scholarly journals Effect of Baseline Characteristics on Cabazitaxel Treatment Duration in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Compassionate Use/Expanded Access Programs and CAPRISTANA Registry

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zafar Malik ◽  
Giuseppe Di Lorenzo ◽  
Angelika Pichler ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Simon Hitier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Compassionate Use ◽  
Expanded Access ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Proactive Management

We examined factors that may impact cabazitaxel treatment duration in a real-life setting in a compassionate use program, expanded access program, and prospective observational study in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel (N = 1621) received cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or physician/patient decision. The median number of cabazitaxel cycles was six (range, 1–49); 708 patients (43.7%) received >6 cycles. Patients receiving >6 cycles tended to have a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 (p = 0.0017 for ≤6 vs. >6 cycles). Overall, 348 patients (21.5%) were ≥75 years of age; 139 (39.9%) received >6 cycles. The main reason for discontinuation was disease progression; however, in patients receiving 1–2 cycles, the main reason for discontinuation was adverse events. Only 52 patients (3.2%) progressed during cycles 1–2. Cabazitaxel was well tolerated in these studies, which included some elderly and frail patients, offering clinicians an important treatment option in the management of mCRPC. Proactive management of adverse events may allow patients to receive a higher number of cabazitaxel cycles and derive greater benefit.

Efficacy of abiraterone acetate in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: Early results from the German compassionate-use program.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15195-e15195
Author(s):  
Carsten Henning Ohlmann ◽  
Michael Stöckle ◽  
David A. Pfister ◽  
Axel Heidenreich ◽  
Axel S. Merseburger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Compassionate Use ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Progression

e15195 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone (P) has demonstrated an improved survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) compared to placebo plus P in a large phase III trial. In Germany, patients were able to receive AA within a compassionate-use program (CUP). Here, we report the first results of the program. Methods: Patients were eligible for the CUP if they progressed on or after at least one cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. For CUP entry, patients were considered to have disease progression if they had radiographic evidence of disease progression in soft tissue or bone with or without PSA-progression and ongoing androgen deprivation. Patients received AA 1000mg daily plus prednisone 5mg BID until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Between 02-05/2011, 398 patients were registered for the CUP in Germany. Data from 191/350 (47.9%) of the patients treated at 10 different sites were available for evaluation of efficacy. Median age was 70.72yrs (52.35-87.61) and patients received a median of 1 (1-4) chemotherapy lines prior to CUP entry. Median PSA at baseline was 220.5 ng/ml (0.47-4245); 168 (88%) of patients presented with bone metastasis. With regard to efficacy, 64/191 (33.5%) of the patients showed an unconfirmed PSA-response ≥50%. At a median follow-up of 5.3 months, 51/191 (26.7%) patients had died, resulting in a median PSA-progression free and overall survival of 8.3 and 10.61 months, respectively. In a subset of patients (71/191, 37.2%) data regarding objective response was available with 25/71 (35.2%) achieving an objective response. Data from 114 pts. revealed fatigue (20.3%), hot flushes (15.8%), edema (10.6%), elevated liver enzymes (8.0%) and asthenia (7.9%) being the most frequent toxicities (any grade). Conclusions: Treatment of CRPC patients with AA outside controlled clinical trials leads to considerable PSA- and objective response rates with a favourable toxicity profile, comparable to the results from COU-AA-301 registration trial. Due to the short median follow-up, conclusions regarding PSA-progression free and overall survival may not be drawn.

scholarly journals Abiraterone in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review of ‘real-life’ studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Marchioni ◽  
Petros Sountoulides ◽  
Maida Bada ◽  
Sebastiano Rapisarda ◽  
Cosimo De Nunzio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
The Real ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Baseline Psa

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with abiraterone acetate (AA) in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the ‘real-life’ setting. Methods: Data acquisition on the outcomes of the use of AA in chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRPC was performed by a MEDLINE comprehensive systematic literature search using combinations of the following key words: ‘prostate cancer’, ‘metastatic’, ‘castration resistant’, ‘abiraterone’, ‘real life’, and excluding controlled clinical trials (phase II and III studies). Identification and selection of the studies was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), 12-week 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and grade 3 and higher adverse events. Data were narratively synthesized in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. Results: Within the eight identified studies that fulfilled the criteria, a total of 801 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Baseline PSA ranged between 9.5 and 212.0 ng/ml. Most of the patients had bone metastases. Duration of treatment with AA was longer in the studies with lower baseline PSA levels. The median OS ranged between 14 and 36.4 months. The PFS, assessed according to different definitions, ranged from 3.9 to 18.5 months. A 50% PSA reduction at 12 weeks was reached by a variable percentage of patients ranging from 36.0% to 62.1%. Finally, the rate of grade 3 and higher adverse events was reported in three studies and ranged from 4.4% to 15.5%. Conclusions: Despite the high grade of heterogeneity among studies, treatment with AA seems to ensure good survival outcomes in the ‘real-life’ setting. However, prospective studies based on patients’ characteristics being more similar to ‘real-life’ patients are necessary.

scholarly journals Combined CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with increased myeloid and neutrophil immune subsets in the bone microenvironment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e002919
Author(s):  
Sumit K Subudhi ◽  
Bilal A Siddiqui ◽  
Ana M Aparicio ◽  
Shalini S Yadav ◽  
Sreyashi Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Microenvironment ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Measurable Disease

BackgroundImmune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has low response rates in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), in part due to few T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration but induces upregulation of PD-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) within the prostate TME. Combined anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 can partly overcome this adaptive resistance and was recently shown to augment responses in patients with mCRPC with measurable disease. Although bone is the most common site of metastasis in prostate cancer, patients with bone-predominant disease are frequently excluded from trials because they lack measurable disease, which limits assessment of disease progression and tissue sampling. We therefore designed this study to investigate combined ICT in mCRPC to bone.HypothesisCombined anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) plus anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) is safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone.Patients and methodsIn this single-arm pilot study, men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone received tremelimumab (75 mg intravenous) plus durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) every 4 weeks (up to four doses), followed by durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) maintenance every 4 weeks (up to nine doses). The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and maximal PSA decline.ResultsTwenty-six patients were treated between August 8, 2017 and March 28, 2019. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 11 patients (42%), with no grade 4 or 5 events. TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in three patients (12%). PSA decline ≥50% occurred in three patients (12%). Six patients (24%) achieved stable disease for >6 months. At a median follow-up of 43.6 months, median rPFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.9 to 5.7), and median overall survival was 28.1 months (95% CI: 14.5 to 37.3). Post-treatment evaluation of the bone microenvironment revealed transcriptional upregulation in myeloid and neutrophil immune subset signatures and increased expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints.ConclusionsTremelimumab plus durvalumab was safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone, with potential activity in a small number of patients as measured by rPFS. Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade with therapies targeting the myeloid compartment or other inhibitory immune receptors may be necessary to overcome mechanisms of resistance within prostate bone microenvironment.Trial registration numberNCT03204812.

scholarly journals Management of Enzalutamide Related Adverse Events for Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer by Patient Reported Outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vii78-vii79
Author(s):  
Taro Iguchi ◽  
Sayaka Yasuda ◽  
Minoru Kato ◽  
Takeshi Yamazaki ◽  
Satoshi Tamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals A prognostic model for stratifying clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. E47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Joseph Khalaf ◽  
Claudia M. Avilés ◽  
Arun A. Azad ◽  
Katherine Sunderland ◽  
Tilman Todenhöfer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Progression

Introduction: Recently, a prognostic index including six risk factors (RFs) (unfavourable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS], presence of liver metastases, short response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists/ antagonists, low albumin, increased alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) was developed from the COUAA- 301 trial in post-chemotherapy metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Our primary objective was to evaluate this model in a cohort of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone.Methods: We identified 197 chemotherapy-naive patients who received abiraterone at six BC Cancer Agency centres and who had complete information on all six RFs. Study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), time to PSA progression, time on treatment, and overall survival (OS). PSA RR and survival outcomes were compared using Χ2 test and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify RFs independently associated with OS.Results: Patients were classified into good (0‒1 RFs), intermediate (2‒3 RFs), and poor (4‒6 RFs) prognostic groups (33%, 52%, and 15%, respectively). For good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, PSA RR (≥50% decline) was 60% vs. 42% vs. 40% (p=0.05); median time to PSA progression was 7.3 vs. 5.3 vs. 5.0 months (p=0.02); and median OS was 29.4 vs. 13.8 vs. 8.7 months (p<0.0001).Conclusions: The six-factor prognostic index model stratifies clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. Identifying patients at risk of poor outcome is important for informing clinical practice and clinical trial design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document