scholarly journals Organellar Gene Expression and Acclimation of Plants to Environmental Stress

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Leister ◽  
Liangsheng Wang ◽  
Tatjana Kleine
2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (29) ◽  
pp. 17031-17040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allegra Terhorst ◽  
Arzu Sandikci ◽  
Abigail Keller ◽  
Charles A. Whittaker ◽  
Maitreya J. Dunham ◽  
...  

Aneuploidy, a condition characterized by whole chromosome gains and losses, is often associated with significant cellular stress and decreased fitness. However, how cells respond to the aneuploid state has remained controversial. In aneuploid budding yeast, two opposing gene-expression patterns have been reported: the “environmental stress response” (ESR) and the “common aneuploidy gene-expression” (CAGE) signature, in which many ESR genes are oppositely regulated. Here, we investigate this controversy. We show that the CAGE signature is not an aneuploidy-specific gene-expression signature but the result of normalizing the gene-expression profile of actively proliferating aneuploid cells to that of euploid cells grown into stationary phase. Because growth into stationary phase is among the strongest inducers of the ESR, the ESR in aneuploid cells was masked when stationary phase euploid cells were used for normalization in transcriptomic studies. When exponentially growing euploid cells are used in gene-expression comparisons with aneuploid cells, the CAGE signature is no longer evident in aneuploid cells. Instead, aneuploid cells exhibit the ESR. We further show that the ESR causes selective ribosome loss in aneuploid cells, providing an explanation for the decreased cellular density of aneuploid cells. We conclude that aneuploid budding yeast cells mount the ESR, rather than the CAGE signature, in response to aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses, resulting in selective ribosome loss. We propose that the ESR serves two purposes in aneuploid cells: protecting cells from aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses and preventing excessive cellular enlargement during slowed cell cycles by down-regulating translation capacity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1986-1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai Slavov ◽  
Edoardo M. Airoldi ◽  
Alexander van Oudenaarden ◽  
David Botstein

The respiratory metabolic cycle in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) consists of two phases that are most simply defined phenomenologically: low oxygen consumption (LOC) and high oxygen consumption (HOC). Each phase is associated with the periodic expression of thousands of genes, producing oscillating patterns of gene expression found in synchronized cultures and in single cells of slowly growing unsynchronized cultures. Systematic variation in the durations of the HOC and LOC phases can account quantitatively for well-studied transcriptional responses to growth rate differences. Here we show that a similar mechanism—transitions from the HOC phase to the LOC phase—can account for much of the common environmental stress response (ESR) and for the cross-protection by a preliminary heat stress (or slow growth rate) to subsequent lethal heat stress. Similar to the budding yeast metabolic cycle, we suggest that a metabolic cycle, coupled in a similar way to the ESR, in the distantly related fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and in humans can explain gene expression and respiratory patterns observed in these eukaryotes. Although metabolic cycling is associated with the G0/G1 phase of the cell division cycle of slowly growing budding yeast, transcriptional cycling was detected in the G2 phase of the division cycle in fission yeast, consistent with the idea that respiratory metabolic cycling occurs during the phases of the cell division cycle associated with mass accumulation in these divergent eukaryotes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette B Moss ◽  
Christopher B Cunningham ◽  
Elizabeth C McKinney ◽  
Allen J. Moore

Parenting buffers offspring from hostile environments, but it is not clear how or if the genes that underlie parenting change their expression under environmental stress. We recently demonstrated that for the subsocial carrion beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis, temperature during parenting does not affect parenting phenotypes. Here, we ask if transcriptional changes associated with parenting are likewise robust to environmental stress. The absence of a transcriptional response for parenting under stress would suggest that the genetic programs for parenting and being parented are canalized. Conversely, a robust transcriptional response would suggest that plasticity of underlying gene expression is critical for maintaining behavioral stability, and that these mechanisms provide a potential target for selection in the face of environmental change. We test these alternatives by characterizing gene expression of parents and offspring with and without parent-offspring interactions under a benign and a stressful temperature. We found that parent-offspring interactions elicit distinct transcriptional responses of parents and larvae irrespective of temperature. We further detected robust changes of gene expression in beetles breeding at 24 degrees C compared to 20 degrees C irrespective of family interaction. However, no strong interaction between parent-offspring interaction and temperature was detected for either parents or larvae. We therefore conclude that canalization, not plasticity of gene expression, most likely explains the absence of behavioral plasticity under thermal stress. This result suggests that species may not have the genetic variation needed to respond to all environmental change, especially for complex phenotypes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document