Nociception coma scale-revised (NCS-R) with personalized painful stimulation versus standard stimulus in non-communicative patients with disorders of consciousness

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 117653
Author(s):  
Rita Formisano ◽  
Marta Aloisi ◽  
Sara Schiattone ◽  
Giulia Ferri ◽  
Marco Iosa ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1112-1121
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Haibo Di ◽  
Wen Hua ◽  
Liwen Cheng ◽  
Zhigang Xia ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of the study was to check on the reliability and validity of the translated version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised. Design: Prospective psychometric study. Setting: Rehabilitation and neurology unit in hospital. Subjects: Patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Interventions: None. Main measures: The original English version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was translated into Chinese. The reliability and validity were undertaken by trained raters. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to investigate internal consistency. Spearman’s correlation was used to calculate concurrent validity. The Coma Recovery Scale–revised was used to assess the consciousness of patients. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Inter-rater reliability of the Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was high for total scores and motor and verbal subscores and good for facial subscores. Test–retest reliability was high for total score and for all subscores. Analysis revealed a moderate internal consistency for subscores. For the concurrent validity, a strong correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability behavioral scale for all patients. A moderate correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Coma Recovery Scale–revised scores for all patients. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised has good reliability and validity data for assessing responses to pain in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1651-1656
Author(s):  
Rita Formisano ◽  
◽  
Marta Aloisi ◽  
Marco Iosa ◽  
Marianna Contrada ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Pistoia ◽  
Antonio Carolei ◽  
Yelena G. Bodien ◽  
Sheldon Greenfield ◽  
Sherrie Kaplan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Chatelle ◽  
Marie-Daniele De Val ◽  
Antonio Catano ◽  
Cristo Chaskis ◽  
Pierrette Seeldrayers ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Molteni ◽  
Katia Colombo ◽  
Valentina Pastore ◽  
Susanna Galbiati ◽  
Monica Recla ◽  
...  

The present study aimed to: (a) characterize the emergence to a conscious state (CS) in a sample of children and adolescents with severe brain injury during the post-acute rehabilitation and through two different neuropsychological assessment tools: the Rappaport Coma/Near Coma Scale (CNCS) and Level of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale (LOCFAS); (b) compare the evolution in patients with brain lesions due to traumatic and non-traumatic etiologies; and (c) describe the relationship between the emergence to a CS and some relevant clinical variables. In this observational prospective longitudinal study, 92 consecutive patients were recruited. Inclusion criteria were severe disorders of consciousness (DOC), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8 at insult, age 0 to 18 years, and direct admission to inpatient rehabilitation from acute care. The main outcome measures were CNCS and LOCFAS, both administered three and six months after injury. The cohort globally shifted towards milder DOC over time, moving from overall ‘moderate/near coma’ at three months to ‘near/no coma’ at six months post-injury. The shift was captured by both CNCS and LOCFAS. CNCS differentiated levels of coma at best, while LOCFAS was superior in characterizing the emergence from coma. Agreement between scales was fair, and reduced negative findings at less than 10%. Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) vs. non-traumatic brain injury (NTBI) were older and had neurosurgical intervention more frequently. No relation between age and the level of consciousness was found overall. Concurrent administration of CNCS and LOCFAS reduced the rate of false negatives and better detected signs of arousal and awareness. This provides indication to administer both tools to increase measurement precision.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1295-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Sattin ◽  
Caroline Schnakers ◽  
Marco Pagani ◽  
Francesca Arenare ◽  
Guya Devalle ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. e126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Pistoia ◽  
Yelena Bodien ◽  
Antonio Carolei ◽  
Simona Sacco ◽  
Alfonsina Casalena ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document