scholarly journals Epstein–Barr Virus in Salivary Samples from Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with Oral Lesions

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4995
Author(s):  
Alessio Buonavoglia ◽  
Patrizia Leone ◽  
Marcella Prete ◽  
Antonio Giovanni Solimando ◽  
Chiara Guastadisegno ◽  
...  

In order to investigate the possible role of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its associated oral lesions, a pilot case–control study was performed. A total of 31 patients (18 females and 13 males) were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups: group A included 16 patients with diagnosis of SLE and group B included 15 healthy individuals. Salivary swab samples were collected and subjected to molecular screening by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for the detection of EBV DNA. EBV DNA was significantly detected in 8/16 (50%) SLE patients and in 5/7 (71.4%) subjects with SLE-associated oral lesions. Since EBV is one of the most common viruses in the human population, it is difficult to understand if it is the causative agent of SLE or, vice versa, if SLE is able to trigger the reactivation of EBV. This study highlights a significant association between the presence of EBV and both SLE and SLE-related oral lesions and provides rationale for further investigation into the role of EBV in SLE pathogenesis.

Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1263-1269
Author(s):  
Deniz Aygun ◽  
Mert Ahmet Kuskucu ◽  
Sezgin Sahin ◽  
Amra Adrovic ◽  
Kenan Barut ◽  
...  

Objectives Clinical and laboratory investigations have revealed that Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is involved in altered immunological response of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Higher seroprevalence rates of anti-EBV antibodies and increased viral load are demonstrated in adult SLE patients. The prevalence of BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation is also suggested to be higher in SLE. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the immune response of children with SLE to EBV antigens in addition to EBV and BKV DNA. We also tried to evaluate whether these serological results differ from another connective tissue disease – juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSS) – and healthy individuals. Methods Serum levels of EBV early antigen diffuse (EA-D) IgG, EBV nuclear antigen-1 IgG, EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA), cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG, EBV DNA, CMV DNA and urinary BKV DNA were evaluated in healthy controls and in patients with a diagnosis of juvenile SLE (jSLE) and jSS. Results A total of 70 jSLE patients, 14 jSS patients and 44 sex-matched healthy individuals were involved in the study. EBV VCA was positive in 84.2% of jSLE patients, 85.7% of jSS patients and 36.3% of healthy controls. EBV EA-D IgG positivity was significantly higher in jSLE patients compared to jSS patients and healthy controls (20% vs. 7.1% and 0%, p = 0.005). EBV VCA positivity was associated with malar rash and immunological disorder, but there was no statistical significance in other antibody positivity in terms of clinical and haemogram findings and autoantibody positivity. CMV DNA positivity was present in only 2.8% of jSLE patients. None of the jSS patients or the healthy controls had CMV DNA positivity. EBV DNA and BKV DNA were also negative in all three groups. Conclusion The results of our study assume a relationship between SLE and EBV, but we could not demonstrate an association between CMV and BKV. The negative DNA results in contrast to serological positivity can be interpreted as an altered and impaired immune system and increased viral susceptibility. These results suggest that EBV contributes to disease continuity, even if it does not directly cause development.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Quaglia ◽  
Guido Merlotti ◽  
Marco De Andrea ◽  
Cinzia Borgogna ◽  
Vincenzo Cantaluppi

A causal link between viral infections and autoimmunity has been studied for a long time and the role of some viruses in the induction or exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in genetically predisposed patients has been proved. The strength of the association between different viral agents and SLE is variable. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), parvovirus B19 (B19V), and human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) are involved in SLE pathogenesis, whereas other viruses such as Cytomegalovirus (CMV) probably play a less prominent role. However, the mechanisms of viral–host interactions and the impact of viruses on disease course have yet to be elucidated. In addition to classical mechanisms of viral-triggered autoimmunity, such as molecular mimicry and epitope spreading, there has been a growing appreciation of the role of direct activation of innate response by viral nucleic acids and epigenetic modulation of interferon-related immune response. The latter is especially important for HERVs, which may represent the molecular link between environmental triggers and critical immune genes. Virus-specific proteins modulating interaction with the host immune system have been characterized especially for Epstein–Barr virus and explain immune evasion, persistent infection and self-reactive B-cell “immortalization”. Knowledge has also been expanding on key viral proteins of B19-V and CMV and their possible association with specific phenotypes such as antiphospholipid syndrome. This progress may pave the way to new therapeutic perspectives, including the use of known or new antiviral drugs, postviral immune response modulation and innate immunity inhibition. We herein describe the state-of-the-art knowledge on the role of viral infections in SLE, with a focus on their mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic targets.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 662.3-662
Author(s):  
P. Breillat ◽  
A. Mathian ◽  
S. Burrel ◽  
M. Hié ◽  
J. Fadlallah ◽  
...  

Background:A role for Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) infection in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis is highly suspected. The frequency of EBV seroprevalence and DNA detection in peripheral blood mononuclear cells are increased in SLE patients compared to healthy controls.Objectives:To analyse the relationship between EBV blood replication and SLE disease activity.Methods:Monocentric, observational and retrospective study of SLE patients (ACR or SLICC criteria) who have had a blood EBV DNA assessment using Polymerase Chain Reaction (artus® EBV Virus QS-RGQ assay) between 2012 and 2018. Exclusion criteria were: organ or bone marrow transplant, absence of EBV seroconversion and insufficient data. SLE clinical features, the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment–Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) flare index (SFI) and therapeutic regimen on the day of EBV DNA load assessment were recorded. A SELENA-SLEDAI score > 4 defined an active SLE. A blood EBV DNA load ≥125 IU/mL was defined as elevated.Results:A total of 105 patients (98 women and 7 men) were included in the study. At inclusion, median (quartiles) age and SLE duration were 34 (23.5-43) and 7 (2-14) years old, respectively. Treatment were hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (n = 67; 64%), prednisone (n = 66; 63%) with an average (±Standard Deviation) dose of 11.3 (±16) mg/day and an immunosuppressant (n = 42; 40%). According to SFI, 57 SLE patients were experiencing a flare at the time of EBV assessment; flares were classified as severe and mild/moderate in 38 (36%) and 19 (18%) SLE patients, respectively. According to the SELENA-SLEDAI score, 60 patients (57%) were deemed active and 45 (43%) inactive. Main clinical manifestations were arthritis in 32 (30%) patients, constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss, anorexia or lymphadenopathy) in 31 (30%), cutaneous involvement in 23 (22%), glomerulonephritis in 19 (18%), cytopenia in 14 (13%), neuropsychiatric involvement in 13 (12%) and serositis in 10 (16%). Blood EBV DNA was elevated in 54 (90%) of the 60 patients with active lupus versus 6 (13%) of the 45 patients with inactive SLE (p <10-4). It was increased in 34 (89%) of the 38 patients with severe flare, in 17 (89%) of the 19 patients with a mild/moderate flare (p = 1) and in 8 (17%) of the 48 patients without flare (p <10-4vs severe flare and p <10-4vs mild/moderate flare). EBV DNA load correlated with SELENA-SLEDAI score (r=0.58; p<0.0001). Elevated blood EBV DNA was not associated with HCQ, prednisone or immunosuppressant intakes. Eighteen patients with active SLE had a second assessment of blood EBV DNA load. For these patients, the median [range] of viral load was significantly higher during periods of active SLE (236 [0-2680] IU/mL) compared with periods with lower SELENA-SLEDAI score (0 [0-1537] IU/mL, p<10-4in paired analysis).Conclusion:Blood EBV viral load is dramatically increased in active phase of SLE, independently of the treatment. We were unable to demonstrate whether the replication of EBV was the cause or the consequence or just an epiphenomenon of the disease activity. Further studies are needed to study whether EBV viral load is linked with Interferons secretion or B lymphocyte activation.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document