CCR6–CCL20 Axis in IBD: What Have We Learnt in the Last 20 Years?

CC chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6) and its specific partner CC chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) are known to play a pivotal role in intestinal inflammation. CCR6-associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is already at the forefront of experimental inflammatory disease models, being the subject of numerous analytical studies. IBD is associated with two sub phenotypes, Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Both these disease entities produce potent immune dysregulation followed by intense tissue damage within the gut mucosal system, initiating symptoms that are severely debilitating. Multiple causative factors are said to be responsible for IBD, but direct immune dysfunction is kindled by overplay of innate and adaptive immune responses produced against the luminal contents through the weakened or leaky gut epithelial barrier. Once immune homeostasis is not achieved by endogenous protective mechanisms, the self-assertive adaptive immunity mobilizes its various T and B cell cohorts, initializing their immune mechanisms by deploying the immune cells towards the site of infection. CCR6 and its unique solitary ligand CCL20 are small protein molecules that are abundantly expressed by T and B lymphocytes and act as chemotactic immune-modulatory envoys that help in the deployment of the effector lymphocyte arm of the immune system and produce two directly opposing outcomes in IBD. This dichotomous immunity consists of either immune tolerance or inflammation which then develops into a chronic state, remaining unresponsive to inherent immunity or targeted clinical therapy. In this review, we have identified large numbers of experimental studies that have employed both mouse models and clinical subjects spanning a period of nearly two decades and we have clustered these into 13 different groups. This review will provide greater understanding of the CCR6–CCL20 axis in IBD and identify gaps in the literature that can be filled in the future.

Download Full-text

CCR6-CCL20 Axis in IBD: What have we learnt in the past 20 years?

10.20944/preprints201808.0381.v1 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Ranmali Ranasinghe ◽

Rajaraman Eri

Keyword(s):

Experimental Studies ◽

Cc Chemokine ◽

Adaptive Immune ◽

Immune Mediated ◽

Causative Factors ◽

Chemokine Ligand ◽

Disease Entities ◽

Inflammatory Bowel ◽

Visual Depiction ◽

Microbial Attack

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a CC chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6) - associated immune mediated disorder which has attracted an extensive superfluity of experimental analyses. IBD has come to the fore of varied scrutinizing owing to its complexity by nature for comprising of two synergistic sub phenotypes; Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC). Both these disease entities cause potent immune dysregulation followed by intense tissue damage within the gut mucosal system, initiating symptoms which are severely debilitating. Multiple causative factors are said to be responsible for IBD but direct immune dysfunction is kindled by overplay of innate and adaptive immune responses produced against a pathogenic microbial attack through the weakened or leaky gut epithelial barrier. Once immune homeostasis is not achieved by tolerating agents, the self-assertive adaptive immunity mobilize its various T and B cell cohorts initializing their allied immune mechanisms by vigorously deploying them towards the site of infection. CCR6 and its unique solitary ligand CC-chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) are small protein molecules which are abundantly expressed by T and B lymphocytes and act as chemotactic immune-modulatory envoys that help in the deployment of the effector lymphocyte arm of the immune system, producing two directly opposing outcomes in IBD. This dichotomous immunity consists of either immune tolerance or inflammation which then develops into a chronic state, remaining catatonic to inherent immunity or targeted clinical therapy. In this review, we have chronologically identified a plethora of experimental studies radiating into 14 different compartments highlighted in the visual depiction which have employed both mouse models and clinical subjects spanning a period of nearly two decades. In doing so, we expect the research community would further benefit by tracing through the history, thereby understanding the CCR6 –CCL20 axis in IBD and identifying the gaps in literature which can be fortuitously filled in the future.

Download Full-text

The Roles of CCR9/CCL25 in Inflammation and Inflammation-Associated Diseases

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology ◽

10.3389/fcell.2021.686548 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 ◽

Author(s):

Xue Wu ◽

Meng Sun ◽

Zhi Yang ◽

Chenxi Lu ◽

Qiang Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inflammatory Responses ◽

Experimental Studies ◽

Early Research ◽

Target Cells ◽

Related Protein ◽

Small Molecular Weight ◽

Associated Diseases ◽

Chemokine Ligand ◽

Inflammatory Bowel ◽

Research Analysis

Chemokine is a structure-related protein with a relatively small molecular weight, which can target cells to chemotaxis and promote inflammatory response. Inflammation plays an important role in aging. C-C chemokine receptor 9 (CCR9) and its ligand C-C chemokine ligand 25 (CCL25) are involved in the regulating the occurrence and development of various diseases, which has become a research hotspot. Early research analysis of CCR9-deficient mouse models also confirmed various physiological functions of this chemokine in inflammatory responses. Moreover, CCR9/CCL25 has been shown to play an important role in a variety of inflammation-related diseases, such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), rheumatoid arthritis, hepatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, asthma, etc. Therefore, the purpose of this review gives an overview of the recent advances in understanding the roles of CCR9/CCL25 in inflammation and inflammation-associated diseases, which will contribute to the design of future experimental studies on the potential of CCR9/CCL25 and advance the research of CCR9/CCL25 as pharmacological inflammatory targets.

Download Full-text

Predicting Therapeutic Response by in vivo Molecular Imaging in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Digestive Diseases ◽

10.1159/000445262 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (5) ◽

pp. 552-557 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Raja Atreya ◽

Markus F. Neurath

Keyword(s):

Molecular Imaging ◽

Cell Apoptosis ◽

Therapeutic Efficacy ◽

Therapeutic Response ◽

Intestinal Inflammation ◽

Photon Emission ◽

Experimental Studies ◽

Intestinal Cell ◽

Inflammatory Bowel

Background: Different invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities are indispensable tools in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Standard imaging procedures like white light endoscopy or MRI are used to define gut inflammation based on structural changes and altered morphology of the mucosa. Nevertheless, it has thus far not been possible to analyse biological processes at the cellular level, which drive intestinal inflammation in IBD patients. The recent advent of molecular imaging in the field of IBD has opened new promising avenues to allow personalized medicine approaches based on in vivo-detected molecular findings. Key Messages: Recent clinical studies have attempted to address the issue of predicting therapeutic response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment in IBD patients based on the molecular mechanism of action of these agents and corresponding in vivo assessment of mucosal immune responses. Several experimental studies have indicated that one of the main functions of efficacious anti-TNF therapy in IBD is the induction of intestinal cell apoptosis. Fittingly, a corresponding molecular-imaging study using single-photon emission CT for the localization and quantification of cell apoptosis, demonstrated that induction of mucosal T-cell apoptosis correlated with the therapeutic response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease patients. There was moreover a predictive capacity regarding therapeutic efficacy. As the main biological properties of anti-TNF antibodies in IBD are mediated through binding to membrane-bound TNF (mTNF) expressing intestinal cells, another study used molecular imaging for in vivo visualization of these cells via fluorescent anti-TNF antibodies to predict therapeutic efficacy of these agents. It could be shown that patients with high amounts of mTNF positive cells showed significantly better response rates compared to patients with low amounts of mTNF positive cells. Conclusion: In vivo molecular imaging in IBD has the potential to have an impact on our current treatment approaches and may allow us to individualize specific therapies based on molecular level analysis.

Download Full-text