scholarly journals Pathogenic Variant Profile of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in a Vietnamese Cohort

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Van Thuan Tran ◽  
Sao Trung Nguyen ◽  
Xuan Dung Pham ◽  
Thanh Hai Phan ◽  
Van Chu Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Carrier Frequency ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cancer Syndromes ◽  
History Of Cancer

BackgroundHereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) are responsible for 5-10% of cancer cases. Genetic testing to identify pathogenic variants associated with cancer predisposition has not been routinely available in Vietnam. Consequently, the prevalence and genetic landscape of HCS remain unknown.Methods1165 Vietnamese individuals enrolled in genetic testing at our laboratory in 2020. We performed analysis of germline mutations in 17 high- and moderate- penetrance genes associated with HCS by next generation sequencing.ResultsA total of 41 pathogenic variants in 11 genes were detected in 3.2% individuals. The carrier frequency was 4.2% in people with family or personal history of cancer and 2.6% in those without history. The percentage of mutation carriers for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes was 1.3% and for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome was 1.6%. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were the most prevalent with the positive rate of 1.3% in the general cohort and 5.1% in breast or ovarian cancer patients. Most of BRCA1 mutations located at the BRCA C-terminus domains and the top recurrent mutation was NM_007294.3:c.5251C>T (p.Arg1751Ter). One novel variant NM_000038.6(APC):c.6665C>A (p.Pro2222His) was found in a breast cancer patient with a strong family history of cancer. A case study of hereditary cancer syndrome was illustrated to highlight the importance of genetic testing.ConclusionThis is the first largest analysis of carrier frequency and mutation spectrum of HCS in Vietnam. The findings demonstrate the clinical significance of multigene panel testing to identify carriers and their at-risk relatives for better cancer surveillance and management strategies.

scholarly journals High Prevalence of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Colorectal Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (31) ◽  
pp. 3544-3549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen E. Mork ◽  
Y. Nancy You ◽  
Jun Ying ◽  
Sarah A. Bannon ◽  
Patrick M. Lynch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Family History ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cancer Syndromes ◽  
History Of Cancer

Purpose Established guidelines recommend evaluation for hereditary cancer syndromes in patients younger than 50 years diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). This group has been well described in the literature; however, patients diagnosed as adolescents and young adults are not well represented in CRC studies. Here, we define the clinical profile, including the extent of hereditary cancer syndromes and family history of cancer, in patients diagnosed with CRC at age 35 or younger. Patients and Methods We reviewed patients who underwent genetic counseling at our institution during 5 years (2009 to 2013). Data were collected regarding demographics, clinicopathologic information, tumor and genetic testing, and family history. Patients with an identified hereditary cancer syndrome were compared with those without a syndrome. Results Of the 193 patients with evaluable data, 35% had an identifiable hereditary cancer syndrome, including 23 with Lynch syndrome, 22 with mutation-negative Lynch syndrome, 16 with familial adenomatous polyposis, two with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, two with biallelic MUTYH mutations, and one with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Patients without a hereditary syndrome more frequently presented with metastatic disease, whereas patients with a syndrome were more likely to present at earlier stages and to have a family history of cancer. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of the hereditary syndromes (19%) were diagnosed in individuals with no family history of the disease. Conclusion We conclude that patients diagnosed with CRC at age 35 years or younger should receive genetic counseling regardless of their family history and phenotype.

scholarly journals Current Testing Guidelines: A Retrospective Analysis of a Community-Based Hereditary Cancer Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Ward, DNP, APRN, AGNP-BC ◽  
Betty Elder, PhD, RN ◽  
Maryon Habtemariam, DNP, APRN
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Preventative Measures ◽  
Cancer Syndromes

It is estimated that 5% to 10% of all cancers are related to a hereditary cancer syndrome. However, specific cancers, such as pancreatic and ovarian cancers, are related to hereditary cancer syndromes 15% to 20% of the time. Genetic testing guidelines for hereditary cancer syndromes are frequently reviewed and updated by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to identify carriers of pathogenic variants or hereditary cancer syndrome who do not meet NCCN criteria for testing and compare the results with previous studies. The data obtained can be used to provide recommendations to assess current guidelines for testing and evaluate the benefit of comprehensive panel testing vs. standard testing for specific hereditary cancer syndromes. This project is a retrospective review of clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing between September 2015 and February 2019 through a cancer outreach and risk assessment (CORA) program. Frequencies analyses were performed to analyze results. A total of 233 individuals were included in the analysis: 171 met BRCA1/2 testing criteria, 66 met Lynch syndrome criteria, and 4 met polyposis criteria. Of the individuals meeting established criteria for testing, 39 were identified with pathogenic variants. However, only 10 of these individuals were identified with a pathogenic variant associated with the criteria for which they met. Genetic testing that is limited to only those patients with genes associated with hereditary cancer syndromes may lead to exclusion of other potentially actionable genes, which may impair a patient’s ability to receive additional screening or preventative measures.

Adult cancer survivorship referrals for hereditary cancer genetic testing.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 183-183
Author(s):  
Farzana L. Walcott ◽  
Rebecca Davidson Kaltman ◽  
Elizabeth Hatcher ◽  
Cam Ha ◽  
Tara Biagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cancer Syndromes ◽  
History Of Cancer

183 Background: Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes is underutilized among cancer patients. Cancer survivorship clinics may identify individuals at risk for hereditary cancer. We present the number of referrals from George Washington (GW) Adult Cancer Survivorship Clinic (ACS) to the GW Ruth Paul Hereditary Cancer Program (RPHCP) to demonstrate the feasibility of identifying high risk individuals in cancer survivorship. Methods: We reviewed the number of patients seen at the GW ACS and subsequent referrals to the GW RPHCP for genetic counseling/testing. An IRB approved research registry was used for retrieval of the data. The ACS clinic is staffed by a physician internist trained in clinical cancer genetics and a nurse practitioner trained in cancer survivorship. Results: 261 patients were seen in ACS from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017. Twenty patients (7.6%) were referred to RPHCP based on personal/family cancer history. Three patients were not consented for the research registry, leaving a total of 17 patients for this analysis. Fifteen (88.2%) patients were referred by the physician and 2/17 (11.7%) were referred by the nurse practitioner. Sixteen patients had genetic testing (94.1%) and results were: 5/16 (31.2%) positive, 6/16 (37.5%) negative, and 3/16 (18.7%) had a variant of unknown significance (VUS). Results on 2 patients are pending. One patient deferred testing. Of the 17 patients referred, 14/17 (82.3%) had personal/family history of cancer and had seen an oncologist. Cancer sites and germline mutations identified were: bilateral breast cancer and bladder cancer (BRCA2), prostate cancer (MUTYH), breast and ovarian cancer (BRCA1), endometrial cancer (APC). One patient without cancer was referred by an oncologist for a previously identified familial MLH1 mutation, and was positive. Conclusions: Cancer survivorship clinics may identify individuals appropriate for genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. This is likely an underestimate as not all cancer patients are seen in survivorship clinic. Systematic capture of personal and family history of cancer in cancer survivors may enhance utilization of genetic testing services among cancer survivors and identification of high risk individuals.

scholarly journals Secondary Prevention in Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer Syndromes Other Than BRCA

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Piombino ◽  
Laura Cortesi ◽  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Kevin Punie ◽  
Giovanni Grandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Precancerous Lesions ◽  
Diffuse Gastric Cancer ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Cancer Syndromes

BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes are among the best-known and most extensively studied hereditary cancer syndromes. Nevertheless, many patients who proved negative at BRCA genetic testing bring pathogenic mutations in other suppressor genes and oncogenes associated with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers. These genes include TP53 in Li–Fraumeni syndrome, PTEN in Cowden syndrome, mismatch repair (MMR) genes in Lynch syndrome, CDH1 in diffuse gastric cancer syndrome, STK11 in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, and NF1 in neurofibromatosis type 1 syndrome. To these, several other genes can be added that act jointly with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the double-strand break repair system, such as PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D. Management of primary and secondary cancer prevention in these hereditary cancer syndromes is crucial. In particular, secondary prevention by screening aims to discover precancerous lesions or cancers at their initial stages because early detection could allow for effective treatment and a full recovery. The present review aims to summarize the available literature and suggest proper screening strategies for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndromes other than BRCA.

Comprehensive next generation sequencing assay and bioinformatic pipeline for identifying pathogenic variants associated with hereditary cancers.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13105-e13105
Author(s):  
Oscar Puig ◽  
Eugene Joseph ◽  
Malgorzata Jaremko ◽  
Gregory Kellogg ◽  
Robert Wisotzkey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Hereditary Cancers ◽  
1000 Genomes ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
End To End ◽  
Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Generation Sequencing

e13105 Background: Diagnosis of hereditary cancer syndromes involves time-consuming comprehensive clinical and laboratory work-up, however, timely and accurate diagnosis is pivotal to the clinical management of cancer patients. Germline genetic testing has shown to facilitate the diagnostic process, allowing for identification and management of individuals at risk for inherited cancers. However, the laboratory diagnostics process requires not only development and validation of comprehensive gene panels to improve diagnostic yields, but a quality driven workflow including an end-to-end bioinformatics pipeline, and a robust process for variant classification. We will present a gene panel for the evaluation of hereditary cancer syndromes, conducted utilizing our novel end-to-end workflow, and validated in the CLIA-approved environment. Methods: A targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel consisting of 130 genes, including exons, promoters, 5’-UTRs, 3’-UTRs and selected introns, was designed to include genes associated with hereditary cancers. The assay was validated using samples from the 1000 genomes project and samples with known pathogenic variants. Elements software was utilized for end-to-end bioinformatic process ensuring adherence with the CLIA quality standards, and supporting manual curation of sequence variants. Results: Preliminary data from our current panel of genes associated with hereditary cancer syndromes revealed high sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Accuracy was confirmed by analysis of known SNVs, indels, and CNVs using 1000 Genomes and samples carrying pathogenic variants. The bioinformatics software allowed for an end-to-end quality controlled process of handling and analyzing of the NGS data, showing applicability for a clinical laboratory workflow. Conclusions: We have developed a comprehensive and accurate genetic testing process based on an automated and quality driven bioinformatics workflow that can be used to identify clinically important variants in genes associated with hereditary cancers. It's performance allows for implementation in the clinical laboratory setting.

scholarly journals Advanced adenomas may be a red flag for hereditary cancer syndromes

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Swati G. Patel ◽  
Heather Hampel ◽  
Derek Smith ◽  
Dexiang Gao ◽  
Myles Cockburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Personal History ◽  
Advanced Adenoma ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
History Of ◽  
Red Flag ◽  
Advanced Adenomas ◽  
Cancer Syndromes

Abstract Background 16–25% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) diagnosed under age 50 are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. Advanced adenomas are considered precursors to CRC. Although polyp removal prevents cancer, polypectomy does not change underlying genetic risk. Patients with isolated advanced polyps do not currently qualify for genetic testing unless they have a personal or family history of cancer. Aim Describe the prevalence of hereditary cancer syndromes among patients with advanced colorectal polyps. Methods We performed a single center retrospective review from 2015 to 2019 of patients who underwent germline genetic testing with indication for testing listed as colorectal polyp. We excluded patients with a personal history of CRC and those with ≥10 cumulative polyps. We collected patient demographics, polyp characteristics, family history data and genetic testing results from the medical record. Discrete variables were reported as frequency and percentages and continuous variables reported as mean with range. Results A total of 42 patients underwent genetic testing due to a personal history of advanced adenoma. 17% of patients met current genetic testing criteria. All patients underwent multi-gene panel testing. Two patients (4.8%) had a germline pathogenic mutation (one in MLH1 and one in CHEK2). The patient with an MLH1 mutation met current criteria for genetic testing (PREMM5 score 5.8), however the patient with the CHEK2 mutation did not. Both mutation carriers had a personal history of synchronous or metachronous advanced adenomas. 38% had a variant of uncertain significance. Conclusions 5% of patients with advanced adenomas in our retrospective series had a pathogenic germline mutation in a cancer predisposition gene. Though the patient with a pathogenic mutation in MLH1 met current clinical criteria for genetic testing, this was not recognized prior to referral; he was referred based on a personal history of advanced adenoma. Advanced polyps may be a red flag to identify patients who are at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes.

scholarly journals Co‐occurrence of germline pathogenic variants for different hereditary cancer syndromes in patients with Lynch syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-228
Author(s):  
Rosario Ferrer‐Avargues ◽  
María Isabel Castillejo ◽  
Estela Dámaso ◽  
Virginia Díez‐Obrero ◽  
Noemí Garrigos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Syndromes

scholarly journals The importance to update the guidelines for the use of genetic testing in noncancer patients in Brazil

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tirzah Braz Petta Lajus
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Private Health Insurance ◽  
Breast Lesion ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
History Of ◽  
National Regulatory Agency ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
History Of Cancer

The Brazilian National Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance and Plans has recently published a technical note defining the criteria for the coverage of genetic testing to diagnose hereditary cancer. In this study we show the case of a patient with a breast lesion and an extensive history of cancer referred to a private service of genetic counseling. The patient met both criteria for hereditary breast and colorectal cancer syndrome screening. Her private insurance denied coverage for genetic testing because she lacks current or previous cancer diagnosis. After she appealed by lawsuit, the court was favorable and the test was performed using next-generation sequencing. A deletion of MLH1 exon 8 was found. We highlight the importance to offer genetic testing using multigene analysis for noncancer patients.

Genetic Characterization of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Based on Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Pelin Ercoskun ◽  
Cigdem Yuce Kahraman ◽  
Guller Ozkan ◽  
Abdulgani Tatar
Keyword(s):  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Novel Variants ◽  
Genetics And Genomics ◽  
Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Generation Sequencing

A hereditary cancer syndrome is a genetic predisposition to cancer caused by a germline mutation in cancer-related genes. Identifying the disease-causing variant is important for both the patient and relatives at risk in cancer families because this could be a guide in treatment and secondary cancer prevention. In this study, hereditary cancer panel harboring cancer-related genes was performed on MiSeq Illumina NGS system from peripheral blood samples. Sequencing files were fed into a cloud-based data analysis pipeline. Reportable variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Three hundred five individuals were included in the study. Different pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in 75 individuals. The majority of these variants were in the <i>MUTYH</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, and <i>CHEK2</i> genes. Nine novel pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in <i>BRCA1</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>GALNT12</i>, <i>ATM</i>, <i>MLH1</i>, <i>MSH2</i>, <i>APC</i>, and <i>KIT</i> genes. We obtained interesting and novel variants which could be related to hereditary cancer, and this study confirmed that NGS is an indispensable method for the risk assessment in cancer families.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document