scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach Vertebral Reconstruction Using a Rectangular Footplate Cage and Conventional Procedure Using a Cylindrical Footplate Cage for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 5664
Author(s):  
Naoki Segi ◽  
Hiroaki Nakashima ◽  
Tokumi Kanemura ◽  
Kotaro Satake ◽  
Kenyu Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Correction Loss ◽  
Conventional Procedure ◽  
Angle Correction ◽  
Cage Subsidence ◽  
Instrumentation Failure

The aim of the current study was to compare outcomes between lateral access vertebral reconstruction (LAVR) using a rectangular footplate cage and the conventional procedure using a cylindrical footplate cage in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). We included 46 patients who underwent anterior–posterior combined surgery for OVF: 24 patients underwent LAVR (Group L) and 22 underwent the conventional procedure (Group C). Preoperative, postoperative, and 1- and 2-year follow-up X-ray images were used to measure local lordotic angle, correction loss, and cage subsidence (>2 mm in vertebral endplate depression). In anterior surgery, the operation time was significantly shorter (183 vs. 248 min, p < 0.001) and the blood loss was significantly less (148 vs. 406 mL, p = 0.01) in Group L than in Group C. In Group C, two patients had anterior instrumentation failure. Correction loss was significantly smaller in Group L than in Group C (1.9° vs. 4.9° at 1 year, p = 0.02; 2.5° vs. 6.5° at 2 years, p = 0.04, respectively). Cage subsidence was significantly less in Group L than in Group C (29% vs. 80%, p < 0.001). LAVR using a rectangular footplate cage is an effective treatment for OVF to minimize surgical invasiveness and postoperative correction loss.

scholarly journals Effects of Mobilization Time on Occurrence of New Fractures after Vertebroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ahmet Onur Akpolat ◽  
Sinan Karaca
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Fracture Treatment ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture ◽  
The Mean

Introduction. Osteoporotic vertebral fracture treatment options include vertebroplasty, in which development of new fractures is among the possible complications which may develop during the postoperative period. We aim to evaluate whether or not postoperative mobilization time has effect on occurrence of new fractures. Materials and Methods. A total of 126 patients, consisting of 30 (39.7%) males and 96 (60.3%) females, who underwent sedation-assisted vertebroplasty under local anesthesia between January 2014 and June 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scores (VASs) and mobilization time (hours) were assessed. Day of new fracture occurrence during follow-up was assessed. Results. The mean follow-up period was 9 months (7–13 months). The most common fracture segment was the L1 vertebra (15.9%). The preoperative VAS was 8.29 ± 0.95, and the postoperative VAS was 2.33 ± 0.91. The change in VAS was statistically significant (p=0.01, p<0.05). Of all the patients, 21 (16.66%) had developed new fractures. No statistical difference was observed between mobilization time (hours) and formation of new fractures (p=0.48, p>0.05). Conclusion. We came to the conclusion that mobilization time (hours) was not a risk factor in the development of new fractures. In addition, there is no relationship between mobilization time and localization of new fractures.

scholarly journals Results after Percutaneous and Arthroscopically Assisted Osteosynthesis of Calcaneal Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0019
Author(s):  
Wolfram Grün ◽  
Marius Molund ◽  
Fredrik Nilsen ◽  
Are Stødle
Keyword(s):  
Subtalar Joint ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Extensile Lateral Approach ◽  
Arthroscopically Assisted ◽  
American Orthopaedic

Category: Arthroscopy, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures using the extensile lateral approach is associated with high rates of infection and soft tissue complications. During the last years there was a trend towards less invasive fixation methods. Percutaneous and arthroscopically assisted calcaneal osteosynthesis (PACO) combines the advantages of good visualization of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint with a minimally invasive approach. We have performed this technique since 2014 in selected Sanders II and III fractures. Methods: We conducted a clinical and radiographic follow-up of 19 patients with 20 calcaneal fractures which had been treated by PACO with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The follow-up rate was 66% (19 of 29 patients). 18 men and 1 woman with a median age of 44 years (range, 21-65) and a follow-up period of 18 months (12-33) were examined. There were 11 Sanders II and 9 Sanders III fractures. Radiographs of all feet were obtained at final follow-up to evaluate the reduction of the fractures as well as the presence of osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint. Our primary outcome was the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score. Secondary outcomes were the Calcaneus Fracture Scoring System (CFSS), the Manchester- Oxford Foot Questionaire (MOxFQ), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the incidence of complications. Results: The patients were operated on after a median of 4 days after injury (range, 1-12). The operation time was 139.5 minutes (98-234). The patients were discharged 3 days (1-6) postoperatively. Postoperative radiographs showed a Böhler angle of 29.5 degrees (0-40). However, the follow-up radiographs showed subsidence of the fractures and a Böhler angle of 21 degrees (-16-36). 95% of the operated feet showed signs of posttraumatic subtalar osteoarthritis. There were no wound healing complications. Two patients were reoperated with screw removal due to prominent screws. The AOFAS score was 85 (50-100), the CFSS score 85 (26-100), the MOxFQ score 26.6 (0-73.4). The VAS pain score was 0 (0-5.7) at rest and 4 (0-8.2) during activity. Conclusion: Only a few articles have reported the outcome after percutaneous artroscopically assisted calcaneal osteosynthesis. Our results suggest that PACO gives good clinical results and a reduced risk of complications in selected calcaneal fractures. However, since this technique is technically challenging and has a steep learning curve, we expect to be able to further improve our results over time. Prospective longterm studies will be necessary to better document the potential advantages and limitations of this operating technique.

scholarly journals Nonsurgical Corrective Union of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture with Once-Weekly Teriparatide

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Naohisa Miyakoshi ◽  
Akira Horikawa ◽  
Yoichi Shimada
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Vertebral Fractures ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Kyphosis Angle ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures usually heal with kyphotic deformities with subsidence of the vertebral body when treated conservatively. Corrective vertebral union using only antiosteoporotic pharmacotherapy without surgical intervention has not been reported previously. An 81-year-old female with osteoporosis presented with symptomatic fresh L1 vertebral fracture with intravertebral cleft. Segmental vertebral kyphosis angle (VKA) at L1 was 20° at diagnosis. Once-weekly teriparatide administration, hospitalized rest, and application of a thoracolumbosacral orthosis alleviated symptoms within 2 months. Corrective union of the affected vertebra was obtained with these treatments. VKA at 2 months after injury was 8° (correction, 12°) and was maintained as of the latest follow-up at 7 months. Teriparatide has potent bone-forming effects and has thus been expected to enhance fracture healing. Based on the clinical experience of this case, teriparatide may have the potential to allow correction of unstable vertebral fractures without surgical intervention.

scholarly journals Anterior versus posterior surgical approach for lumbosacral tuberculosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 2569-2577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bolong Zheng ◽  
Dingjun Hao ◽  
Hua Guo ◽  
Baorong He
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Loss Of Correction ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Angle Correction ◽  
Before And After

Objective To compare two different approaches for the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis. Patients and Methods In total, 115 patients who were surgically treated in our department from July 2010 to July 2014 were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into the anterior and posterior approach groups. Intraoperative hemorrhage; the surgery time; the Cobb angle preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the follow-up visit (2 years postoperatively); visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores before and after surgery; and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results The Cobb angle and VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups after surgery. Significant differences were found in the operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, Cobb angle correction, and loss of correction at the last follow-up. No significant differences were found in the VAS and ODI scores between the groups. Conclusions The posterior approach is superior to the anterior approach with respect to the surgery time, intraoperative hemorrhage, and Cobb angle postoperatively and at the last follow-up. When both approaches can be carried out for a patient with lumbosacral tuberculosis, the posterior approach should be favored over the anterior approach.

scholarly journals Parathyroid Hormone Injection Versus Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture in Old Age: A Retrospective Study of 58 Female Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Incheol Kook ◽  
Byeong-Jik Kang ◽  
Ye-Soo Park
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Vertebral Fractures ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Group I ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

Abstract Background: While the indications of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in osteoporosis prevention and management have been established, its indications in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures remain unknown. This study aimed to compare the effects of intervention (percutaneous vertebroplasty followed by anti-resorptive agents) and conservative treatment (PTH administration) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, as well as to investigate the optimal duration of PTH administration. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data of patients treated for osteoporotic vertebral fractures between January 2015 and November 2019. Treatment was selected based on the patient’s age, comorbidities, and patient’s preference after explaining the expected advantages and disadvantages of each treatment. Group C was administered PTH injections once weekly, whereas Group I underwent vertebroplasty followed by the administration of anti-resorptive agents. Radiological and clinical parameters were analyzed between two groups.Results: This study enrolled 58 patients (77 vertebrae). Group C included 24 patients (38 vertebrae) with average age of 77.50 ± 7.19 years (range, 65–85 years), average bone mineral density (BMD) of −3.39 ± 0.86 (range, −2.5 to −5.8), average follow-up period of 27.47 ± 7.60 weeks (range, 12–49 weeks). Group I included 34 patients (39 vertebrae) with an average age of 76.20 ± 8.67 years (range, 65–92 years), average BMD of −3.35 ± 0.91 (range, −2.5 to −5.1), average follow-up period of 30.82 ± 10.95 weeks (range, 16–59 weeks). There was no significant difference between the two groups in initial demographic, clinical and radiographic parameters. Group I showed significantly better clinical and radiological outcome during the last follow-up. Regarding side effects in Group C, two cases of dizziness (8.3%), nausea and vomiting (8.3%) were reported. In Group I, cement leakage was found in 26 vertebrae (66.7%), and cement leakage complications were observed in four patients (11.8%). Conclusion: Conservative treatment using PTH injection demonstrated slower pain relief and lesser suppression of vertebral height loss than vertebroplasty. However, PTH injection demonstrated a lower risk of procedure-related complications. The patient’s age, preference, and general condition with respect to the procedure’s risk should be considered when determining treatment options for osteoporotic vertebral fracture in old age.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Functional Outcomes of Combined Medial-lateral Approach Arthrolysis With or Without External Fixation for Severe Elbow Stiffness

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Xiao ◽  
Maoqi Gong ◽  
Chen chen ◽  
Yejun Zha ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Elbow Stiffness ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Open Arthrolysis ◽  
Hinged External Fixation ◽  
Elbow Arthrolysis

Abstract Background: To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation. Methods: We retrospectively collected and analysed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our center from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results: The average follow-up time was 28.4±3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation. Conclusion: Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

scholarly journals Efficacy of percutaneous short segment fixation on the treatment of Magerl A3 thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
hongheng lin ◽  
Xiaoting Ou ◽  
Wenchao Li ◽  
Minyuan Chen ◽  
Caijun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Correction Loss ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Significant Correction ◽  
Short Segment Fixation

Abstract BackgroundThis is a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous short segment fixation (PSSF) with or without intermediate screws in Magerl A3 thoracolumbar (TL) fractures accompanied with low bone mineral density (BMD).Methods From January 2017 to December 2018, 30 patients diagnosed with Magerl A3 TL fractures having a BMD between 0.5/cm2 and 1g/cm2 in the lumbar vertebrae with intact neurological functions and a history of major trauma who underwent PSSF with or without intermediate screws were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups of those with intermediate screws (group F) or without (group S). The operation time and intra-operation blood loss were recorded. Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) were employed as clinical assessments and quantified. Radiographic follow-up assessed according to the Cobb angle (CA), Vertebral wedge angle (VWA), and anterior vertebral body height (AVBH).ResultsLoose screws were observed in 4 of the 30 enrolled patients. Significant differences were observed in operation time and intra-operative blood loss between the two groups. The enrolled patients’ clinical results (VAS and ODI scores) were good, however, no significant differences during all follow-up periods were present between the two groups. Radiographic evaluation (CA, VWA and AVBH) improved immediately after surgery, but significant correction loss was observed in the follow-up periods, especially in the first month. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups.Conclusion Although the patients’ clinical results were satisfactory, PSSF could not resist the correction loss in Magerl A3 TL fractures accompanied with BMD below 1g/cm2. Accordingly, the use of intermediate pedicle screws may be unnecessary due to their limited ability in resisting correction loss and increasing operation time as well as intra-operation blood loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document