scholarly journals Prostaglandin E-Major Urinary Metabolite (PGE-MUM) as a Tumor Marker for Lung Adenocarcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Kawamoto ◽  
Hiromichi Hara ◽  
Jun Araya ◽  
Akihiro Ichikawa ◽  
Yu Fujita ◽  
...  

Background: Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is metabolized to prostaglandin E-major urinary metabolite (PGE-MUM). Enhanced cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression demonstrated in lung adenocarcinoma indicates increased PGE-MUM levels in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Objectives: We aimed to elucidate the clinical usefulness of measuring PGE-MUM as an indicator of tumor burden in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: PGE-MUM was measured by a radioimmunoassay in control healthy volunteers (n = 124) and patients with lung adenocarcinoma (n = 54). Associations between PGE-MUM levels and clinical characteristics of the patients (including lung cancer stage and TNM factors (T: Tumor, N: Node, M: Metastasis) were examined. Results: PGE-MUM levels were significantly elevated in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. A PGE-MUM level of 14.9 μg/g∙Cr showed 70.4% sensitivity and 67.7% specificity for the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma. PGE-MUM levels tended to be positively correlated with cancer progression as determined by the TNM staging system. Advanced stage (stage III, stage IV, and recurrence) was significantly associated with high PGE-MUM levels by logistic regression analysis. No apparent correlation was demonstrated between PGE-MUM and carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Conclusions: PGE-MUM can be a promising biomarker reflecting the systemic tumor burden of lung adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21588-e21588
Author(s):  
Bixia Tang ◽  
Xieqiao Yan ◽  
Zhihong Chi ◽  
Siming Li ◽  
Chuanliang Cui ◽  
...  

e21588 Background: Primary mucosal melanoma arising in the urinary tract is rare and poorly characterized. Methods: The records of patients with urological mucosal melanoma who presented to the department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma of Peking University Cancer Hospital between September, 2004 and April, 2019 were reviewed. Available clinicopathological and molecular characteristics were summarized, including pathological parameters, gene mutation, primary surgical intervention, systemic treatment and clinical course. The rates of local recurrence rate, loco-regional lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were assessed. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System for bladder cancer/renal pelvis and ureter cancer/urethral carcinoma (8th ed., 2017) were adopted for staging. Results: Fifty-eight patients were involved in the study with a median age of 62.5 years (range: 32-82). The anatomic sites of the primary urological mucosal melanomas were from the urethra (89.7%), bladder (6.9%), ureter (0%) and kidney (0%), and the left (4.4%) were from multiple loci. At initial diagnosis, 75.9% (n=44) were stage I/II disease, 1.7% (n=1) stage III, and 22.4% (n=13) stage IV. There was 3.4% incidence of CKIT mutation and 1.7% of BRAF mutation. After median follow-up of 22.6 mo, 31.4% (16/51) relapsed locally after organ-preserved surgery. 21.6% (11/51) and 39.2% (20/51) developed metastases to reginal lymph nodes and distance, respectively. The median relapse free survival and median overall survival were 12.2 (95%CI: 7.9-16.4) mo and 33.9 (95%CI: 19.2-48.6) mo, respectively. Univariate Cox analysis showed that TNM stage and systemic adjuvant therapy were the prognostic factors of OS, while no association was found with Breslow thickness, miotic rate, ulceration and gender. Conclusions: Urological mucosal melanoma predominantly arises from lower urinary tract with rare BRAF and CKIT mutation. AJCC TNM Staging System for urothelial carcinoma is proved practical for urothelial melanoma, which should be validated in larger population. Future research is required to identify adjuvant treatment approaches to improve disease outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 955-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin-ichiro Hagiwara ◽  
Isao Okayasu ◽  
Mutsunori Fujiwara ◽  
Masaaki Matsuura ◽  
Hiromitsu Ohnishi ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14588-e14588
Author(s):  
E. Merola ◽  
F. Panzuto ◽  
M. Rinzivillo ◽  
R. Valente ◽  
C. Bestani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e00289
Author(s):  
Natsuki Ishida ◽  
Kiichi Sugiura ◽  
Takahiro Miyazu ◽  
Satoshi Tamura ◽  
Satoshi Suzuki ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-658
Author(s):  
Elettra Merola ◽  
Francesco Panzuto ◽  
Maria Rinzivillo ◽  
Stefano Festa ◽  
Claudia Bestani ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Förstermann ◽  
Thomas J. Feuerstein

1. The rates of secretion into the circulation of prostaglandin E, prostacyclin, and thromboxane A2 were estimated in male alcoholics on the third day of withdrawal and in control subjects by measuring appropriate metabolites in urine. 2. Urinary levels of tetranor-5,11-diketo-7α-hydroxyprostane-1,16-dioic acid (the major urinary metabolite of prostaglandins E1 and E2), of 2,3-dinor-6-ketoprostaglandin F1α (the major urinary metabolite of prostacyclin) and of 6-keto-prostaglandin F1α (the stable hydrolysis product of prostacyclin) were significantly different from the normal subjects in the alcoholic group. In contrast, 2,3-dinor-thromboxane B2 (the major urinary metabolite of thromboxane A2) and thromboxane B2 (the stable hydrolysis product of thromboxane A2) were not significantly different between the groups. 3. These data suggest that the ratio of the vasodilator prostanoids prostaglandin E and prostacyclin and the vasoconstrictor prostanoid thromboxane A2 is lower than in normal subjects, in alcoholics during withdrawal. This may be one causal factor for the higher incidence of hypertension observed in withdrawing alcoholics compared with control subjects.


2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110509
Author(s):  
Marcin Miszczyk ◽  
Emilia Staniewska ◽  
Iwona Jabłońska ◽  
Aleksandra Lipka-Rajwa ◽  
Konrad Stawiski ◽  
...  

Introduction: Despite routine use of 3D radiotherapy planning in radical radio(chemo)therapy for oropharyngeal cancers, volumetric data have not been implemented in initial staging. We analyzed 228 oropharyngeal cancer cases treated at one institution between 2004 and 2014 to compare the predictive value of volumetric staging and tumor nodal metastasis staging system (TNM) and determine whether they could be complementary for the estimation of survival. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 228 consecutive oropharyngeal cancer cases treated with radiotherapy (76.9%) or concurrent radiochemotherapy (23.1%) between 2004 and 2014. The volumetric parameters included primary gross tumor volume (pGTV), metastatic lymph nodes gross tumor volume (nGTV), and total gross tumor volume (tGTV), and were compared with the 7th edition of the TNM staging system. Results: Median overall survival (OS) was 30.3 months. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, tGTV had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66, followed by pGTV (AUC,0.64), nGTV (AUC 0.62), and TNM (AUC 0.6). The median OS for patients with tGTV ⩽32.2 mL was 40.5 months, compared to 15.4 months for >32.2 mL ( p < 0.001). This threshold allowed for a statistically significant difference in survival between TNM stage IV cases with low and high tumor volume ( p < 0.001). Despite both TNM and tGTV reaching statistical significance in univariate analysis, only the tGTV remained an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.07, confidence interval 1.02–1.12, p = 0.008). Conclusions: tGTV is an independent prognostic factor, characterized by a higher discriminatory value than the TNM staging system, and can be used to further divide stage IV cases into subgroups with significantly different prognosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 989-990
Author(s):  
Alessandro Baisi ◽  
Federico Raveglia ◽  
Matilde De Simone ◽  
Ugo Cioffi

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haihong Wang ◽  
Zhenyu Lin ◽  
Guiling Li ◽  
Dejun Zhang ◽  
Dandan Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging classifications and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) are two broadly used systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study aims to identify the most accurate and useful TNM staging system for poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas(pNECs). Methods An analysis was performed to evaluate the application of the ENETS, 7th edition (7th) AJCC and 8th edition (8th) AJCC staging classifications using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (N = 568 patients). A modified system was proposed based on analysis of the 7th AJCC classification. Results In multivariable analyses, only the 7th AJCC staging system allocated patients into four different risk groups, compared with the 8th AJCC staging system and ENETS staging system, although there was no significant difference. We modified the staging classification by maintaining the T and M definitions of the 7th AJCC staging and adopting new staging definitions. An increased hazard ratio (HR) of death was also observed from class I to class IV for the modified 7th (m7th) staging system (compared with stage I disease; HR for stage II =1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.73-2.06, P =0.44; HR for stage III =2.20, 95% CI =1.06-4.56, P=0.03; HR for stage IV =4.95, 95% CI =3.20-7.65, P < 0.001).The concordance index (C-index) was higher for local disease with the m7th AJCC staging system than with the 7th AJCC staging system. Conclusions The m7th AJCC staging system for pNECs proposed in this study provides improvements and may be assessed for potential adoption in the next edition.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haihong Wang ◽  
Zhenyu Lin ◽  
Guiling Li ◽  
Dejun Zhang ◽  
Dandan Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) staging classifications are two broadly used systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study aims to identify the most accurate and useful tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system for poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas(pNECs).Methods: An analysis was performed to evaluate the application of the ENETS, 7th edition (7th) AJCC and 8th edition (8th) AJCC staging classifications using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (N = 568 patients), and a modified system based on the analysis of the 7th AJCC classification was proposed Results: In multivariable analyses, only the 7th AJCC staging system allocated patients into four different risk groups, although there was no significant difference. We modified the staging classification by maintaining the T and M definitions of the 7th AJCC staging and adopting new staging definitions. An increased hazard ratio (HR) of death was also observed from class I to class IV for the modified 7th (m7th) staging system (compared with stage I disease; HR for stage II =1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.73-2.06, P =0.44; HR for stage III =2.20, 95% CI =1.06-4.56, P=0.03; HR for stage IV =4.95, 95% CI =3.20-7.65, P < 0.001).The concordance index (C-index) was higher for local disease with the m7th AJCC staging system than with the 7th AJCC staging system. Conclusions: The m7th AJCC staging system for pNECs proposed in this study provides improvements and may be assessed for potential adoption in the next edition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document