scholarly journals “Endothelial Protector Drugs” and Diabetes: Is there a Role for these Drugs?

2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bertini
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Dysfunction ◽  
Diabetic Animal ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Diabetic Vasculopathy ◽  
Potent Vasoconstrictor ◽  
Vasoconstrictor Peptide ◽  
Circulating Levels ◽  
Local Levels

Diabetic vasculopathy, including macro and micro vascular disorders, is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 1 (T1) and type 2 (T2) diabetes mellitus (DM) [1]. A lot of researches pointed out that endothelial dysfunction, characterized by an imbalance between Endothelium-Derived Relaxing Factors (EDRFs) and endothelium-derived contracting factors (EDCFs) play a central role on the development and progression of diabetic vasculopathy [2-5]. Endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, as indicated by abnormal flow-dependent vasodilatation and by increased circulating levels of adhesion molecules (ICAM-1 and E-selectin) are known to occur in T2DM and seems to be an important predictor in systemic atherogenesis [6]. Both hyperglycemia and insulin administration increasing circulating levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1), an endothelial cell (EC)-derived potent vasoconstrictor peptide with mitogenic, pro-oxidative and pro-inflammatory properties that have shown to be extremely relevant to the pathophysiology of diabetic vasculopathy [7-10]. Circulating and local levels of ET-1 are increased in diabetic animal models and diabetic patients [1,11,12].

Relationship of Soluble RAGE and RAGE Ligands HMGB1 and EN-RAGE to Endothelial Dysfunction in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (05) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Škrha Jr ◽  
M. Kalousová ◽  
J. Švarcová ◽  
A. Muravská ◽  
J. Kvasnička ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Endothelial Dysfunction ◽  
Advanced Glycation Endproducts ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Glycation Endproducts ◽  
Diabetic Vascular Complications ◽  
Soluble Rage

AbstractReceptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) plays the essential role in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications. The aim of the study was to compare concentration of soluble RAGE and its ligands (EN-RAGE and HMGB1) with different biochemical parameters in Type 1 (T1DM) and Type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus.Total number of 154 persons (45 T1DM, 68 T2DM, 41 controls) was examined and concentrations of sRAGE, EN-RAGE and HMGB1 were measured and compared to diabetes control, albuminuria, cell adhesion molecules and metalloproteinases (MMPs).Mean serum sRAGE concentration was higher in T1DM as compared to controls (1137±532 ng/l vs. 824±309 ng/l, p<0.01). Similarly, EN-RAGE was significantly higher in both diabetic groups (p<0.001) and HMGB1 concentrations were elevated in T2DM patients (p<0.01). Significant relationship was found between MMP9 and HMGB1 and EN-RAGE in diabetic patients. Inverse relationship was observed between MMP2 and MMP9 in both types of diabetic patients (r= − 0.602, p<0.002 and r= − 0.771, p<0.001). Significant positive correlation was found between sRAGE and ICAM-1, VCAM-1 or vWF (p<0.01 to p<0.001).We conclude that serum sRAGE and RAGE ligands concentrations reflect endothelial dysfunction developing in diabetes.

scholarly journals Guidelines adherence in the prevention and management of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes mellitus on the background of recent European recommendations – a registry-based analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bramlage ◽  
Stefanie Lanzinger ◽  
Sascha R. Tittel ◽  
Eva Hess ◽  
Simon Fahrner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology

Abstract Background Recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines provide recommendations for detecting and treating chronic kidney disease (CKD) in diabetic patients. We compared clinical practice with guidelines to determine areas for improvement. Methods German database analysis of 675,628 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, with 134,395 included in this analysis. Data were compared with ESC/EASD recommendations. Results This analysis included 17,649 and 116,747 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The analysis showed that 44.1 and 49.1 % patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively, were annually screened for CKD. Despite anti-diabetic treatment, only 27.2 % patients with type 1 and 43.5 % patients with type 2 achieved a target HbA1c of < 7.0 %. Use of sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (1.5 % type 1/8.7 % type 2 diabetes) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (0.6 % type 1/5.2 % type 2 diabetes) was limited. Hypertension was controlled according to guidelines in 41.1 and 67.7 % patients aged 18–65 years with type 1 and 2 diabetes, respectively, (62.4 vs. 68.4 % in patients > 65 years). Renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors were used in 24.0 and 40.9 % patients with type 1 diabetes (micro- vs. macroalbuminuria) and 39.9 and 47.7 %, respectively, in type 2 diabetes. Conclusions Data indicate there is room for improvement in caring for diabetic patients with respect to renal disease diagnosis and treatment. While specific and potentially clinically justified reasons for non-compliance exist, the data may serve well for a critical appraisal of clinical practice decisions.

scholarly journals Prevalence and risk of appearence of skin lesions considered to be cutaneous markers of diabetes in a population group in bihor county

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-290
Author(s):  
Denisa Kovacs ◽  
Luiza Demian ◽  
Aurel Babeş
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Skin Lesion ◽  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Population Group ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Cutaneous Lesions

Abstract Objectives: The aim of the study was to calculate the prevalence rates and risk ofappearance of cutaneous lesions in diabetic patients with both type-1 and type-2diabetes. Material and Method: 384 patients were analysed, of which 47 had type-1diabetes (T1DM), 140 had type-2 diabetes (T2DM) and 197 were non-diabeticcontrols. Results: The prevalence of the skin lesions considered markers of diabeteswas 57.75% in diabetics, in comparison to 8.12% in non-diabetics (p<0.01). The riskof skin lesion appearance is over 7 times higher in diabetic patients than in nondiabetics.In type-1 diabetes the prevalence of skin lesions was significantly higherthan in type-2 diabetes, and the risk of skin lesion appearance is almost 1.5 timeshigher in type-1 diabetes than type-2 diabetes compared to non-diabetic controls.Conclusions: The diabetic patients are more susceptible than non-diabetics todevelop specific skin diseases. Patients with type-1 diabetes are more affected.

Beneficial effects of pyridoxamine in endothelial dysfunction of type 2 diabetic animal models

2021 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. e100
Author(s):  
C. Sena ◽  
D. Carvalho ◽  
A. Pereira ◽  
M. Queiroz ◽  
R. Seiça
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Dysfunction ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Diabetic Animal ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic

Stem Cell Therapy for T1 D and T2 D Diabetic patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 23-25
Author(s):  
Nandakumar Ravichandran
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Beta Cells ◽  
Chronic Condition ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Insulin Production ◽  
Working Age

Diabetes is a chronic condition that causes several diseases. Type 1 and Type 2 dependent diabetes are shown more concern in today’s world. Type1 dependent patients suffers from inability of the Beta cells to produce insulin whereas Type 2 dependent patients suffers from insufficient insulin production. Diabetic Retinopathy, Nephropathy, Critical Limb Ischemia and impaired glucose tolerance are some of the major risk factors of Diabetes. Diabetic Retinopathy is a major complication of Diabetes causing blindness in working age adults. This article discusses some research methods involved in the generation of Beta cells carried out by certain authors, hypothesis and future works in this field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document