scholarly journals The Application of Wearable Glucose Sensors in Point-of-Care Testing

Author(s):  
Sheng Zhang ◽  
Junyan Zeng ◽  
Chunge Wang ◽  
Luying Feng ◽  
Zening Song ◽  
...  

Diabetes and its complications have become a worldwide concern that influences human health negatively and even leads to death. The real-time and convenient glucose detection in biofluids is urgently needed. Traditional glucose testing is detecting glucose in blood and is invasive, which cannot be continuous and results in discomfort for the users. Consequently, wearable glucose sensors toward continuous point-of-care glucose testing in biofluids have attracted great attention, and the trend of glucose testing is from invasive to non-invasive. In this review, the wearable point-of-care glucose sensors for the detection of different biofluids including blood, sweat, saliva, tears, and interstitial fluid are discussed, and the future trend of development is prospected.

The Analyst ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Ning ◽  
Fan Lu ◽  
Yucheng Liu ◽  
Sisi Yang ◽  
Fubing Wang ◽  
...  

Cholesterol is an essential compound for human health, and high or low concentration of cholesterol is closely related to various diseases. Thus, developing a simple method for POCT of cholesterol...


Author(s):  
Gomathi Ramaswamy ◽  
Kashish Vohra ◽  
Kapil Yadav ◽  
Ravneet Kaur ◽  
Tripti Rai ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Globally around 47.4% of children and in India, 58% of children aged 6–59 months are anemic. Diagnosis of anemia in children using accurate technologies and providing adequate treatment is essential to reduce the burden of anemia. Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices is a potential option for estimation of hemoglobin in peripheral and field settings were the hematology analyzer and laboratory services are not available. Objectives To access the validity of the POCTs (invasive and non-invasive devices) for estimation of hemoglobin among children aged 6–59 months compared with hematology analyzer. Methods The study participants were enrolled from the pediatric outpatient department in Haryana, India, from November 2019 to January 2020. Hemoglobin levels of the study participants were estimated in Sahli’s hemoglobinometer and invasive digital hemoglobinometers (DHs) using capillary blood samples. Hemoglobin levels in non-invasive DH were assessed from the finger/toe of the children. Hemoglobin levels measured in POCTs were compared against the venous blood hemoglobin estimated in the hematology analyzer. Results A total of 120 children were enrolled. The mean (SD) of hemoglobin (g/dl) estimated in auto-analyzer was 9.4 (1.8), Sahli’s hemoglobinometer was 9.2 (1.9), invasive DH was 9.7 (1.9), and non-invasive DH was 11.9 (1.5). Sahli’s hemoglobinometer (95.5%) and invasive DH (92.2%) had high sensitivity for the diagnosis of anemia compared with non-invasive DH (24.4%). In contrast, non-invasive DH had higher specificity (96.7%) compared with invasive DH (83.3%) and Sahli’s hemoglobinometer (70%). Invasive DH took the least time (2–3 min) for estimation of hemoglobin per participant, followed by Sahli’s (4–5 min) and non-invasive DH (5–7 min). Conclusion All three POCT devices used in this study are reasonable and feasible for estimating hemoglobin in under-5 children. Invasive DHs are potential POCT devices for diagnosis of anemia among under-5 children, while Sahli’s can be considered as a possible option, where trained and skilled technicians are available. Further research and development are required in non-invasive DH to improve accuracy. Lay summary In India, anemia is a serious public health problem, where 58% of the children aged 6–59 months are anemic. Point-of-care testing (POCT) using digital hemoglobinometers (DHs) has been recommended as one of the key interventions by the Anemia Mukt Bharat program since 2018 in India. These POCT devices are easy to use, less invasive, can be carried to field, require minimal training and results are available immediately. Therefore this study assessed the validity of POCT devices—invasive DH, non-invasive DH and Sahli’s hemoglobinometer among 6–59 months children in facility setting compared with the gold standard hematology analyzer. A total of 120 children under 6–59 months of age were enrolled from the pediatric outpatient department in Haryana, India, from November 2019 to January 2020. The (mean hemoglobin in g/dl) invasive (9.7) and non-invasive DH (11.9) overestimated hemoglobin value, while Sahli’s (9.2) underestimated hemoglobin compared with hematology analyzer (9.4). Invasive DH (92.2%) and Sahli’s hemoglobinometer (95.5%) reported high ability to correctly identify those with anemia compared with non-invasive DH (24.4%). In contrast, non-invasive DH (96.73%) had higher ability to correctly identify those without the anemia compared with invasive DH (83.3%) and Sahli’s (70%).


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1901201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongyan He ◽  
Yan Niu ◽  
Zedong Li ◽  
Ang Li ◽  
Huayuan Yang ◽  
...  

The Analyst ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 140 (21) ◽  
pp. 7399-7406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Wentao Yang ◽  
Yuankui Yang ◽  
Hong Liu ◽  
Zhongze Gu

Here we report a smartphone-based potentiometric biosensor for point-of-care testing of salivary α-amylase (sAA), which is one of the most sensitive indices of autonomic nervous system activity, and therefore a promising non-invasive biomarker for mental health.


2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Charchut ◽  
Magdalena Wójcik ◽  
Barbara K. Kościelniak ◽  
Przemysław J. Tomasik

Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is a non-invasive and easy-to-carry, self-performed assay. It is often conducted in the diagnosis of various gastrointestinal diseases, especially as a screening test for colorectal cancer. This test is aimed at detecting blood which is not visible macroscopically in a stool sample. The purpose of this paper is to discuss various types of FOB tests: chemical, immunochroma- tographic and DNA tests. Despite the similarity in their performance, these tests use different methods and thus differ in their ability to detect blood from different parts of the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, the interfering factors in the various assays and the proper preparation of the patient before the test are discussed in detail. The knowledge of the differences between these tests will allow to correct performance and interpretation of the results obtained with each tests.


Author(s):  
Rosy Tirimacco ◽  
Limei Siew ◽  
Paul A. Simpson ◽  
Penelope J. Cowley ◽  
Philip A. Tideman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document