scholarly journals A conserved cell growth cycle can account for the environmental stress responses of divergent eukaryotes

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1986-1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai Slavov ◽  
Edoardo M. Airoldi ◽  
Alexander van Oudenaarden ◽  
David Botstein
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Environmental Stress ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Metabolic Cycle

The respiratory metabolic cycle in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) consists of two phases that are most simply defined phenomenologically: low oxygen consumption (LOC) and high oxygen consumption (HOC). Each phase is associated with the periodic expression of thousands of genes, producing oscillating patterns of gene expression found in synchronized cultures and in single cells of slowly growing unsynchronized cultures. Systematic variation in the durations of the HOC and LOC phases can account quantitatively for well-studied transcriptional responses to growth rate differences. Here we show that a similar mechanism—transitions from the HOC phase to the LOC phase—can account for much of the common environmental stress response (ESR) and for the cross-protection by a preliminary heat stress (or slow growth rate) to subsequent lethal heat stress. Similar to the budding yeast metabolic cycle, we suggest that a metabolic cycle, coupled in a similar way to the ESR, in the distantly related fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and in humans can explain gene expression and respiratory patterns observed in these eukaryotes. Although metabolic cycling is associated with the G0/G1 phase of the cell division cycle of slowly growing budding yeast, transcriptional cycling was detected in the G2 phase of the division cycle in fission yeast, consistent with the idea that respiratory metabolic cycling occurs during the phases of the cell division cycle associated with mass accumulation in these divergent eukaryotes.

scholarly journals Coupling among growth rate response, metabolic cycle, and cell division cycle in yeast

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1997-2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai Slavov ◽  
David Botstein
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Carbon Source ◽  
Oxidative Metabolism ◽  
Sole Source ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Steady State Responses ◽  
Yeast Metabolic Cycle ◽  
Metabolic Cycle

We studied the steady-state responses to changes in growth rate of yeast when ethanol is the sole source of carbon and energy. Analysis of these data, together with data from studies where glucose was the carbon source, allowed us to distinguish a “universal” growth rate response (GRR) common to all media studied from a GRR specific to the carbon source. Genes with positive universal GRR include ribosomal, translation, and mitochondrial genes, and those with negative GRR include autophagy, vacuolar, and stress response genes. The carbon source–specific GRR genes control mitochondrial function, peroxisomes, and synthesis of vitamins and cofactors, suggesting this response may reflect the intensity of oxidative metabolism. All genes with universal GRR, which comprise 25% of the genome, are expressed periodically in the yeast metabolic cycle (YMC). We propose that the universal GRR may be accounted for by changes in the relative durations of the YMC phases. This idea is supported by oxygen consumption data from metabolically synchronized cultures with doubling times ranging from 5 to 14 h. We found that the high oxygen consumption phase of the YMC can coincide exactly with the S phase of the cell division cycle, suggesting that oxidative metabolism and DNA replication are not incompatible.

scholarly journals Extensive Regulation of Metabolism and Growth during the Cell Division Cycle

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai Slavov ◽  
David Botstein ◽  
Amy Caudy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Emergent Behavior ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Physiological Data ◽  
Synchronized Cultures ◽  
Metabolic Cycle

Yeast cells grown in culture can spontaneously synchronize their respiration, metabolism, gene expression and cell division. Such metabolic oscillations in synchronized cultures reflect single-cell oscillations, but the relationship between the oscillations in single cells and synchronized cultures is poorly understood. To understand this relationship and the coordination between metabolism and cell division, we collected and analyzed DNA-content, gene-expression and physiological data, at hundreds of time-points, from cultures metabolically-synchronized at different growth rates, carbon sources and biomass densities. The data enabled us to extend and generalize our mechanistic model, based on ensemble average over phases (EAP), connecting the population-average gene-expression of asynchronous cultures to the gene-expression dynamics in the single-cells comprising the cultures. The extended model explains the carbon-source specific growth-rate responses of hundreds of genes. Our physiological data demonstrate that the frequency of metabolic cycling in synchronized cultures increases with the biomass density, suggesting that this cycling is an emergent behavior, resulting from the entraining of the single-cell metabolic cycle by a quorum-sensing mechanism, and thus underscoring the difference between metabolic cycling in single cells and in synchronized cultures. Measurements of constant levels of residual glucose across metabolically synchronized cultures indicate that storage carbohydrates are required to fuel not only the G1/S transition of the division cycle but also the metabolic cycle. Despite the large variation in profiled conditions and in the scale of their dynamics, most genes preserve invariant dynamics of coordination with each other and with the rate of oxygen consumption. Similarly, the G1/S transition always occurs at the beginning, middle or end of the high oxygen consumption phases, analogous to observations in human and drosophila cells. These results highlight evolutionary conserved coordination among metabolism, cell growth and division.

scholarly journals Mathematical model of the cell division cycle of fission yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bela Novak ◽  
Zsuzsa Pataki ◽  
Andrea Ciliberto ◽  
John J. Tyson
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Division Cycle

scholarly journals Functional Comparison of the Tup11 and Tup12 Transcriptional Corepressors in Fission Yeast

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 716-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik Fagerström-Billai ◽  
Anthony P. H. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Duplication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Functional Difference ◽  
Evolutionary Mechanism ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Number Of Genes ◽  
Transcriptional Corepressors ◽  
Genome Wide Gene Expression

ABSTRACT Gene duplication is considered an important evolutionary mechanism. Unlike many characterized species, the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains two paralogous genes, tup11 + and tup12 + , that encode transcriptional corepressors similar to the well-characterized budding yeast Tup1 protein. Previous reports have suggested that Tup11 and Tup12 proteins play redundant roles. Consistently, we show that the two Tup proteins can interact together when expressed at normal levels and that each can independently interact with the Ssn6 protein, as seen for Tup1 in budding yeast. However, tup11 − and tup12 − mutants have different phenotypes on media containing KCl and CaCl2. Consistent with the functional difference between tup11 − and tup12 − mutants, we identified a number of genes in genome-wide gene expression experiments that are differentially affected by mutations in the tup11 + and tup12 + genes. Many of these genes are differentially derepressed in tup11 − mutants and are over-represented in genes that have previously been shown to respond to a range of different stress conditions. Genes specifically derepressed in tup12 − mutants require the Ssn6 protein for their repression. As for Tup12, Ssn6 is also required for efficient adaptation to KCl- and CaCl2-mediated stress. We conclude that Tup11 and Tup12 are at least partly functionally diverged and suggest that the Tup12 and Ssn6 proteins have adopted a specific role in regulation of the stress response.

scholarly journals The environmental stress response causes ribosome loss in aneuploid yeast cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (29) ◽  
pp. 17031-17040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allegra Terhorst ◽  
Arzu Sandikci ◽  
Abigail Keller ◽  
Charles A. Whittaker ◽  
Maitreya J. Dunham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Environmental Stress ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Environmental Stress Response ◽  
Cellular Stresses

Aneuploidy, a condition characterized by whole chromosome gains and losses, is often associated with significant cellular stress and decreased fitness. However, how cells respond to the aneuploid state has remained controversial. In aneuploid budding yeast, two opposing gene-expression patterns have been reported: the “environmental stress response” (ESR) and the “common aneuploidy gene-expression” (CAGE) signature, in which many ESR genes are oppositely regulated. Here, we investigate this controversy. We show that the CAGE signature is not an aneuploidy-specific gene-expression signature but the result of normalizing the gene-expression profile of actively proliferating aneuploid cells to that of euploid cells grown into stationary phase. Because growth into stationary phase is among the strongest inducers of the ESR, the ESR in aneuploid cells was masked when stationary phase euploid cells were used for normalization in transcriptomic studies. When exponentially growing euploid cells are used in gene-expression comparisons with aneuploid cells, the CAGE signature is no longer evident in aneuploid cells. Instead, aneuploid cells exhibit the ESR. We further show that the ESR causes selective ribosome loss in aneuploid cells, providing an explanation for the decreased cellular density of aneuploid cells. We conclude that aneuploid budding yeast cells mount the ESR, rather than the CAGE signature, in response to aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses, resulting in selective ribosome loss. We propose that the ESR serves two purposes in aneuploid cells: protecting cells from aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses and preventing excessive cellular enlargement during slowed cell cycles by down-regulating translation capacity.

scholarly journals Cell cycle Start is coupled to entry into the yeast metabolic cycle across diverse strains and growth rates

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Burnetti ◽  
Mert Aydin ◽  
Nicolas E. Buchler
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Quantitative Relationship ◽  
High Temporal Resolution ◽  
Different Strains ◽  
Yeast Metabolic Cycle ◽  
Metabolic Cycle

Cells have evolved oscillators with different frequencies to coordinate periodic processes. Here we studied the interaction of two oscillators, the cell division cycle (CDC) and the yeast metabolic cycle (YMC), in budding yeast. Previous work suggested that the CDC and YMC interact to separate high oxygen consumption (HOC) from DNA replication to prevent genetic damage. To test this hypothesis, we grew diverse strains in chemostat and measured DNA replication and oxygen consumption with high temporal resolution at different growth rates. Our data showed that HOC is not strictly separated from DNA replication; rather, cell cycle Start is coupled with the initiation of HOC and catabolism of storage carbohydrates. The logic of this YMC–CDC coupling may be to ensure that DNA replication and cell division occur only when sufficient cellular energy reserves have accumulated. Our results also uncovered a quantitative relationship between CDC period and YMC period across different strains. More generally, our approach shows how studies in genetically diverse strains efficiently identify robust phenotypes and steer the experimentalist away from strain-specific idiosyncrasies.

Phosphorylation of Cdc28 and regulation of cell size by the protein kinase CKII in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2000 ◽  
Vol 351 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Luigi RUSSO ◽  
Christian VAN DEN BOS ◽  
Ann SUTTON ◽  
Paola COCCETTI ◽  
Maurizio D. BARONI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Peptide Mapping ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Kinase Ckii

The CDK (cyclin-dependent kinase) family of enzymes is required for the G1-to-S-phase and G2-to-M-phase transitions during the cell-division cycle of eukaryotes. We have shown previously that the protein kinase CKII catalyses the phosphorylation of Ser-39 in Cdc2 during the G1 phase of the HeLa cell-division cycle [Russo, Vandenberg, Yu, Bae, Franza and Marshak (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20317–20325]. To identify a functional role for this phosphorylation, we have studied the homologous enzymes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The S. cerevisiae homologue of Cdc2, Cdc28, contains a consensus CKII site (Ser-46), which is homologous with that of human Cdc2. Using in vitro kinase assays, metabolic labelling, peptide mapping and phosphoamino acid analysis, we demonstrate that this site is phosphorylated in Cdc28 in vivo as well in vitro. In addition, S. cerevisiae cells in which Ser-46 has been mutated to alanine show a decrease in both cell volume and protein content of 33%, and this effect is most pronounced in the stationary phase. Because cell size in S. cerevisiae is regulated primarily at the G1 stage, we suggest that CKII contributes to the regulation of the cell cycle in budding yeast by phosphorylation of Cdc28 as a checkpoint for G1 progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document