scholarly journals Experimental Protocol to Test Explicit Motor Learning–Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Ortelli ◽  
Davide Ferrazzoli ◽  
Roberto Maestri ◽  
Leopold Saltuari ◽  
Markus Kofler ◽  
...  

Implicit and explicit motor learning processes work interactively in everyday life to promote the creation of highly automatized motor behaviors. The cerebellum is crucial for motor sequence learning and adaptation, as it contributes to the error correction and to sensorimotor integration of on-going actions. A non-invasive cerebellar stimulation has been demonstrated to modulate implicit motor learning and adaptation. The present study aimed to explore the potential role of cerebellar theta burst stimulation (TBS) in modulating explicit motor learning and adaptation, in healthy subjects. Cerebellar TBS will be applied immediately before the learning phase of a computerized task based on a modified Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) paradigm. Here, we present a study protocol aimed at evaluating the behavioral effects of continuous (cTBS), intermittent TBS (iTBS), or sham Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) on four different conditions: learning, adaptation, delayed recall and re-adaptation of SRTT. We are confident to find modulation of SRTT performance induced by cerebellar TBS, in particular, processing acceleration and reduction of error in all the conditions induced by cerebellar iTBS, as already known for implicit processes. On the other hand, we expect that cerebellar cTBS could induce opposite effects. Results from this protocol are supposed to advance the knowledge about the role of non-invasive cerebellar modulation in neurorehabilitation, providing clinicians with useful data for further exploiting this technique in different clinical conditions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. McCalley ◽  
Daniel H. Lench ◽  
Jade D. Doolittle ◽  
Julia P. Imperatore ◽  
Michaela Hoffman ◽  
...  

AbstractTheta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a form of non-invasive neuromodulation which is delivered in an intermittent (iTBS) or continuous (cTBS) manner. Although 600 pulses is the most common dose, the goal of these experiments was to evaluate the effect of higher per-dose pulse numbers on cortical excitability. Sixty individuals were recruited for 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, participants received 600, 1200, 1800, or sham (600) iTBS (4 visits, counterbalanced, left motor cortex, 80% active threshold). In Experiment 2, participants received 600, 1200, 1800, 3600, or sham (600) cTBS (5 visits, counterbalanced). Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were measured in 10-min increments for 60 min. For iTBS, there was a significant interaction between dose and time (F = 3.8296, p = 0.01), driven by iTBS (1200) which decreased excitability for up to 50 min (t = 3.1267, p = 0.001). For cTBS, there was no overall interaction between dose and time (F = 1.1513, p = 0.33). Relative to sham, cTBS (3600) increased excitability for up to 60 min (t = 2.0880, p = 0.04). There were no other significant effects of dose relative to sham in either experiment. Secondary analyses revealed high within and between subject variability. These results suggest that iTBS (1200) and cTBS (3600) are, respectively, the most effective doses for decreasing and increasing cortical excitability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 131 (11) ◽  
pp. 2691-2699
Author(s):  
Andrea Guerra ◽  
Francesco Asci ◽  
Alessandro Zampogna ◽  
Valentina D'Onofrio ◽  
Simona Petrucci ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (17) ◽  
pp. 3922
Author(s):  
Ivana Stevanovic ◽  
Milica Ninkovic ◽  
Bojana Mancic ◽  
Marija Milivojevic ◽  
Ivana Stojanovic ◽  
...  

Cortical theta burst stimulation (TBS) structured as intermittent (iTBS) and continuous (cTBS) could prevent the progression of the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). The interplay of brain antioxidant defense systems against free radicals (FRs) overproduction induced by EAE, as well as during iTBS or cTBS, have not been entirely investigated. This study aimed to examine whether oxidative-nitrogen stress (ONS) is one of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of EAE, which may be changed in terms of health improvement by iTBS or cTBS. Dark Agouti strain female rats were tested for the effects of EAE and TBS. The rats were randomly divided into the control group, rats specifically immunized for EAE and nonspecifically immuno-stimulated with Complete Freund’s adjuvant. TBS or sham TBS was applied to EAE rats from 14th–24th post-immunization day. Superoxide dismutase activity, levels of superoxide anion (O2•–), lipid peroxidation, glutathione (GSH), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) activity were analyzed in rat spinal cords homogenates. The severity of EAE clinical coincided with the climax of ONS. The most critical result refers to TrxR, which immensely responded against the applied stressors of the central nervous system (CNS), including immunization and TBS. We found that the compensatory neuroprotective role of TrxR upregulation is a positive feedback mechanism that reduces the harmfulness of ONS. iTBS and cTBS both modulate the biochemical environment against ONS at a distance from the area of stimulation, alleviating symptoms of EAE. The results of our study increase the understanding of FRs’ interplay and the role of Trx/TrxR in ONS-associated neuroinflammatory diseases, such as EAE. Also, our results might help the development of new ideas for designing more effective medical treatment, combining neuropsychological with noninvasive neurostimulation–neuromodulation techniques to patients living with MS.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 963-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Michael ◽  
Kristian Sandberg ◽  
Joshua Skewes ◽  
Thomas Wolf ◽  
Jakob Blicher ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tino Stöckel ◽  
Jeffery J. Summers ◽  
Mark R. Hinder

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has the potential to enhance corticospinal excitability (CSE) and subsequent motor learning. However, the effects of iTBS following motor learning are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to explore the effect of iTBS on CSE and performance following motor learning. Therefore twenty-four healthy participants practiced a ballistic motor task for a total of 150 movements. iTBS was subsequently applied to the trained motor cortex (STIM group) or the vertex (SHAM group). Performance and CSE were assessed before motor learning and before and after iTBS. Training significantly increased performance and CSE in both groups. In STIM group participants, subsequent iTBS significantly reduced motor performance with smaller reductions in CSE. CSE changes as a result of motor learning were negatively correlated with both the CSE changes and performance changes as a result of iTBS. No significant effects of iTBS were found for SHAM group participants. We conclude that iTBS has the potential to degrade prior motor learning as a function of training-induced CSE changes. That means the expected LTP-like effects of iTBS are reversed following motor learning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 510
Author(s):  
T. Poppa Fioretti ◽  
S. de Witte ◽  
M. Vanderhasselt ◽  
A. Bechara ◽  
C. Baeken

2007 ◽  
Vol 118 (8) ◽  
pp. 1815-1823 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Talelli ◽  
B.J. Cheeran ◽  
J.T.H. Teo ◽  
J.C. Rothwell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document