scholarly journals The Comorbidities Coma Scale (CoCoS): Psychometric Properties and Clinical Usefulness in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Pistoia ◽  
Antonio Carolei ◽  
Yelena G. Bodien ◽  
Sheldon Greenfield ◽  
Sherrie Kaplan ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0252089
Author(s):  
Jaime Navarrete ◽  
Rocío Herrero ◽  
Joaquim Soler ◽  
Elisabet Domínguez-Clavé ◽  
Rosa Baños ◽  
...  

The Forms of Self-Criticizing/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) was designed to measure self-criticism (SC) through Inadequate Self (IS) and Hated Self (HS) factors, as well as self-reassurance (RS). However, its long and short forms have yet to be validated in the Spanish Population. The present study examines the psychometric properties of the short form (FSCRS-SF) and its clinical usefulness in a sample of 576 adult individuals, 77 with psychiatric disorders and 499 without. Non-clinical participants were split according to their previous experience with meditation (active meditators, n = 133; non-active meditators, n = 41; and non-meditators, n = 325) and differences between these subgroups were explored. Additionally, a subsample of 20 non-clinical participants took part in a mindfulness- and compassion- based intervention (MCBI) to assess the usefulness of the scale as an outcome measure. Results confirmed the original three-factorial structure, good internal consistency, acceptable test-retest reliability, and a pattern of correlations consistent with previous literature. Regarding differences between groups, the clinical subsample showed significant higher SC and lower RS levels than non-clinical participants and active meditators had significant lower IS and higher RS levels than non-meditators. Participants who participated in the MCBI showed significant RS improvement and a decrease in IS and HS levels. Moreover, a hierarchical multiple regression showed that RS made a significant predictive contribution to distress at three months’ time. In conclusion, results show that the Spanish version of the FSCRS-SF is a reliable and valid measure of SC and RS in non-clinical populations and an adequate instrument to detect changes after MCBIs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1112-1121
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Haibo Di ◽  
Wen Hua ◽  
Liwen Cheng ◽  
Zhigang Xia ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of the study was to check on the reliability and validity of the translated version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised. Design: Prospective psychometric study. Setting: Rehabilitation and neurology unit in hospital. Subjects: Patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Interventions: None. Main measures: The original English version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was translated into Chinese. The reliability and validity were undertaken by trained raters. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to investigate internal consistency. Spearman’s correlation was used to calculate concurrent validity. The Coma Recovery Scale–revised was used to assess the consciousness of patients. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Inter-rater reliability of the Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was high for total scores and motor and verbal subscores and good for facial subscores. Test–retest reliability was high for total score and for all subscores. Analysis revealed a moderate internal consistency for subscores. For the concurrent validity, a strong correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability behavioral scale for all patients. A moderate correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Coma Recovery Scale–revised scores for all patients. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised has good reliability and validity data for assessing responses to pain in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1651-1656
Author(s):  
Rita Formisano ◽  
◽  
Marta Aloisi ◽  
Marco Iosa ◽  
Marianna Contrada ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Chatelle ◽  
Marie-Daniele De Val ◽  
Antonio Catano ◽  
Cristo Chaskis ◽  
Pierrette Seeldrayers ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 7512500005p1-7512500005p1
Author(s):  
Jennifer Weaver ◽  
Trudy Mallinson ◽  
Alison M. Cogan ◽  
Ann Guernon ◽  
Katherine O’Brien ◽  
...  

Abstract Date Presented 04/9/21 OTs use the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised (CRS–R) to evaluate and make treatment decisions for individuals with disorders of consciousness (DoC) after a brain injury. This session will describe psychometric properties of the assessment and examine the association with state of consciousness. State of consciousness influences how therapists think about the patient’s prognosis, plan of care, and rehabilitation outcomes. Primary Author and Speaker: Jennifer Weaver Additional Authors and Speakers: Sara Stephenson


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document