scholarly journals Supportive Management of Patients with Advanced Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas Receiving PRRT

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 2823-2829
Author(s):  
Erica S. Tsang ◽  
Gayle Funk ◽  
Janet Leung ◽  
Grace Kalish ◽  
Hagen F. Kennecke

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is used to treat patients with advanced malignant pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs). Patients are at risk of a PRRT-induced catecholamine crisis, and standard guidelines regarding the prevention and management of infusion reactions are lacking. In this case series, the institutional experience of five sequential patients with metastatic PCCs and PGLs receiving PRRT on an outpatient basis is described, of which four had symptomatic tumors and three had a high burden of disease. All patients with symptomatic tumors were treated with preventive management prior to the initiation of PRRT, and no infusion reactions or catecholamine crises were documented. PRRT may be delivered safely on an outpatient basis for patients with metastatic PCCs and PGLs with the involvement of an interdisciplinary team.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A993-A993
Author(s):  
Lim Sue Wen ◽  
Goh Kian Guan ◽  
Jin Hui Ho ◽  
Serena Sert Kim Khoo ◽  
Zanariah Hussein

Abstract Background: Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide secreting islet cell tumors (VIPoma) are rare neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin, characterized by secretory diarrhoea and electrolyte imbalances. Metastasis, commonly hepatic, frequently occur at diagnosis in up to 80% patients. Surgery of the primary tumour remains the gold standard management and in metastatic tumors, somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) are the drugs of choice for symptom relief and disease control. Some patients will require other approaches to control symptoms, such as liver-targeted therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) or chemotherapy. We describe a case series of metastatic VIPoma which partially-responded to SRL and review of other treatment modalities to achieve disease and symptom control. Case: We report 3 cases, ages 37 to 58 years, with metastatic VIPoma whom presented with secretory diarrhoea, hypokalaemia, achlorhydria and elevated serum VIP levels. CT and 68Gallium PET-CT imaging identified metastases in liver, bone, lungs, spleen and lymph nodes. One case underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy at diagnosis and two cases were advanced and non-resectable. All received long-acting SRL initially and achieved partial control of the gastrointestinal symptoms. Two cases underwent Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) and one case received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Two patients have progressive disease and one succumbed to advanced disease. For inoperable disease, PRRT is useful adjuvant therapy for symptom relief and may improve progression free survival (PFS). Cytotoxic chemotherapy is an option for patients with progressive or symptomatic unresectable tumor. Chemoembolization or liver-targeted therapy are used in liver metastasis for loco-regional control. Alfa-interferon and targeted therapies such as everolimus and sunitinib are other treatment options that can be considered. Conclusion: Metastatic VIPoma remains a challenging disease to manage, requiring multimodal treatment approaches. With timely diagnosis and advancing therapeutic options, more patients can achieve improved symptom and disease control as well as increased survival.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. A. T. Braat ◽  
H. Ahmadzadehfar ◽  
S. C. Kappadath ◽  
C. L. Stothers ◽  
A. Frilling ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and radioembolization are increasingly used in neuroendocrine neoplasms patients. However, concerns have been raised on cumulative hepatotoxicity. The aim of this sub-analysis was to investigate hepatotoxicity of yttrium-90 resin microspheres radioembolization in patients who were previously treated with PRRT. Methods Patients treated with radioembolization after systemic radionuclide treatment were retrospectively analysed. Imaging response according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) v1.1 and clinical response after 3 months were collected. Clinical, biochemical and haematological toxicities according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v4.03 were also collected. Specifics on prior PRRT, subsequent radioembolization treatments, treatments after radioembolization and overall survival (OS) were collected. Results Forty-four patients were included, who underwent a total of 58 radioembolization procedures, of which 55% whole liver treatments, at a median of 353 days after prior PRRT. According to RECIST 1.1, an objective response rate of 16% and disease control rate of 91% were found after 3 months. Clinical response was seen in 65% (15/23) of symptomatic patients after 3 months. Within 3 months, clinical toxicities occurred in 26%. Biochemical and haematological toxicities CTCAE grade 3–4 occurred in ≤ 10%, apart from lymphocytopenia (42%). Radioembolization-related complications occurred in 5% and fatal radioembolization-induced liver disease in 2% (one patient). A median OS of 3.5 years [95% confidence interval 1.8–5.1 years] after radioembolization for the entire study population was found. Conclusion Radioembolization after systemic radionuclide treatments is safe, and the occurrence of radioembolization-induced liver disease is rare. Level of Evidence 4, case series.


2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 282-290
Author(s):  
Adrian Gonzalez-Aguirre ◽  
Etay Ziv

AbstractGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. Current treatment algorithms for these tumors are complex and often require a multidisciplinary approach. Recently, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was granted Food and Drug Administration approval, making this treatment widely available in the United States. PRRT is now another therapeutic option for patients with GEP-NETs. To date there are no consensus guidelines about how to sequence multiple treatment options. Moreover, there is concern of potential liver toxicity when PRRT is used before or after liver-directed therapies (LDTs). In this review, we describe the characteristics of the most commonly used LDT and their potential interactions with PRRT, as well as specific clinical scenarios that are relevant when deciding on the use of LDT. We also review the limited case series that have been published involving patients treated with different combinations of LDT and PRRT. Finally, we discuss some of the future directions for GEP-NET treatments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document