scholarly journals Conventional, High-Resolution and Imaging Flow Cytometry: Benchmarking Performance in Characterisation of Extracellular Vesicles

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Jaco Botha ◽  
Haley R. Pugsley ◽  
Aase Handberg

Flow cytometry remains a commonly used methodology due to its ability to characterise multiple parameters on single particles in a high-throughput manner. In order to address limitations with lacking sensitivity of conventional flow cytometry to characterise extracellular vesicles (EVs), novel, highly sensitive platforms, such as high-resolution and imaging flow cytometers, have been developed. We provided comparative benchmarks of a conventional FACS Aria III, a high-resolution Apogee A60 Micro-PLUS and the ImageStream X Mk II imaging flow cytometry platform. Nanospheres were used to systematically characterise the abilities of each platform to detect and quantify populations with different sizes, refractive indices and fluorescence properties, and the repeatability in concentration determinations was reported for each population. We evaluated the ability of the three platforms to detect different EV phenotypes in blood plasma and the intra-day, inter-day and global variabilities in determining EV concentrations. By applying this or similar methodology to characterise methods, researchers would be able to make informed decisions on choice of platforms and thereby be able to match suitable flow cytometry platforms with projects based on the needs of each individual project. This would greatly contribute to improving the robustness and reproducibility of EV studies.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1588555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz L. Ricklefs ◽  
Cecile L. Maire ◽  
Rudolph Reimer ◽  
Lasse Dührsen ◽  
Katharina Kolbe ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl 5) ◽  
pp. v72.1-v72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalie Schnoor ◽  
Sybren L.N. Maas ◽  
Ger J.A. Arkesteijn ◽  
Jeroen de Vrij ◽  
Pierre A. Robe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi37-vi38
Author(s):  
Franz Ricklefs ◽  
Cecile Maire ◽  
Katharina Kolbe ◽  
Mareike Holz ◽  
Rudolph Reimer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii7-ii7
Author(s):  
Luz Milbeth Cumba Garcia ◽  
Abudumijiti Aibaidula ◽  
Nazanin Yeganeh Kazemi ◽  
Miyeon Jung ◽  
Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a median survival of 15 months despite aggressive treatment. Immunosuppressive monocytes are heavily infiltrated in these tumors and in patients’ circulation. Treatment-related pseudo-progression confounds outcome assessment by MRI. Thus, there is a need for additional non-invasive methods to assess treatment response. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) contain tumor-specific microRNA (miRNA) cargo that could serve as a liquid biopsy to distinguish true progression from treatment-related pseudo-progression. We had found significant differences in plasma EVs molecular profile (i.e. miRNA signatures) between GBM patients and healthy donors. Our overall hypothesis is that these differences reflect the EVs cell of origin. Our goal in this project was to develop a fluorescent staining paradigm by flow cytometry to distinguish EVs from different cells in vitro and determine differences in EV miRNA expression profile between GBM and monocytic cell-derived EVs. Gleolan (5-ALA) is an FDA-approved orally available agent for fluorescence-guided resection of GBM tumors. It is metabolized to protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in GBM cells but not in non-neoplastic cells and has been reported to aid in the detection of GBM-derived EVs by flow cytometry. However, distinguishing between GBM-derived EVs and EVs from other cells of origin has not been described. We co-cultured human GBM cells (dBT114 or dBT116) and CD14+ monocytes for 72 hours in the presence or absence of 5-ALA. EVs were isolated by ultracentrifugation and stained for CD11b (myeloid cell marker). ImageStream Imaging Flow Cytometry was performed showing clear differentiation between PpIX+ EVs from GBM cells and CD11b+ EVs from monocytes. Interestingly, a small number of double-positive EVs (presumably representing monocyte-derived EVs that had taken up PpIX after phagocytizing GBM cells) were also present. Taken together, we were able to optimize a technique to distinguish EVs originating from GBM and monocytes for further characterization by short non-coding RNA sequencing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document