scholarly journals Replication Stress Response Links RAD52 to Protecting Common Fragile Sites

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Wu

Rad52 in yeast is a key player in homologous recombination (HR), but mammalian RAD52 is dispensable for HR as shown by the lack of a strong HR phenotype in RAD52-deficient cells and in RAD52 knockout mice. RAD52 function in mammalian cells first emerged with the discovery of its important backup role to BRCA (breast cancer genes) in HR. Recent new evidence further demonstrates that RAD52 possesses multiple activities to cope with replication stress. For example, replication stress-induced DNA repair synthesis in mitosis (MiDAS) and oncogene overexpression-induced DNA replication are dependent on RAD52. RAD52 becomes essential in HR to repair DSBs containing secondary structures, which often arise at collapsed replication forks. RAD52 is also implicated in break-induced replication (BIR) and is found to inhibit excessive fork reversal at stalled replication forks. These various functions of RAD52 to deal with replication stress have been linked to the protection of genome stability at common fragile sites, which are often associated with the DNA breakpoints in cancer. Therefore, RAD52 has important recombination roles under special stress conditions in mammalian cells, and presents as a promising anti-cancer therapy target.

Open Biology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 180018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Özgün Özer ◽  
Ian D. Hickson

Oncogene activation during tumour development leads to changes in the DNA replication programme that enhance DNA replication stress. Certain regions of the human genome, such as common fragile sites and telomeres, are particularly sensitive to DNA replication stress due to their inherently ‘difficult-to-replicate’ nature. Indeed, it appears that these regions sometimes fail to complete DNA replication within the period of interphase when cells are exposed to DNA replication stress. Under these conditions, cells use a salvage pathway, termed ‘mitotic DNA repair synthesis (MiDAS)’, to complete DNA synthesis in the early stages of mitosis. If MiDAS fails, the ensuing mitotic errors threaten genome integrity and cell viability. Recent studies have provided an insight into how MiDAS helps cells to counteract DNA replication stress. However, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and regulation of MiDAS remain poorly defined. Here, we provide an overview of how DNA replication stress triggers MiDAS, with an emphasis on how common fragile sites and telomeres are maintained. Furthermore, we discuss how a better understanding of MiDAS might reveal novel strategies to target cancer cells that maintain viability in the face of chronic oncogene-induced DNA replication stress.


Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoît Falquet ◽  
Ulrich Rass

Complete genome duplication in every cell cycle is fundamental for genome stability and cell survival. However, chromosome replication is frequently challenged by obstacles that impede DNA replication fork (RF) progression, which subsequently causes replication stress (RS). Cells have evolved pathways of RF protection and restart that mitigate the consequences of RS and promote the completion of DNA synthesis prior to mitotic chromosome segregation. If there is entry into mitosis with underreplicated chromosomes, this results in sister-chromatid entanglements, chromosome breakage and rearrangements and aneuploidy in daughter cells. Here, we focus on the resolution of persistent replication intermediates by the structure-specific endonucleases (SSEs) MUS81, SLX1-SLX4 and GEN1. Their actions and a recently discovered pathway of mitotic DNA repair synthesis have emerged as important facilitators of replication completion and sister chromatid detachment in mitosis. As RS is induced by oncogene activation and is a common feature of cancer cells, any advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms related to chromosome underreplication have important biomedical implications.


Oncogene ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (23) ◽  
pp. 3256-3264 ◽  
Author(s):  
P K Tsantoulis ◽  
A Kotsinas ◽  
P P Sfikakis ◽  
K Evangelou ◽  
M Sideridou ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Reubens ◽  
Sophie Rozenzhak ◽  
Paul Russell

ABSTRACT DNA replication involves the inherent risk of genome instability, since replisomes invariably encounter DNA lesions or other structures that stall or collapse replication forks during the S phase. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the multi-BRCT domain protein Brc1, which is related to budding yeast Rtt107 and mammalian PTIP, plays an important role in maintaining genome integrity and cell viability when cells experience replication stress. The C-terminal pair of BRCT domains in Brc1 were previously shown to bind phosphohistone H2A (γH2A) formed by Rad3/ATR checkpoint kinase at DNA lesions; however, the putative scaffold interactions involving the N-terminal BRCT domains 1 to 4 of Brc1 have remained obscure. Here, we show that these domains bind Rhp18/Rad18, which is an E3 ubiquitin protein ligase that has crucial functions in postreplication repair. A missense allele in BRCT domain 4 of Brc1 disrupts binding to Rhp18 and causes sensitivity to replication stress. Brc1 binding to Rhp18 and γH2A are required for the Brc1 overexpression suppression of smc6-74, a mutation that impairs the Smc5/6 structural maintenance of chromosomes complex required for chromosome integrity and repair of collapsed replication forks. From these findings, we propose that Brc1 provides scaffolding functions linking γH2A, Rhp18, and Smc5/6 complex at damaged replication forks.


1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven H. Robison ◽  
Orazio Cantoni ◽  
J.Daniel Heck ◽  
Max Costa

1977 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Zardi ◽  
Leone St. Vincent ◽  
Alain Barbin ◽  
Ruggero Montesano ◽  
Geoffrey P. Margison

EMBO Reports ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Sattler ◽  
Philippe Frit ◽  
Bernard Salles ◽  
Patrick Calsou

1993 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2109-2117 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Molinete ◽  
W. Vermeulen ◽  
A. Bürkle ◽  
J. Ménissier-de Murcia ◽  
J.H. Küpper ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Lu ◽  
Swetha Parvathaneni ◽  
Toshifumi Hara ◽  
Ashish Lal ◽  
Sudha Sharma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document