scholarly journals Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experience with Personal Genetic Testing

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne B. Haga ◽  
Esther Kim ◽  
Rachel A. Myers ◽  
Geoffrey S. Ginsburg
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Health Knowledge ◽  
Genomic Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Direct To Consumer

Primary care providers (PCPs) will play an important role in precision medicine. However, their lack of training and knowledge about genetics and genomics may limit their ability to advise patients or interpret or utilize test results. We evaluated PCPs’ awareness of the role of genetics/genomics in health, knowledge about key concepts in genomic medicine, perception/attitudes towards direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, and their level of confidence/comfort in discussing testing with patients prior to and after undergoing DTC testing through the 23andMe Health + Ancestry Service. A total of 130 PCPs completed the study. Sixty-three percent were board-certified in family practice, 32% graduated between 1991 and 2000, and 88% had heard of 23andMe prior to the study. Seventy-two percent decided to participate in the study to gain a better understanding about testing. At baseline, 23% of respondents indicated comfort discussing genetics as a risk factor for common diseases, increasing to 59% after undergoing personal genetic testing (PGT) (p < 0.01). In summary, we find that undergoing PGT augments physicians’ confidence, comfort, and interest in DTC testing.

scholarly journals Primary Care Physician Experiences with Integrated Population-Scale Genetic Testing: A Mixed-Methods Assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Amy A. Lemke ◽  
Laura M. Amendola ◽  
Kristine Kuchta ◽  
Henry M. Dunnenberger ◽  
Jennifer Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Data Privacy ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Genomic Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Care Providers

The scalable delivery of genomic medicine requires collaboration between genetics and non-genetics providers. Thus, it is essential to investigate and address the perceived value of and barriers to incorporating genetic testing into the clinical practice of primary care providers (PCPs). We used a mixed-methods approach of qualitative interviews and surveys to explore the experience of PCPs involved in the pilot DNA-10K population genetic testing program. Similar to previous research, PCPs reported low confidence with tasks related to ordering, interpreting and managing the results of genetic tests, and identified the need for additional education. PCPs endorsed high levels of utility for patients and their families but noted logistical challenges to incorporating genetic testing into their practice. Overall PCPs were not familiar with the United States’ Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and they expressed high levels of concern for patient data privacy and potential insurance discrimination. This PCP feedback led to the development and implementation of several processes to improve the PCP experience with the DNA-10K program. These results contribute to the knowledge base regarding genomic implementation using a mixed provider model and may be beneficial for institutions developing similar clinical programs.

scholarly journals A Primary Care Perspective on Gout

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Eva Rimler ◽  
Jennifer Lom ◽  
Jason Higdon ◽  
Dominique Cosco ◽  
Danielle Jones
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Treat All ◽  
Care Costs

Gout causes patients’ significant morbidity, work-related disability, loss of productivity, increased health care costs, and even all-cause hospital admissions. As a result, primary care providers must be armed with the knowledge to properly diagnose and manage gout. While many aspects of care remain the same, some key updates that primary care providers must consider when treating their patients with gout will be discussed. In this perspective we will highlight and discuss acceptable circumstances for empiric treatment, renewed emphasis on treat to target, access to commonly used medications, recommended first line agents, and the role of primary care physicians in gout flare prevention among other topics. These strategies will aid primary care physicians treat all but the most complex cases of gout.

Physicians' Attitudes toward Disclosure of Genetic Information to Third Parties

1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail Geller ◽  
Ellen S. Tambor ◽  
Barbara A. Bernhardt ◽  
Gary A. Chase ◽  
Karen J. Hofman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Genetic Information ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Physician Patient Relationship ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Physician Patient

Confidentiality is a cornerstone of the physician-patient relationship. Breaches of confidentiality in the context of genetic testing are of particular concern for a number of reasons. First, genetic testing reveals information not only about a particular patient, but also about his or her family members. Second,genetic testing can label healthy people as “at risk,” subjecting them to possible stigmatization or discrimination by third parties. Third, as genetic testing becomes more widespread and is incorporated into primary care, breaches of confidentiality might inadvertently occur more frequently because primary care providers may not be trained to understand the uniqueness of genetic information. Until now, genetic services have been provided primarily by medical geneticists and genetic counselors. However, with the proliferation of new genetic presymptomatic and carrier tests, primary care physicians are going to become increasingly involved in genetic testing. Currently, little is known about physicians’ attitudes (other than those of medical geneticists) toward disclosure of confidential genetic information to third parties.

Primary Care Providers’ Preferences and Concerns Regarding Specific Visual Displays for Returning Hemoglobin A1c Test Results to Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 796-804
Author(s):  
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher ◽  
Jacob B. Solomon ◽  
Aaron M. Scherer ◽  
Nicole L. Exe ◽  
Beth A. Tarini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Hemoglobin A1c ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Visual Displays ◽  
Hba1c Test ◽  
Laboratory Test Results ◽  
Physician Workload

Purpose. Patient portals of electronic health record systems currently present patients with tables of laboratory test results, but visual displays can increase patient understanding and sensitivity to result variations. We sought to assess physician preferences and concerns about visual display designs as potential motivators or barriers to their implementation. Methods. In an online survey, 327 primary care physicians (>50% patient care time) recruited through the online e-community/survey research firm SERMO compared hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test results presented in table format to various visual displays (number line formats) previously tested in public samples. Half of participants also compared additional visual formats displaying target goal ranges. Outcome measures included preferred display format and whether any displays were unacceptable, would change physician workload, or would induce liability concerns. Results. Most (85%–89%) respondents preferred visual displays over tables for result communications both to patients tested for diagnosis purposes and to diagnosed patients, with a design with color-coded categories most preferred. However, for each format (including tables), 11% to 23% rated them as unacceptable. Most respondents also preferred adding goal range information (in addition to standard ranges) for diagnosed patients. While most physicians anticipated no workload changes, 19% to 32% anticipated increased physician workload while 9% to 28% anticipated decreased workload. Between 32% and 40% had at least some liability concerns. Conclusions. Most primary care physicians prefer visual displays of HbA1c test results over table formats when communicating results to patients. However, workload and liability concerns from a minority of physicians represent a barrier for adoption of such designs in clinical settings.

scholarly journals Complementary and Integrative Health Knowledge and Practice in Primary Care Settings: A Survey of Primary Care Providers in the Northwestern United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 216495612110233
Author(s):  
Malaika R Schwartz ◽  
Allison M Cole ◽  
Gina A Keppel ◽  
Ryan Gilles ◽  
John Holmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Knowledge ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Integrative Health ◽  
And Training

Background The demand for complementary and integrative health (CIH) is increasing by patients who want to receive more CIH referrals, in-clinic services, and overall care delivery. To promote CIH within the context of primary care, it is critical that providers have sufficient knowledge of CIH, access to CIH-trained providers for referral purposes, and are comfortable either providing services or co-managing patients who favor a CIH approach to their healthcare. Objective The main objective was to gather primary care providers’ perspectives across the northwestern region of the United States on their CIH familiarity and knowledge, clinic barriers and opportunities, and education and training needs. Methods We conducted an online, quantitative survey through an email invitation to all primary care providers (n = 483) at 11 primary care organizations from the WWAMI (Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana and Idaho) region Practice and Research Network (WPRN). The survey questions covered talking about CIH with patients, co-managing care with CIH providers, familiarity with and training in CIH modalities, clinic barriers to CIH integration, and interest in learning more about CIH modalities. Results 218 primary care providers completed the survey (45% response rate). Familiarity with individual CIH methods ranged from 73% (chiropracty) to 8% (curanderismo). Most respondents discussed CIH with their patients (88%), and many thought that their patients could benefit from CIH (41%). The majority (89%) were willing to co-manage a patient with a CIH provider. Approximately one-third of respondents had some expertise in at least one CIH modality. Over 78% were interested in learning more about the safety and efficacy of at least one CIH modality. Conclusion Primary care providers in the Northwestern United States are generally familiar with CIH modalities, are interested in referring and co-managing care with CIH providers, and would like to have more learning opportunities to increase knowledge of CIH.

scholarly journals Online Ratings of Primary Care Physicians: Comparison of Gender, Training, and Specialty

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110077
Author(s):  
Daliah Wachs ◽  
Victoria Lorah ◽  
Allison Boynton ◽  
Amanda Hertzler ◽  
Brandon Nichols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Female Physicians ◽  
Online Ratings ◽  
And Gender

The purpose of this study was to explore patient perceptions of primary care providers and their offices relative to their physician’s philosophy (medical degree [MD] vs doctorate in osteopathic medicine [DO]), specialty (internal medicine vs family medicine), US region, and gender (male vs female). Using the Healthgrades website, the average satisfaction rating for the physician, office parameters, and wait time were collected and analyzed for 1267 physicians. We found female doctors tended to have lower ratings in the Midwest, and staff friendliness of female physicians were rated lower in the northwest. In the northeast, male and female MDs were rated more highly than DOs. Wait times varied regionally, with northeast and northwest regions having the shortest wait times. Overall satisfaction was generally high for most physicians. Regional differences in perception of a physician based on gender or degree may have roots in local culture, including proximity to a DO school, comfort with female physicians, and expectations for waiting times.

Are primary care physicians aware of peripheral artery disease risk reduction and management in the Saudi healthcare transformation era? A health cluster observational study

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110443
Author(s):  
Sultan Alsheikh ◽  
Hesham AlGhofili ◽  
Omar A Alayed ◽  
Abdulkareem Aldrak ◽  
Kaisor Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Artery Disease

Introduction Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are often underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of the recommended target levels of blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin A1C, and knowledge and attitude about PAD risk reduction therapies among physicians working in primary care settings in Saudi Arabia. Methods This observational cross-sectional study included family medicine consultants, residents, and general practitioners working in a health cluster in the capital city of Saudi Arabia using a self-administered questionnaire. Results Of the 129 physicians who completed the survey, 55% had completed PAD-related continuing medical education hours within the past 2 years. Despite this, the knowledge score of the recommended target levels was high in only 13.2% of the participants. Antiplatelet therapy was prescribed by 68.2% of the participants. Conclusion Here we identified the knowledge and action gaps among primary care providers in Saudi Arabia. Physicians had an excellent attitude about screening for and counseling about risk factors. However, they showed less interference in reducing these risk factors. We recommend addressing these knowledge gaps early in medical school and residency programs.

scholarly journals Barriers to and solutions for addressing insufficient professional interpreter use in primary healthcare

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabienne N. Jaeger ◽  
Nicole Pellaud ◽  
Bénédicte Laville ◽  
Pierre Klauser
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Interpreter Use ◽  
Health Authorities ◽  
Professional Interpreter ◽  
Paediatric Primary Care

Abstract Background The aim of this nationwide study was to investigate barriers to adequate professional interpreter use and to describe existing initiatives and identify key factors for successful interpreter policies in primary care, using Switzerland as a case study. Methods Adult and paediatric primary care providers were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. All accredited regional interpreter agencies were contacted first by email and, in the absence of a reply, by mail and then by phone. Local as well as the national health authorities were asked about existing policies. Results 599 primary care physicians participated. Among other reasons, physicians identified cumbersome organization (58.7%), absent financial coverage (53.7%) and lack of knowledge on how to arrange interpreter interventions (44%) as main barriers. The odds of organising professional interpreters were 6.6-times higher with full financial coverage. Some agencies confirmed difficulties providing professional interpreters for certain languages at a timely manner. Degrees of coverage of professional interpreter costs (full coverage to none) and organization varied between regions resulting in different levels of unmet needs. Conclusions Professional interpreter use can be improved through the following points: increase awareness and knowledge of primary care providers on interpreter use and organization, ensure financial coverage, as well as address organizational aspects. Examples of successful interventions exist.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document