scholarly journals Anterior versus posterior surgical approach for lumbosacral tuberculosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 2569-2577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bolong Zheng ◽  
Dingjun Hao ◽  
Hua Guo ◽  
Baorong He
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Loss Of Correction ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Angle Correction ◽  
Before And After

Objective To compare two different approaches for the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis. Patients and Methods In total, 115 patients who were surgically treated in our department from July 2010 to July 2014 were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into the anterior and posterior approach groups. Intraoperative hemorrhage; the surgery time; the Cobb angle preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the follow-up visit (2 years postoperatively); visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores before and after surgery; and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results The Cobb angle and VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups after surgery. Significant differences were found in the operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, Cobb angle correction, and loss of correction at the last follow-up. No significant differences were found in the VAS and ODI scores between the groups. Conclusions The posterior approach is superior to the anterior approach with respect to the surgery time, intraoperative hemorrhage, and Cobb angle postoperatively and at the last follow-up. When both approaches can be carried out for a patient with lumbosacral tuberculosis, the posterior approach should be favored over the anterior approach.

scholarly journals Application of open-door laminoplasty with ARCH plate fixation in cervical intraspinal tumors

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Chao Wang ◽  
Shu-Zhong Li ◽  
Xin-Fei Qu ◽  
Chu-Qiang Yin ◽  
Yuan-Liang Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Open Door ◽  
Successful Operation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background The open-door laminoplasty is an effective procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. However, little information is available about the surgical results of open-door laminoplasty in the treatment of intraspinal tumors. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the clinical effect of open-door laminoplasty with ARCH plate fixation in the treatment of cervical intraspinal tumors. Methods This was a retrospective study. From January 2013 to May 2018, 38 patients (13 males and 25 females, the average age of 44 ± 17 years) with cervical intraspinal tumors underwent open-door laminoplasty with ARCH plate fixation in our hospital. The operation time, blood loss, pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were determined. To determine the radiographic outcomes, cervical X-ray film and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed before and after the operation, and cervical X-ray sagittal film was used to measure Cobb angle. The clinical data before and after the operation were compared by t-test. Results A total of 38 patients underwent a successful operation and demonstrated primary healing. The average operation time was 113 ± 12 min. The average blood loss was 120 ± 19 mL. All patients were followed up for 26.1 ± 2.8 months, and the final follow-up time was more than 24 months. VAS scores were much better at 24 months after operation compared with those before the operation, which were decreased from 6.1 ± 1.1 to 1.4 ± 0.7 (t = 32.63, P < 0.01). The JOA score was improved from 9.9 ± 1.5 to 15.5 ± 0.6 (t = − 18.36, P < 0.01), and the mean JOA recovery rate was 79% ± 11% at 24 months after the operation. There was no significant difference in Cobb angle between pre-operation and 24 months after the operation, which was 9.8 ± 2.6 and 10.3 ± 3.1 respectively (t = − 0.61, P > 0.05). Neither spinal malalignment on the coronal plane nor displacement of the laminoplasty flap was observed on postoperative cervical X-ray and MRI examinations at the final follow-up. Conclusions Open-door laminoplasty with ARCH plate fixation was a safe and effective surgical approach for the treatment of cervical intraspinal tumors.

Lateral Thoracolumbar Listhesis as an Independent Predictor of Disability in Adult Scoliosis Patients: Multivariable Assessment Before and After Surgical Realignment

Neurosurgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan H Daniels ◽  
Wesley M Durand ◽  
Renaud Lafage ◽  
Andrew S Zhang ◽  
David K Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Adult Scoliosis ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Minimally Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Plane Deformity ◽  
Numeric Scale

Abstract BACKGROUND Lateral (ie, coronal) vertebral listhesis may contribute to disability in adult scoliosis patients. OBJECTIVE To assess for a correlation between lateral listhesis and disability among patients with adult scoliosis. METHODS This was a retrospective multi-center analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients eligible for a minimum of 2-yr follow-up and with coronal plane deformity (defined as maximum Cobb angle ≥20º) were included (n = 724). Outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and leg pain numeric scale rating. Lateral thoracolumbar listhesis was measured as the maximum vertebral listhesis as a percent of the superior endplate across T1-L5 levels. Linear and logistic regression was utilized, as appropriate. Multivariable analyses adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, surgical invasiveness, maximum Cobb angle, and T1-PA. Minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in ODI was defined as 12.8. RESULTS In total, 724 adult patients were assessed. The mean baseline maximum lateral thoracolumbar listhesis was 18.3% (standard deviation 9.7%). The optimal statistical grouping for lateral listhesis was empirically determined to be none/mild (&lt;6.7%), moderate (6.7-15.4%), and severe (≥15.4%). In multivariable analysis, listhesis of moderate and severe vs none/mild was associated with worse baseline ODI (none/mild = 33.7; moderate = 41.6; severe = 43.9; P &lt; .001 for both comparisons) and leg pain NSR (none/mild = 2.9, moderate = 4.0, severe = 5.1, P &lt; .05). Resolution of severe lateral listhesis to none/mild was independently associated with increased likelihood of reaching MCID in ODI at 2 yr postoperatively (odds ratio 2.1 95% confidence interval 1.2–3.7, P = .0097). CONCLUSION Lateral thoracolumbar listhesis is associated with worse baseline disability among adult scoliosis patients. Resolution of severe lateral listhesis following deformity correction was independently associated with increased likelihood of reaching MCID in ODI at 2-yr follow-up.

scholarly journals Lower Dislocation Rate Following Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach than via Posterior Approach: Five-Year-Average Follow-Up Results

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiyuki Tsukada ◽  
Motohiro Wakui
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Dislocation Rate ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Total Hip

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the dislocation rate between total hip arthroplasty (THA) via direct anterior approach (DAA) and via posterior approach (PA). Methods: We compared a consecutive series of 139 THAs via DAA with 177 THAs via PA. All study patients received ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces and similar uncemented prostheses. Dislocation-free survival after THA was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier survival method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Results: In the DAA group, none of 139 hips experienced dislocations in five-year-average follow-up. In the PA group, seven hips experienced dislocations among 177 hips (4 %). The dislocation was significantly less in the DAA group compared to the PA group (p = 0.033). Conclusion: The dislocation rate of THA via DAA was significantly less than that of THA via PA.

scholarly journals Is It Necessary to Reduce Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures  with Intermediate Screws in the Fractured Vertebra?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZeJun Xing ◽  
Shuai Hao ◽  
XiaoFei Wu
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Screw Group

Abstract PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous short-segment pedicle screws fixation (PPSF) with or without intermediate screws (IS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures.MethodsFrom January 2016 to March 2019, a retrospective study of 38 patients with thoracolumbar compression fractures conducted. The patients were divided into a 4-screw group (without IS) and a 6-screw group (with IS) according to whether pedicle screws were placed in the fractured vertebrae. Combined positional reduction effects with the technique of pre-contoured lordotic rods were used to reduce the fracture by lengthening the anterior column of the fractured vertebrae. The posterior structure of the fractured vertebrae was undertaken as the fulcrum point for both groups. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), segment kyphosis（SK）before and after operation and complications were recorded.ResultsAlthough the operation time and blood loss in the 6-screw group were higher than in the 4-screw group, difference was not significant (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS, AVBH and SK between the two groups (P＞0.05). Nevertheless, these results were significant differences between the preoperative and the immediate postoperative, between preoperative and follow-up groups (P < 0.001). No neurologic injury was observed in either groups. ConclusionsIn the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures, percutaneous short-segment pedicle screws fixation without intermediate screws in the 4-screw construct may obtain the same clinical effect as that in the 6-screw construct.

scholarly journals Ultrasonography-guided sialolithotomy and stricture dilations of the major salivary glands: a preliminary study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (86) ◽  
pp. e237-e243
Author(s):  
Kaan Orhan ◽  
◽  
Poyzan Bozkurt ◽  
Zeynep Serap Berktaş ◽  
Mehmet Hakan Kurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Positive Outcomes ◽  
Case Description ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Preliminary Study ◽  
Duct Stricture ◽  
Ultrasonography Guidance

Aim of the study: The present preliminary study aims to evaluate the possible positive outcomes of ultrasonography-guided sialolithotomies and duct stricture dilations utilizing stone retrieval baskets and guide wires. Case description: A total of 6 cases in an ongoing study (4 cases of sialolithiasis and 2 cases of duct strictures with intraluminal adhesion) were analyzed. All sialoliths were <5 mm in diameter. Stone removals and duct dilations were performed under ultrasonography guidance with two different types of linear probes. Edema measurements were carried out, and the area of edema was evaluated via the echogenicity changes. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated by the patients themselves using a Visual Analog Scale questionnaire on postoperative day 0, and on days 1, 2, and 3. Conclusions: There were no postoperative complications, and mouth openings returned to normal at 7-day follow-up. The pain scores decreased after 6 hours, and pain subsided completely after 12 hours in all the patients. Edema also resolved gradually after the operation. The patient satisfaction levels were high.

scholarly journals The Loss of Correction in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Treated by Surgery. Can We Predict It?

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-101
Author(s):  
S. Anghel ◽  
D. Márton
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Kyphosis Angle ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Loss Of Correction ◽  
Short Segment Fixation ◽  
Lumbar Fractures ◽  
Fracture Level

Abstract Objective: This paper aims to differentially depict potential patterns of the loss of correction in surgically treated thoraco-lumbar burst fractures. These may eventually serve to foreseeing and even forestalling loss of correction. Methods: The study focused on 253 patients with surgically treated thoraco-lumbar fractures. This cohort of patients was clustered in four subgroups according to the fracture spine segment (T11-L1 or L1-L2) and surgery type (short segment fi xation or anterior approach). Relevant recorded and processed data were the fracture level, post-operative (Kpo) and last follow-up (Kf) kyphosis angle values. Correlation, regression and determination testing were performed for the last follow-up kyphosis angle and post-operative kyphosis angle, and regression equations were determined for each subgroup of patients. Results: The patterns of loss of correction were described through the following equations: Kf = 0.95*Kpo + 3.2° for the T11-L1 level fractured vertebrae treated by posterior short segment fixation; Kf = 0.98*Kpo + 3.4° for the L1-L2 level fractured vertebrae treated by posterior short segment fixation; Kf = 1.1*Kpo + 1.6° for the T11-L1 level fractured vertebrae treated by anterior approach; and Kf = 0.7*Kpo + 2.8° for the L1-L2 level fracture vertebrae treated by anterior approach. Conclusions: The loss of correction may be predicted, to a certain extent, for thoraco-lumbar fractured vertebrae treated surgically. The bestfit equations depicted for both type of surgery (short segment fixation and anterior approach) and both spinal segments (T11-L1 and L2-L3) are significantly different than the equations delineated for the collapse of non-surgically treated fractures.

Medicaid Payer Status Is a Predictor of Early Postoperative Pain Following Upper Extremity Procedures

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472091256
Author(s):  
Michael T. Scott ◽  
Allison L. Boden ◽  
Stephanie A. Boden ◽  
Lauren M. Boden ◽  
Kevin X. Farley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Preoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Subjective Pain

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between insurance status and patient-reported pain both before and after upper extremity surgical procedures. We hypothesized that patients with Medicaid payer status would report higher levels of pre- and postoperative pain and report less postoperative pain relief. Methods: In all, 376 patients who underwent upper extremity procedures by a single surgeon at an academic ambulatory surgery center were identified. Patient information, including insurance status and Visual Analog Scale pain score (VAS-pain) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months, were collected. VAS-pain scores were compared with t-tests and linear regression. Results: Preoperatively and at 2-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up, Medicaid patients reported statistically significant higher pain levels than patients with Private insurance, finding a mean adjusted increase of 0.51 preoperatively, 0.39 at 1 month, and 0.79 at 3 months. Preoperatively and at 3-month follow-up, Medicaid patients reported statistically significant higher pain than patients with Medicare, finding increases in VAS-pain of 0.99 preoperatively and 0.94 at 3 months. There was no difference in pain improvement between any insurance types at any time point (all P values > .05). Conclusions: Patients with Medicaid report higher levels of preoperative pain and early postoperative pain, but reported the same improvement in pain as patients with other types of insurance. As healthcare systems are becoming increasingly dependent on patient-reported outcomes, including pain, it is important to consider that differences may exist in subjective pain depending on insurance status.

scholarly journals Ankle Arthrodesis Through an Anterior Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0026
Author(s):  
Kathleen Jarrell ◽  
Marek Denisiuk ◽  
Elizabeth McDonald ◽  
Steven Raikin
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Ankle Arthrodesis ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Extensor Hallucis Longus ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Functional Scores

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Ankle arthrodesis can be approached anteriorly, laterally, medially, or posteriorly, and debate remains as to which approach is most advantageous. Although an anterior approach using the interval between the extensor hallucis longus and tibialis anterior is commonly performed, there is a paucity of studies showing the clinical outcomes after this procedure. This study aims to evaluate the functional outcomes and patient satisfaction at mid-term follow-up after ankle arthrodesis via an anterior approach. Methods: All isolated primary ankle arthrodeses performed with the anterior approach by a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon between May of 2011 and December of 2015 were retrospectively included. Chart review was performed and patient reported outcomes were collected including FAAM ADL, FAAM Sports, VAS, and SF-12 scores pre-operatively and at a minimum of two-years post-operatively. At final follow-up, a survey was distributed via phone or email inquiring about level of satisfaction and whether they would undergo the procedure again. A total of 108 patients were included, of which only 45 (41.67%) had pre-operative functional scores, 24 (22.2%) completed both pre- and post-operative functional scores, and 20 patients (18.5%) had satisfaction results. The average length of follow-up was 4.4 years (range: 1.7 – 7.9, SD 1.6). Results: FAAM ADL scores improved from a mean of 48.1 to 67.6, FAAM Sports increased from 18.1 to 34.9, VAS Pain decreased from 73.2 to 44.9, SF-12 MCS changed from 44.2 to 46.7, and SF-12 PCS increased from 31.0 to 42.2. Using a linear mixed effects model and controlling for length of follow-up, all functional and pain score improvements were significant except SF- 12 MCS (Table 1). Overall, 65% of patients were satisfied with their results and 85% of patients would consider the same surgery if needed. Patients who were more satisfied with their surgery were more likely to say that they would consider the same surgery given similar circumstances (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Post-operative functional scores were significantly improved and pain scores were significantly decreased compared to pre-operative scores in a cohort of patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis using an anterior approach. Satisfaction with the surgery was lower than expected given the improvement in functional scores. Further study is indicated to determine methods to improve satisfaction. Our study suggests that an anterior approach to ankle arthrodesis is an effective technique to improve function and pain in patients with ankle arthritis, however satisfaction after surgery is no guarantee. The study is limited by the small subset of patients with pre- and post-operative functional scores.

Total subaxial reconstruction

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent C. Traynelis
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Anterior Decompression ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Subaxial Cervical Spine ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
The Mean

Object Certain cervical spinal conditions require decompression and reconstruction of the entire subaxial cervical spine. There are limited data concerning the clinical details and outcomes of patients treated in this manner. The object of this study was to describe the specific technique employed to perform a total subaxial reconstruction and review the postoperative outcomes following surgery. Methods The author performed a review of data prospectively collected in 27 consecutive patients undergoing complete anterior decompression and reconstruction of the anterior cervical spine and followed by posterior instrumented arthrodesis with or without decompression. Results There were 16 men and 11 women whose mean age was 59 years (range 35–86 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months and the mean follow-up period for all patients was 26 months. One patient underwent C2–7 surgery, and in all others the procedure crossed the cervicothoracic junction. Following surgery patients remained intubated for an average of 3.3 days (range 1–22 days). The mean hospital length of stay was 11 days (range 3–45 days). One patient died 6 weeks following an uneventful surgery. Pneumonia developed in 5 patients, 1 patient experienced a minor pulmonary embolism, and 2 patients had posterior wound infections. No patient was neurologically worse following surgery. A single patient presented with a C-8 radiculopathy 6 weeks after surgery. At final follow-up no patient complained of dysphagia when specifically questioned about this potential problem. In all patients solid fusions developed at each treated levels. Preoperatively the mean sagittal Cobb angle was 15.4° (kyphosis) and the postoperative mean angle was −10.9° (lordosis) representing a total average correction of over 25° (p < 0.0001). The mean preoperative Neck Disability Index was 27.6; this score decreased to 15.5 (p = 0.0008) postoperatively. The mean pre- and postoperative visual analog scale neck pain scores were 6.0 and 2.1, respectively (p = 0.0004), and mean visual analog scale arm pain scores decreased by 3.7 following surgery (p = 0.001). Based on Odom criteria, the author found that 8 patients had an excellent outcome and 14 patients a good outcome. There were 4 patients in whom the outcome was judged to be fair and the single death was recorded as a poor outcome. The mean preoperative Nurick score was 2.68. Postoperatively the group improved to an average score of 1.5; the difference between the 2 was statistically significant (p = 0.002). Conclusions Segmental anterior decompression and reconstruction of the entire subaxial cervical spine, combined with an instrumented posterolateral fusion, can be performed with acceptable morbidity and is of significant benefit in selected patients.

External Qigong for Chronic Pain

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (04) ◽  
pp. 695-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Vincent ◽  
Jamia Hill ◽  
Kelly M. Kruk ◽  
Stephen S. Cha ◽  
Brent A. Bauer
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Experienced Pain ◽  
Before And After ◽  
To Receive

External qigong as a pharmacotherapy adjunct was investigated in 50 subjects with chronic pain (pain lasting > 3 months with pain score of ≥ 3 on 0–10 numeric analog scale) who presented to a qigong healing center. Participants were randomized to receive either external qigong treatment (EQT) or equivalent attention time (EAT) in weekly 30-min sessions for four consecutive weeks. Outcomes were assessed before and after sessions. The primary outcome measure was intensity of pain by a 10-cm visual analog scale used to rate all pain severity measurements. At 8-week follow-up, participants were contacted by telephone and mailed a questionnaire. Most had experienced pain for > 5 years (66%); the rest, for > 3 to 5 years (8%), 1 to 3 years (10%), or < 1 year but > 3 months (10%). The most frequent concomitant diagnoses were multifactorial (26%), osteoarthritis (18%), and low back pain (12%). Most patients were also receiving other treatments (74%); none previously had EQT. Participants were randomly assigned to EQT ( n = 26) or EAT ( n = 24). These groups had no significant differences at baseline except for prior awareness of qigong (EQT 31% vs. EAT 63%; p = 0.025). Compared to the EAT group, EQT participants had a significant decrease in pain intensity in the 2nd ( p = 0.003), 3rd ( p < 0.001), and 4th weeks of treatment ( p = 0.003). At week 8, these differences in overall decreased pain intensity persisted but were not statistically significant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document