scholarly journals Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Neither Improves Survival nor Reduces Myocardial or Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy Flechsig ◽  
Tobias F. Ruf ◽  
Willi Troeger ◽  
Stephan Wiedemann ◽  
Silvio Quick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Background: Peri-interventional myocardial injury occurs frequently during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on myocardial injury, acute kidney injury (AKIN) and 6-month mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: We performed a prospective single-center controlled trial. Sixty-six patients treated with RIPC prior to TAVI were enrolled in the study and were matched to a control group by propensity-score. RIPC was applied to the upper extremity using a conventional tourniquet. Myocardial injury was assessed using high-sensitive troponin-T (hsTnT), and kidney injury was assessed using serum creatinine levels. Data were compared with the Wilcoxon-Rank and McNemar tests. Mortality was analysed with the log-rank test. Results: TAVI led to a significant rise of hsTnT across all patients (p < 0.001). No significant inter-group difference in maximum troponin release or areas-under-the-curve was detected. Medtronic CoreValve and Edwards Sapien valves showed similar peri-interventional troponin kinetics and patients receiving neither valve did benefit from RIPC. AKIN occurred in one RIPC patient and four non-RIPC patients (p = 0.250). No significant difference in 6-month mortality was observed. No adverse events related to RIPC were recorded. Conclusion: Our data do not show a beneficial role of RIPC in TAVI patients for cardio- or renoprotection, or improved survival.

scholarly journals Incidental abnormal CT scan findings during transcatheter aortic valve implantation assessment: incidence and implications

Open Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Patel ◽  
Kajan Mahendran ◽  
Michael Collins ◽  
Mahmoud Abdelaziz ◽  
Saib Khogali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Incidental Findings ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

ObjectivesThe aim of this retrospective series is to describe the prevalence and clinical significance of the incidental findings found during pre–transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) work-up and to ascertain the clinical course of such patients.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing TAVI from 2013 to 2015 where a TAVI CT assessment was performed (n=138) were included in the study. All incidental findings that were not expected from the patient’s history were discussed at the TAVI multidisciplinary meeting in order to ascertain the clinical significance of said findings and whether they would alter the proposed course of treatment. Mortality data were determined by careful retrospective case note and follow-up appointment analysis.ResultsSeventy-eight patients (57%) were found to have incidental findings on pre-TAVI CT scan. The majority of patients had benign pathology with high incidence in particular of diverticular disease, pleural effusions, gallstones, hiatus hernia and degenerative spinal disease. Vascular pathology such as superior mesenteric, renal and iliac artery stenoses and abdominal aortic aneurysm was detected in seven patients. In terms of long-term mortality data, we found no significant difference between those with incidental findings and those without (p=0.48). Survival as assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference between those with and without incidental abnormal CT scan findings (p=0.98).ConclusionsIncidental findings with potential for malignancy are common in an elderly, comorbid population. Ultimately, clinical correlation and prognosis must be swiftly ascertained in order to streamline the patients down the appropriate management pathway while avoiding unnecessary delay for treatment of their aortic stenosis.

scholarly journals Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Incidence, predictors and impact on mortality

2014 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yacine Elhmidi ◽  
Sabine Bleiziffer ◽  
Marcus-André Deutsch ◽  
Markus Krane ◽  
Domenico Mazzitelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document