Prior Use of Antiplatelet Therapy and Outcomes after Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion: A Single-Center Experience

Endovascular therapy (EVT) represents the gold standard treatment in patients affected by acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Prior antiplatelet (APT) therapy might increase the risk of bleeding and modify the clinical outcome of AIS patients treated with EVT. Thus, we compared effectiveness and safety of EVT in Caucasian patients with and without previous use of APT agents. We recruited consecutive patients admitted to Udine University Hospital with AIS undergoing EVT from January 2015 to December 2017. The following outcomes were documented: successful recanalization, 3-month favorable outcome, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), parenchymal hematoma (PH), and 3-month mortality. The study population included 100 patients (mean age 70.1 ± 11.2 years, 58% males). At time of admission, 34 patients were taking APT agents. Patients on APT pretreatment were older, had more vascular risk factors, and showed higher levels of serum creatinine than APT naïve patients. Moreover, prior APT therapy was associated with a higher rate of pre-stroke disability and a more severe stroke at admission. Patients pretreated with APT had higher rates of successful recanalization (91.2% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.04). Prevalence of 3-month unfavorable outcome and 3-month mortality was significantly higher in APT-pretreated patients than in those without APT pretreatment. However, these associations were not confirmed on multivariable analyses. Prevalence of sICH and PH did not differ in the two groups. APT pretreatment is associated to successful recanalization rate, without increasing the risk of intracranial bleeding in patients with LVO undergoing EVT.

Download Full-text

Abstract 3314: The Role of Bridging with Intravenous Thrombolysis in Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3314 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Omar Kass-Hout ◽

Tareq Kass-Hout ◽

Maxim Mokin ◽

David Orion ◽

Shadi Jahshan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Combined Therapy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

P Value ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Nihss Score

Background: Large vessel occlusions with a high clot burden are less likely to improve with the FDA-approved IV strategy. Endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke symptom onset provides an effective alternative treatment in patients with large vessel occlusion. It is not clear if combination of IV thrombolysis and endovascular approach is superior to endovascular treatment alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated within the first 3 h stroke onset during the 2005-2010 period. First group received endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke onset. Second group consisted of patients who received IV thrombolysis within the first 3 h followed by endovascular therapy. We compared the following outcomes: revascularization rates, NIHSS score at discharge, mRS at discharge and 3months, symptomatic hemorrhage rates and mortality. Results: Among 104 patients identified, 42 received combined therapy, and 62 received endovascular therapy only. The two groups had similar demographic (age and sex distribution) and vascular risk factors distribution, as well as NIHSS score on admission (14.8±4.7 and 16.0±5.3; p=0.23). We found no difference in TIMI recanalization rates (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scale score of 2 or 3) following combined or endovascular therapy alone (83.3% and 79.0%; p=0.59). A preferred outcome, defined as a mRS of 2 or less at 90 days also did not differ between the combined therapy group and the endovascular only group (37.5% and 34.5%; p=0.76). There was no difference in mortality rate (22.5% and 31.0%; p=0.36) and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (9.5% and 8.1%; p=0.73). There was a significant difference in mean time from symptom onset to endovascular treatment between the combined group (227±88 min) and endovascular only group (125±40 min; p<0.0001).Patients with good TIMI recanalization rate of 2 or 3 showed a trend of having a better mRS at 90 days in both bridging (16.67% vs. 41.18%, p-value: 0.3813) and endovascular groups (25% vs. 34.78%, p-value: 0.7326).When analyzing the correlation of mRS at 90 days with the site of occlusion, patients in the bridging group showed a trend of a better outcome when the site of occlusion was ICA (33.3% vs 30%) and MCA (66.67% vs. 27.59%) and worse outcome when the site of occlusion was in the posterior circulation (26.32% vs. 50%), however, these results were not statistically significant (p-values: 0.1735& 0.5366). Conclusion: Combining IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy achieves similar rates of clinical outcomes, revascularization rates, complications and mortality rates, when compared with endovascular treatment alone. The combined therapy, however, significantly delays initiation of endovascular treatment. A randomized prospective trial comparing both treatment strategies in acute ischemic stroke is warranted

Download Full-text

E-033 The smoking-thrombolysis paradox in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke after endovascular therapy

10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-snis.105 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

J Grossberg ◽

M Bouslama ◽

L Rebello ◽

D Haussen ◽

M Frankel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion

Download Full-text

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion due to Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105960 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 30 (10) ◽

pp. 105960

Author(s):

Manabu Shirakawa ◽

Hidetoshi Matsukawa ◽

Nobuyuki Sakai ◽

Hiroshi Yamagami ◽

Kanta Tanaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Download Full-text

Abstract TMP5: The Smoking-Thrombolysis Paradox in Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Therapy

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tmp5 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Mehdi Bouslama ◽

Leticia C Rebello ◽

Diogo C Haussen ◽

Jonathan A Grossberg ◽

Shannon Doppelheuer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Posterior Circulation ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion

Background and Purpose: The smoking-thrombolysis paradox has been well described in myocardial infarction. However, its existence in the stroke population remains elusive. In the past decade, several studies have investigated the phenomenon with mixed results. We sought to determine whether clinical outcomes differ between smokers and non-smokers with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy. Methods: We reviewed our prospectively collected endovascular database at a tertiary care academic institution. All patients who underwent endovascular therapy for acute large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke were categorized into current smokers and non-smokers. Baseline characteristics, procedural radiological as well as outcome parameters where compared. Results: A total of 968 patients qualified for the study of which 189 (19.5%) were current smokers. Smokers were younger (60.78±11.95 vs. 66.41±15.05 years, p<0.001), had higher rates of dyslipidemia (49.7% vs 31.7%, p<0.001) and posterior circulation strokes (13.2% vs 7.8%, p=0.02,) and lower rates of atrial fibrillation (21.1% vs 37.9%, p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of stroke severity (as assessed by NIHSS), baseline CT perfusion core and hypoperfusion volumes, CT angiogram collateral scores as well as procedural variables. On univariate analysis, smokers had higher rates of good outcomes at 90 days (modified Rankin scale, mRS 0-2: 53.8% vs 42.8%, p=0.01) and similar rates of successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) (92.1% vs 87.7%, p=0.09), parenchymal hematomas (4.2% vs 4%, p=0.84) and mortality at 90 days (20.2% vs 25.7%, p=0.14). Multivariate analysis showed that smoking was not independently associated with good outcomes. Stratifying for (1) stroke etiology and (2) anterior vs. posterior circulation topology yielded similar results. Conclusion: In stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, smoking does not seem to be associated with outcomes regardless of stroke subtype or location.

Download Full-text