scholarly journals Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients—The Nephrologist’s View within an Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Team

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3379
Author(s):  
Matthias Klingele ◽  
Lea Baerens
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Late Start

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in critically ill patients with an incidence of up to 50% in intensive care patients. The mortality of patients with AKI requiring dialysis in the intensive care unit is up to 50%, especially in the context of sepsis. Different approaches have been undertaken to reduce this high mortality by changing modalities and techniques of renal replacement therapy: an early versus a late start of dialysis, high versus low dialysate flows, intermittent versus continuous dialysis, anticoagulation with citrate or heparin, the use of adsorber or special filters in case of sepsis. Although in smaller studies some of these approaches seemed to have a positive impact on the reduction of mortality, in larger studies these effects could not been reproduced. This raises the question of whether there exists any impact of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients—beyond an undeniable impact on uremia, hyperkalemia and/or hypervolemia. Indeed, this is one of the essential challenges of a nephrologist within an interdisciplinary intensive care team: according to the individual situation of a critically ill patient the main indication of dialysis has to be identified and all parameters of dialysis have to be individually chosen with respect to the patient’s situation and targeting the main dialysis indication. Such an interdisciplinary and individual approach would probably be able to reduce mortality in critically ill patients with dialysis requiring AKI.

Continuous renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients in the intensive care units of two tertiary hospitals. v1

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge not provided not provided Machado Alba
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Severity Scores

Introduction: Acute kidney injury is characterized by a sudden decrease in renal function. The objective was to determine the variables that are associated with the need for continuous renal replacement therapy and its outcome in critically ill patients treated in two intensive care units. Methods. A cohort follow-up study with reviewed clinical histories of 140 patients admitted between January-2012 and July-2015, who were receiving continuous therapy, and the main outcome was survival after discharge. Clinical variables, severity scores, disease prognosis, continuous renal replacement techniques and outcomes were collected. Results. Mean age was 61.9±17.6 years, and 60.7% were men. Septic shock was the main cause of acute kidney injury. In total, 79.4% of cases died in the intensive care units. The median dose of continuous renal replacement therapy was 28 ml/kg/hour (interquartile range: 35-37). The late initiation of the therapy between 25-72 hours after the diagnosis increased the probability that the patient would experience a fatal outcome (OR:6.9, 95%CI:1.5-33.0). Conclusions: Acute kidney injury secondary to sepsis is a frequent condition in critically ill patients and is associated with high mortality rates. In these cases, continuous renal replacement therapy was the main recourse for its treatment.

scholarly journals Report of the first AKI Round Table meeting: an initiative of the ESICM AKI Section

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ostermann ◽  
A. Schneider ◽  
T. Rimmele ◽  
I. Bobek ◽  
M. van Dam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Knowledge Gaps ◽  
Blood Pressure Targets

Abstract Purpose Critical Care Nephrology is an emerging sub-specialty of Critical Care. Despite increasing awareness about the serious impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy (RRT), important knowledge gaps persist. This report represents a summary of a 1-day meeting of the AKI section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) identifying priorities for future AKI research. Methods International Members of the AKI section of the ESICM were selected and allocated to one of three subgroups: “AKI diagnosis and evaluation”, “Medical management of AKI” and “Renal Replacement Therapy for AKI.” Using a modified Delphi methodology, each group identified knowledge gaps and developed potential proposals for future collaborative research. Results The following key research projects were developed: Systematic reviews: (a) epidemiology of AKI with stratification by patient cohorts and diagnostic criteria; (b) role of higher blood pressure targets in patients with hypertension admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, and (c) specific clearance characteristics of different modalities of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Observational studies: (a) epidemiology of critically ill patients according to AKI duration, and (b) current clinical practice of CRRT. Intervention studies:( a) Comparison of different blood pressure targets in critically ill patients with hypertension, and (b) comparison of clearance of solutes with various molecular weights between different CRRT modalities. Conclusion Consensus was reached on a future research agenda for the AKI section of the ESICM.

scholarly journals Comparison of Approaches for Prediction of Renal Replacement Therapy-Free Survival in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Pattharawin Pattharanitima ◽  
Akhil Vaid ◽  
Suraj K. Jaladanki ◽  
Ishan Paranjpe ◽  
Ross O’Hagan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Adaptive Boosting ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Extreme Gradient Boosting

Background/Aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients is common, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a preferred mode of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in hemodynamically unstable patients. Prediction of clinical outcomes in patients on CRRT is challenging. We utilized several approaches to predict RRT-free survival (RRTFS) in critically ill patients with AKI requiring CRRT. Methods: We used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database to identify patients ≥18 years old with AKI on CRRT, after excluding patients who had ESRD on chronic dialysis, and kidney transplantation. We defined RRTFS as patients who were discharged alive and did not require RRT ≥7 days prior to hospital discharge. We utilized all available biomedical data up to CRRT initiation. We evaluated 7 approaches, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and MLP with long short-term memory (MLP + LSTM). We evaluated model performance by using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. Results: Out of 684 patients with AKI on CRRT, 205 (30%) patients had RRTFS. The median age of patients was 63 years and their median Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II was 67 (interquartile range 52–84). The MLP + LSTM showed the highest AUROC (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.67–0.73), followed by MLP 0.59 (0.54–0.64), LR 0.57 (0.52–0.62), SVM 0.51 (0.46–0.56), AdaBoost 0.51 (0.46–0.55), RF 0.44 (0.39–0.48), and XGBoost 0.43 (CI 0.38–0.47). Conclusions: A MLP + LSTM model outperformed other approaches for predicting RRTFS. Performance could be further improved by incorporating other data types.

Timing of renal replacement therapy and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Bagshaw ◽  
Shigehiko Uchino ◽  
Rinaldo Bellomo ◽  
Hiroshi Morimatsu ◽  
Stanislao Morgera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Kidney Injury

scholarly journals Use of a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparinoid (Danaparoid Sodium) for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Intensive Care Patients

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edelgard Lindhoff-Last ◽  
Christoph Betz ◽  
Rupen Bauersachs
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Acute Renal Failure ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Infusion Rate ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Intensive Care Patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of danaparoid in the treatment of critically ill patients with acute renal failure and suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) needing renal replacement therapy (RRT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 13 consecutive intensive care patients with acute renal failure and suspected HIT who were treated with danaparoid for at least 3 days during RRT. In eight patients, continuous venovenous hemofiltration was performed. The mean infusion rate of danaparoid was 140 ± 86 U/hour. Filter exchange was necessary every 37.5 hours. In five patients, continuous venovenous hemodialysis was used. A bolus injection of 750 U danaparoid was followed by a mean infusion rate of 138 ± 122 U/hour. Filters were exchanged every 24 hours. In 7 of 13 patients, even a low mean infusion rate of 88 ± 35 U/hour was efficient. Mean anti-Xa (aXa) levels were approximately 0.4 ± 0.2 aXa U/mL. Persistent thrombocytopenia despite discontinuation of heparin treatment was observed in 9 of 13 patients, owing to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). HIT was confirmed by an increase in platelet count and positive heparin-induced antibodies in 2 of 13 patients. No thromboembolic complications occurred, but major bleeding was observed in 6 of 13 patients, which could be explained by consumption of coagulation factors and platelets due to DIC in 5 of 6 patients. Nine of 13 patients died of multiorgan failure or sepsis, or both. In none of these patients was the fatal outcome related to danaparoid treatment. In critically ill patients with renal impairment and suspected HIT, a bralus injection of 750 U danaparoid followed by a mean infusion rate of 50 to 150 U/hour appears to be a safe and efficient treatment option when alternative anticoagutation is necessary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document