Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Traumatic Fractures

Background: Traumatic fracture is a common orthopaedic disease, and application of 3D printing technology in fracture treatment, which entails utilisation of pre-operative printed anatomic fracture model, is increasingly gaining popularity. However, effectiveness of 3D printing-assisted surgery lacks evidence-based findings to support its application.Materials and Methods: Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched until October, 2020 to identify relevant studies. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy of 3D printing-assisted surgery vs. conventional surgery for traumatic fractures were reviewed. RevMan V.5.3 software was used to conduct meta-analysis.Results: A total of 12 RCTs involving 641 patients were included. Pooled findings showed that 3D printing-assisted surgery had shorter operation duration [standardised mean difference (SMD) = −1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) – 1.70 ~ −1.34, P < 0.00001], less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = 1.34, 95% CI 1.74 ~ 0.94, P < 0.00001), fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies (SMD = 1.25, 95% CI 1.64 ~ 0.87, P < 0.00001), shorter fracture union time (SMD = −0.15, 95% CI −0.25 ~ −0.05, P = 0.003), and higher rate of excellent outcomes (OR = 2.40, 95% CI 1.07 ~ 5.37, P = 0.03) compared with conventional surgery. No significant differences in complication rates were observed between the two types of surgery (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.69 ~ 1.42, P = 0.32).Conclusions: Indicators including operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, fracture union time, and rates of excellent outcomes showed that 3D printing-assisted surgery is a superior alternative in treatment of traumatic fractures compared with conventional surgery. Moreover, the current study did not report significant differences in incidence of complications between the two approaches.Systematic Review Registration: CRD42021239507.

Download Full-text

The efficacy of 3D printing-assisted surgery for traumatic fracture: a meta-analysis

Postgraduate Medical Journal ◽

10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-136482 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 95 (1126) ◽

pp. 414-419 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Liang Xiong ◽

Xiaoyang Li ◽

Hui Li ◽

Zhuoyuang Chen ◽

Tao Xiao

Keyword(s):

3D Printing ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Comparative Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Mean Difference ◽

Orthopaedic Trauma ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Conventional Surgery ◽

3D Printing Technology ◽

Operation Duration

BackgroundRecent years have witnessed a rapid development of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology applied in orthopaedic surgery. To be assisted by 3D printing is a potent method to realise accurate and individualised operation. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of 3D printing technology in the management of trauma fractures.MethodsPubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched up until January 2019 to identify relevant studies. All clinical studies comparing conventional surgery and 3D printing-assisted surgery in the management of orthopaedic trauma were obtained. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan V.5.3 software.ResultsFour randomised controlled trials, four retrospective comparative studies and two prospective comparative studies involving 521 patients were included. Compared with conventional surgery, 3D printing-assisted surgery leads to shorter operation duration (mean difference (MD) −16.59 (95% CI −18.60 to –14.58), p<0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (standardised mean difference (SMD) −1.02 (95% CI –1.25 to –0.79), p<0.001) and fewer intraoperative fluroscopies (SMD −2.20 (95% CI –2.50 to –1.90), p<0.001). However, 3D printing-assisted surgery leads to longer hospital stay (MD 2.51 (95% CI 0.31 to –4.72), p=0.03). No significant results were found regarding fracture healing time, the rate of excellent and good outcomes, anatomical reduction and complications.ConclusionsThese results suggest that 3D printing-assisted surgery outperforms conventional surgery in the management of orthopaedic trauma fractures with shorter operation duration, less intraoperative blood loss and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies.

Download Full-text

3D printing-assisted extended lateral approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-021-02832-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Guang Shi ◽

Wei Liu ◽

Ying Shen ◽

Xiyu Cai

Keyword(s):

3D Printing ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Lateral Approach ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Calcaneal Fractures ◽

Printing Technology ◽

3D Printing Technology ◽

Extended Lateral Approach

Abstract Background Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has developed rapidly in orthopaedic surgery and effectively achieves precise and personalized surgery. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of 3D printing technology in the management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DICFs) by extended lateral approach (ELA). Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and VANFUN databases were searched up to October 2020. All clinical studies comparing traditional surgery and 3D printing-assisted surgery in the management of DICFs were obtained, evaluating the quality of the included studies and extracting data. For each study, we assessed odds ratios (ORs), standard mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to assess and synthesize the outcomes. Results Three RCTs and nine retrospective studies involving 732 patients were included met our inclusion criteria with 366 patients in the 3D group and 366 patients in the conventional group. The meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences of the operative time in the 3D group [SMD = − 1.86, 95% CI (− 2.23, − 1.40), P < 0.001], intraoperative blood loss [SMD = − 1.26, 95% CI (− 1.82, − 0.69), P < 0.001], the number of intraoperative X-ray exposures [SMD = − 0.66, 95% CI (− 1.20, − 0.12), P < 0.001], postoperative complications [OR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.31, 0.79), P < 0.001], excellent and good rate of calcaneal fracture outcome [OR = 4.09, 95% CI (2.03, 8.22), P < 0.001]. Conclusion The current study indicates that 3D printing-assisted ELA surgery showed a better rate of excellent and good outcome, shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies, fewer complications. Besides, there is still a need for large-sample, high-quality, long-term randomized controlled trials to confirm the conclusion.

Download Full-text

Laparoscopic Major Gastrointestinal Surgery Is Safe for Properly Selected Patient with COPD: A Meta-Analysis

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2019/8280358 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Yulin Guo ◽

Feng Cao ◽

Yixuan Ding ◽

Haichen Sun ◽

Shuang Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽

Laparoscopic Approach ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Pulmonary Complications ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Chronic Obstructive ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss

Background. Laparoscopy has been widely applied in gastrointestinal surgery, with benefits such as less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery, and shorter length of hospital stay. However, it remains controversial if laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery could be conducted for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which was traditionally considered as an important risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. The present study was conducted to review and assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic major abdominal surgery for patient with COPD. Materials and Methods. Databases including PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane Library, and Wan-fang were searched for all years up to Jul 1, 2018. Studies comparing perioperative results for COPD patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery between laparoscopic and open approaches were enrolled. Results. Laparoscopic approach was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (MD = -174.03; 95% CI: −232.16 to -115.91, P < 0.00001; P < 0.00001, I2=93% for heterogeneity) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD = -3.30; 95% CI: −3.75 to -2.86, P < 0.00001; P = 0.99, I2=0% for heterogeneity). As for pulmonary complications, laparoscopic approach was associated with lower overall pulmonary complications rate (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.71, P < 0.00001; P = 0.42, I2=0% for heterogeneity) and lower postoperative pneumonia rate (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.67, P < 0.00001; P = 0.57, I2=0% for heterogeneity). Moreover, laparoscopic approach was associated with lower wound infection (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.63, P < 0.00001; P = 0.99, I2=0% for heterogeneity) and abdominal abscess rates (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.79, P < 0.0004; P = 0.24, I2=30% for heterogeneity). Conclusions. Laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery for properly selected COPD patient was safe and feasible, with shorter term benefits.

Download Full-text

Full-Endoscopic Procedures Versus Traditional Discectomy Surgery for Discectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Global Clinical Trials

January 2018 - Pain Physician ◽

10.36076/ppj/2019.19.103 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 3;19 (3;3) ◽

pp. 103-118

Author(s):

Chun-Ming Huang

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Postoperative Pain ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Return To Work ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Pooled Data ◽

Vas Score ◽

Matching Criteria

Background: Traditional discectomy surgery (TDS) provides good or excellent results in clinical surgical discectomy but may induce neural adhesion, spinal structural damage, instability, and other complications. The potential advantages of full-endoscopic (FE) procedures over standard TDS include less blood loss, less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, and an earlier return to work. However, more evidence is needed to support this new technology in clinical applications. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of FE and TDS. Study Design: Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, SinoMed, and Cochrane Library, were searched to identify clinical therapeutic trials comparing FE to TDS for discectomy. Results: Six trials comprising 730 patients were included, and the overall quality of the literature was moderate, including 4 Grade I levels of evidence (4 randomized controlled trials, [RCTs]) and 2 Grade II levels (2 non-RCTs). The pooled data revealed no difference in reoperation rates between FE and TDS (P = 0.94), but the complication rate was significantly lower in the FE group (3.86%) than in the TDS group (11.4%). Perioperative parameters (operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, and return to work days) were significantly lower in the FE group (P < 0.05 for all groups using either score). Postoperative pain and neurology score assessments were conducted at 4 different time points at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Significant differences were detected in the following: lumbar North American Spine Society (NASS) pain at 6 months (P = 0.008); cervical NASS neurology at 6 months (P = 0.03); visual analog scale (VAS) score in leg at 3 months (P < 0.001); VAS score in arm at 24 months (P = 0.002); VAS score in neck at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after therapy (P = 0.003, P = 0.004, P = 0.01); and VAS score in neck at 3 months and 6 months (P = 0.01, P = 0.004). Moreover, the pooled data revealed no statistically significant differences in improvements in the Oswestry disability index (ODI), instability (X-ray), and Hilibrand criteria (P > 0.05 for all groups). Limitations: Only 6 studies were included, 4 of which had the same authors. Between-study heterogeneity due to differences in socioeconomic factors, nutrition, and matching criteria is difficult to avoid. Conclusions: Based on this meta-analysis of 24 months of clinical results, we conclude that the FE procedure is as effective as TDS but has the additional benefits of lower complication rates and superior perioperative parameters. In addition, patients may experience less pain with FE techniques due to a smaller incision and less operative injury. However, large-volume, well-designed RCTs with extensive follow-up are needed to confirm and update the findings of this analysis. Key words: Full-endoscopic, minimally invasive, discectomy, meta-analysis

Download Full-text

Comparison of Survival and Safety Between Total Omentectomy and Partial Omentectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Surgery ◽

10.3389/fsurg.2021.708545 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

Author(s):

Yue-Xin Zhang ◽

Han-Dong Liu ◽

Ze-Hua Chen ◽

Tao Jin ◽

Jian-Kun Hu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Weighted Mean Difference ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Operation Time ◽

Greater Omentum ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Free Survival

Background: The greater omentum can limit abdominal inflammation and act as a protective cushion, but it is always involved in dissemination of gastric cancer. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the survival and safety between total omentectomy and partial omentectomy for gastric cancer.Methods: Two investigators independently conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Cochrane Library ranging from January 2000 to November 2020. The pooled odds ratio (ORs) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to assess perioperative and survival parameters.Results: A total of 2,031 patients in 11 studies (574 patients in the partial omentectomy group and 1,457 patients in the total omentectomy group) were included. The results found shorter operation time (WMD = −25.584; P = 0.000) and less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = −47.301; P = 0.050) in the partial omentectomy group, compared to total omentectomy. There were no significant differences in terms of incidence of complications (OR = 0.770; P = 0.164), blood transfusions rates (OR = 0.269; P = 0.161), time to first flatus (WMD = 0.160; P = 0.345), hospital stay (WMD = −1.258; P = 0.087), and number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 1.265; P = 0.662). For the disease-free survival (OR = 0.80; P = 0.381) and overall survival, there were no statistical differences between the two procedures.Conclusions: The partial omentectomy could reduce operation time and trended to decrease intraoperative blood loss. And the survival in patients with partial omentectomy seemed to be comparable to that of patients with total omentectomy.

Download Full-text

The effects of tourniquet use on blood loss in primary total knee arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-019-1422-4 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

D. F. Cai ◽

Q. H. Fan ◽

H. H. Zhong ◽

S. Peng ◽

H. Song

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Operation Time ◽

Postoperative Blood Loss ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Total Knee

Abstract Background The tourniquet is a common medical instrument used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there has always been a debate about the use of a tourniquet and there is no published meta-analysis to study the effects of a tourniquet on blood loss in primary TKA for patients with osteoarthritis. Methods We performed a literature review on high-quality clinical studies to determine the effects of using a tourniquet or not on blood loss in cemented TKA. PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to November 2018 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a meta-analysis following the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook. We used the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias of each trial. The statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager statistical software (version 5.3). Results Eleven RCTs involving 541 patients (541 knees) were included in this meta-analysis. There were 271 patients (271 knees) in the tourniquet group and 270 patients (270 knees) in the no tourniquet group. The results showed that using a tourniquet significantly decreased intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.002), calculated blood loss (P < 0.002), and the time of operation (P < 0.002), but tourniquet use did not significantly decrease postoperative blood loss (P > 0.05), total blood loss (P > 0.05), the rate of transfusion (P > 0.05), and of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (P > 0.05) in TKA. Conclusions Using a tourniquet can significantly decrease intraoperative blood loss, calculated blood loss, and operation time but does not significantly decrease the rate of transfusion or the rate of DVT in TKA. More research is needed to determine if there are fewer complications in TKA without the use of tourniquets.

Download Full-text

Laparoscopic procedure is associated with lower morbidity for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an updated meta-analysis

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-020-02018-z ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Long Pan ◽

Chenhao Tong ◽

Siyuan Fu ◽

Jing Fang ◽

Qiuxia Gu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Laparoscopic Surgery ◽

Postoperative Complications ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Effective Length ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Surgery Group ◽

Simultaneous Resection

Abstract Background It has been demonstrated that simultaneous resection of both primary colorectal lesion and metastatic hepatic lesion is a safe approach with low mortality and postoperative complication rates. However, there are some controversies over which kind of surgical approach is better. The aim of study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgeries and open surgeries for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM). Methods A systemic search of online database including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase was performed until June 5, 2019. Intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes were synthesized by using STATA, version 15.0. Cumulative and single-arm meta-analyses were also conducted. Results It contained twelve studies with 616 patients (273 vs 343, laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group, respectively) and manifested latest surgical results for the treatment of CRC and SCRLM. Among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries, they had lower rates of postoperative complications (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028), less intraoperative blood loss (weight mean difference (WMD) = − 113.31, 95% CI: − 189.03 to − 37.59, P = 0.003), less time in the hospital and recovering after surgeries (WMD = − 2.70, 95% CI: − 3.99 to − 1.40, P = 0.000; WMD = − 3.20, 95% CI: − 5.06 to − 1.34, P = 0.001), but more operating time (WMD = 36.57, 95% CI: 7.80 to 65.35, P = 0.013). Additionally, there were no statistical significance between two kinds of surgical approaches in disease-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, cumulative meta-analysis indicated statistical difference in favor of laparoscopic surgery in terms of morbidity was firstly detected in the 12th study in 2018 (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.96, P = 0.028) as the 95% CI narrowed. Conclusion Compared with open surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries are safer (postoperative complications and intraoperative blood loss) and more effective (length of hospital stay and postoperative stay), and it can be considered as the first option for management of SCRLM in high-volume laparoscopic centers. Trial registration CRD42020151176

Download Full-text

Total Hip Arthroplasty After Failed Less Invasive Hip Preservation Surgery for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1079335/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

liang mo ◽

Jianxiong Li ◽

Zhangzheng Wang ◽

Fayi Huang ◽

Pengfei Xin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoral Head ◽

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Operative Time ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Total Hip

Abstract BackgroundLess invasive hip-preserving surgery (LIHP) is an effective treatment in delaying total hip arthroplasty (THA) for young patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). But the success rate of it was not as effective as expected and were significantly reduced with the advancement of the diseases stages. Therefore, it is essential to analysis the impact of LIHP on subsequent THA.MethodsThe search language was restricted to Chinese and English, and the references of included studies were also searched. Chinese databases including CNKI, Wan-Fang databases and VIP, and English databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched by the computer from the inception of each database to 23rd May 2021. The outcome indicators were extracted from the included literature and analyzed by Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager software (RevMan version 5.4). The quality of the studies was scored using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS).ResultsA total of nine articles met the inclusion and were included in this meta-analysis, two of them were published in Chinese and the remaining studies were published in English. Results showed that the LIHP group has longer operative time (SMD=17.31, 95%CI=6.29 to 28.32, p=0.002), more intraoperative blood loss (SMD=79.90, 95%CI=13.92 to 145.87, p=0.02) and higher rate of varus or valgus femoral stem (OR=4.17, 95%CI=1.18 to 14.71, p=0.03) compared to primary THA group. The risk of intraoperative fracture was higher in the prior LIHP THA group compared with primary THA group but the difference was not statistically significant (OR=5.88, 95%CI=0.93 to 37.05, p=0.06). While there was no significant difference in cup anteversion angle (SMD=-0.10, 95%CI=-0.61 to 0.41, p=0.70), cup inclination angle (SMD=0.58, 95%CI=-0.05 to 1.22, p=0.07), postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) (SMD=-0.01, 95%CI=-0.43 to 0.46, p=0.96) and survivorship (OR=1.38, 95%CI=0.34 to 5.55, p=0.65) between THA groups with and without prior LIHP.ConclusionAlthough the prior LIHP increased the difficulty of the conversion to THA with longer operative time, more intraoperative blood loss, and higher rate of intraoperative fracture, it does not detrimentally affect the clinical results of subsequent THA in the mid-term following-up.

Download Full-text

Comparison of emergency cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Updates in Surgery ◽

10.1007/s13304-020-00894-4 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Shao-Zhuo Huang ◽

Hao-Qi Chen ◽

Wei-Xin Liao ◽

Wen-Ying Zhou ◽

Jie-Huan Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Acute Cholecystitis ◽

Conversion Rate ◽

Operative Time ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Gallbladder Drainage ◽

Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage

Abstract Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) are common treatments for patients with acute cholecystitis. However, the safety and efficacy of emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) after PTGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis remain unclear. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through October 2019. The quality of the included nonrandomized studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS). The meta-analysis was performed using STATA version 14.2. A random-effects model was used to calculate the outcomes. A total of fifteen studies involving 1780 patients with acute cholecystitis were included in the meta-analysis. DLC after PTGBD was associated with a shorter operative time (SMD − 0.51; 95% CI − 0.89 to − 0.13; P = 0.008), a lower conversion rate (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.69; P = 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (SMD − 0.59; 95% CI − 0.96 to − 0.22; P = 0.002) and longer time of total hospital stay compared to ELC (SMD 0.91; 95% CI 0.57–1.24; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the postoperative complications (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.48–0.97; P = 0.035), biliary leakage (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.34–1.22; P = 0.175) or mortality (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.39–2.80; P = 0.933). Compared to ELC, DLC after PTGBD had the advantages of a shorter operative time, a lower conversion rate and less intraoperative blood loss.

Download Full-text

Efficacy evaluation of three-dimensional printing assisted osteotomy guide plate in accurate osteotomy of adolescent cubitus varus deformity

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-019-1403-7 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Yuan-Wei Zhang ◽

Xin Xiao ◽

Wen-Cheng Gao ◽

Yan Xiao ◽

Su-Li Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

3D Printing ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Operation Time ◽

Varus Deformity ◽

Conventional Group ◽

Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽

Cubitus Varus ◽

Guide Plate ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background This present study is aimed to retrospectively assess the efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) printing assisted osteotomy guide plate in accurate osteotomy of adolescent cubitus varus deformity. Material and methods Twenty-five patients (15 males and 10 females) with the cubitus varus deformity from June 2014 to December 2017 were included in this study and were enrolled into the conventional group (n = 11) and 3D printing group (n = 14) according to the different surgical approaches. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, osteotomy degrees, osteotomy end union time, and postoperative complications between the two groups were observed and recorded. Results Compared with the conventional group, the 3D printing group has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, higher rate of excellent correction, and higher rate of the parents’ excellent satisfaction with appearance after deformity correction (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.019, P = 0.023). Nevertheless, no significant difference was presented in postoperative carrying angle of the deformed side and total complication rate between the two groups (P = 0.626, P = 0.371). Conclusions The operation assisted by 3D printing osteotomy guide plate to correct the adolescent cubitus varus deformity is feasible and effective, which might be an optional approach to promote the accurate osteotomy and optimize the efficacy.

Download Full-text