scholarly journals Size Effect on the Elastic Mechanical Properties of Beech and Its Application in Finite Element Analysis of Wood Structures

Forests ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wengang Hu ◽  
Hui Wan ◽  
Huiyuan Guan
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Elastic Constants ◽  
Wood Specimen ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Wood Structures

Elastic constants of wood are fundamental parameters used in finite element analysis of wood structures. However, few studies and standards regulate the dimensions of sample used to measure elastic constants of wood. The size effect on mechanical properties (i.e., elastic constants and proportional limit stresses) of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) wood was studied with five different sizes samples. The data of experiments were inputted into a finite element model of self-designed chair and the loading capacity of chair was investigated by finite element method (FEM) and experiment. The results showed that nonlinear relationships were found between proportional limit stresses, cross-sectional area, and height of specimen by response surface method with R2 greater than 0.72 in longitudinal, radial, and tangential directions. Elastic moduli and shear moduli increased with the height of specimen when cross-sectional area was kept constant, and decreased with an increased cross-sectional area of specimen, when the height was a constant, while the trends of Poisson’s ratio were not as expected. The comparisons between experiment and FEM suggested that the accuracy of FEM simulation increase with the raise of width-height ratio (≤1) of specimens used to determine the elastic constants. It is recommended to use small cubic wood specimen to determine the elastic mechanical properties used for finite element analysis of beech wood structures. Further research to find optimized wood specimen dimensions to get mechanical properties for FEM is quite necessary.

Design Innovation Size and Shape Optimization of a 1.0mm Multifunctional Forceps-Scissors Surgical Instrument

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton E. Aguirre ◽  
Mary Frecker
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Shape Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Size And Shape ◽  
The Cross

A size and shape optimization routine is developed for a 1.0mm diameter multifunctional instrument for minimally invasive surgery. The instrument is a compliant mechanism capable of both grasping and cutting. Multifunctional instruments are expected to be beneficial in the operating room because of their ability to perform multiple surgical tasks, thereby decreasing the total number of instrument exchanges in a single procedure. With fewer instrument exchanges, the risk of inadvertent tissue trauma as well as overall surgical time and costs are reduced. The focus of this paper is to investigate the performance effects of allowing the cross-sectional area along the length of the device to vary. This investigation is accomplished by defining various cross-sectional segments in terms of parametric variables and optimizing the dimensions of the instrument to provide a sufficient opening of the forceps jaws while maintaining adequate cutting and grasping forces. Two optimization problems are considered. First, all parametric segments are set equal to one another to achieve size optimization. Second, each segment is allowed to vary independently, thereby achieving shape optimization. Large deformation finite element analysis and optimization are conducted using ANSYS®. Finally, prototypes are fabricated using wire EMD and experiments are conducted to evaluate the instrument performance. As a result of allowing the cross-sectional area to vary, i.e., conducting shape optimization, the forceps and scissors blocked forces increased by as much as 83.2% and 87%, respectively. During prototype evaluations, it is found that the finite element analysis predictions were within 10% of the measured tool performance. Therefore, for this application, it is concluded that performing shape optimization does significantly influence the performance of the instrument.

scholarly journals Measurement and calibration of the nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio to increase the accuracy of finite element analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchi Li ◽  
Zhipeng Xi ◽  
Xiaoyu Zhang ◽  
Shenglu Sun ◽  
Lin Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Area Ratio ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fea Model ◽  
Nucleus Position

Abstract Background: As a widely used biomechanical research method, finite element analysis (FEA) is an important tool for investigating the pathogenesis of disc degenerative diseases and optimizing spine surgical methods. However, the definitions of the relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio do not conform to a uniform standard, thus affecting the accuracy (ACC) of the FEA. Hence, this study aimed to determine a precise definition of the relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio to increase the ACC of the following FEA studies. Methods: The lumbar relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio were measured from magnetic resonance imaging data and then calibrated and validated via FEA. Imaging data from patients without disc degeneration were used. The L4-L5 nucleus and disc cross-sectional areas and the distances between the edges of the annulus and nucleus were measured; the ratios between these values were calculated as P1 and P2, respectively. The FEA model was constructed using these measured values, and the relative nucleus position was calibrated by estimating the differences in the range of motion (ROM) between the model, wherein the ligaments, facet joints and nucleus were suppressed, and that of an in vitro study. Then, the ACC was re-estimated in the model with all non-bony structures by comparing the ROM, the intradiscal pressure (IDP), the facet contact force (FCF) and the disc compression (DC) under different sizes and directions of moments magnitudes to validate the measured and calibrated indicators. Results: The interobserver homogeneity was acceptable, and the measured P1 and P2 values were 1.22 and 38%, respectively. Furthermore, an ACC of up to 99% was attained for the model under flexion–extension conditions when the calibrated P1 value (1.62) was used, with a model validation of greater than 90% attained under al most all of the loading conditions considering the different indicators and moment magnitude s. Conclusion: The measured and calibrated relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio increase the ACC of the FEA model and can therefore be used in subsequent studies.

scholarly journals Measurement and calibration of the nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio to increase the accuracy of finite element analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchi Li ◽  
Zhipeng Xi ◽  
Xiaoyu Zhang ◽  
Shenglu Sun ◽  
Lin Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Area Ratio ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fea Model ◽  
Nucleus Position

Abstract Background: As a widely used biomechanical research method, finite element analysis (FEA) is a significant tool for investigating the pathogenesis of disc degenerative diseases and optimizing of spine surgical methods. However, the definitions of the relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio do not conform to a uniform standard, thus affecting the accuracy (ACC) of the FEA. Hence, this study aimed to determine a precise definition of the relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio to increase ACC of following FEA studies. Methods: The lumbar relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio were measured from magnetic resonance imaging data, and then calibrated and validated via FEA. Imaging data from patients without disc degeneration were recruited. The L4-L5 nucleus and disc cross-sectional areas and the distances between the edges of the annulus and nucleus were measured; the ratios between these values were calculated as P1 and P2, respectively. The FEA model was constructed using these measured values, and the relative nucleus position was calibrated by estimating the differences in the range of motions (ROMs) between the model, wherein the ligaments, facet joints and nucleus were supressed, and an in vitro study. Then, ACC were re-estimated in the model with all non-bony structures to validate the measured and calibrated indicators. Results: The interobserver homogeneity is acceptable, and the measured P1 and P2 values are 1.22 and 38%, respectively. Furthermore, an ACC of up to 99% was attained for the model under flexion–extension conditions when the calibrated P1 value (1.62) was used, with a model validation of greater than 90% attained under all loading conditions. Conclusion: The measured and calibrated relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio increase the ACC of the FEA model, and can therefore be used in subsequent studies.

scholarly journals Measurement and calibration of the nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio to increase the accuracy of finite element analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchi Li ◽  
Zhipeng Xi ◽  
Xiaoyu Zhang ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Shenglu Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Area Ratio ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fea Model ◽  
Nucleus Position

Abstract Backgrounds: As a widely used biomechanical research method, finite element analysis (FEA) is an important tool for investigating the pathogenesis of disc degenerative diseases and optimizing spine surgical methods. However, the definitions of the relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio do not conform to a uniform standard, thus affecting the accuracy (ACC) of the FEA.Objectives: This study aimed to determine a precise definition of the relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio to increase the ACC of the following FEA studies.Methods: The lumbar relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio were measured from magnetic resonance imaging data and then calibrated and validated via FEA. Imaging data from patients without disc degeneration were used. The L4-L5 nucleus and disc cross-sectional areas and the distances between the edges of the annulus and nucleus were measured; the ratios between these values were calculated as P1 and P2, respectively. The FEA model was constructed using these measured values, and the relative nucleus position was calibrated by estimating the differences in the range of motion (ROM) between the model, wherein the ligaments, facet joints and nucleus were suppressed, and that of an in vitro study. Then, the ACC was re-estimated in the model with all non-bony structures by comparing the ROM, the intradiscal pressure (IDP), the facet contact force (FCF) and the disc compression (DC) under different sizes and directions of moments magnitudes to validate the measured and calibrated indicators.Results: The interobserver homogeneity was acceptable, and the measured P1 and P2 values were 1.22 and 38%, respectively. Furthermore, an ACC of up to 99% was attained for the model under flexion–extension conditions when the calibrated P1 value (1.62) was used, with a model validation of greater than 90% attained under almost all of the loading conditions considering the different indicators and moment magnitudes.Conclusions: The measured and calibrated relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio increase the ACC of the FEA model and can therefore be used in subsequent studies.

Measurement of pharyngeal cross-sectional area by finite element analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 294-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled F. Mansour ◽  
James A. Rowley ◽  
M. Safwan Badr
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Rem Sleep ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pharyngeal Pressure ◽  
Simultaneous Measurements ◽  
The Mean

A noninvasive measurement of pharyngeal cross-sectional area (CSA) during sleep would be advantageous for research studies. We hypothesized that CSA could be calculated from the measured pharyngeal pressure and flow by finite element analysis (FEA). The retropalatal airway was visualized by using a fiber-optic scope to obtain the measured CSA (mCSA). Flow was measured with a pneumotachometer, and pharyngeal pressure was measured with a pressure catheter at the palatal rim. FEA was performed as follows: by using a three-dimensional image of the upper airway, a mesh of finite elements was created. Specialized software was used to allow the simultaneous calculation of velocity and area for each element by using the measured pressure and flow. In the development phase, 677 simultaneous measurements of CSA, pressure, and flow from one subject during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep were entered into the software to determine a series of equations, based on the continuity and momentum equations, that could calculate the CSA (cCSA). In the validation phase, the final equations were used to calculate the CSA from 1,767 simultaneous measurements of pressure and flow obtained during wakefulness, NREM, and REM sleep from 14 subjects. In both phases, mCSA and cCSA were compared by Bland-Altman analysis. For development breaths, the mean difference between mCSA and cCSA was 0.0 mm2 (95% CI, −0.1, 0.1 mm2). For NREM validation breaths, the mean difference between mCSA and cCSA was 1.1 mm2 (95% CI 1.3, 1.5 mm2). Pharyngeal CSA can be accurately calculated from measured pharyngeal pressure and flow by FEA.

The Influence of Specimen Attachment and Dimension on Microtensile Strength

2004 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 420-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. El Zohairy ◽  
A.J. de Gee ◽  
N. de Jager ◽  
L.J. van Ruijven ◽  
A.J. Feilzer
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Maximum Stress ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Testing Device ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Surface Flaws ◽  
Stress Patterns

The higher microtensile bond strength values found for specimens with a smaller cross-sectional area are often explained by the lower occurrence of internal defects and surface flaws. We hypothesized that this aberrant behavior is mainly caused by the lateral way of attachment of the specimens to the testing device, which makes the strength dependent on the thickness. This study showed that composite bars of 1×1×10, 1×2×10, and 1×3×10mm attached at their 1-mm-wide side (situation A) fractured at loads of the same magnitude, as a result of which the microtensile strength (μTS), calculated as F/A (force at fracture/cross-sectional area), significantly increased for specimens with decreasing thickness. Attachment at the 1-, 2-, or 3-mm-wide side (situation B) resulted in equal μTS values (P > 0.05). Finite element analysis showed different stress patterns for situation A, but comparable patterns for situation B. Both situations showed the same maximum stress at fracture.

Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Exterior FRP Shell

2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 1461-1465
Author(s):  
Chuan Min Zhang ◽  
Chao He Chen ◽  
Ye Fan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Concrete Beams ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Beams ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Contact Interface ◽  
Accurate Calculation ◽  
Element Analysis

The paper makes an analysis of the reinforced concrete beams with exterior FRP Shell in Finite Element, and compares it with the test results. The results show that, by means of this model, mechanical properties of reinforced concrete beams with exterior FRP shell can be predicted better. However, the larger the load, the larger deviation between calculated values and test values. Hence, if more accurate calculation is required, issues of contact interface between the reinforced concrete beams and the FRP shell should be taken into consideration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document