scholarly journals Structural and Functional Significance of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Unfolded Protein Response Transducers and Chaperones at the Mitochondria–ER Contacts: A Cancer Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppina Amodio ◽  
Valentina Pagliara ◽  
Ornella Moltedo ◽  
Paolo Remondelli
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Mitochondria Dynamics ◽  
Fate Decision ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Protein Response

In the last decades, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has emerged as a key coordinator of cellular homeostasis, thanks to its physical interconnection to almost all intracellular organelles. In particular, an intense and mutual crosstalk between the ER and mitochondria occurs at the mitochondria–ER contacts (MERCs). MERCs ensure a fine-tuned regulation of fundamental cellular processes, involving cell fate decision, mitochondria dynamics, metabolism, and proteostasis, which plays a pivotal role in the tumorigenesis and therapeutic response of cancer cells. Intriguingly, recent studies have shown that different components of the unfolded protein response (UPR) machinery, including PERK, IRE1α, and ER chaperones, localize at MERCs. These proteins appear to exhibit multifaceted roles that expand beyond protein folding and UPR transduction and are often related to the control of calcium fluxes to the mitochondria, thus acquiring relevance to cell survival and death. In this review, we highlight the novel functions played by PERK, IRE1α, and ER chaperones at MERCs focusing on their impact on tumor development.

scholarly journals The unfolded protein response coordinates the production of endoplasmic reticulum protein and endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1805-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Cox ◽  
R E Chapman ◽  
P Walter
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Lipid Synthesis ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a multifunctional organelle responsible for production of both lumenal and membrane components of secretory pathway compartments. Secretory proteins are folded, processed, and sorted in the ER lumen and lipid synthesis occurs on the ER membrane itself. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, synthesis of ER components is highly regulated: the ER-resident proteins by the unfolded protein response and membrane lipid synthesis by the inositol response. We demonstrate that these two responses are intimately linked, forming different branches of the same pathway. Furthermore, we present evidence indicating that this coordinate regulation plays a role in ER biogenesis.

scholarly journals Class I histone deacetylases localize to the endoplasmic reticulum and modulate the unfolded protein response

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 2437-2445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumen Kahali ◽  
Bhaswati Sarcar ◽  
Antony Prabhu ◽  
Edward Seto ◽  
Prakash Chinnaiyan
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Class I ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

scholarly journals A Role for the DnaJ Homologue Scj1p in Protein Folding in the Yeast Endoplasmic Reticulum

1998 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
pp. 921-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Silberstein ◽  
Gabriel Schlenstedt ◽  
Pam A. Silver ◽  
Reid Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Carboxypeptidase Y ◽  
Reporter Protein ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
A Cell ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

Members of the eukaryotic heat shock protein 70 family (Hsp70s) are regulated by protein cofactors that contain domains homologous to bacterial DnaJ. Of the three DnaJ homologues in the yeast rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER; Scj1p, Sec63p, and Jem1p), Scj1p is most closely related to DnaJ, hence it is a probable cofactor for Kar2p, the major Hsp70 in the yeast RER. However, the physiological role of Scj1p has remained obscure due to the lack of an obvious defect in Kar2p-mediated pathways in scj1 null mutants. Here, we show that the Δscj1 mutant is hypersensitive to tunicamycin or mutations that reduce N-linked glycosylation of proteins. Although maturation of glycosylated carboxypeptidase Y occurs with wild-type kinetics in Δscj1 cells, the transport rate for an unglycosylated mutant carboxypeptidase Y (CPY) is markedly reduced. Loss of Scj1p induces the unfolded protein response pathway, and results in a cell wall defect when combined with an oligosaccharyltransferase mutation. The combined loss of both Scj1p and Jem1p exaggerates the sensitivity to hypoglycosylation stress, leads to further induction of the unfolded protein response pathway, and drastically delays maturation of an unglycosylated reporter protein in the RER. We propose that the major role for Scj1p is to cooperate with Kar2p to mediate maturation of proteins in the RER lumen.

scholarly journals XBP-1 Regulates a Subset of Endoplasmic Reticulum Resident Chaperone Genes in the Unfolded Protein Response

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 7448-7459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Hwee Lee ◽  
Neal N. Iwakoshi ◽  
Laurie H. Glimcher
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Profiling ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Compensatory Mechanism ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Protein Response

ABSTRACT The mammalian unfolded protein response (UPR) protects the cell against the stress of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We have investigated here the contribution of the UPR transcription factors XBP-1, ATF6α, and ATF6β to UPR target gene expression. Gene profiling of cell lines lacking these factors yielded several XBP-1-dependent UPR target genes, all of which appear to act in the ER. These included the DnaJ/Hsp40-like genes, p58IPK, ERdj4, and HEDJ, as well as EDEM, protein disulfide isomerase-P5, and ribosome-associated membrane protein 4 (RAMP4), whereas expression of BiP was only modestly dependent on XBP-1. Surprisingly, given previous reports that enforced expression of ATF6α induced a subset of UPR target genes, cells deficient in ATF6α, ATF6β, or both had minimal defects in upregulating UPR target genes by gene profiling analysis, suggesting the presence of compensatory mechanism(s) for ATF6 in the UPR. Since cells lacking both XBP-1 and ATF6α had significantly impaired induction of select UPR target genes and ERSE reporter activation, XBP-1 and ATF6α may serve partially redundant functions. No UPR target genes that required ATF6β were identified, nor, in contrast to XBP-1 and ATF6α, did the activity of the UPRE or ERSE promoters require ATF6β, suggesting a minor role for it during the UPR. Collectively, these results suggest that the IRE1/XBP-1 pathway is required for efficient protein folding, maturation, and degradation in the ER and imply the existence of subsets of UPR target genes as defined by their dependence on XBP-1. Further, our observations suggest the existence of additional, as-yet-unknown, key regulators of the UPR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document