scholarly journals Sildenafil Supplementation for Women Undergoing Infertility Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 4346
Author(s):  
Loris Marin ◽  
Alessandra Andrisani ◽  
Luciana Bordin ◽  
Francesco Dessole ◽  
Marco Noventa ◽  
...  

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize data on the effectiveness of Sildenafil supplementation for women undergoing assisted reproduction techniques. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluates the effects of Sildenafil administration during infertility treatments compared with a control group in infertile women. Outcomes evaluated were endometrial thickness (ETh) and the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). The chemical pregnancy rate (ChPR) was also evaluated. Pooled results were expressed as the risk ratio (RR) or mean differences (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Women undergoing ovulation induction who received Sildenafil showed higher ETh and a higher CPR in comparison to controls. In this group, both the ETh and ChPR resulted in significantly higher values only with delayed start administration. Women undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfer who received Sildenafil showed no significant advantages regarding ETh and CPR in comparison to controls. In this group, we found a significantly higher ChPR in women receiving Sildenafil. A subgroup analysis revealed significant advantages regarding ETh with oral administration for women undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfer. Sildenafil therapy appears to improve endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate in women undergoing timed intercourses but it resulted not effective in IUI and IVF treatments. Further RCTs with rigorous methodology are still mandatory.

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Teixeira ◽  
L. A. Dassunção ◽  
C. V. R. Vieira ◽  
M. A. P. Barbosa ◽  
M. A. Coelho Neto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-Yan Zhu ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Xiao-Jing Cao ◽  
Xiao-Yun Wang

Objective: To compare the efficacy of various listed Chinese patent medicines combined with letrozole in the treatment of ovulation disorders using network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP Information databases up to June 2020. Randomized controlled trials reporting Chinese patent medicine combined with letrozole for ovulation disorders were included. The Stata 13 and WinBUGS1.43 software were used for data analysis. Results: A total of 24 randomized controlled trials were included, involving 2,318 patients. The results showed that when compared with patients using only letrozole, the ovulation rate was higher in patients using letrozole combined with Kuntai capsules, Fuke Zaizao capsules, Fufang Xuanju capsules, or Dingkun Dan, and Fufan Xuanju capsules showed the greatest improvement; the pregnancy rate was higher in patients using letrozole combined with Kuntai capsules, Fuke Zaizao capsules, or Dingkun Dan; and the endometrial thickness on the day of follicular maturity was greater in patients using letrozole combined with Kuntai capsules, Fuke Zaizao capsules, Fufang Xuanju capsules, Bailing capsules, or Dingkun Dan. In terms of the sequencing of NMA results, Fufang Xuanju capsules combined with letrozole gave the best results in improving the ovulation rate and increasing the endometrial thickness, while Dingkun Dan combined with letrozole achieved the best results for improving the pregnancy rate. Conclusion: Letrozole combined with Chinese patent medicine is more effective than letrozole alone in the treatment of ovulation disorders. Fufang Xuanju capsules is good at improving the ovulation rate and increasing the endometrial thickness. Dingkun Dan is good at improving the pregnancy rate. The appropriate choice of treatment should be made according to the actual clinical situation. This study is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020200603).


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci

BackgroundHarmful alcohol use leads to a large burden of disease and disability which disportionately impacts LMICs. The World Health Organization and the Lancet have issued calls for this burden to be addressed, but issues remain, primarily due to gaps in information. While a variety of interventions have been shown to be effective at reducing alcohol use in HICs, their efficacy in LMICs have yet to be assessed. This systematic review describes the current published literature on alcohol interventions in LMICs and conducts a meta analysis of clinical trials evaluating interventions to reduce alcohol use and harms in LMICs.MethodsIn accordance with PRISMA guidelines we searched the electronic databases Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus,Web of Science, Cochrane, and Psych Info. Articles were eligible if they evaluated an intervention targeting alcohol-related harm in LMICs. After a reference and citation analysis, we conducted a quality assessment per PRISMA protocol. A meta-analysis was performed on the 39 randomized controlled trials that evaluated an alcohol-related outcome.ResultsOf the 3,801 articles from the literature search, 87 articles from 25 LMICs fit the eligibility and inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 39 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Nine of these studies focused specifically on medication, while the others focused on brief motivational intervention, brain stimulation, AUDIT-based brief interventions, WHO ASSIST-based interventions, group based education, basic screening and interventions, brief psychological or counseling, dyadic relapse prevention, group counseling, CBT, motivational + PTSD based interview, and health promotion/awareness. Conclusion Issues in determining feasible options specific to LMICs arise from unstandardized interventions, unequal geographic distribution of intervention implementation, and uncertain effectiveness over time. Current research shows that brain stimulation, psychotherapy, and brief motivational interviews have the potential to be effective in LMIC settings, but further feasibility testing and efforts to standardize results are necessary to accurately assess their effectiveness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document