scholarly journals Review of Therapeutic Options for the Prevention of VTE in Total Joint Arthroplasty

Geriatrics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Jordan Etscheidt ◽  
Amir Shahien ◽  
Monique Gainey ◽  
Daniel Kronenfeld ◽  
Ruijia Niu ◽  
...  

Hip and knee arthroplasty patients are at high risk of perioperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE). VTE has been well studied in this population and it is recommended that total joint arthroplasty recipients receive chemoprophylactic anticoagulation due to risk factors inherent to the surgical intervention. There are few concise resources for the orthopedic surgeon that summarize data regarding post-operative anticoagulation in the context of currently available therapeutic options and perioperative standards of practice. The periodic reexamination of literature is essential as conclusions drawn from studies predating perioperative protocols that include early mobilization and sequential compression devices as standards of practice in total joint arthroplasty are no longer generalizable to modern-day practice. We reviewed a large number of recently published research studies related to post-operative anticoagulation in total joint arthroplasty populations that received a high Level of Evidence grade. Current literature supports the use of oral aspirin regimens in place of more aggressive anticoagulants, particularly among low risk patients. Oral aspirin regimens appear to have the additional benefit of lower rates of bleeding and wound complications. Less consensus exists among high risk patients and more potent anticoagulants may be indicated. However, available evidence does not demonstrate clear superiority among current options, all of which may place patients at a higher risk of bleeding and wound complications. In this situation, chemoprophylactic selection should reflect specific patient needs and characteristics.

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1171-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres F. Duque ◽  
Zachary D. Post ◽  
Fabio R. Orozco ◽  
Rex W. Lutz ◽  
Alvin C. Ong

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 533-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan H. Garfinkel ◽  
Brian P. Gladnick ◽  
Niama Roland ◽  
David W. Romness

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 405-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L Johnson ◽  
Ryan D Frank ◽  
Elizabeth B Habermann ◽  
Alanna M Chamberlain ◽  
Matthew P Abdel ◽  
...  

BackgroundFrailty increases risk for complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Whether this association is influenced by anesthetic administered is unknown. We hypothesized that use of neuraxial (spinal or epidural) anesthesia is associated with better outcomes compared with general anesthesia, and that the effect of anesthesia type on outcomes differs by frailty status.MethodsThis single-institution cohort study included all patients (≥50 years) from January 2005 through December 2016 undergoing unilateral, primary and revision TJA. Using multivariable Cox regression, we assessed relationships between anesthesia type, a preoperative frailty deficit index (FI) categorized as non-frail (FI <0.11), vulnerable (FI 0.11 to 0.20), and frail (FI >0.20), and complications (mortality, infection, wound complications/hematoma, reoperation, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture) within 1 year after surgery. Interactions between anesthesia type and frailty were tested, and stratified models were presented when an interaction (p<0.1) was observed.ResultsAmong 18 458 patients undergoing TJA, more patients were classified as frail (21.5%) and vulnerable (36.2%) than non-frail (42.3%). Anesthesia type was not associated with complications after adjusting for age, joint, and revision type. However, in analyzes stratified by frailty, vulnerable patients under neuraxial block had less mortality (HR=0.49; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.89) and wound complications/hematoma (HR=0.71; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90), whereas no difference in risk by anesthesia type was observed among patients found non-frail or frail.ConclusionsNeuraxial anesthesia use among vulnerable patients was associated with improved survival and less wound complications. Calculating preoperative frailty prior to TJA informs perioperative risk and enhances shared-decision making for selection of anesthesia type.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document