scholarly journals Cancer and Tumour Suppressor p53 Encounters at the Juncture of Sex Disparity

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Haupt ◽  
Ygal Haupt

There are many differences in cancer manifestation between men and women. New understanding of the origin of these point to fundamental distinctions in the genetic code and its demise. Tumour suppressor protein p53 is the chief operating officer of cancer defence and critically acts to safeguard against sustained DNA damaged. P53 cannot be ignored in cancer sex disparity. In this review we discuss the greater prevalence and associated death rates for non-reproductive cancers in males. The major tumour suppressor protein p53, encoded in the TP53 gene is our chosen context. It is fitting to ask why somatic TP53 mutation incidence is estimated to be disproportionately higher among males in the population for these types of cancers compared with females? We scrutinised the literature for evidence of predisposing genetic and epigenetic alterations that may explain this sex bias. Our second approach was to explore whether redox activity, either externally imposed or inherent to males and females, may define distinct risks that could contribute to the clear cancer sex disparities.

2015 ◽  
Vol 289 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Hu ◽  
Ting Yu ◽  
Satu Arpiainen ◽  
Matti A. Lang ◽  
Jukka Hakkola ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0146648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Albert ◽  
Claudia Antrecht ◽  
Elisabeth Kremmer ◽  
Michael Meisterernst

1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesc Miró ◽  
Jean-Claude Lelong ◽  
Floria Pancetti ◽  
Nerea Roher ◽  
Arlette Duthu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna Scotcher ◽  
David J. Clarke ◽  
C. Logan Mackay ◽  
Ted Hupp ◽  
Peter J. Sadler ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie-May McLaughlin ◽  
Jindrich Cinatl ◽  
Mark N Wass ◽  
Martin Michaelis

SAMHD1 is discussed as a tumour suppressor protein, but its potential role in cancer has only been investigated in very few cancer types. Here, we performed a systematic analysis of the TCGA (adult cancer) and TARGET (paediatric cancer) databases, the results of which did not suggest that SAMHD1 should be regarded as a bona fide tumour suppressor. SAMHD1 mutations that interfere with SAMHD1 function were not associated with poor outcome, which would be expected for a tumour suppressor. High SAMHD1 tumour levels were associated with increased survival in some cancer entities and reduced survival in others. Moreover, the data suggested differences in the role of SAMHD1 between males and females and between different races. Often, there was no significant relationship between SAMHD1 levels and cancer outcome. Taken together, our results indicate that SAMHD1 may exert pro- or anti-tumourigenic effects and that SAMHD1 is involved in the oncogenic process in a minority of cancer cases. These findings seem to be in disaccord with a perception and narrative forming in the field suggesting that SAMHD1 is a tumour suppressor. A systematic literature review confirmed that most of the available scientific articles focus on a potential role of SAMHD1 as a tumour suppressor. The reasons for this remain unclear but may include confirmation bias and publication bias. Our findings emphasise that hypotheses, perceptions, and assumptions need to be continuously challenged by using all available data and evidence.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258543
Author(s):  
Francis Opoku ◽  
Kweku Bedu-Addo ◽  
Nicholas Akinwale Titiloye ◽  
Elijah Atta Manu ◽  
Charity Ameh-Mensah ◽  
...  

Background Inactivation or mutation of the tumour suppressor gene p53 or its regulator mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) is the commonest event in breast cancer. These altered genes usually express abnormally high levels of their proteins in many carcinomas. The phenotypic expression of p53 and MDM2 in breast cancer cases in our setting is not known. This study investigated the expression of the tumour suppressor protein p53 and its regulator MDM2, using immunohistochemistry in a Ghana breast cancer cohort. Method A 9-year retrospective cross-sectional study on archived tissue blocks–formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) was carried out. Demographic data were abstracted. Based on complete clinical data and availability of FFPE archived blocks 203 cases were selected for tissue micro array (TMA) construction. The TMA sections were subjected to immunohistochemistry (IHC) (ER, PR, HER2, p53, and MDM2). Expression of p53 and MDM2 were related to grade and molecular subtypes. Results The age ranged from 17 to 92 years (mean = 49.34 ± 13.74). Most of the cases were high grade; grade II (34.9%) and grade III (55.7%). Fifty-four percent of the cases were triple negative. Invasive ductal carcinoma no special type was the commonest histotype (87.1%). Thirty-six percent (36%) of the cases expressed p53. Significant associations were found between p53 overexpression and histological grade (p = 0.034), triple negative (p = 0.0333) and luminal B (p<0.01) tumors. Most cases (93.1%) were negative for MDM2 expression. Significant association was found between MDM2 and HER2 over-expression as well as Ki-67. There was no significant positive correlation between MDM2 and p53 co-expression (p>0.05). Conclusion The elevated level of p53 expression in the aggressive breast cancer phenotypes (high histological grade and triple negative) in our cohort suggest that P53 elevation may be a poor prognostic marker in our setting. High expression of MDM2 in our cohort with high Ki67; also in cases with Her2/neu overexpression known with predictable poor prognosis in the absence of target therapy suggest MDM2 may be associated with aggressive biological behaviour in our breast cancer cases. The non-significant association of p53 and MDM2 expression in the same cases as also documented by previous studies suggest independent genetic pathway in tumourigenesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document