Conclusions. The risk of adjacent-segment failure is clearly higher for patients in whom lumbar fusion with rigid instrumentation is performed to treat degenerative instability. This risk appears to be especially high in postmenopausal women.

Download Full-text

Predicting factors of adjacent segment degeneration after long-segment spinal fusion: spinopelvic parameters analysis

10.21203/rs.2.18590/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ping-Yeh Chiu ◽

Fu-Cheng Kao ◽

Wen-Jer Chen ◽

Chia-Wei Yu ◽

Chi-Chien Niu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Fusion ◽

Lumbar Fusion ◽

Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽

Control Group ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Adjacent Segment ◽

Spinopelvic Parameters ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Adjacent Disc

Abstract Background We investigated whether spinopelvic parameters are important prognostic factors causing adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after long instrumented spinal fusion for degenerative spinal disease. Methods This uncontrolled, randomized, single arm retrospective study included patients who underwent long instrumented lumbar fusion (fusion levels≥ 4) in the past 5 years with follow-up for at least 2 years. The inclusion criteria included adult patients (≥40 years of age) with a diagnosis of spinal degeneration who underwent instrumented corrective surgery. The exclusion criteria included preexisting adjacent disc degeneration, combined anterior reconstructive surgery, and distal ASD. Clinical and operative characters were evaluated. Angle of lumbar lordosis (LLA), sacral slope (SSA), pelvic tilt (PTA) and pelvic incidence (PIA) were compared preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Results From 2009 to 2014, 60 patients (30 ASD and 30 non-ASD) were enrolled. The average age was 66.82 ± 7.48 years for the study group and 67.97 ± 7.81 years for the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical and operative characteristics. Among all spinopelvic parameters, only pre-, post-operative and final follow-up PIA in ASD group (53.9±10.4ﾟ, 54.6±14.0ﾟ, 54.3±14.1ﾟ) and non-ASD group (60.3±13.0ﾟ, 61.8±11.3ﾟ, 62.5±11.2ﾟ) showed statistically significant differences ( p <0.05). Conclusion This study confirms that preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up PIA is a significant factor contributing to the development of ASD after long instrumented spinal fusion.

Download Full-text