scholarly journals Public Awareness of Stroke and Its Predicting Factors in Korea: a National Public Telephone Survey, 2012 and 2014

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyung-Jae Oh ◽  
Jiyoung Moon ◽  
Yu-Mi Lee ◽  
Hyeung-Keun Park ◽  
Ki Soo Park ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 194 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Benameur ◽  
Nassima Benameur ◽  
Neji Saidi ◽  
Sakina Tartag ◽  
Hadjer Sayad ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 76-78
Author(s):  
Morgan J. Martin ◽  
Rychael Morton ◽  
Shawn Rau ◽  
Sue Nyberg ◽  
Gina M. Berg

Introduction. All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) are associated with injury,mortality, and healthcare costs. ATV related injuries are less severewhen consistent safety practices are followed, however, ATV safetyregulations are varied among states. This study sought to surveyKansas ATV dealers and track owners to determine safety promotionpractices. Methods. A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted ofKansas ATV dealers and tracks. Survey questions included promotionand sale of safety equipment, provision of ATV safety information,and respondent characteristics. Results. Of those contacted, 32% of dealers and 31% of tracksresponded to the survey. Most ATV dealers sell safety gear (70% -100%) and all recommend safety gear to buyers and riders. All ATVtracks reported requiring helmets (100%) but were varied regardingother forms of safety gear. The majority of ATV dealers (77%) recommendedsafety courses, but only 31% of dealers and 40% of tracksoffered courses. Eighty percent of ATV tracks and 52% of dealers feltthey had a professional responsibility to educate riders/owners onsafety. Conclusions. Safety promotion by ATV dealers in Kansas consistentlywas recommended, but often limited to the sales of safety gear(helmets and gloves) or the provision of manufacturer provided safetymaterials. Further, ATV dealers reported rarely offering skills tests orsafety courses to buyers. In Kansas, safety promotion at the point ofsale or track level could be improved to increase public awareness ofATV safety practices. KS J Med 2017;10(4):76-78.


Author(s):  
James S. Webber

INTRODUCTION“Acid rain” and “acid deposition” are terms no longer confined to the lexicon of atmospheric scientists and 1imnologists. Public awareness of and concern over this phenomenon, particularly as it affects acid-sensitive regions of North America, have increased dramatically in the last five years. Temperate ecosystems are suffering from decreased pH caused by acid deposition. Human health may be directly affected by respirable sulfates and by the increased solubility of toxic trace metals in acidified waters. Even man's monuments are deteriorating as airborne acids etch metal and stone features.Sulfates account for about two thirds of airborne acids with wet and dry deposition contributing equally to acids reaching surface waters or ground. The industrial Midwest is widely assumed to be the source of most sulfates reaching the acid-sensitive Northeast since S02 emitted as a byproduct of coal combustion in the Midwest dwarfs S02 emitted from all sources in the Northeast.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Murza ◽  
Barbara J. Ehren

Purpose The purpose of this article is to situate the recent language disorder label debate within a school's perspective. As described in two recent The ASHA Leader articles, there is international momentum to change specific language impairment to developmental language disorder . Proponents of this change cite increased public awareness and research funding as part of the rationale. However, it is unclear whether this label debate is worthwhile or even practical for the school-based speech-language pathologist (SLP). A discussion of the benefits and challenges to a shift in language disorder labels is provided. Conclusions Although there are important arguments for consistency in labeling childhood language disorder, the reality of a label change in U.S. schools is hard to imagine. School-based services are driven by eligibility through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which has its own set of labels. There are myriad reasons why advocating for the developmental language disorder label may not be the best use of SLPs' time, perhaps the most important of which is that school SLPs have other urgent priorities.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 288-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Salonia ◽  
Federico Pellucchi ◽  
Ricardo A. Castillejos Molina ◽  
Alberto Briganti ◽  
Federico Dehò ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 465-466
Author(s):  
Aída Hurtado
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vytenis B. Damusis ◽  
Christine M. Novak ◽  
Cindy R. Lenart ◽  
Tiffany R. Bussie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document