scholarly journals Uveal Melanoma Biopsy: A Review

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Frizziero ◽  
Edoardo Midena ◽  
Sara Trainiti ◽  
Davide Londei ◽  
Laura Bonaldi ◽  
...  

Intraocular tumor diagnosis is based on clinical findings supported by additional imaging tools, such as ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and angiographic techniques, usually without the need for invasive procedures or tissue sampling. Despite improvements in the local treatment of uveal melanoma (UM), the prevention and treatment of the metastatic disease remain unsolved, and nearly 50% of patients develop liver metastasis. The current model suggests that tumor cells have already spread by the time of diagnosis, remaining dormant until there are favorable conditions. Tumor sampling procedures at the time of primary tumor diagnosis/treatment are therefore now commonly performed, usually not to confirm the diagnosis of UM, but to obtain a tissue sample for prognostication, to assess patient’s specific metastatic risk. Moreover, several studies are ongoing to identify genes specific to UM tumorigenesis, leading to several potential targeted therapeutic strategies. Genetic information can also influence the surveillance timing and metastatic screening type of patients affected by UM. In spite of the widespread use of biopsies in general surgical practice, in ophthalmic oncology the indications and contraindications for tumor biopsy continue to be under debate. The purpose of this review paper is to critically evaluate the role of uveal melanoma biopsy in ophthalmic oncology.

Author(s):  
V.A. Yarovaya ◽  
◽  
A.A. Yarovoy ◽  
A.R. Zaretsky ◽  
L.V. Chudakova ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1143
Author(s):  
Gustav Stålhammar ◽  
Hans E. Grossniklaus

Malignant tumors are rarely homogenous on the morphological, genome, transcriptome or proteome level. In this study, we investigate the intratumor heterogeneity of BAP-1 expression in uveal melanoma with digital image analysis of 40 tumors. The proportion of BAP-1 positive cells was measured in full tumor sections, hot spots, cold spots and in scleral margins. The mean difference between hot spots and cold spots was 41 percentage points (pp, SD 29). Tumors with gene expression class 1 (associated with low metastatic risk) and 2 (high metastatic risk) had similar intratumor heterogeneity. Similarly, the level of intratumor heterogeneity was comparable in tumors from patients that later developed metastases as in patients that did not. BAP-1 measured in any tumor region added significant prognostic information to both American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor size category (p ≤ 0.001) and gene expression class (p ≤ 0.04). We conclude that there is substantial intratumor heterogeneity in uveal melanoma BAP-1 expression. However, it is of limited prognostic importance. Regardless of region, analysis of BAP-1 expression adds significant prognostic information beyond tumor size and gene expression class.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C Schefler ◽  
Alison Skalet ◽  
Scott C N Oliver ◽  
John Mason ◽  
Anthony B Daniels ◽  
...  

Aim: The Clinical Application of DecisionDx-UM Gene Expression Assay Results study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the prognostic 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) test for uveal melanoma (UM) patients in a large, prospective multicenter cohort. Patients & methods: Nine centers prospectively enrolled 138 UM patients clinically tested with the 15-GEP. Physician-recommended specialty referrals and metastatic surveillance regimens were collected. Results: A total of 93% of high-risk class 2 patients were referred to medical oncology for follow-up, compared with 51% of class 1 patients. A majority (62%) of class 2 patients were recommended overall high-intensity metastatic surveillance, while 85% of class 1 patients were recommended low-intensity metastatic surveillance. Conclusion: Treatment plan recommendations for UM patients are aligned with GEP-informed metastatic risk, consistent with prior studies.


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 666-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cécile Laurent ◽  
Fabien Valet ◽  
Nathalie Planque ◽  
Licia Silveri ◽  
Selma Maacha ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 247-252
Author(s):  
Štěpán Rusňák ◽  
Lenka Hecová ◽  
Zdeněk Kasl ◽  
Markéta Sobotová ◽  
Lukáš Hauer

In intraocular tumors, diagnosis is usually based on clinical examination and imaging without the need for invasive surgery or tissue sampling. The diagnosis can be confirmed by biopsy, however, in the case of intraocular malignancy, the biopsy is considered controversial. Due to the development of uveal melanoma cytogenetic prognostics and the progression in generalised uveal melanoma treatment, intraocular melanoma biopsy is becoming increasingly important. Diagnostic biopsy of intraocular tumors is indicated in cases of diagnostic uncertainty for findings with conflicting non-invasive test results and for small melanocyte lesions. Tumor prognostic biopsy is performed to obtain a tissue sample for tumor cytogenetic testing, which can help to determine the prognosis and specific metastatic risk of the patient. For anterior segment tumors, anterior chamber fluid sampling, thin-needle iris biopsy, punch biopsy, surgical biopsy or biopsy using vitrectomy may be used. For posterior segment tumors, procedures include transscleral or transretinal thin-needle biopsy, vitrectomy-assisted biopsy, punch biopsy, endoresection or transscleral exoresection. Complications of intraocular melanoma biopsy include too small or non-valuable sample collection, intra-tumoral heterogeneity, intra-ocular trauma and induction of intraocular or extraocular tumor dissemination.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-503
Author(s):  
Oleg Kit ◽  
Anna Goncharova ◽  
Sergey Tkachev ◽  
Tatyana Protasova

Uveal melanoma is a big challenge for medicine, because despite successful local treatment, metastatic disease develops frequently and this is an important factor affecting patient survival. Revealing mechanisms of pathogenesis of this disease and developing targeted therapy requires high-quality animal models that reproduce many aspects of tumor biology, mimic its metastasis dissemination and, most importantly, can be the basis for understanding the principles of diagnosis and treatment. Methods for creating a model of uveal melanoma include injecting syngeneic skin melanoma cells to the experimental animals, injecting xenogenic uveal and skin melanoma cells that can be of both human and animal origin, as well as transplanting xenografts obtained from patients and creating transgenic and induced tumor models. In this review, we analyzed the data of the last 30 years on the methods of modeling uveal melanoma, described the advantages, disadvantages and features that must be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document