scholarly journals The Challenge of Converting “Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation Syndrome” Back to Clinical Success, Using SCS Reprogramming as Salvage Therapy, through Neurostimulation Adapters Combined with 3D-Computerized Pain Mapping Assessment: A Real Life Retrospective Study

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 272
Author(s):  
Philippe Rigoard ◽  
Amine Ounajim ◽  
Lisa Goudman ◽  
Tania Banor ◽  
France Héroux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Intensity Rating ◽  
Pain Mapping

While paresthesia-based Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) has been proven effective as treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, its initial benefits may lead to the development of “Failed SCS Syndrome’ (FSCSS) defined as decrease over time related to Loss of Efficacy (LoE) with or without Loss of Coverage (LoC). Development of technologies associating new paresthesia-free stimulation waveforms and implanted pulse generator adapters provide opportunities to manage patients with LoE. The main goal of our study was to investigate salvage procedures, through neurostimulation adapters, in patients already implanted with SCS and experiencing LoE. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who were offered new SCS programs/waveforms through an implanted adapter between 2018 and 2021. Patients were evaluated before and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Outcomes included pain intensity rating with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pain/coverage mappings and stimulation preferences. Last follow-up evaluations (N = 27) showed significant improvement in VAS (p = 0.0001), ODI (p = 0.021) and quality of life (p = 0.023). In the 11/27 patients with LoC, SCS efficacy on pain intensity (36.89%) was accompanied via paresthesia coverage recovery (55.57%) and pain surface decrease (47.01%). At 12-month follow-up, 81.3% preferred to keep tonic stimulation in their waveform portfolio. SCS conversion using adapters appears promising as a salvage solution, with an emphasis on paresthesia recapturing enabled via spatial retargeting. In light of these results, adapters could be integrated in SCS rescue algorithms or should be considered in SCS rescue.

scholarly journals The Challenge of Converting “Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation Syndrome” Back to Clinical Success, Using SCS Reprogramming as Salvage Therapy, Through Neurostimulation Adapters Combined with 3D-Computerized Pain Mapping Assessment. A Real-Life Retrospective Cohort Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Rigoard ◽  
Amine Ounajim ◽  
Lisa Goudman ◽  
Tania Banor ◽  
France Héroux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Intensity Rating ◽  
Pain Mapping

While paresthesia-based spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been proven effective to treat chronic neuropathic pain, initial benefits may lead to the development of “Failed SCS Syndrome’ (FSCSS) defined as decrease over time related to Loss of Efficacy (LoE) with or without Loss of Coverage (LoC). Development of technologies associating new paresthesia-free stimulation waveforms and implanted pulse generator adapters provide opportunities to manage patients with LoE. The main goal of our study was to investigate salvage procedures, through neu-rostimulation adapters, in patients already implanted with SCS and experienced LoE. We retro-spectively analyzed a cohort of patients who were offered new SCS programs/waveforms through an implanted adapter between 2018 and 2021. Patients were evaluated before, and at 1, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up. Outcomes included pain intensity rating with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pain/coverage mappings and stimulation preferences. Last follow-up evaluations (N=27) showed significant improvement in VAS (p = 0.0001), ODI (p = 0.021) and Quality of Life (p=0.023). In the 11/27 patients with LoC, SCS efficacy on pain intensity (36.89%) was accompa-nied by paresthesia coverage recovery (55.57%) and pain surface decrease (47.01%). At 12-month follow-up, 81.3% preferred to keep tonic stimulation in their waveform portfolio. SCS conver-sion using adapters appears promising as a salvage solution, with an emphasis on paresthesia recapturing enabled by spatial retargeting. In light of these results, adapters could be integrated to SCS rescue algorithms or should be considered in SCS rescue.

scholarly journals Improving Limb Salvage for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia With Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 153857442098576
Author(s):  
Anna E. Cyrek ◽  
Nora Henn ◽  
Fabian Meinhardt ◽  
Martin Lainka ◽  
Arkadius Pacha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Fontaine Stage

Introduction: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the most severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Up to a third of CLTI patients are not eligible to receive first-line treatments such as bypass surgery or endovascular interventions. Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used as a method to improve microcirculatory blood flow and relieve ischemic pain in CTLI patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate limb salvage, ulcer closure, and clinical changes of SCS implanted CTLI patients at 1-year follow-up. Methods: Eligible patients had end-stage lower limb PAD unresponsive to medical therapy and not amenable to surgical reconstruction. Patients were candidates for amputation, but limb loss was not inevitable (Fontaine stage III and IV). Pain intensity and skin temperature in the ischemic area (visual analogue scale), quality of life (WHOQoL-BREF), and ankle/brachial blood pressure index (ABI) were recorded at routine follow-up visits. Data were analyzed retrospectively. Results: 29 patients underwent SCS implantation at one vascular center. The minimum follow-up period was 30 months. Limb survival at 1-year follow-up was 97% (28/29) and 73% (11/15) had complete closure of limb ulcers. Pain intensity, skin temperature, and quality of life progressively improved up to 12 months after implant, with Fontaine stage III patients improving more substantially than Fontaine stage IV patients. SCS therapy did not affect ABI measurement. No complications related to the device or procedure occurred. Conclusions: SCS is a valid alternative in patients unsuitable for revascularization. The quality of results depends on both a strict selection of patients by vascular specialists and the frequency of follow-up controls. The therapy may be more beneficial in patients classified as Fontaine stage III.

Spinal Cord Stimulation in Treatment of Chronic Benign Pain: Challenges in Treatment Planning and Present Status, a 22-Year Experience

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Kumar ◽  
Gary Hunter ◽  
Denny Demeria
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Axial Component

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To present an in-depth analysis of clinical predictors of outcome including age, sex, etiology of pain, type of electrodes used, duration of pain, duration of treatment, development of tolerance, employment status, activities of daily living, psychological status, and quality of life. Suggestions for treatment of low back pain with a predominant axial component are addressed. We analyzed the complications and proposed remedial measures to improve the effectiveness of this modality. METHODS: Study group consists of 410 patients (252 men, 58 women) with a mean age of 54 years and a mean follow-up period of 97.6 months. All patients were gated through a multidisciplinary pain clinic. The study was conducted over 22 years. RESULTS: The early success rate was 80% (328 patients), whereas the long-term success rate of internalized patients was 74.1% (243 patients) after the mean follow-up period of 97.6 months. Hardware-related complications included displaced or fractured electrodes, infection, and hardware malfunction. Etiologies demonstrating efficacy included failed back syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, angina pain, complex regional pain syndrome I and II, peripheral neuropathy, lower limb pain caused by multiple sclerosis. Age, sex, laterality of pain or number of surgeries before implant did not play a role in predicting outcome. The percentage of pain relief was inversely related to the time interval between pain onset and time of implantation. Radicular pain with axial component responded better to dual Pisces electrode or Specify-Lead implantation. CONCLUSION: Spinal cord stimulation can provide significant long-term pain relief with improved quality of life and employment. Results of this study will be effective in better defining prognostic factors and reducing complications leading to higher success rates with spinal cord stimulation.

Spinal Cord Stimulation Is Effective in Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome I: Fact or Fiction

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 566-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Kumar ◽  
Syed Rizvi ◽  
Sharon Bishop Bnurs
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Sf 36

Abstract BACKGROUND: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) I is a debilitating neuropathic pain disorder characterized by burning pain and allodynia. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in the treatment of CRPS I in the medium term but its long-term efficacy and ability to improve functional status remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of SCS to improve pain, functional status, and quality of life in the long term. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients over a mean follow-up period of 88 months. The parameters for evaluation were visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) and Short Form 36 (SF-36), and drug consumption. Evaluations were conducted at point of entry, 3 months, 12 months, and last follow-up at 88 months (mean). RESULTS: At baseline, the mean scores were VAS 8.4, ODI 70%, BDI 28, EQ-5D 0.30, and SF-36 24. In general, maximum improvement was recorded at follow-up at 3 months (VAS 4.8, ODI 45%, BDI 15, EQ-5D 0.57, and SF-36 45). At last follow-up, scores were 5.6, 50%, 19, 0.57, and 40, respectively. Despite some regression, at last follow-up benefits were maintained and found to be statistically significant (P < .001) compared with baseline. Medication usage declined. SCS did not prevent disease spread to other limbs. Best results were achieved in stage I CRPS I, patients under 40 years of age, and those receiving SCS within 1 year of disease onset. CONCLUSION: SCS improves pain, quality of life, and functional status over the long term and consequently merits early consideration in the treatment continuum.

scholarly journals Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 478-484
Author(s):  
F. E. Vervaat ◽  
A. van der Gaag ◽  
H. van Suijlekom ◽  
C. J. Botman ◽  
K. Teeuwen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Angina Pectoris ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Refractory Angina ◽  
Refractory Angina Pectoris

scholarly journals SPINAL CORD STIMULATION IN TREATMENT OF THE NEUROPATHIC PAIN SYNDROMES: INITIAL EXPERIENCE

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
D. A. Rzaev ◽  
V. V. Rudenko ◽  
I. L. Pudovkin ◽  
A. P. Tatarintsev ◽  
D. S. Godanyuk
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Pain Syndromes ◽  
Chronic Pain Syndromes

In the article initial experience of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain syndromes is described. The trial was done for 62 patients, in 52 cases trial was successful and subcutaneous pulse generator were implanated. Maximal follow-up is 26 months. The level of pain evaluates at VAS. Permanent pain-relieve results were achieved in 46 patients (74,2%). These results correspond to literature data.

Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of paraplegic pain

1995 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Cioni ◽  
Mario Meglio ◽  
Luigi Pentimalli ◽  
Massimiliano Visocchi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Status Level

✓ Twenty-five patients suffering from intractable pain due to a chronic spinal cord lesion underwent a percutaneous test of spinal cord stimulation. At the end of the test period, 40.9% of the patients reported a mean of 65% pain relief and these patients were selected for ongoing stimulation. At a mean follow-up time of 37.2 months the success rate, based on the number of patients with more than 50% pain relief, had fallen to 18.2%. Pain relief rates were analyzed in relation to quality of pain, neurological status, level and extent of the lesion, and electrode level to identify prognostic factors that could improve the clinical usefulness of spinal cord stimulation. Patients experiencing painful spasms or a constrictive type of pain and with incomplete thoracic lesions were found to be the best candidates for spinal cord stimulation.

scholarly journals Improved Pain Control with Combination Spinal Cord Stimulator Therapy Utilizing Sub-perception and Traditional Paresthesia Based Waveforms: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amnon A. Berger ◽  
Ivan Urits ◽  
Jamal Hasoon ◽  
Jatinder Gill ◽  
Musa Aner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Failed Back Surgery

Background: Chronic back and neck pain affects 20% of Americans. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective therapy for otherwise refractory chronic pain. Traditional SCS relies on low-frequency stimulus in the 40 - 60 Hz range causing robust paresthesia in regions overlapping with painful dermatomes. Objectives: This study aims to determine the effect of superimposing sub-perception stimulation in patients who previously had good long-term relief with paresthesia. Methods: This is a prospective observational trial examining patients who had previously been implanted with paresthesia based SCS for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) or complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). These patients presented for implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacement based on battery depletion with an IPG capable of combined sub-perception and paresthesia based SCS therapy. Patients were assessed immediately following the exchange and four weeks later using a telephone survey. Their pain was assessed on each follow up using a Numerical Rating scale (NRS); the primary outcome was the change in NRS after four weeks from the exchange day. Secondary outcomes included paresthesia changes, which included the subjective quality of sensation generated, the overall subjective coverage of the painful region, subjective variation of coverage with positional changes, and global perception of the percentage improvement in pain. Results: Based on our clinic registry, 30 patients were eligible for IPG exchange, 16 were consented for follow up and underwent an exchange, and 15 were available for follow up four weeks following. The average NRS decreased from 7.47 with traditional SCS to 4.5 with combination therapy. 80% of patients reported an improvement in the quality of paresthesia over traditional SCS therapy, and in most patients, this translated to significantly improved pain control. Conclusions: Our findings suggest improved pain relief in patients who had previously had good results with paresthesia based therapy and subsequently underwent IPG exchange to a device capable of delivering combined sub-perception stimulation. The mechanism of action is unclear though there may be an additive and/or synergistic effect of the two waveforms delivered. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to elucidate the durability of pain relief and the precise mechanism by which combined subperception and paresthesia based SCS may improve overall patient outcomes.

BurstDR spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic visceral pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 319-329
Author(s):  
Ganesan Baranidharan ◽  
Beatrice Bretherton ◽  
Thomas Kay ◽  
Nathan Marsh ◽  
Charlotte Romanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Chronic Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Pain Scores

Background:Visceral pain can be disabling for patients and challenging to treat in the clinic. Spinal cord stimulation is a NICE approved treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, presenting potential advantages over conventional therapies for managing chronic visceral pain. Results: A retrospective study revealed that a specific type of spinal cord stimulation, BurstDRTM (Abbott, TX, USA), was effective at improving pain and quality of life in patients with chronic visceral pain. Baseline pain scores significantly correlated with change at follow-up, suggesting it may be possible to identify potential responders from the outset. BurstDR was safe: rates of revision, explantation and complications were low. Conclusion: Clinical trials exploring the long-term effects of BurstDR including a control arm are needed. Findings could have the potential to inform best practice and improve outcomes for individuals with chronic visceral pain.

Sleep disturbance in patients attending specialized chronic pain clinics in Denmark: a longitudinal study examining the relationship between sleep and pain outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Bjarke Vaegter ◽  
Mette Terp Høybye ◽  
Frederik Hjorth Bergen ◽  
Christine E. Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Sleep Disturbances ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Pain Clinics ◽  
Pain Outcomes

Abstract Objectives Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent in patients with chronic pain. However, the majority of studies to date examining sleep disturbances in patients with chronic pain have been population-based cross-sectional studies. The aims of this study were to 1) examine the frequency of sleep disturbances in patients referred to two interdisciplinary chronic pain clinics in Denmark, 2) explore associations between sleep disturbances and pain intensity, disability and quality of life at baseline and follow-up, and 3) explore whether changes in sleep quality mediated the relationships between pain outcomes at baseline and pain outcomes at follow-up. Methods We carried out a longitudinal observational study, examining patients enrolled in two chronic pain clinics assessed at baseline (n=2,531) and post-treatment follow-up (n=657). Patients reported on their sleep disturbances using the sleep quality subscale of the Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire (KSQ), their pain intensity using 0–10 numerical rating scales, their pain-related disability using the Pain Disability Index (PDI), and quality of life using the EuroQol-VAS scale. The average time between baseline and follow-up was 207 days (SD=154). Results At baseline, the majority of patients reported frequent sleep disturbances. We found a significant association at baseline between self-reported sleep disturbances and pain intensity, pain-related disability, and quality of life, where greater sleep disturbance was associated with poorer outcomes. At follow-up, patients reported significant improvements across all pain and sleep outcomes. In two mediation models, we showed that changes in sleep disturbances from baseline to follow-up were significantly associated with (i) pain intensity at follow-up, and (ii) pain disability at follow-up. However, baseline pain intensity and disability scores were not associated with changes in sleep disturbances and, we did not find evidence for significant mediation of either pain outcome by changes in sleep disturbances. Conclusions Self-reported sleep disturbances were associated with pain outcomes at baseline and follow-up, with greater sleep disturbances associated with poorer pain outcomes. Changes in sleep quality did not mediate the relationships between baseline and follow-up scores for pain intensity and disability. These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence confirming an association between sleep and chronic pain experience, particularly suggestive of a sleep to pain link. Our data following patients after interdisciplinary treatment suggests that improved sleep is a marker for a better outcome after treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document