scholarly journals Resusitasi Pengendalian Kerusakan Di Unit Perawatan Intensif

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
Dhanu Pitra Arianto ◽  
Nurita Dian Kestriani
Keyword(s):  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Massive Bleeding ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Damage Control Resuscitation ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Severe Haemorrhage ◽  
Lethal Triad ◽  
Clotting Cascade ◽  
Injured Patients

Abstrak Resusitasi dengan pengendalian kerusakanmenggambarkan suatu pendekatan ke perawatan awal pada pasien dengan cedera berat. Tujuan pendekatan ini untuk menjaga pasien tetap stabil dengan menghindari intervensi dan kondisi yang berisiko kepada keadaan perburukan dengan mengendalikan trias kematian, yaitu hipotermia, koagulopati, dan asidosis. Merupakan hal yang penting bahwa konsep dan kepraktisan pendekatan ini dipahami oleh semua yang terlibat dalam manajemen awal pasien trauma. Pendekatan ini dimulai dengan pemberian produk darah sejak awal, penghentian perdarahan dan pengembalian volume darah yang bertujuan untuk mengembalikan stabilitas fisiologis dengan cepat. Resusitasi dengan pengendalian kerusakan memilikibeberapa tambahan pendekatan dari bidang farmakologis dan laboratorium untuk meningkatkan perawatan pasien yang mengalami perdarahan. Pendekatan ini termasuk trombelastografi sebagai ukuran rinci kaskade pembekuan, asam traneksamat sebagai antifibrinolitik.   Kata kunci : hipotermia, koagulopati, asidosis, perdarahan masif     Damage Control Resuscitation in Intensive Care Unit   Abstract Damage control resuscitation (DCR) describes an approach to the early care of very seriously injured patients. The aim is to keep the patient alive whilst avoiding interventions and situations that risk worsening their situation by driving the lethal triad of hypothermia, coagulopathy and acidosis.It is critical that the concepts and practicalities of this approach are understood by all those involved in the early management of trauma patients. Damage control resuscitation forms part of an overall approach to patient care rather than a specific intervention and has evolved from damage control surgery. It is characterised by early blood product administration, haemorrhage arrest and restoration of blood volume aiming to rapidly restore physiologic stability. The infusion of large volumes of crystalloid is no longer appropriate, instead the aim is to replace lost blood and avoid dilution and coagulopathy. In specific situations, permissive hypotension may also be of benefit, particularly in patients with severe haemorrhage from an arterial source. Damage control resuscitation has been augmented by both pharmacologic and laboratory adjuncts to improve the care of the hemorrhaging patient. These include thrombelastography as a detailed measure of the clotting cascade, tranexamic acid as an antifibrinolytic.   Keywords: hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis, massive bleeding

Massive Transfusion in a Child

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Sabato
Keyword(s):  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Damage Control Resuscitation ◽  
Acute Hemorrhage ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Major Morbidity ◽  
The Core

The traditional early management of hemorrhagic shock is currently being challenged, and many centers around the world have already changed their practice. Damage-control resuscitation, in conjunction with damage-control surgery, has been shown to improve major morbidity and mortality outcomes in adults. In children there is little direct evidence for these new approaches, but supporting evidence is accumulating. This chapter will introduce these concepts while also reinforcing the core principles of managing acute hemorrhage in the trauma setting.

Critical Care Considerations for Damage Control in a Trauma Patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-75
Author(s):  
Shannon Gaasch
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Fixed Ratio ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Fluid Restriction ◽  
Damage Control Resuscitation ◽  
Lethal Triad

Traumatic injury remains the leading cause of death among individuals younger than age 45 years. Hemorrhage is the primary preventable cause of death in trauma patients. Management of hemorrhage focuses on rapidly controlling bleeding and addressing the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy. The principles of damage control surgery are rapid control of hemorrhage, temporary control of contamination, resuscitation in the intensive care unit to restore normal physiology, and a planned, delayed definitive operative procedure. Damage control resuscitation focuses on 3 key components: fluid restriction, permissive hypotension, and fixed-ratio transfusion. Rapid recognition and control of hemorrhage and implementation of resuscitation strategies to control damage have significantly improved mortality and morbidity rates. In addition to describing the basic principles of damage control surgery and damage control resuscitation, this article explains specific management considerations for and potential complications in patients undergoing damage control interventions in an intensive care unit.

scholarly journals Damage control surgery: Our experience

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
Zeljko Lausevic ◽  
Vladimir Resanovic ◽  
Goran Vukovic ◽  
Aleksandar Karamarkovic ◽  
Dejan Radenkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operating Room ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Emergency Center ◽  
Medical Facilities ◽  
The World ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Uncontrolled Bleeding

Damage control surgery represents widely implemented technique of treatment of seriously injured patients all over the world. In medical facilities with large number of seriously injured patients, type of injuries often imposes method of damage control surgery as ultimate way in treating such patients. In Emergency center from 2005-2009. 895 patients had been operated because of the trauma to the abdomen and thorax. Method of damage control surgery had been implanted on 41 patients (4.6% of all operated patients). 18 patients died, and 30 seriously injured patients that hadn?t been treated according to this method had died in operating room. Likewise, 11 non-trauma patients were treated according to the principles of damage control surgery because of uncontrolled bleeding. The greatest challenge today is defining criteria for choosing right patients for damage control surgery.

scholarly journals Evidence for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Roberts ◽  
◽  
Niklas Bobrovitz ◽  
David A. Zygun ◽  
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Clinical Scenario ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Iliac Vessel ◽  
Civilian Trauma ◽  
Definitive Surgery

Abstract Background Although damage control (DC) surgery is widely assumed to reduce mortality in critically injured patients, survivors often suffer substantial morbidity, suggesting that it should only be used when indicated. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine which indications for DC have evidence that they are reliable and/or valid (and therefore in which clinical situations evidence supports use of DC or that DC improves outcomes). Methods We searched 11 databases (1950–April 1, 2019) for studies that enrolled exclusively civilian trauma patients and reported data on the reliability (consistency of surgical decisions in a given clinical scenario) or content (surgeons would perform DC in that clinical scenario or the indication predicted use of DC in practice), construct (were associated with poor outcomes), or criterion (were associated with improved outcomes when DC was conducted instead of definitive surgery) validity for suggested indications for DC surgery or DC interventions. Results Among 34,979 citations identified, we included 36 cohort studies and three cross-sectional surveys in the systematic review. Of the 59 unique indications for DC identified, 10 had evidence of content validity [e.g., a major abdominal vascular injury or a packed red blood cell (PRBC) volume exceeding the critical administration threshold], nine had evidence of construct validity (e.g., unstable patients with combined abdominal vascular and pancreas gunshot injuries or an iliac vessel injury and intraoperative acidosis), and six had evidence of criterion validity (e.g., penetrating trauma patients requiring > 10 U PRBCs with an abdominal vascular and multiple abdominal visceral injuries or intraoperative hypothermia, acidosis, or coagulopathy). No studies evaluated the reliability of indications. Conclusions Few indications for DC surgery or DC interventions have evidence supporting that they are reliable and/or valid. DC should be used with respect for the uncertainty regarding its effectiveness, and only in circumstances where definitive surgery cannot be entertained.

scholarly journals Resuscitation and coagulation in the severely injured trauma patient

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1562) ◽  
pp. 192-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Midwinter ◽  
Tom Woolley
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Patient ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Physiological Status ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Tissue Hypoperfusion ◽  
Coagulation Status ◽  
Haemostatic Resuscitation

Developments in the resuscitation of the severely injured trauma patient in the last decade have been through the increased understanding of the early pathophysiological consequences of injury together with some observations and experiences of recent casualties of conflict. In particular, the recognition of early derangements of haemostasis with hypocoagulopathy being associated with increased mortality and morbidity and the prime importance of tissue hypoperfusion as a central driver to this process in this population of patients has led to new resuscitation strategies. These strategies have focused on haemostatic resuscitation and the development of the ideas of damage control resuscitation and damage control surgery continuum. This in turn has led to a requirement to be able to more closely monitor the physiological status, of major trauma patients, including their coagulation status, and react in an anticipatory fashion.

scholarly journals Damage control surgery in the abdomen: An approach for the management of severe injured patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stylianos Germanos ◽  
Stavros Gourgiotis ◽  
Constantinos Villias ◽  
Marco Bertucci ◽  
Nikitas Dimopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Injured Patients

Operative Exposure of Abdominal Injuries and Closure of the Abdomen

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D Nealeigh ◽  
Mark W Bowyer
Keyword(s):  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Nonoperative Management ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Damage Control Resuscitation ◽  
Abdominal Injuries ◽  
Penetrating Injuries ◽  
Optimal Outcomes ◽  
Medial Rotation ◽  
Selective Nonoperative Management

Operative exposure and management of significant blunt or penetrating injuries to the abdomen is a critical skill required of all surgeons caring for victims of trauma. Application of damage control resuscitation and damage control surgical principles improves survival. Advances in diagnostics, increasing experience with selective nonoperative management, and use of endovascular and angiographic techniques have all significantly decreased the frequency of laparotomies performed for trauma. This decreasing clinical experience mandates that surgeons dealing with victims of trauma remain facile with the operative approaches and techniques detailed in this chapter to achieve optimal outcomes. Detailed management of specific injuries is covered in other chapters of this text. This review contains 7 figures, 2 tables, and 41 references.  Key Words: abdominal trauma, damage control resuscitation, damage control surgery, endovascular control of hemorrhage, open abdomen, REBOA, supraceliac control of aorta, trauma systems, visceral medial rotation

scholarly journals Predictive Factors for Massive Transfusion in Trauma: A Novel Clinical Score from an Italian Trauma Center and German Trauma Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3235
Author(s):  
Sara Giulia Cornero ◽  
Marc Maegele ◽  
Rolf Lefering ◽  
Claudia Abbati ◽  
Shailvi Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Registry ◽  
Massive Transfusion ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Clinical Score ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Predictive Score ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Critical Bleeding

Early management of critical bleeding and coagulopathy can improve patient survival. The aim of our study was to identify independent predictors of critical bleeding and to build a clinical score for early risk stratification. A prospective analysis was performed on a cohort of trauma patients with at least one hypotensive episode during pre-hospital (PH) care or in the Emergency Department (ED). Patients who received massive transfusion (MT+) (≥4 blood units during the first hour) were compared to those who did not (MT−). Hemodynamics, Glagow Coma Score (GCS), diagnostics and blood tests were evaluated. Using multivariate analysis, we created and validated a predictive score for MT+ patients. The predictive score was validated on a matched cohort of patients of the German Trauma Registry TR-DGU. One hundred thirty-nine patients were included. Independent predictors of MT+ included a prehospital (PH) GCS of 3, PH administration of tranexamic acid, hypotension and tachycardia upon admission, coagulopathy and injuries with significant bleeding such as limb amputation, hemoperitoneum, pelvic fracture, massive hemothorax. The derived predictive score revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.854. Massive transfusion is essential to damage control resuscitation. Altered GCS, unstable hemodynamics, coagulopathy and bleeding injuries can allow early identification of patients at risk for critical hemorrhage.

Surgical Complications and Causes of Death in Trauma Patients that Require Temporary Abdominal Closure

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
JosÉ A. Montalvo ◽  
JosÉ A. Acosta ◽  
Pablo RodrÍguez ◽  
Kathia Alejandro ◽  
AndrÉs SÁrraga
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Complications ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Hypovolemic Shock ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Abdominal Closure

Temporary abdominal closure (TAC) has increasingly been employed in the management of severely injured patients to avoid abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and as part of damage control surgery (DCS). Although the use of TAC has received great interest, few data exist describing the morbidity and mortality associated with its use in trauma victims. The main goal of this study is to describe the incidence of surgical complications following the use of TAC as well as to define the mortality associated with this procedure. A retrospective review of patients admitted to a state-designated level 1 trauma center from April 2000 to February 2003 was performed. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, traumatic injury, and need for exploratory laparotomy and use of TAC. A total of 120 patients were included in the study. The overall mortality of trauma patients requiring TAC was 59.2 per cent. The most common causes of death were acute inflammatory process (50.7%), followed by hypovolemic shock (43.7%). The incidence of surgical complications was 26.6 per cent. Intra-abdominal abscesses were the most frequent surgical complication (10%). After multiple logistic regression analysis, increasing age and a numerically greater initial base deficit were found to be independent predictors of mortality in trauma patients that require TAC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document