scholarly journals A Discriminative Multi-Output Gaussian Processes Scheme for Brain Electrical Activity Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 6765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Torres-Valencia ◽  
Álvaro Orozco ◽  
David Cárdenas-Peña ◽  
Andrés Álvarez-Meza ◽  
Mauricio Álvarez

The study of brain electrical activity (BEA) from different cognitive conditions has attracted a lot of interest in the last decade due to the high number of possible applications that could be generated from it. In this work, a discriminative framework for BEA via electroencephalography (EEG) is proposed based on multi-output Gaussian Processes (MOGPs) with a specialized spectral kernel. First, a signal segmentation stage is executed, and the channels from the EEG are used as the model outputs. Then, a novel covariance function within the MOGP known as the multispectral mixture kernel (MOSM) allows us to find and quantify the relationships between different channels. Several MOGPs are trained from different conditions grouped in bi-class problems, and the discrimination is performed based on the likelihood score of the test signals against all the models. Finally, the mean likelihood is computed to predict the correspondence of new inputs with each class’s existing models. Results show that this framework allows us to model the EEG signals adequately using generative models and allows analyzing the relationships between channels of the EEG for a particular condition. At the same time, the set of trained MOGPs is well suited to discriminate new input data.

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3345
Author(s):  
Enrico Zero ◽  
Chiara Bersani ◽  
Roberto Sacile

Automatizing the identification of human brain stimuli during head movements could lead towards a significant step forward for human computer interaction (HCI), with important applications for severely impaired people and for robotics. In this paper, a neural network-based identification technique is presented to recognize, by EEG signals, the participant’s head yaw rotations when they are subjected to visual stimulus. The goal is to identify an input-output function between the brain electrical activity and the head movement triggered by switching on/off a light on the participant’s left/right hand side. This identification process is based on “Levenberg–Marquardt” backpropagation algorithm. The results obtained on ten participants, spanning more than two hours of experiments, show the ability of the proposed approach in identifying the brain electrical stimulus associate with head turning. A first analysis is computed to the EEG signals associated to each experiment for each participant. The accuracy of prediction is demonstrated by a significant correlation between training and test trials of the same file, which, in the best case, reaches value r = 0.98 with MSE = 0.02. In a second analysis, the input output function trained on the EEG signals of one participant is tested on the EEG signals by other participants. In this case, the low correlation coefficient values demonstrated that the classifier performances decreases when it is trained and tested on different subjects.


EEG is the term used for recording the brain electrical activity. In Electroencephalography, the encephalon means brain. EEG measures electrical activity generated by thousands of neurons that exists in human brain. The brain electrical activity is measured in voltages. This paper is focused on recognizing emotion from human activity, measured by EEG signals. Making the computer more empathic to the user is one of the aspects of affective computing. With EEG-based emotion detection, the computer can actually take a look inside user’s head to observe their mental state. A low power, low noise and high sensitive analog signal from brain decoded into filtered digital output. The decoder picks a low amplitude and a microvolt signal from brain and decodes it into a filtered and amplified output. As of thelatestattentiongiving fromexaminationteam in creatingsensitivecommunicationamong human beings and peripheral device, the proof of identity of emotive state of the previousdeveloped a necessity. Electro-encephalography establishedimportantconsideration from scientists, becausethey establish modest, inexpensive, transportable, and easily solving theidentification of mind states in this paper.[2] In this paper, it provide a comprehensive overviewfrompresent works in emotion detection using EEG signals


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
Lorne Direnfeld ◽  
David B. Torrey ◽  
Jim Black ◽  
LuAnn Haley ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract When an individual falls due to a nonwork-related episode of dizziness, hits their head and sustains injury, do workers’ compensation laws consider such injuries to be compensable? Bearing in mind that each state makes its own laws, the answer depends on what caused the loss of consciousness, and the second asks specifically what happened in the fall that caused the injury? The first question speaks to medical causation, which applies scientific analysis to determine the cause of the problem. The second question addresses legal causation: Under what factual circumstances are injuries of this type potentially covered under the law? Much nuance attends this analysis. The authors discuss idiopathic falls, which in this context means “unique to the individual” as opposed to “of unknown cause,” which is the familiar medical terminology. The article presents three detailed case studies that describe falls that had their genesis in episodes of loss of consciousness, followed by analyses by lawyer or judge authors who address the issue of compensability, including three scenarios from Arizona, California, and Pennsylvania. A medical (scientific) analysis must be thorough and must determine the facts regarding the fall and what occurred: Was the fall due to a fit (eg, a seizure with loss of consciousness attributable to anormal brain electrical activity) or a faint (eg, loss of consciousness attributable to a decrease in blood flow to the brain? The evaluator should be able to fully explain the basis for the conclusions, including references to current science.


2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Rezinkina ◽  
Eleonora Bydianskaya ◽  
Anatoliy Shcherba

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document