scholarly journals Vestibular Function in Children and Adults Before and After Unilateral or Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruirui Guan ◽  
Yanqi Wang ◽  
Sasa Wu ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Jingwu Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Window Approach

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) helps patients with severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) restore hearing and speech abilities. However, some patients exhibit abnormal vestibular functions with symptoms such as dizziness or balance disorders, after CI. Whether age at CI and CI approach (unilateral or sequential bilateral) affect vestibular functions in users with cochlear implants remains unclear.Objectives: To investigate the vestibular functions in children and adults before and after unilateral or sequential bilateral CI.Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven patients with severe or profound SNHL who were candidates for a first- or second-side CI were divided into three groups: first-side CI-implanted adults (≥18 years), first-side CI-implanted children (6–17 years), and second-side CI-implanted children (6–17 years). All cases were implanted with the round window approach to minimize damage to the intra-cochlear structures. The caloric test, vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test, video head impulse test (vHIT), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Pediatric Vestibular Symptom Questionnaire (PVSQ), and audiometric tests were performed before and 1 month after CI.Results: The abnormal rates of caloric test and VEMP test after CI in the first-side CI-implanted adults and children significantly increased compared with those before CI. The pre-implantation VEMP test showed significantly higher abnormal rates between first- and second-side CI-implanted children. No other significant differences of abnormal rates between first- and second-side CI-implanted children or between first-side CI-implanted adults and children were found. In second-side CI-implanted children, PVSQ scores significantly increased at day 3 post-implantation but decreased at day 30.Conclusion: CI has a negative effect on the results of caloric and VEMP tests, but not on vHIT, indicating that the otolith and low-frequency semicircular canal (SCC) are more vulnerable to damage from CI. The alterations of vestibular functions resulting from CI surgery may be independent of age at CI and CI approach (unilateral or sequential bilateral). Long-term impacts on the vestibular function from CI surgery, as well as the chronic electrical stimulation to the cochlea, are still to be investigated.

scholarly journals Vestibular Preservation After Cochlear Implantation Using the Round Window Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keita Tsukada ◽  
Shin-ichi Usami
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Flexible Electrodes ◽  
Caloric Testing ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Window Approach ◽  
Caloric Response

Background: The development of less traumatic surgical techniques, such as the round window approach (RWA), as well as the use of flexible electrodes and post-operative steroid administration have enabled the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation (CI) surgery. However, consideration must still be given to the complications that can accompany CI. One such potential complication is the impairment of vestibular function with resulting vertigo symptoms. The aim of our current study was to examine the changes in vestibular function after implantation in patients who received CI using less traumatic surgery, particularly the RWA technique.Methods: Sixty-six patients who received CI in our center were examined by caloric testing, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) before or after implantation, or both, to obtain data on semicircular canal, saccular and utricular function, respectively. Less traumatic CI surgery was performed by the use of the RWA and insertion of flexible electrodes such as MED-EL FLEX soft, FLEX 28, and FLEX 24 (Innsbruck, Austria).Results: Caloric response and the asymmetry ratio of cVEMP and oVEMP were examined before and after implantation using less traumatic surgical techniques. Compared with before implantation, 93.9, 82.4, and 92.5% of the patients showed preserved vestibular function after implantation based on caloric testing, cVEMP and oVEMP results, respectively. We also examined the results for vestibular function by a comparison of the 66 patients using the RWA and flexible electrodes, and 17 patients who underwent cochleostomy and insertion of conventional or hard electrodes. We measured responses using caloric testing, cVEMP and oVEMP in patients after CI. There were no differences in the frequencies of abnormal caloric and oVEMP results in the implanted ears between the RWA and cochleostomy. On the other hand, the frequency of abnormal cVEMP responses in the implanted ears in the patients who received implantation by cochleostomy was significantly higher than that in the patients undergoing surgery using the RWA.Conclusion: Patients receiving CI using less traumatic surgical techniques such as RWA and flexible electrodes have reduced risk of damage to vestibular function.

scholarly journals Alteration of Vestibular Function in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajime Koyama ◽  
Akinori Kashio ◽  
Chisato Fujimoto ◽  
Tsukasa Uranaka ◽  
Yu Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Round Window ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Rotation Test ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Window Approach

Background: Vestibular dysfunction is a complication of cochlear implantation (CI). Reports on the evaluation of vestibular function before and after CI are limited, especially in children. We investigated the effect of CI on vestibular function in pediatric patients.Patients and Methods: We routinely evaluated vestibular function before but not immediately after CI. Therefore, patients who underwent sequential bilateral CI were enrolled in this study. Seventy-three children who underwent sequential CI from 2003 to 2020 at our hospital were included. Since the vestibular function of the first implanted ear was evaluated before the second surgery for the contralateral ear, post-CI evaluation timing differed among the cases. The evaluation included a caloric test, a cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) test, and a damped rotation test. The objective variables included the results of these tests, and the explanatory variables included the age at surgery, cause of hearing loss, electrode type, and surgical approach used. The associations of these tests were analyzed.Results: cVEMP was the most affected after CI (36.1%), followed by the caloric test (23.6%), and damped rotation test (7.8%). Cochleostomy was significantly more harmful than a round window (RW) approach or an extended RW approach based on the results of the caloric test (p = 0.035) and damped rotation test (p = 0.029). Perimodiolar electrodes affected the caloric test results greater than straight electrodes (p = 0.041). There were no significant associations among these tests' results.Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery in children using a round window approach or an extended round window approach with straight electrodes is desirable to preserve vestibular function after CI.

Postural control before and after cochlear implantation: Standard cochleostomy versus round window approach

2009 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 696-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Dieter Kluenter ◽  
Ruth Lang-Roth ◽  
Dirk Beutner ◽  
Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink ◽  
Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Window Approach

scholarly journals Early Assessment of Vestibular Function after Unilateral Cochlear Implant Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (Suppl. 1-2) ◽  
pp. 50-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Barbara ◽  
Rita Talamonti ◽  
Anna Teresa Benincasa ◽  
Silvia Tarentini ◽  
Chiara Filippi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Window Approach

Introduction: Cochlear implantation (CI) has been reported to negatively affect vestibular function. The study of vestibular function has variably been conducted using different types of diagnostic tools. The combined use of modern, rapidly performing diagnostic tools could prove useful for standardization of the evaluation protocol. Methods: In a group of 28 subjects undergoing CI, the video head impulse test (vHIT), the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and the short form of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire were investigated preoperatively and postoperatively (implant on and off) in both the implanted and the contralateral, nonimplanted ear. All surgeries were performed with a round window approach (RWA), except for 3 otosclerosis cases in which the extended RWA (eRWA) was used. Results: The vHIT of the lateral semicircular canal showed preoperative vestibular involvement in nearly 50% of the cases, while the 3 canals were contemporarily affected in only 14% of the cases. In all the hypofunctional subjects, cVEMP were absent. A low VOR gain in all of the investigated superior semicircular canals was found in 4 subjects (14%). In those subjects (21.7%) in whom cVEMP were preoperatively present and normal on the operated side, the absence of a response was postoperatively recorded. Discussion/Conclusion: The vestibular protocol applied in this study was found to be appropriate for distinguishing between the CI-operated ear and the nonoperated ear. In this regard, cVEMP was found to be more sensitive than vHIT for revealing a vestibular sufferance after CI, though without statistical significance. Finally, the use of RWA surgery apparently did not reduce the occurrence of signs of vestibular impairment.

scholarly journals Vestibular Function After Cochlear Implantation in Partial Deafness Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Sosna-Duranowska ◽  
Grazyna Tacikowska ◽  
Elzbieta Gos ◽  
Anna Krupa ◽  
Piotr Henryk Skarzynski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Single Sided Deafness ◽  
Caloric Response ◽  
Vestibular Damage

Introduction: Cochlear implantation is a fully accepted method of treating individuals with profound hearing loss. Since the indications for cochlear implantation have broadened and include patients with low-frequency residual hearing, single-sided deafness, or an already implanted ear (meaning bilateral cochlear implantation), the emphasis now needs to be on vestibular protection.Materials and Methods: The research group was made up of 107 patients operated on in the otorhinolaryngosurgery department: 59 females and 48 males, aged 10.4–80.2 years (M = 44.4; SD = 18.4) with hearing loss lasting from 1.4 to 56 years (M = 22.7; SD = 13.5). The patients underwent cVEMP, oVEMP, a caloric test, and vHIT assessment preoperatively, and, postoperatively, cVEMP and oVEMP at 1–3 months and a caloric test and vHIT at 4–6 months.Results: After cochlear implantation, there was postoperative loss of cVEMP in 19.2% of the patients, oVEMP in 17.4%, reduction of caloric response in 11.6%, and postoperative destruction of the lateral, anterior, and posterior semicircular canal as measured with vHIT in 7.1, 3.9, and 4% respectively.Conclusions: Hearing preservation techniques in cochlear implantation are connected with vestibular protection, but the risk of vestibular damage in never totally eliminated. The vestibular preservation is associated with hearing preservation and the relation is statistically significant. Informed consent for cochlear implantation must include information about possible vestibular damage. Since the risk of vestibular damage is appreciable, preoperative otoneurological diagnostics need to be conducted in the following situations: qualification for a second implant, after otosurgery (especially if the opposite ear is to be implanted), having a history of vestibular complaints, and when there are no strict audiological or anatomical indications on which side to operate.

The Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Function

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P60-P60
Author(s):  
Thuy-Anh N. Melvin ◽  
Americo Migliaccio ◽  
John P Carey ◽  
Charles Coleman Della Santina
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Head Impulse ◽  
Vestibular Hypofunction ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

Objective 1) Measure vestibular function before and after cochlear implantation (CI) using a battery of tests covering the full range of stimulus frequencies over which the normal angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) stabilizes gaze. Methods Semicircular canal (SCC) function was assayed using head impulse test during 3-dimensional scleral search coil eye movement recordings (HIT), dynamic visual acuity during rapid head movements (DVA), head-shake nystagmus (HSN), and caloric electronystagmography (ENG). Saccular function was determined using vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). Patient self-assessment via the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) and clinical head impulse testing (cHIT) were also measured. Results One of 28 post-implanted ears (4%) suffered severe loss of vestibular function in all 3 SCCs. HSN revealed no change in 11 subjects. ENG revealed new hypofunction in 1 of 16 ears (6%). Passive DVA revealed no significant change for 16 implanted ears. VEMP revealed significant increase or disappearance in threshold in 5 of 16 ears (31%). DHI scores were variable and correlated poorly with objective tests. The cHIT performed by one otolaryngologist in 14 subjects exhibited 44% sensitivity and 94% specificity for detection of severe hypofunction confirmed via quantitative HIT. Conclusions CI carries a small but nontrivial risk of iatrogenic vestibular hypofunction in the implanted ear. For bilateral simultaneous-CI, the risk of bilateral vestibular hypofunction is ∼0.16%, comparable to the likelihood of meningitis. The cHIT was highly specific for vestibular hypofunction in this study, but likely depends heavily on the examiner's threshold for abnormal.

Objective vestibular function changes in children following cochlear implantation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ruijie Wang ◽  
Xiuhua Chao ◽  
Jianfen Luo ◽  
Daogong Zhang ◽  
Jiliang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Semicircular Canal ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Deterioration Rate ◽  
Vestibular Aqueduct

BACKGROUND: To date, systematically objective evaluations of vestibular function in children with cochlear implantation (CI) have been conducted sparsely, especiallyin children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS). OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to investigate the function of all five vestibular end-organs pre- and post-cochlear implantation in children with LVAS and normal CT. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 34 children (age 4–17 years) with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) undergoing unilateral CI were included. Participants included 18 (52.9%) children with LVAS. Objective modalities to evaluate vestibular function included the caloric test, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP), and video head impulse test (vHIT). All measurements were performed before surgery and 9 months after surgery. RESULTS: Mean age at CI was 8.1±3.7 years. Caloric testing showed hypofunction in 38.2%of cases before implantation and in 50%after (p >  0.05). We found a significant increase of overall abnormality rate in cVEMP and oVEMP from pre- to post-CI (p <  0.05). In all three semicircular canals tested by vHIT, there were no statistically significant mean gain changes (p >  0.05). Higher deterioration rates in cVEMP (53.3%) and oVEMP (52.0%) after surgery were observed (p <  0.05). In children with LVAS, cVEMP revealed a higher deterioration rate than superior semicircular canal (SSC) and posterior semicircular canal (PSC) (p <  0.05). In children with normal CT, the deterioration rates in VEMPs were both higher than those in vHIT (p <  0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In general, the otolith organs were the most affected peripheral vestibular sensors in children after cochlear implantation. The variations in otolith function influenced by CI were different between children with LVAS and normal CT. We recommend the use of this vestibular function test battery for children with cochlear implantation.

Video head impulse test saccades and loss of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are late vestibular footprints of cochlear implantation

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Niels West ◽  
Mads Klokker ◽  
Per Cayé-Thomasen
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vestibular Assessment

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation may be complicated by concurrent injury to the vestibular apparatus, potentially resulting in disabling vertigo and balance problems. Information on vestibular function before implantation as measured by the video head impulse test (VHIT) and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) is scarce and literature on long-term effects is non-existing. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate how vestibular function was affected by cochlear implantation (CI), as measured by VHIT and cVEMPs in the late phase after implantation. METHODS: Retrospective repeated measurement study. Patients: Among the 436 patients elected for CI surgery during 2013 to 2018, 45 patients met the inclusion criteria (CI recipients with a vestibular assessment prior to the first CI and a repeated vestibular assessment after the CI operation). Intervention: VHIT and cVEMPs before and after cochlear implantation. Main outcome measures were vestibular function as evaluated by VHIT gain, saccades and cVEMPs. RESULTS: The mean time between first and second vestibular screening was 19 months. The mean VHIT gain on implanted ears was 0.79 before the operation and showed no change at follow-up (p = 0.65). Likewise, the number of abnormal VHIT gain values was equal before and after the operation (p = 0.31). Preoperatively, saccades were present on 12 ears (14% ) compared with 25 ears (29% ) postoperatively (p = 0.013) and were associated with significantly lower VHIT gain values. Preoperatively, positive cVEMPs were found in 20 CI ears (49% ) and 24 contralateral ears (62% ). 10 CI ears lost cVEMP postoperatively compared with 2 ears on the contralateral side (p = 0.0047). CONCLUSIONS: Even though VHIT gain has been reported to be affected in the immediate post-implantation period, the findings in this study show that VHIT gain is normalized in the long-term. However, cochlear implantation is associated with the occurrence of VHIT saccades in the long-term and these are associated with lower VHIT gain values. In addition, cVEMP responses are significantly reduced long-term on implanted ears, which agrees with other studies with shorter follow-up.

Surgical considerations during cochlear implantation: the utility of temporal bone computed tomography

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Beomcho Jun ◽  
Sunwha Song
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Temporal Bone ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Posterior Tympanotomy ◽  
Electrode Insertion ◽  
Window Approach ◽  
Bone Structures

Abstract Objective This paper describes the construction of portals for electrode placement during cochlear implantation and emphasises the utility of pre-operative temporal bone three-dimensional computed tomography. Methods Temporal bone three-dimensional computed tomography was used to plan portal creation for electrode insertion. Results Pre-operative temporal bone three-dimensional computed tomography can be used to determine the orientation of temporal bone structures, which is important for mastoidectomy, posterior tympanotomy and cochleostomy, and when using the round window approach. Conclusion It is essential to create appropriate portals (from the mastoid cortex to the cochlea) in a step-by-step manner, to ensure the safe insertion of electrodes into the scala tympani. Pre-operative three-dimensional temporal bone computed tomography is invaluable in this respect.

Does Intracochlear Implantation Jeopardize Vestibular Function?

1994 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 609-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick L. M. Huygen ◽  
Paul Van Den Broek ◽  
Lucas H. M. Mens ◽  
Teun H. Spies ◽  
Ronald J. C. Admiraal
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Step Test ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Vestibular Function Tests ◽  
Function Tests ◽  
Reported Data

We present the results of the vestibular function tests of 35 patients who were selected for cochlear implantation. Vestibular function was evaluated with a caloric test and a velocity step test. The preimplant data were compared to those in previously reported series. Intracochlear implantation was performed in 25 patients. The vestibular complications encountered in this group are presented and discussed. Six patients had normal or residual (but substantial) vestibular function in the ear eligible for implantation. Vestibular function was preserved in 3 patients and was lost in 3 patients, in 1 case through an iatrogenic cause. We estimate the risk of losing vestibular function as a result of intracochlear implantation as between 50% and 60% on the basis of the present and previously reported data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document