Use of Non-Cancer Medications in New Zealand Women at the Diagnosis of Primary Invasive Breast Cancer: Prevalence, Associated Factors and Effects on Survival

Background: Assessing the use of multiple medications in cancer patients is crucial as such use may affect cancer outcomes. This study reports the prevalence of non-cancer medication use at breast cancer diagnosis, its associated factors, and its effect on survival. Methods: We identified all women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016, from four population-based breast cancer registries, in Auckland, Waikato, Wellington, and Christchurch, New Zealand. Through linkage to the pharmaceutical records, we obtained information on non-cancer medications that were dispensed for a minimum of 90 days’ supply between one year before cancer diagnosis and first cancer treatment. We performed ordered logistic regressions to identify associated factors and Cox regressions to investigate its effect on patient survival. Results: Of 14,485 patients, 52% were dispensed at least one drug (mean—1.3 drugs; maximum—13 drugs), with a higher prevalence observed in patients who were older, treated at a public facility, more economically deprived, and screen-detected. The use of 2–3 drugs showed a reduced non-breast cancer mortality (HR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.60–0.92) in previously hospitalised patients, with other groups showing non-significant associations when adjusted for confounding factors. Drug use was not associated with changes in breast cancer-specific mortality. Conclusions: Non-cancer medication use at breast cancer diagnosis was common in New Zealand, more prevalent in older and disadvantaged women, and showed no effect on breast cancer-specific mortality, but a reduction in other cause mortality with the use of 2–3 drugs.

Download Full-text

Metastatic-free intervals and risk of breast cancer-specific mortality among patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A population-based analysis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e13034 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e13034-e13034

Author(s):

Gregory Sampang Calip ◽

Ernest H Law ◽

Colin Hubbard ◽

Nadia Azmi Nabulsi ◽

Alemseged Ayele Asfaw ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Cancer Diagnosis ◽

Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽

Population Based ◽

Breast Cancer Specific Survival ◽

Cancer Specific Survival ◽

Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽

Specific Mortality ◽

Cancer Specific Mortality ◽

Positive Breast Cancer

e13034 Background: Patients successfully treated for hormone receptor (HR)-positive early breast cancer remain at risk of recurrence and metastatic disease even after extended periods of disease-free years. Whether prolonged metastatic-free intervals ultimately confer a benefit to breast cancer-specific survival is not well understood. This study aimed to investigate metastatic-free intervals and risk of breast cancer-specific mortality among patients with HR-positive breast cancer after adjuvant therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women aged 18 years and older diagnosed with recurrent metastatic HR-positive breast cancer between 1990 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Patients with longitudinal information on primary stage I-III HR-positive breast cancer through the occurrence of metastatic disease and survival were included. Risks of breast cancer-specific mortality associated with metastatic-free intervals (defined as time from primary breast cancer diagnosis to metastasis) of ≥5 years compared to < 5 years were estimated. Fine and Gray competing risks regression models were used to calculate subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among 1,057 women with HR-positive breast cancer with a median age of 54 years at primary breast cancer diagnosis and 62 years at metastatic progression, 65% of women had a metastatic-free disease interval ≥5 years, whereas 35% had an interval of < 5 years. Overall, patients with metastatic-free intervals < 5 years had a five-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of 31% compared to 52% in women with intervals of ≥5 years. In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, race, diagnosis year, grade, treatment and sites of metastasis, patients with intervals of ≥5 years had decreased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (SHR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.89, P = 0.002) compared to women with metastatic-free intervals of < 5 years. Conclusions: In this population-based study, rates of cancer-specific mortality among patients who experienced metastatic recurrence of HR-positive breast cancer were lower in women with metastatic-free intervals of 5 years or more. The results of this study may inform patient-clinician discussions surrounding prognosis and treatment selection among HR-positive patients.

Download Full-text

Impact of Preexisting Mental Illness on All-Cause and Breast Cancer–Specific Mortality in Elderly Patients With Breast Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.73.4947 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (36) ◽

pp. 4012-4018 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Kristy Iglay ◽

Melissa L. Santorelli ◽

Kim M. Hirshfield ◽

Jill M. Williams ◽

George G. Rhoads ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Mental Illness ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Severe Mental Illness ◽

Cancer Diagnosis ◽

Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽

Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽

Mortality Hazard ◽

Specific Mortality ◽

Cancer Specific Mortality

Purpose Limited data are available on the survival of patients with breast cancer with preexisting mental illness, and elderly women are of special interest because they experience the highest incidence of breast cancer. Therefore, we compared all-cause and breast cancer–specific mortality for elderly patients with breast cancer with and without mental illness. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted by using SEER-Medicare data, including 19,028 women ≥ 68 years of age who were diagnosed with stage I to IIIa breast cancer in the United States from 2005 to 2007. Patients were classified as having severe mental illness if an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification code for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorder was recorded on at least one inpatient or two outpatient claims during the 3 years before breast cancer diagnosis. Patients were followed for up to 5 years after breast cancer diagnosis to assess survival outcomes, which were then compared with those of patients without mental illness. Results Nearly 3% of patients had preexisting severe mental illness. We observed a two-fold increase in the all-cause mortality hazard between patients with severe mental illness compared with those without mental illness after adjusting for age, income, race, ethnicity, geographic location, and marital status (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.84 to 2.60). A 20% increase in breast cancer–specific mortality hazard was observed, but the association was not significant (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.74). Patients with severe mental illness were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced breast cancer and aggressive tumor characteristics. They also had increased tobacco use and more comorbidities. Conclusion Patients with severe mental illness may need assistance with coordinating medical services.

Download Full-text

Associated Factors and Survival Outcomes for Breast Conserving Surgery versus Mastectomy among New Zealand Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18052738 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (5) ◽

pp. 2738

Author(s):

Mohammad Shoaib Abrahimi ◽

Mark Elwood ◽

Ross Lawrenson ◽

Ian Campbell ◽

Sandar Tin Tin

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Regression Analysis ◽

New Zealand ◽

Early Stage ◽

Breast Conserving Surgery ◽

Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽

Clinical Factors ◽

Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽

Specific Mortality ◽

Cancer Specific Mortality

This study aimed to investigate type of loco-regional treatment received, associated treatment factors and mortality outcomes in New Zealand women with early-stage breast cancer who were eligible for breast conserving surgery (BCS). This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Auckland and Waikato Breast Cancer Registers and involves 6972 women who were diagnosed with early-stage primary breast cancer (I-IIIa) between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2015, were eligible for BCS and had received one of four loco-regional treatments: breast conserving surgery (BCS), BCS followed by radiotherapy (BCS + RT), mastectomy (MTX) or MTX followed by radiotherapy (MTX + RT), as their primary cancer treatment. About 66.1% of women received BCS + RT, 8.4% received BCS only, 21.6% received MTX alone and 3.9% received MTX + RT. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with the receipt of the BCS + RT (standard treatment). Differences in the uptake of BCS + RT were present across patient demographic and clinical factors. BCS + RT was less likely amongst patients who were older (75+ years old), were of Asian ethnicity, resided in impoverished areas or areas within the Auckland region and were treated in a public healthcare facility. Additionally, BCS + RT was less likely among patients diagnosed symptomatically, diagnosed during 2000–2004, had an unknown tumour grade, negative/unknown oestrogen and progesterone receptor status or tumour sizes ≥ 20 mm, ≤50 mm and had nodal involvement. Competing risk regression analysis was undertaken to estimate the breast cancer-specific mortality associated with each of the four loco-regional treatments received. Over a median follow-up of 8.8 years, women who received MTX alone had a higher risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.82) compared to women who received BCS + RT. MTX + RT and BCS alone did not have any statistically different risk of mortality when compared to BCS + RT. Further inquiry is needed as to any advantages BCS + RT may have over MTX alternatives.

Download Full-text

Prior DCIS and overall mortality in women with stage I breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e12593 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12593-e12593

Author(s):

Rebecca A. Nelson ◽

Lily L. Lai ◽

Joanne E. Mortimer ◽

Enrique Soto Perez De Celis ◽

Rowan T. Chlebowski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Invasive Breast Cancer ◽

Tumor Grade ◽

Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽

Stage I ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽

Specific Mortality ◽

Cancer Specific Mortality ◽

Overall Mortality

e12593 Background: Whether a prior diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women later diagnosed with invasive breast cancer is unclear. If localized breast cancer following DCIS is more aggressive than localized breast cancer alone, this could inform therapy decisions. To our knowledge, no study has examined the impact of prior DCIS on overall mortality in women with stage I invasive breast cancer. The study objective was to determine if overall mortality for women with stage I breast cancer with prior DCIS is different from those with stage I disease without prior DCIS. Our hypothesis was that women with prior DCIS would have higher mortality compared to those without prior DCIS. Methods: 302,484 patients with stage I cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2016 were ascertained from SEER. Of these, 5,011 (1.7%) had prior DCIS. Patients with DCIS were matched 1:2 to women with no prior DCIS based on age, year of diagnosis, race/ethnicity, marital status, and invasive breast cancer characteristics including histology, tumor grade, tumor size, T stage, N stage, ER/PR status, surgery type, radiation, and chemotherapy status. The primary study outcome was overall mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Cases and controls had similar demographics. Compared to women with stage I breast cancer without prior DCIS, overall mortality was statistically significantly lower in women with stage I breast cancer with prior DCIS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89 95% confidence interval [CI]0.80-0.98). Other factors associated with overall mortality were bilateral mastectomy (adjusted HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49-0.78), radiation therapy (adjusted HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.56-0.75) and chemotherapy (adjusted HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99). Factors associated with higher overall mortality included age (trend p < 0.001), tumor grade (trend p = 0.003), and negative PR receptor status (adjusted HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.13-1.45). Breast cancer specific mortality, however, was statistically significantly higher in women with prior DCIS to their breast cancer diagnosis compared to women without prior DCIS to their breast cancer diagnosis (HR 1.24 95% CI 1.01-1.52). Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, women with prior DCIS and subsequent stage I breast cancer have lower overall mortality compared to matched controls with stage I breast cancer without prior DCIS. In contrast, those with prior DCIS have higher breast cancer specific mortality than those without prior DCIS. Reasons for this discrepancy are unknown, but since DCIS is most commonly diagnosed on mammogram, differences may be related to sociodemographic characteristics that are associated with both higher screening adherence and higher overall survival, such as higher income, higher education achievement , and higher access to health care.

Download Full-text