Association of Tumor PD-L1 Expression with the T790M Mutation and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving EGFR-TKI Therapy

Background: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of the epidermal growth receptor gene (EGFR) after first-line treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patient groups with and without tumor expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). Methods: Data of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using the 22C3 antibody. T790M gene mutation was evaluated by Cobas EGFR assay using tissues or humoral specimens. Results: Data of 47 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were analyzed. The median (95% confidence interval) PFS in the PD-L1-negative and -positive patient groups were 12.9 (9.7–15.4) months and 9.0 (5.1–12.3) months, respectively (p = 0.029). T790M gene mutation was analyzed in 27 patients. The proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of EGFR after first-line treatment with an EGFR-TKI was higher in the PD-L1-negative patient group than in the PD-L1-positive patient group (8/11 patients (72.7%) vs. 4/16 patients (25.0%); p = 0.022). Conclusions: Patients with negative tumor PD-L1 expression showed longer PFS and a higher proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of EGFR after first-line treatment with an EGFR-TKI.

Download Full-text

Association of progression free survival with the timing of genomic testing in non-small cell lung cancer: Evidence from the GuardantInform clinic-genomic database.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e21143 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e21143-e21143

Author(s):

Mark D. Hiatt ◽

Junhua Yu ◽

Nicole Zhang ◽

Amy McNeal ◽

Julie Kaylor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

P Value ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Egfr Tki ◽

First Line Treatment ◽

Group 1

e21143 Background: The clinical utility of ctDNA analysis for biomarker identification in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been established, supporting clinical adoption of this testing modality. All FDA-approved, immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapies require the prerequisite of negativity for ALK rearrangement and EGFR mutation, or prior toxicity or progression on oral therapies targeting mutations in these genes. Despite these recommendations and support from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network, broad-panel marker testing for targeted therapy options in NSCLC continues to be underperformed. Data are even limited on when those tests are typically conducted and the effects of timing on the treatment outcomes. Methods: The GuardantINFORM™ clinic-genomic database was interrogated for patients over the age of 18 having a Guardant360 test positive for EGFR mutations of L858R or exon 19 after 2016 and known to have a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer one year prior to testing. Patients had to have at least three claims prior to, and 90 days of follow-up after, their test. Patients were stratified into three groups by pre- and post-test treatment: 1) patients treated with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as a first-line treatment after the test, with no other chemotherapy, ICI immunotherapy (IO), or targeted therapy before the test; 2) patients with other first-line treatments prior to the test and then EGFR TKI immediately following the test; and 3) patients treated with ICI or chemotherapy after the test and before EGFR TKI or patients not treated after the test. Real-world time to next treatment (rwTTN) was defined as the index date to the treatment different than the index therapy. Progression free survival (PFS) time was defined as rwTTN or time to death, whichever came earlier. Patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) associated with chemotherapy or IO were reported as a percentage (p-value<0.001). Results: Among the 3 cohorts of patients (384 in each group who were matched on age with difference < 3, gender, and follow-up time with difference < 4 months) identified, a statistically significant difference in PFS was discovered between group 1 ( EGFR TKI as first-line treatment) and the other two groups based on the Cox proportional hazard model [hazard ratio=1.8, p-value<0.001, median survival time for group 1= 26 months (95% CI 23-29) vs. 17 months (95% CI 14-19)]. No difference existed in PFS between groups 2 and 3. The proportion of patients experiencing treatment-associated AEs was lowest in group 1 (13.5% vs 15.9% in group 2 vs 30.2% in group 3 for ICI-related AEs, 16.9% vs 23.2% vs 38.5% for chemo-related AEs, p-value<0.001). Conclusions: Performing genomic testing sooner, as early as first-line treatment, may improve the treatment response for patients with NSCLC.

Download Full-text

Cetuximab (C225) in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (Pts) with K-ras wild-type (WT) tumors: Does the choice and schedule of fluoropyrimidine (Fp) matter?

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.576 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 576-576

Author(s):

Geoffrey Yuyat Ku ◽

Benjamin Haaland ◽

Gilberto de Lima Lopes

Keyword(s):

Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Wild Type ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Epidermal Growth ◽

First Line Treatment

576 Background: C225, a monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, has been shown to inconsistently improve response rates (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the first-line treatment of advanced CRC Pts with K-ras WT tumors. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of four trials where K-ras WT Pts received a Fp (capecitabine (C) or bolus (b) or infusional (CI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)) and oxaliplatin (oxali) or irinotecan (CPT) ± C225 (CRYSTAL, OPUS, COIN and NORDIC VII trials) and one trial, where K-ras WT and mutant Pts received C225 with capecitabine (C) and oxali or CPT (AIO study). We sought to determine if the choice of Fp affects the response to C225. A mixed effects model similar to that of DerSimonian and Laird was fit by restricted maximum likelihood and used to obtain an overall estimate of the effect of C225 in the presence of CI 5-FU, an indirect estimate of the decrease in the effect of C225 in the presence of C/b5-FU relative to CI 5-FU, and an estimate of the study-to-study variability. Results: Only Pts treated with CI 5-FU based chemo derived benefit from C225. Relative to CI 5-FU, Pts treated with C or b5-FU based doublet chemo had a decrease in RR, PFS and OS. The choice of oxali or CPT did not affect responses to C225. Conclusions: The lack of benefit for C225 with C or b5-FU chemo is unexpected. A possible explanation is increased toxicity with C225, which led to dose reduction of C only in the C225-arm of the COIN study; however, increased toxicity was not seen in the NORDIC VII study. Pending further study, only CI 5-FU regimens should be used with C225. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Optimal duration of therapy in the first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: single center experience

Vojnosanitetski pregled ◽

10.2298/vsp200924053j ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 53-53

Author(s):

Sasa Jungic ◽

Biljana Tubic ◽

Jelena Berendika ◽

Zdenka Gojkovic ◽

Ivanka Rakita ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Drug Reactions ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Patient Groups ◽

First Line Treatment

Background / Aim. FOLFOX (5fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin)/CapOx (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI (5 fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab are a standard treatment options for a first line treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). The aim of this study was to compare overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the groups of patients with mCRC who were treated in the first line with FOLFIRI/bev versus FOLFOX/bev. At the same time, it was compared the safety profile in observed groups of patients and investigated optimal treatment duration and characteristics of patients who had the best treatment outcomes. Methods. In a retrospective-prospective study, patients with mCRC were treated with a chemotherapy protocols for the first line in combination with bevacizumab (FOLFOX/bev, respectively, FOLFIRI/bev). Treatment efficacy was evaluated on the basis of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the safety of treatment was evaluated by monitoring adverse drug reactions. Results. ORR was 70% in the FOLFIRI/bev group and 50% in the FOLFOX/bev group. Median PFS for FOLFIRI/bev (n = 30) and for FOLFOX/bev (n = 30) was 15.6 months and 12.1 months respectively (HR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.53; P = 0.5591). Median OS for FOLFIRI/bev and for FOLFOX/bev was 24.7 months and 19.9 months respectively (HR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-1.23; P = 0.1552). In both patient groups, the patients who received more than 9 cycles of induction therapy had better treatment response in comparison with patients who received less than 9 cycles of therapy. In FOLFOX/bev group PFS was 16.9 versus 9.7 months and OS was 22.1 versus 17.6 months respectively. In FOLFIRI/bev group PFS was 9 months for patients who received less than 9 cycles of therapy versus 18.8 months for patients who received more than 9 cycles, OS was 18.0 versus 27.7 respectively. The adverse drug reactions grade 3 and 4 were 7% in the FOLFIRI/bev group versus 27% in the FOLFOX/bev group. Conclusion. Patients who received FOLFIRI/bev had better ORR (70 % versus 50 %), PFS (15.6 versus 12.1 months) and OS (24.7 versus 19.9 months). In both patient groups, better treatment response had the patients who received induction therapy for 4-6 months (more than 9 cycles of therapy).

Download Full-text

Lenvatinib as first-line treatment for advanced thyroid cancer: long progression-free survival

Endocrine ◽

10.1007/s12020-020-02477-0 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Simone De Leo ◽

Marta Di Stefano ◽

Luca Persani ◽

Laura Fugazzola ◽

Carla Colombo

Keyword(s):

Thyroid Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Advanced Thyroid Cancer ◽

First Line Treatment

Download Full-text

Vasculogenic mimicry, a negative indicator for progression free survival of lung adenocarcinoma irrespective of first line treatment and epithelial growth factor receptor mutation status

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-021-07863-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Xuejun He ◽

Jijun You ◽

Haibing Ding ◽

Zhisheng Zhang ◽

Lin Cui ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽

Target Therapy ◽

Vasculogenic Mimicry ◽

Therapy Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Egfr Mutations ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Background Vascular mimicry (VM) was associated with the prognosis of cancers. The aim of the study was to explore the association between VM and anticancer therapy response in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with lung adenocarcinoma between March 1st, 2013, to April 1st, 2019, at the Second People’s Hospital of Taizhou City. All included patients were divided into the VM and no-VM groups according to whether VM was observed or not in the specimen. Vessels with positive PAS and negative CD34 staining were confirmed as VM. The main outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Sixty-six (50.4%) patients were male. Eighty-one patients received chemotherapy as the first-line treatment, and 50 patients received TKIs. Forty-five (34.4%) patients were confirmed with VM. There was no difference regarding the first-line treatment between the VM and no-VM groups (P = 0.285). The 86 patients without VM had a median PFS of 279 (range, 90–1095) days, and 45 patients with VM had a median PFS of 167 (range, 90–369) days (P < 0.001). T stage (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.71), N stage (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.09–1.86), M stage (HR = 2.85, 95%CI: 1.76–4.61), differentiation (HR = 1.85, 95%CI: 1.29–2.65), therapy (HR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.21–0.49), VM (HR = 2.12, 95%CI: 1.33–3.37), and ECOG (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.09–1.84) were independently associated with PFS. Conclusion The benefits of first-line TKIs for NSCLC with EGFR mutation are possibly better than those of platinum-based regimens in patients without VM, but there is no difference in the benefit of chemotherapy or target therapy for VM-positive NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Download Full-text