scholarly journals Clinical Approach to Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Associated With Ovarian Teratoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Opalińska ◽  
Anna Sowa-Staszczak ◽  
Helena Olearska ◽  
Magdalena Ulatowska-Bialas ◽  
Aleksandra Gilis-Januszewska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Endocrine System ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Ovarian Teratoma ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Clinical Approach ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Procedures ◽  
Diffuse Endocrine System

BackgroundNeuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of cancers that develop from enterochromaffin cells of the diffuse endocrine system, with an increase in incidents over the last years. Ovarian neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare neoplasms, comprising 0.1% of all ovarian neoplasms and less than 5% of all neuroendocrine tumors. They may arise alone (as monodermal, specialized teratoma – ovarian carcinoid) or as a part of other ovarian lesion: cystic mature or immature teratomas. Due to the rarity and limited amount of such cases reported in the literature, there is no consensus on diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in this group of patients.Materials and MethodsThe group of 10 patients at the age of 19 to 77 years (mean 42.8 ± 17.9), diagnosed with unilateral NET within ovarian teratoma were analyzed. The histopathological type of tumor, progression free survival after surgical treatment and presence of hormonally active syndrome were assessed.Results70% (n=7) of patients was diagnosed with mature cystic teratomas containing NET component and 30% (n=3) with monodermal teratoma (strumal carcinoid). All cases of monodermal teratomas were found in women at premenopausal age. Determined Ki67 ranged from 2% to 9%. Ninety percent of lesions (n=9) stained positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin, while markers: CK20, CK7, TTF-1 and CDX2 were negative in all cases, which ruled out their metastatic nature. None of the patients presented with carcinoid syndrome. All followed-up patients remain progression-free, which confirms surgical intervention being a crucial and sufficient method of treatment.ConclusionsThe prognosis and clinical behavior of NETs associated with ovarian teratomas are good with long progression-free survival.

scholarly journals FAS and Subsequent Therapies in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E. Rogers ◽  
Michael Lam ◽  
Daniel M. Halperin ◽  
Cecile G. Dagohoy ◽  
James C. Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

We evaluated outcomes of treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and streptozocin (FAS) in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and its impact on subsequent therapy (everolimus or temozolomide). Advanced PanNET patients treated at our center from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2), streptozocin (400 mg/m2) (both IV, days 1-5) and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 IV, day 1) every 28 days. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. Of 243 eligible patients, 220 were evaluable for ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Most (90%) had metastatic, nonfunctional PanNETs; 14% had prior therapy. ORR to FAS was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-48%). Median follow-up was 61 months. Median PFS was 20 (95% CI: 15-23) months; median overall survival (OS) was 63 (95% CI: 60-71) months. Cox regression analyses suggested improvement with first-line vs subsequent lines of FAS therapy. Main adverse events ≥ grade 3 were neutropenia (10%) and nausea/vomiting (5.5%). Dose reductions were required in 32% of patients. Post-FAS everolimus (n=108; 68% second line) had a median PFS of 10 (95% CI: 8-14) months. Post-FAS temozolomide (n=60; 53% > fourth line) had an ORR of 13% and median PFS of 5.2 (95% CI: 4-12) months. In this largest reported cohort of PanNETs treated with chemotherapy, FAS demonstrated activity without significant safety concerns. FAS did not appear to affect subsequent PFS with everolimus; this sequence is being evaluated prospectively. Responses were noted with subsequent temozolomide-based regimens although PFS was possibly limited by line of therapy.

scholarly journals Prognostic Threshold for Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Pancreatic and Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalvinder Mandair ◽  
Mohid S Khan ◽  
Andre Lopes ◽  
Luke Furtado O’Mahony ◽  
Leah Ensell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Optimum Threshold

Abstract Background Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are detectable in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and are accurate prognostic markers although the optimum threshold has not been defined. Objective This work aims to define optimal prognostic CTC thresholds in PanNET and midgut NETs. Patients and Methods CellSearch was used to enumerate CTCs in 199 patients with metastatic pancreatic (PanNET) (90) or midgut NETs (109). Patients were followed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for a minimum of 3 years or until death. Results The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for progression at 12 months in PanNETs and midgut NETs identified the optimal CTC threshold as 1 or greater and 2 or greater, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, these thresholds were predictive for 12-month progression with an odds ratio (OR) of 6.69 (P < .01) for PanNETs and 5.88 (P < .003) for midgut NETs. The same thresholds were found to be optimal for predicting death at 36 months, with an OR of 2.87 (P < .03) and 5.09 (P < .005) for PanNETs and midgut NETs, respectively. In multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis for PFS in PanNETs, 1 or greater CTC had a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.6 (P < .01), whereas 2 or greater CTCs had an HR of 2.25 (P < .01) in midgut NETs. In multivariate analysis OS in PanNETs, 1 or greater CTCs had an HR of 3.16 (P < .01) and in midgut NETs, 2 or greater CTCs had an HR of 1.73 (P < .06). Conclusions The optimal CTC threshold to predict PFS and OS in metastatic PanNETs and midgut NETs is 1 and 2, respectively. These thresholds can be used to stratify patients in clinical practice and clinical trials.

scholarly journals 177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Radiosensitizing Capecitabine Versus Octreotide Long-Acting Release as First-Line Systemic Therapy in Advanced Grade 1 or 2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1167-1175
Author(s):  
Swayamjeet Satapathy ◽  
Bhagwant R. Mittal ◽  
Ashwani Sood ◽  
Apurva Sood ◽  
Rakesh Kapoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Octreotide Lar ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Long Acting

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) as first-line systemic therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable or metastatic grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs treated with first-line 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine or octreotide LAR from September 2012 to December 2019 were collected and analyzed for response, toxicity, and survival outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (median age: 53 years; range 14-81 years) with treatment-naïve advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs were included. Thirty-six patients received a median cumulative dose of 27.3 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE intravenously at 8-12 weeks' intervals along with 1,250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 0-14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE, whereas 40 patients were administered 30 mg octreotide LAR intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor 1.1, the objective response rate was 38% in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with 15% in the octreotide LAR arm ( P = .025), whereas the disease control rates were 88% and 67% in 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms, respectively ( P = .035). The median durations of progression-free survival in the 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms were 54 months and 16 months, respectively ( P = .017), whereas the median overall survival was not reached and not significantly different across both the arms. Of the treatment-related adverse events, no major difference was observed in the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION First-line systemic 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine achieved better radiologic response and longer progression-free survival compared with octreotide LAR in patients with advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs. Future randomized controlled trials are, however, required to determine the best treatment sequence for the treatment-naïve patients with advanced GEP-NETs.

scholarly journals Long-Term Pancreatic Functional Impairment after Surgery for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreasi ◽  
Partelli ◽  
Capurso ◽  
Muffatti ◽  
Balzano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Exocrine Insufficiency ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Onset Of Diabetes ◽  
Pancreatic Exocrine

Radical surgery represents the only curative treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative onset of diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) in surgically treated PanNEN. Consecutive PanNEN patients, without preoperative DM, who underwent partial pancreatic resection, were included. After a median follow-up of 72 months, overall 68/276 patients (24%) developed DM. Patients who developed DM were significantly older (p = 0.002) and they had a higher body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.0001) than those who did not; they were more frequently male (p = 0.017) and with nonfunctioning neoplasms (p = 0.019). BMI > 25 Kg/m2 was the only independent predictor of DM (p = 0.001). Overall, 118/276 patients (43%) developed a PEI, which was significantly more frequent after pancreaticoduodenectomy (p < 0.0001) and in patients with T3-T4 tumors (p = 0.001). Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the only independent predictor of PEI (p < 0.0001). Overall, 54 patients (20%) developed disease progression. Patients with and without DM had similar progression free survival (PFS), whereas patients without PEI had better five-year-PFS (p = 0.002), although this association was not confirmed in multivariate analysis. The risk of DM and PEI after surgery for PanNEN is relatively high but it does not affect PFS. BMI and pancreatic head resection are independent predictors of DM and PEI, respectively.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus in Adult Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. CMO.S7319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Oberstein ◽  
M. Wasif Saif
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Significant Advance ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
To Receive

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of a diverse family of tumors which are derived from the neuroendocrine system. Most NETs are well or moderately differentiated tumors with a relatively indolent growth pattern. However, these tumors can cause significant clinical disease due to release of functional products that mediate the carcinoid syndrome and other diverse sequela. They also can grow progressively and cause symptoms from local invasion or distant metastasis. NETs are optimally treated with surgery and somatosatin analogs (SSAs) to control symptoms but are relatively insensitive to systemic chemotherapy. As a result, patients with advanced unresectable NETs have a poor prognosis. In 2011, two targeted therapies, sunitinib and everolimus were approved in the subset of progressive pancreatic NETs (pNETs). Everolimus is an oral inhibitor of the growth stimulatory mTOR pathway. In Phase 2 trials in NETs and pNETs, everolimus was well tolerated and associated with some response and widespread disease stabilization. In follow-up, randomized Phase 3 trials, everolimus was compared to placebo. In the RADIANT-2 trial, everolimus and a somatostatin analog were used in patients with functional NETs and treatment was associated with an an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). In the RADIANT-3 trial, patients with pNET were randomized to receive everolimus or placebo along with best supportive care. Everolimus was again associated with improvement in PFS compared to placebo and it has been approved by the FDA for patients with progressive pNET. Everolimus is associated with frequent low grade toxicity but is also notable for increased rates of infection as well as non-infectious pneumonitis. mTOR inhibition with everolimus represents a significant advance in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

scholarly journals Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Advanced, Well-Differentiated, Neuroendocrine Tumors Being Treated With a Somatostatin Analog: The GETNE-TRASGU Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (28) ◽  
pp. 2571-2580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Carmona-Bayonas ◽  
Paula Jiménez-Fonseca ◽  
Ángela Lamarca ◽  
Jorge Barriuso ◽  
Ángel Castaño ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Failure Time ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Accelerated Failure Time Model ◽  
Endocrine Tumors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Well Differentiated

PURPOSE Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended for the first-line treatment of most patients with well-differentiated, gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors; however, benefit from treatment is heterogeneous. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate a progression-free survival (PFS) prediction model in SSA-treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We extracted data from the Spanish Group of Neuroendocrine and Endocrine Tumors Registry (R-GETNE). Patient eligibility criteria included GEP primary, Ki-67 of 20% or less, and first-line SSA monotherapy for advanced disease. An accelerated failure time model was developed to predict PFS, which was represented as a nomogram and an online calculator. The nomogram was externally validated in an independent series of consecutive eligible patients (The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom). RESULTS We recruited 535 patients (R-GETNE, n = 438; Manchester, n = 97). Median PFS and overall survival in the derivation cohort were 28.7 (95% CI, 23.8 to 31.1) and 85.9 months (95% CI, 71.5 to 96.7 months), respectively. Nine covariates significantly associated with PFS were primary tumor location, Ki-67 percentage, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, alkaline phosphatase, extent of liver involvement, presence of bone and peritoneal metastases, documented progression status, and the presence of symptoms when initiating SSA. The GETNE-TRASGU (Treated With Analog of Somatostatin in Gastroenteropancreatic and Unknown Primary NETs) model demonstrated suitable calibration, as well as fair discrimination ability with a C-index value of 0.714 (95% CI, 0.680 to 0.747) and 0.732 (95% CI, 0.658 to 0.806) in the derivation and validation series, respectively. CONCLUSION The GETNE-TRASGU evidence-based prognostic tool stratifies patients with GEP neuroendocrine tumors receiving SSA treatment according to their estimated PFS. This nomogram may be useful when stratifying patients with neuroendocrine tumors in future trials. Furthermore, it could be a valuable tool for making treatment decisions in daily clinical practice.

Whole-liver irradiation with hepatic arterial floxuridine/leucovorin/streptozotocin followed by hepatic arterial floxuridine/leucovorin and chemo-embolization with mitomycin C for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 339-339
Author(s):  
Mark Shilkrut ◽  
Sheela Hanasoge ◽  
Daniel Paul Normolle ◽  
Edgar Ben-Josef ◽  
William D. Ensminger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Hepatic Artery Infusion ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Continual Reassessment ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Safe Dose

339 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to liver are incurable with limited treatments. We conducted a phase I trial combining hepatic arterial (HA) chemotherapy, chemoembolization and dose-escalated whole liver radiotherapy (WLRT) to determine if the maximum safe dose of 32 Gy in 2 Gy fractions could be achieved. Methods: Patients (pts) with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors who failed somatostatin analog therapy were eligible. First, floxuridine (FUDR, 3 mg/m2/d) and leucovorin (LV, 300 mg/m2/d) were given by continuous hepatic artery infusion for 12 days; streptozotocin (500 mg/m2/d) was given over 3 h on days 5, 8 and 10. Concurrent WLRT was prescribed in 2 Gy/day with doses escalated from 24 Gy to 32 Gy using the time-to-event continual reassessment method for dose allocation with a target rate of dose-limiting grade (gr.) ≥ 3 radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) of 10%. 8 weeks later, for pts without RILD and other gr. ≥ 4 toxicities, continuous 72-h infusion with HA FUDR (3 mg/m2/d) and LV (300 mg/m2/d) was given, followed by chemoembolization with mitomycin C (20 mg) and polyvinyl alcohol foam. Results: 19 pts were enrolled in the trial. 8 pts received 24 Gy, 2 - 26 Gy, 1 - 28 Gy, 2 - 30 Gy and 6 - 32 Gy. 8 pts received only the first part of the treatment, 11 completed the entire protocol. No pts developed dose-limiting RILD; 5 - had gr. 3-4 increased liver function tests (LFT), 4 - had other gr. 4 toxicities after the first part of the treatment, primarily chemotherapy and embolization-related; 3 - had gr. 3 increased LFT, and 1 - had other gr. 4 toxicities after the second part of the treatment. 4 pts (21%) had partial response, 14 (74%) - stable disease and one pt (5%) receiving only part 1 had progressive disease. Median progression free survival for all pts was 20.6 (8.4-45.4) months (m); 15.4 (3.4-67.8) m for pts who received the first part of the treatment only, and 27.9 (8.4 – infinite) m for pts who received both parts of treatment. Conclusions: This study showed that chemotherapy can be safely combined with a full dose of WLRT and subsequent chemoembolization without producing RILD.

Effectiveness of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: A multi-institutional registry study with prospective follow-up.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4033-4033
Author(s):  
Dieter Hörsch ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Registry Study ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Well Differentiated

4033 Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy targets somatostatin receptors expressed on well differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms. Retrospective monocentric studies indicate that peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is an effective treatment for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Methods: We initiated a multi-institutional, prospective and board reviewed registry study for patients treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. 450 patients were included and followed for a mean of 24.4 months. Patients were treated with Lutetium-177 (54%), Yttrium-90 (17%) or both radionuclides (29%). Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms were derived of pancreas (38%), small bowel 30%), unknown primary (19%), lung (4%) and colorectum (3,5%). Most neuroendocrine neoplasms were well differentiated with a proliferation rate below 20% in 54% and were pretreated by 1 or more therapies in 73%. Results: Overall survival of all patients from the beginning of therapy was 59 months in median. Median survival depended on radionuclides used (Yttrium-90: 38 months; Lutetium-177: not reached; both: 58 months), proliferation rate (G1: median not reached; G2: 58 months; G3: 33 months; unknown: 55 months) and origin of primary tumors (pancreas: 53 months; small bowel: not reached; unknown primary: 47 months; lung: 38 months) but not upon number of previous therapies. Median progression-free survival measured from last cycle of therapy accounted to 41 months for all patients. Progression-free survival of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms was 39 months in median. Similar results were obtained for neuroendocrine neoplasms of unknown primary with a median of 38 months whereas neuroendocrine neoplasm of small bowel were progression-free for a median of 51 months. Side effects like G3-G4 nephrotoxicity or hematological function were observed in 0.2% and 2% of patients. Conclusions: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is effective for patients with G1-G2 neuroendocrine tumors irrespective of previous therapies with a survival advantage of several years compared to other therapies and only minor side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document