scholarly journals Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Sepsis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miao Wu ◽  
Xianjin Du ◽  
Raymond Gu ◽  
Jie Wei
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Medical Technology ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Optimal Management

Sepsis is one of the main causes of death in critically ill patients. Despite the continuous development of medical technology in recent years, its morbidity and mortality are still high. This is mainly related to the delay in starting treatment and non-adherence of clinical guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) is an evolving field in medicine, which has been used to develop a variety of innovative Clinical Decision Support Systems. It has shown great potential in predicting the clinical condition of patients and assisting in clinical decision-making. AI-derived algorithms can be applied to multiple stages of sepsis, such as early prediction, prognosis assessment, mortality prediction, and optimal management. This review describes the latest literature on AI for clinical decision support in sepsis, and outlines the application of AI in the prediction, diagnosis, subphenotyping, prognosis assessment, and clinical management of sepsis. In addition, we discussed the challenges of implementing and accepting this non-traditional methodology for clinical purposes.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support Systems and a Classification Framework

2020 ◽  
pp. 167-186
Author(s):  
Steven Walczak
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Classification Framework

Clinical decision support systems are meant to improve the quality of decision-making in healthcare. Artificial intelligence is the science of creating intelligent systems that solve complex problems at the level of or better than human experts. Combining artificial intelligence methods into clinical decision support will enable the utilization of large quantities of data to produce relevant decision-making information to practitioners. This article examines various artificial intelligence methodologies and shows how they may be incorporated into clinical decision-making systems. A framework for describing artificial intelligence applications in clinical decision support systems is presented.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support Systems and a Classification Framework

2020 ◽  
pp. 390-409
Author(s):  
Steven Walczak
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Classification Framework

Clinical decision support systems are meant to improve the quality of decision-making in healthcare. Artificial intelligence is the science of creating intelligent systems that solve complex problems at the level of or better than human experts. Combining artificial intelligence methods into clinical decision support will enable the utilization of large quantities of data to produce relevant decision-making information to practitioners. This article examines various artificial intelligence methodologies and shows how they may be incorporated into clinical decision-making systems. A framework for describing artificial intelligence applications in clinical decision support systems is presented.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support Systems and a Classification Framework

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Walczak
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Intelligent Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision

Clinical decision support systems are meant to improve the quality of decision-making in healthcare. Artificial intelligence is the science of creating intelligent systems that solve complex problems at the level of or better than human experts. Combining artificial intelligence methods into clinical decision support will enable the utilization of large quantities of data to produce relevant decision-making information to practitioners. This article examines various artificial intelligence methodologies and shows how they may be incorporated into clinical decision-making systems. A framework for describing artificial intelligence applications in clinical decision support systems is presented.

scholarly journals A Method for Medical Data Analysis Using the LogNNet for Clinical Decision Support Systems and Edge Computing in Healthcare

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 6209
Author(s):  
Andrei Velichko
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Classification Accuracy ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Medical Data

Edge computing is a fast-growing and much needed technology in healthcare. The problem of implementing artificial intelligence on edge devices is the complexity and high resource intensity of the most known neural network data analysis methods and algorithms. The difficulty of implementing these methods on low-power microcontrollers with small memory size calls for the development of new effective algorithms for neural networks. This study presents a new method for analyzing medical data based on the LogNNet neural network, which uses chaotic mappings to transform input information. The method effectively solves classification problems and calculates risk factors for the presence of a disease in a patient according to a set of medical health indicators. The efficiency of LogNNet in assessing perinatal risk is illustrated on cardiotocogram data obtained from the UC Irvine machine learning repository. The classification accuracy reaches ~91% with the~3–10 kB of RAM used on the Arduino microcontroller. Using the LogNNet network trained on a publicly available database of the Israeli Ministry of Health, a service concept for COVID-19 express testing is provided. A classification accuracy of ~95% is achieved, and~0.6 kB of RAM is used. In all examples, the model is tested using standard classification quality metrics: precision, recall, and F1-measure. The LogNNet architecture allows the implementation of artificial intelligence on medical peripherals of the Internet of Things with low RAM resources and can be used in clinical decision support systems.

Mental Health Clinical Decision Support Exploiting Big Data

2019 ◽  
pp. 160-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Kalina
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision

The complexity of clinical decision-making is immensely increasing with the advent of big data with a clinical relevance. Clinical decision systems represent useful e-health tools applicable to various tasks within the clinical decision-making process. This chapter is devoted to basic principles of clinical decision support systems and their benefits for healthcare and patient safety. Big data is crucial input for clinical decision support systems and is helpful in the task to find the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. Statistical challenges of analyzing big data in psychiatry are overviewed, with a particular interest for psychiatry. Various barriers preventing telemedicine tools from expanding to the field of mental health are discussed. The development of decision support systems is claimed here to play a key role in the development of information-based medicine, particularly in psychiatry. Information technology will be ultimately able to combine various information sources including big data to present and enforce a holistic information-based approach to psychiatric care.

OP199 From Pilot Studies To System-Wide Innovation: Challenges And Opportunities For Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) Implementation In Australia

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Mah Laka ◽  
Adriana Milazzo ◽  
Drew Carter ◽  
Tracy Merlin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
National Level ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Policy Framework

IntroductionThe clinical data is increasing at a considerably higher rate than the capacity of the healthcare system and clinicians to manage this data. Digital tools such as clinical decision support systems (CDSS) provide opportunities for evidence-based patient care by intelligently filtering and presenting the information required for clinical decision making at the point of care. Despite the success of pilot projects, CDSS have had limited implementation in broader health systems. We aimed to identify challenges faced by policymakers for CDSS implementation and to provide policy recommendations.MethodsWe conducted eleven semi-structured interviews with Australian policymakers from state and national committees involved in digital health activities. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify policy priorities.ResultsOur findings indicate that fragmentation of care processes and structures in the digital health ecosystem is one of the main impediments to delivering coordinated care using CDSS. Five themes for policy action were identified: (i) establishing a shared conceptual framework for user-centered design of CDSS that is aligned with stakeholders’ priorities, (ii) maintaining the right balance between the customization and standardization of systems, (iii) developing mutually agreed semantic interoperability standards at the local, state and national level, allowing generation and exchange of information across the health system without changing its context and meaning, (iv) reorienting organizational structures to build capacity to foster change, and (v) developing collaborative care models to avoid conflicting interests between stakeholders.ConclusionsFindings highlight the importance of developing system-wide guidance to establish a clear vision for CDSS implementation and alignment of organizational processes across all levels of health care. There is a need to build a shared policy framework for modelling the innovative activities such as CDSS implementation across the digital health landscape which minimizes the operational and strategic fragmentation of different organizations.

scholarly journals Evaluation Framework for Successful Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengting Ji ◽  
Georgi Z Genchev ◽  
Hengye Huang ◽  
Ting Xu ◽  
Hui Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Measurement Instrument ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
User Acceptance ◽  
Evaluation Framework

BACKGROUND Clinical decision support systems are designed to utilize medical data, knowledge, and analysis engines and to generate patient-specific assessments or recommendations to health professionals in order to assist decision making. Artificial intelligence–enabled clinical decision support systems aid the decision-making process through an intelligent component. Well-defined evaluation methods are essential to ensure the seamless integration and contribution of these systems to clinical practice. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a measurement instrument and test the interrelationships of evaluation variables for an artificial intelligence–enabled clinical decision support system evaluation framework. METHODS An artificial intelligence–enabled clinical decision support system evaluation framework consisting of 6 variables was developed. A Delphi process was conducted to develop the measurement instrument items. Cognitive interviews and pretesting were performed to refine the questions. Web-based survey response data were analyzed to remove irrelevant questions from the measurement instrument, to test dimensional structure, and to assess reliability and validity. The interrelationships of relevant variables were tested and verified using path analysis, and a 28-item measurement instrument was developed. Measurement instrument survey responses were collected from 156 respondents. RESULTS The Cronbach α of the measurement instrument was 0.963, and its content validity was 0.943. Values of average variance extracted ranged from 0.582 to 0.756, and values of the heterotrait-monotrait ratio ranged from 0.376 to 0.896. The final model had a good fit (<i>χ<sub>26</sub><sup>2</sup></i>=36.984; <i>P</i>=.08; comparative fit index 0.991; goodness-of-fit index 0.957; root mean square error of approximation 0.052; standardized root mean square residual 0.028). Variables in the final model accounted for 89% of the variance in the user acceptance dimension. CONCLUSIONS User acceptance is the central dimension of artificial intelligence–enabled clinical decision support system success. Acceptance was directly influenced by perceived ease of use, information quality, service quality, and perceived benefit. Acceptance was also indirectly influenced by system quality and information quality through perceived ease of use. User acceptance and perceived benefit were interrelated.

scholarly journals Evaluation Framework for Successful Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Mixed Methods Study

10.2196/25929 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. e25929
Author(s):  
Mengting Ji ◽  
Georgi Z Genchev ◽  
Hengye Huang ◽  
Ting Xu ◽  
Hui Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Clinical Decision Support System ◽  
Measurement Instrument ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
User Acceptance ◽  
Evaluation Framework

Background Clinical decision support systems are designed to utilize medical data, knowledge, and analysis engines and to generate patient-specific assessments or recommendations to health professionals in order to assist decision making. Artificial intelligence–enabled clinical decision support systems aid the decision-making process through an intelligent component. Well-defined evaluation methods are essential to ensure the seamless integration and contribution of these systems to clinical practice. Objective The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a measurement instrument and test the interrelationships of evaluation variables for an artificial intelligence–enabled clinical decision support system evaluation framework. Methods An artificial intelligence–enabled clinical decision support system evaluation framework consisting of 6 variables was developed. A Delphi process was conducted to develop the measurement instrument items. Cognitive interviews and pretesting were performed to refine the questions. Web-based survey response data were analyzed to remove irrelevant questions from the measurement instrument, to test dimensional structure, and to assess reliability and validity. The interrelationships of relevant variables were tested and verified using path analysis, and a 28-item measurement instrument was developed. Measurement instrument survey responses were collected from 156 respondents. Results The Cronbach α of the measurement instrument was 0.963, and its content validity was 0.943. Values of average variance extracted ranged from 0.582 to 0.756, and values of the heterotrait-monotrait ratio ranged from 0.376 to 0.896. The final model had a good fit (χ262=36.984; P=.08; comparative fit index 0.991; goodness-of-fit index 0.957; root mean square error of approximation 0.052; standardized root mean square residual 0.028). Variables in the final model accounted for 89% of the variance in the user acceptance dimension. Conclusions User acceptance is the central dimension of artificial intelligence–enabled clinical decision support system success. Acceptance was directly influenced by perceived ease of use, information quality, service quality, and perceived benefit. Acceptance was also indirectly influenced by system quality and information quality through perceived ease of use. User acceptance and perceived benefit were interrelated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document