scholarly journals Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Stephanie Seidler ◽  
Meriem Koual ◽  
Guillaume Achen ◽  
Enrica Bentivegna ◽  
Laure Fournier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Systematic Lymph Node Dissection

Recent robust data allow for omitting lymph node dissection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and without any suspicion of lymph node metastases, without compromising recurrence-free survival (RFS), nor overall survival (OS), in the setting of primary surgical treatment. Evidence supporting the same postulate for patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking. Throughout a systematic literature review, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of lymph node dissection in patients undergoing surgery for advanced-stage EOC after NACT. A total of 1094 patients, included in six retrospective series, underwent either systematic, selective or no lymph node dissection. Only one study reveals a positive effect of lymphadenectomy on OS, and two on RFS. The four remaining series fail to demonstrate any beneficial effect on survival, neither for RFS nor OS. All of them highlight the higher peri- and post-operative complication rate associated with systematic lymph node dissection. Despite heterogeneity in the design of the studies included, there seems to be a trend showing no improvement on OS for systematic lymph node dissection in node negative patients. A well-conducted prospective trial is mandatory to evaluate this matter.

scholarly journals Systematic Lymph Node Dissection May Be Abolished in Patients With Apparent Early-Stage Low-Grade Mucinous and Endometrioid Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiayu Chen ◽  
Jie Yin ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Yu Gu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Systematic Lymph Node Dissection

ObjectiveTo investigate whether systematic lymph node dissection can confer clinical benefits in patients with apparent early-stage low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer.MethodsPatients with apparent early-stage low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer seen at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015, were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with other histological types and those who did not receive necessary adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Data collection and long-term follow-up were performed. According to the removed lymph node number, three groups based on surgical methods were used: abnormal lymph node resection, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and systematic lymph node dissection to control surgical quality. Their effects on prognosis were analyzed in pathological subgroups.ResultsA total of 196 patients were enrolled; 30.1% of patients had serous, 42.3% of patients had mucinous, and 27.6% of patients had endometrioid carcinoma, of which 51 (26.0%), 96 (49.0), and 49 (25.0%) patients were treated with the above surgical methods, respectively. The occult lymph node metastasis rate was 14 (7.1%), and only five (2.6%) of apparent early-stage patients were upstaged due to lymph node metastasis alone. Systematic lymph node dissection did not benefit progression-free survival or disease-specific overall survival of apparent early-stage low-grade mucinous and endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer but prolonged progression-free survival of apparent early-stage low-grade serous patients (OR, 0.231, 95% CI, 0.080, 0.668, p = 0.007).ConclusionsSystematic lymph node dissection may be abolished in patients with apparent early-stage low-grade mucinous and endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer but may be considered for apparent early-stage low-grade serous patients.

scholarly journals The impact of lymph node dissection on survival in patients with clinical early-stage ovarian cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Deng ◽  
Qidan Huang ◽  
Ting Wan ◽  
Xiaoling Luo ◽  
Yanling Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Early Stage Ovarian Cancer

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated With Prolonged Primary Treatment Intervals in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Milam ◽  
Xia Tao ◽  
Robert L. Coleman ◽  
Robyn Harrell ◽  
Roland Bassett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Cycle Number ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
The Impact

Background:We evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) relative to primary surgery (PS) to determine if there was a difference in the total time and number of chemotherapy cycles given in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.Methods:We identified 263 consecutive women meeting eligibility from 1993 to 2005 for this institutional review board-approved study. Eligible patients in this analysis were those women with advanced disease (stage IIIC-IV) in whom a maximal cytoreductive effort was planned either at PS or after NC. Time to start chemotherapy was defined as follows: (1) NC group: confirmation of diagnosis through biopsy, cytological diagnosis from ascites, and pleural effusion; (2) PS group: confirmation of diagnosis from the date of surgery that confirmed the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Total chemotherapy cycles: (1) NC group: NC chemotherapy cycles plus postoperative cycles; (2) PS group: chemotherapy after primary tumor debulking surgery. Clinical information evaluated included chemotherapy type, chemotherapy cycle number, total time to administer frontline chemotherapy, and survival.Results:Median chemotherapy cycles were greater in the NC group compared with the PS group (9 [range, 4-30] vs 6 [range, 3-19];P< 0.01). The PS group was also more likely to undergo chemotherapy regimens involving platinum and taxane treatment compared with the NC group (79% vs 65%;P= 0.017). Total time undergoing primary chemotherapy from initial diagnosis was greater in the NC group compared with PS (223 vs 151 days;P< 0.01). No significant difference was observed in overall survival and progression-free survival in the 2 groups.Conclusions:In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, NC followed by abdominal hysterectomy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes including optimal cytoreduction, decreased blood loss, and decreased inpatient hospitalization. In this cohort, NC was also associated with prolonged chemotherapy treatment intervals and increased chemotherapy cycles without improvement in survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document