scholarly journals Investigation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses to Multi-Pulse Stimulation of High Frequency in Cochlear Implant Users

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Saeedi ◽  
Werner Hemmert
1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Gorga ◽  
Jan K. Reiland ◽  
Kathryn A. Beauchaine

Click-evoked auditory brainstem responses were measured in a patient with high-frequency conductive hearing loss. As is typical in cases of conductive hearing loss, Wave I latency was prolonged beyond normal limits. Interpeak latency differences were just below the lower limits of the normal range. The Wave V latency-intensity function, however was abnormally steep. This pattern is explained by the hypothesis that the slope of the latency-intensity function is determined principally by the configuration of the hearing loss. In cases of high-frequency hearing loss (regardless of the etiology), the response may be dominated by more apical regions of the cochlea at lower intensities and thus have a longer latency.


2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (01) ◽  
pp. e1-e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Kasbekar ◽  
Yu Chuen Tam ◽  
Robert Carlyon ◽  
John Deeks ◽  
Neil Donnelly ◽  
...  

Objectives A decision on whether to insert a cochlear implant can be made in neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) if there is objective evidence of cochlear nerve (CN) function post vestibular schwannoma (VS) excision. We aimed to develop intraoperative CN monitoring to help in this decision. Design We describe the intraoperative monitoring of a patient with NF2 and our stimulating and recording set up. A novel test electrode is used to stimulate the CN electrically. Setting This study was set at a tertiary referral center for skull base pathology. Main outcome measure Preserved auditory brainstem responses leading to cochlear implantation. Results Electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) waveforms will be displayed from different stages of the operation. A cochlear implant was inserted at the same sitting based on the EABR. Conclusion Electrically evoked CN monitoring can provide objective evidence of CN function after VS excision and aid in the decision-making process of hearing rehabilitation in patients who will be rendered deaf.


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Gordon ◽  
Jerome Valero ◽  
Richard van Hoesel ◽  
Blake C. Papsin

ORL ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 285-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kasper ◽  
Marco Pelizzone ◽  
Pierre Montandon

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Schebsdat ◽  
Manuel C. Kohl ◽  
Farah I. Corona-Strauss ◽  
Harald Seidler ◽  
Daniel J. Strauss

The importance of binaural cues in auditory stream formation and sound source segregation is widely accepted. When treating one ear with a cochlear implant (CI) the peripheral auditory system gets partially replaced and processing delays get added potentially, thus important interaural time differences get altered. However, these effects are not fully understood, leaving a lack of systematic binaural fitting strategies with respect to an optimal binaural fusion. To get new insights into such alterations, we suggest a novel method of free-field auditory brainstem evoked responses (ABRs) analysis in CI users. This method does not bypass the technically induced intrinsic delays of the sound processor while leaving the whole electrode array active, thus the most natural way of stimulation is provided. We compared the ABRs collected of 12 CI users and 12 normal hearing listeners using two different stimuli (chirp, click) at four different intensities each. We analyzed the ABRs using the average of 2000 trials as well as a single trial analysis and found consistent results in the ABRs’ amplitudes and latencies, as well as in single trial relationships between both groups. This method provides a new perspective into the natural CI users’ ABRs and can be useful in future research regarding binaural interaction and fusion.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 239-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Fausti ◽  
Christopher L. Flick ◽  
Alison M. Bobal ◽  
Roger M. Ellingson ◽  
James A. Henry ◽  
...  

Effective objective testing methodology is needed for early detection of the effects of ototoxicity on hearing in patients. The requirements for such testing include responses that are: 1) reliable across test sessions; 2) sensitive to ototoxic change (> 8 kHz), and 3) recordable in a time-efficient manner. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) appear well suited to this task however, conventional clicks stimulate primarily mid-frequencies (1-4 kHz) and high frequency tonebursts require too much time. We hypothesized that delivery of a band of high frequencies (a high frequency "click"), would elicit reliable and useful ABRs. In the current study, flat and sloped HF (high frequency) clicks with a bandwidth of 8-14 kHz were used. The purpose was to compare brainstem responses elicited by tonebursts, two HF clicks and conventional clicks. The results show that the reliability of responses to the HF clicks were comparable to the tonebursts and further, both HF clicks produced responses slightly larger than tonebursts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document