scholarly journals Effect of Paddy-Upland Rotation System on the Net Greenhouse Gas Balance as the Sum of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Soil Carbon Storage: A Case in Western Japan

Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Hasukawa ◽  
Yumi Inoda ◽  
Satoshi Toritsuka ◽  
Shigeto Sudo ◽  
Noriko Oura ◽  
...  

To investigate the effect of paddy-upland (PU) rotation system on greenhouse gas emissions, methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were monitored for three years for a PU rotation field (four cultivations (wheat-soybean-rice-rice) over three years) and continuous paddy (CP) field on alluvial soil in western Japan. Soil carbon storage was also calculated using an improved Rothamsted Carbon (RothC) model. The net greenhouse gas balance was finally evaluated as the sum of CO2eq of the CH4, N2O and changes in soil carbon storage. The average CH4 emissions were significantly lower and the average N2O emissions were significantly higher in the PU field than those in the CP field (p < 0.01). On CO2 equivalent basis, CH4 emissions were much higher than N2O emission. In total, the average CO2eq emissions of CH4 plus N2O in the PU field (1.81 Mg CO2 ha−1 year−1) were significantly lower than those in the CP field (7.42 Mg CO2 ha−1 year−1) (p < 0.01). The RothC model revealed that the changes in soil carbon storage corresponded to CO2eq emissions of 0.57 and 0.09 Mg CO2 ha−1 year−1 in the both fields, respectively. Consequently, the net greenhouse gas balance in the PU and CP fields were estimated to be 2.38 and 7.51 Mg CO2 ha−1 year−1, respectively, suggesting a 68% reduction in the PU system. In conclusion, PU rotation system can be regarded as one type of the climate-smart soil management.

GCB Bioenergy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Don ◽  
Bruce Osborne ◽  
Astley Hastings ◽  
Ute Skiba ◽  
Mette S. Carter ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo V. Popin ◽  
Arthur K. B. Santos ◽  
Thiago de P. Oliveira ◽  
Plínio B. de Camargo ◽  
Carlos E. P. Cerri ◽  
...  

Agriculture ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumiaki Takakai ◽  
Shinpei Nakagawa ◽  
Kensuke Sato ◽  
Kazuhiro Kon ◽  
Takashi Sato ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (28) ◽  
pp. e2022666118
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Northrup ◽  
Bruno Basso ◽  
Michael Q. Wang ◽  
Cristine L. S. Morgan ◽  
Philip N. Benfey

Plants remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through photosynthesis. Because agriculture’s productivity is based on this process, a combination of technologies to reduce emissions and enhance soil carbon storage can allow this sector to achieve net negative emissions while maintaining high productivity. Unfortunately, current row-crop agricultural practice generates about 5% of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States and European Union. To reduce these emissions, significant effort has been focused on changing farm management practices to maximize soil carbon. In contrast, the potential to reduce emissions has largely been neglected. Through a combination of innovations in digital agriculture, crop and microbial genetics, and electrification, we estimate that a 71% (1,744 kg CO2e/ha) reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from row crop agriculture is possible within the next 15 y. Importantly, emission reduction can lower the barrier to broad adoption by proceeding through multiple stages with meaningful improvements that gradually facilitate the transition to net negative practices. Emerging voluntary and regulatory ecosystems services markets will incentivize progress along this transition pathway and guide public and private investments toward technology development. In the difficult quest for net negative emissions, all tools, including emission reduction and soil carbon storage, must be developed to allow agriculture to maintain its critical societal function of provisioning society while, at the same time, generating environmental benefits.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal Stolpe ◽  
Cristina Muñoz ◽  
Erick Zagal ◽  
Carlos Ovalle

Author(s):  
Beatriz Gómez‐Muñoz ◽  
Lars Stoumann Jensen ◽  
Lars Munkholm ◽  
Jørgen Eivind Olesen ◽  
Elly Møller Hansen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document