scholarly journals Prevalence and Correlates of Cardiovascular Calcification and Its Prognostic Effects Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Results From the C-STRIDE Study

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Wang ◽  
Hong Cheng ◽  
Xinrong Zou ◽  
Jun Yuan ◽  
Wenjing Wu ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics and risk factors for cardiovascular calcification, and its relationship to prognosis, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1–4.Methods: Cardiovascular calcification was evaluated at baseline by lateral abdominal radiography to detect abdominal aortic calcifications (AAC), and by echocardiogram to detect cardiac valvular calcifications (CVC), respectively. Demographic and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression model was used to explore the factors associated with the indicators of cardiovascular calcification, while Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between AAC/CVC and incidence of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.Results: A subgroup of 2,235 patients with measurement of AAC in the C-STRIDE study and a subgroup of 2,756 patients with CVC were included in the analysis. AAC was present in 206 patients (9.22%) and CVC was present in 163 patients (5.91%). Age, gender, history of cardiovascular diseases, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, levels of hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and uric acid were associated with prevalence of AAC, while only age, history of cardiovascular diseases, levels of serum albumin and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were associated with prevalence of CVC (all p < 0.05).Survival analyses showed that cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality were significantly greater in patients with AACor with CVC (all p-values for log-rank tests <0.05). After adjustment for age, sex and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), AAC was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.67[95% confidence interval: 0.99, 2.79]), while CVC associated with that of cardiovascular events only among patients with comparatively normal eGFR (≥45 ml/min/1.73m2) (hazard ratio = 1.99 [0.98, 4.03]).Conclusion: Demographic and traditional cardiovascular risk factors were associated with cardiovascular calcification, especially AAC. AAC may be associated with risk of death for patients CKD of any severity, while CVC as a possible risk factor for cardiovascular disease only among those with mild to moderate CKD. Assessments of vascular calcification are need to be advanced to patients in the early and middle stages of chronic kidney disease and to initiate appropriate preventive measures earlier.

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jui-Ting Hsiung ◽  
Maria Marroquin ◽  
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh

Background: Studies suggests that in the general population, hyperlipidemia may confer higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD). But, there is conflicting data as to whether statins can protect renal function or slow renal degradation. We sought to examine the impact of statins on the association of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) and risk of incident CKD. Methods: Our cohort included 1,439,756 US veterans without chronic kidney disease (CKD), but with LDL measured between 2004-2006, who were followed until 2014. Incident CKD was defined as over 3 estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements <60 mL/min/1.73m 2 at least 90 days apart. Patients with a statin prescription at the time of LDL measurement were identified. Cox models were used to estimate the associations between LDL with incident CKD. Model adjustments include demographics, comorbidities, smoking status, prescription of fibrate or niacin, body mass index, albumin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. Results: The cohort included 5% females, 16% African Americans, 26% diabetics, and 30% statin-users, with a mean age of 60±13 years. The median [IQR] of LDL and eGFR were 109 [88,133] mg/dL and 83 [72,94] mL/min/1.73m 2 , respectively. A J-shaped association between LDL and incident CKD were observed in both those on statin and not on a statin after adjustment. Low LDL (<70 mg/dL) was associated with a higher risk of incident CKD compared to the reference (LDL 70-<100 mg/dL) regardless of statin use. High LDL ≥160 mg/dL was associated with the highest of risks of incident CKD (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.13, and HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.12, for statin use and no statin use, respectively). Conclusion: Both high and low LDL were associated with higher incident CKD risk independent of statin use in this US veteran cohort. Further studies are needed to understand how to manage cardiovascular disease risk by lowering LDL while simultaneously reducing risk of CKD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (31) ◽  
pp. 2952-2961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M Ridker ◽  
Jean G MacFadyen ◽  
Robert J Glynn ◽  
Gary Bradwin ◽  
Ahmed A Hasan ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims In epidemiologic cohorts initiated &gt;30 years ago, inflammatory biomarkers, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were shown to independently predict future cardiovascular events with a magnitude of effect comparable to that of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC). Whether aggressive contemporary therapy for atherosclerosis has altered these relationships is unknown yet has major implications for future drug development. Methods and results Interleukin-6, hsCRP, and LDLC were measured at baseline in up to 4168 North American patients enrolled in the contemporary Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial with prior myocardial infarction or multivessel coronary disease who additionally had diabetes or metabolic syndrome and were followed for a period of up to 5 years for incident major recurrent cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Three-quarters of the cohort were previously revascularized and the great majority was taking statins, angiotensin blocking agents, beta-blockers, and antithrombotic agents. Participants were randomly allocated to low-dose methotrexate 15 mg weekly or to placebo. Randomized use of methotrexate had no effect on event rates nor plasma levels of IL-6, hsCRP, or LDL over time. Yet, baseline levels of IL-6, hsCRP, and LDLC were all predictors of major recurrent cardiovascular events; adjusted hazard ratios [HR; 95% confidence interval (CI)] for the lowest to highest baseline quartiles of IL-6 were 1.0 (referent), 1.66 (1.18–2.35), 1.92 (1.36–2.70), and 2.11 (1.49–2.99; P &lt; 0.0001), while adjusted HRs for increasing quartiles of hsCRP were 1.0 (referent), 1.28 (0.92–1.79), 1.73 (1.25–2.38), and 1.79 (1.28–2.50; P &lt; 0.0001) and adjusted HRs for increasing quartiles of LDLC were 1.0 (referent), 1.12 (0.78–1.62), 1.25 (0.87–1.79), and 2.38 (1.72–3.30; P &lt; 0.0001). Effect estimates were not statistically different in these analyses for comparisons between IL-6, hsCRP, or LDLC, although IL-6 was the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality. The highest absolute risks were observed among those with elevated levels of both cholesterol and inflammation [HR 6.4 (95% CI 2.9–14.1) for those in the top quartiles of baseline IL-6 and LDLC, HR 4.9 (95% CI 2.6–9.4) for those in the top quartiles of baseline hsCRP and LDLC, both P &lt; 0.0001]. Conclusion Despite aggressive contemporary secondary prevention efforts, the relationships between inflammation, cholesterol, and cardiovascular risk are largely unchanged from those described two decades ago. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that future treatments for atherosclerosis may require a combination of inflammation inhibition and additional cholesterol reduction. Clinical trial ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01594333.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Kawamoto ◽  
Asuka Kikuchi ◽  
Taichi Akase ◽  
Daisuke Ninomiya ◽  
Teru Kumagi

Abstract Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) independently impacts aging-related health outcomes and plays a critical role in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, there are limited predictive data on all-cause mortality, especially for the Japanese community population. In this study, it was examined whether LDL-C is related to survival prognosis based on 7 or 10 years of follow-up.Methods: Participants included 1,610 men (63 ± 14 years old) and 2,074 women (65 ± 12 years old) who participated in the Nomura cohort study conducted in 2002 (first cohort) and 2014 (second cohort) and who continued throughout the follow-up periods (follow-up rates: 94.8% and 98.0%). Adjusted relative risk estimates were obtained for all-cause mortality using a basic resident register. The data were analyzed by a Cox regression with age as the time variable and risk factors including gender; age; body mass index (BMI); presence of diabetes; lipid levels; renal function; serum uric acid levels; blood pressure; and history of smoking, drinking, and CVD.Results: Of the 3,684 participants, 326 (8.8%) were confirmed to be deceased. Of these, 180 were men (11.2% of all men) and 146 were women (7.0% of all women). The univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality significantly increased with a decrease in LDL-C level (P < 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression analysis with adjustment variables showed that LDL-C grouping (HR: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62–0.82), gender (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51–0.93), age (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.08–1.11), BMI (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54–0.86), history of CVD (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.03–1.82), and presence of diabetes (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.23–2.22) were significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Compared with individuals with LDL-C levels of 144 mg/dL or higher, the multivariate-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for all-cause mortality were 2.68 (1.67–4.28) for those with LDL-C levels under 70 mg/dL and 1.74 (1.17–2.59) for those with LDL-C levels between 70 and 92 mg/dL. Conclusions: There is an inverse relationship between the risk of all-cause mortality and LDL-C level, and this association is statistically significant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document