scholarly journals Evolution of CD8+ T Cell Receptor (TCR) Engineered Therapies for the Treatment of Cancer

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 2379
Author(s):  
Yimo Sun ◽  
Fenge Li ◽  
Heather Sonnemann ◽  
Kyle R. Jackson ◽  
Amjad H. Talukder ◽  
...  

Engineered T cell receptor T (TCR-T) cell therapy has facilitated the generation of increasingly reliable tumor antigen-specific adaptable cellular products for the treatment of human cancer. TCR-T cell therapies were initially focused on targeting shared tumor-associated peptide targets, including melanoma differentiation and cancer-testis antigens. With recent technological developments, it has become feasible to target neoantigens derived from tumor somatic mutations, which represents a highly personalized therapy, since most neoantigens are patient-specific and are rarely shared between patients. TCR-T therapies have been tested for clinical efficacy in treating solid tumors in many preclinical studies and clinical trials all over the world. However, the efficacy of TCR-T therapy for the treatment of solid tumors has been limited by a number of factors, including low TCR avidity, off-target toxicities, and target antigen loss leading to tumor escape. In this review, we discuss the process of deriving tumor antigen-specific TCRs, including the identification of appropriate tumor antigen targets, expansion of antigen-specific T cells, and TCR cloning and validation, including techniques and tools for TCR-T cell vector construction and expression. We highlight the achievements of recent clinical trials of engineered TCR-T cell therapies and discuss the current challenges and potential solutions for improving their safety and efficacy, insights that may help guide future TCR-T studies in cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381983106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxiang Zhang ◽  
Lingyu Wang

T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are 2 types of adoptive T-cell therapy that genetically modify natural T cells to treat cancers. Although chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has yielded remarkable efficacy for hematological malignancies of the B-cell lineages, most solid tumors fail to respond significantly to chimeric antigen receptor T cells. T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy, on the other hand, has shown unprecedented promise in treating solid tumors and has attracted growing interest. In order to create an unbiased, comprehensive, and scientific report for this fast-moving field, we carefully analyzed all 84 clinical trials using T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy and downloaded from ClinicalTrials.gov updated by June 11, 2018. Informative features and trends were observed in these clinical trials. The number of trials initiated each year is increasing as expected, but an interesting pattern is observed. NY-ESO-1, as the most targeted antigen type, is the target of 31 clinical trials; melanoma is the most targeted cancer type and is the target of 33 clinical trials. Novel antigens and underrepresented cancers remain to be targeted in future studies and clinical trials. Unlike chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, only about 16% of the 84 clinical trials target against hematological malignancies, consistent with T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy’s high potential for solid tumors. Six pharma/biotech companies with novel T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell ideas and products were examined in this review. Multiple approaches have been utilized in these companies to increase the T-cell receptor’s affinity and efficiency and to minimize cross-reactivity. The major challenges in the development of the T-cell receptor–engineered T-cell therapy due to tumor microenvironment were also discussed here.


1993 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Okazaki ◽  
Chiemi Nakanishi-Ito ◽  
Naohiro Seo ◽  
Takae Tanino ◽  
Masafumi Takiguchi ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3749-3749
Author(s):  
Elisavet Vlachonikola ◽  
Electra Sofou ◽  
Glykeria Gkoliou ◽  
Nikos Pechlivanis ◽  
Georgios Karakatsoulis ◽  
...  

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) B cells engage in multifaceted bi-directional interactions with bystander cells, including T cells. Immunogenetic studies in CLL revealed clonal expansions of T cells and shared T cell clonotypes between different patients, strongly implying clonal selection by antigens. Although the exact nature of these antigens remains largely elusive, evidence exists that the clonotypic B cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) may serve as a source of antigenic epitopes for T cells. That said, recurrent genomic aberrations associated with distinct abnormal expression profiles could represent an alternative, non mutually exclusive, source of potent immunogenic onco-antigens that might shape the T cell repertoire in CLL. On these grounds, here we interrogated the T cell receptor (TR) gene repertoire of CLL patients with different genomic aberration profiles with the aim to identify unique signatures that would allude to distinct antigen selection pressures. The study group included 46 patients with CLL, sampled before treatment initiation, who were categorized in 5 subgroups defined by a unique genomic aberration, as follows: +12, n=18; del(11q), n=10; del(13q), n=7; del(17p)/TP53mut, n=6; NOTCH1mut, n=5. Confounding effects of multiple aberrations have been minimized, as we previously established through comprehensive characterization (including FISH, SNP arrays and gene panels) that the analyzed patients carried only one of the above aberrations. Starting material was RNA extracted from blood mononuclear cells. TRBV-TRBD-TRBJ gene rearrangements were RT-PCR amplified and subjected to paired-end next generation sequencing (NGS). Raw NGS reads (n=13,213,563| median: 294,757/sample) were processed through a purpose-built bioinformatics pipeline. Only productive rearrangements (n=9,249,546 | median=199,184/sample) were taken into consideration for the computation of clonotypes i.e. TRB rearrangements with identical TRBV gene usage and amino acid complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) sequence. Overall, 513,984 distinct clonotypes (median=10,304 clonotypes/sample) were assessed. The main measure of clonality employed in this study was the median cumulative frequency of the 10 most expanded T cell clonotypes/sample (MCF-10). For comparisons of the clonality profiles, a group of 17 aged-matched healthy individuals were used as controls. All patients displayed oligoclonal T cell expansions with the following MCF-10 values: del(11q): 21.6%, +12: 25%, del(13q): 20.6%, NOTCH1mut: 9.1%, del(17p)/TP53mut: 12.9%; the difference between the del(11q) and +12 groups versus the NOTCH1mut group was statistically significant (p<0.05). The MCF-10 value of the control group was estimated at 17.5%, supporting the notion of age-related decrease in TR repertoire diversity. However, the del(11q), +12 and del(13q) CLL groups displayed elevated clonality, reaching statistical significance (p<0.002) in the case of +12. TRBV gene repertoire analysis revealed that the TRBV12-3 gene predominated in most groups, except for the del(17p)/TP53mut, where the predominant gene was TRBV10-3. Clonotype comparisons disclosed the presence of shared TR clonotypes both within a particular group but also between groups. Overall, 446/513,984 clonotypes were found to be shared by at least two patients across all groups; the vast majority (392/446, 88%) of shared clonotypes appeared to be CLL-biased since they did not match entries in public databases of TR clonotypes from various contexts. Subgroup-specific clonotypes were identified for all aberrations examined; these emerged as unique to the particular subgroups, as revealed by extensive comparisons against both public databases but also a large TR clonotype database from CLL available to us from our previous studies. In conclusion, recurrent genomic aberrations, especially large chromosomal abnormalities, display an oligoclonal TR gene repertoire. The distinct immunogenetic profile of each group examined here and, most importantly, the existence of subgroup-specific clonotypes, suggest that abnormal protein expression and gene dosage effects likely represent a relevant source of CLL-specific selecting antigens. Disclosures Scarfo: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Anagnostopoulos: Abbvie: Other: clinical trials; Sanofi: Other: clinical trials ; Ocopeptides: Other: clinical trials ; GSK: Other: clinical trials; Incyte: Other: clinical trials ; Takeda: Other: clinical trials ; Amgen: Other: clinical trials ; Janssen: Other: clinical trials; novartis: Other: clinical trials; Celgene: Other: clinical trials; Roche: Other: clinical trials; Astellas: Other: clinical trials . Ghia: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ArQule/MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Juno/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding. Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Other: Part ownership. Rosenquist: Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Illumina: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Stamatopoulos: Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baliakas: Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Chatzidimitriou: Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (571) ◽  
pp. eaaz6667
Author(s):  
Meixi Hao ◽  
Siyuan Hou ◽  
Weishuo Li ◽  
Kaiming Li ◽  
Lingjing Xue ◽  
...  

Treatment of solid tumors with T cell therapy has yielded limited therapeutic benefits to date. Although T cell therapy in combination with proinflammatory cytokines or immune checkpoints inhibitors has demonstrated preclinical and clinical successes in a subset of solid tumors, unsatisfactory results and severe toxicities necessitate the development of effective and safe combinatorial strategies. Here, the liposomal avasimibe (a metabolism-modulating drug) was clicked onto the T cell surface by lipid insertion without disturbing the physiological functions of the T cell. Avasimibe could be restrained on the T cell surface during circulation and extravasation and locally released to increase the concentration of cholesterol in the T cell membrane, which induced rapid T cell receptor clustering and sustained T cell activation. Treatment with surface anchor-engineered T cells, including mouse T cell receptor transgenic CD8+ T cells or human chimeric antigen receptor T cells, resulted in superior antitumor efficacy in mouse models of melanoma and glioblastoma. Glioblastoma was completely eradicated in three of the five mice receiving surface anchor-engineered chimeric antigen receptor T cells, whereas mice in other treatment groups survived no more than 64 days. Moreover, the administration of engineered T cells showed no obvious systemic side effects. These cell-surface anchor-engineered T cells hold translational potential because of their simple generation and their safety profile.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1727078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Bonte ◽  
Stijn De Munter ◽  
Glenn Goetgeluk ◽  
Joline Ingels ◽  
Melissa Pille ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-103
Author(s):  
Satoshi Suzuki ◽  
Kayo Masuko-Hongo ◽  
Torsten Alfons H�ger ◽  
Nguyen Mai Hong ◽  
Hiroko Sasakawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document