scholarly journals More Results on Italian Domination in Cn□Cm

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Gao ◽  
Penghui Wang ◽  
Enmao Liu ◽  
Yuansheng Yang

Italian domination can be described such that in an empire all cities/vertices should be stationed with at most two troops. Every city having no troops must be adjacent to at least two cities with one troop or at least one city with two troops. In such an assignment, the minimum number of troops is the Italian domination number of the empire/graph is denoted as γ I . Determining the Italian domination number of a graph is a very popular topic. Li et al. obtained γ I ( C n □ C 3 ) and γ I ( C n □ C 4 ) (weak {2}-domination number of Cartesian products of cycles, J. Comb. Optim. 35 (2018): 75–85). Stȩpień et al. obtained γ I ( C n □ C 5 ) = 2 n (2-Rainbow domination number of C n □ C 5 , Discret. Appl. Math. 170 (2014): 113–116). In this paper, we study the Italian domination number of the Cartesian products of cycles C n □ C m for m ≥ 6 . For n ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) , m ≡ 0 ( mod 3 ) , we obtain γ I ( C n □ C m ) = m n 3 . For other C n □ C m , we present a bound of γ I ( C n □ C m ) . Since for n = 6 k , m = 3 l or n = 3 k , m = 6 l ( k , l ≥ 1 ) , γ r 2 ( C n □ C m ) = m n 3 , (the Cartesian product of cycles with small 2-rainbow domination number, J. Comb. Optim. 30 (2015): 668–674), it follows in this case that C n □ C m is an example of a graph class for which γ I = γ r 2 , which can partially answer the question presented by Brešar et al. on the 2-rainbow domination in graphs, Discret. Appl. Math. 155 (2007): 2394–2400.


Filomat ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 599-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zehui Shao ◽  
Seyed Sheikholeslamib ◽  
Bo Wang ◽  
Pu Wu ◽  
Xiaosong Zhang

A 2-rainbow dominating function (2RDF) of a graph G is a function f : V(G) ? P({1,2}) such that for each v ? V(G) with f (v) = ? we have Uu?N(v) f (u) = {1,2}. For a 2RDF f of a graph G, the weight w(f) of f is defined as w(f)=?v?V(G)?f(v)?. The minimum weight over all 2RDFs of G is called the 2-rainbow domination number of G, which is denoted by ?r2(G). A subset S of vertices of a graph G without isolated vertices, is a total dominating set of G if every vertex in V(G) has a neighbor in S. The total domination number ?t(G) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. Chellali, Haynes and Hedetniemi conjectured that ?t(G)? ?r2(G) [M. Chellali, T.W. Haynes and S.T. Hedetniemi, Bounds on weak Roman and 2-rainbow domination numbers, Discrete Appl. Math. 178 (2014), 27-32.], and later Furuya confirmed the conjecture [M. Furuya, A note on total domination and 2-rainbow domination in graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 184 (2015), 229-230.]. In this paper, we provide a constructive characterization of trees T with ?r2(T) = ?t(T).



Author(s):  
E. Sampathkumar ◽  
L. Pushpalatha

The study of domination in graphs originated around 1850 with the problems of placing minimum number of queens or other chess pieces on an n x n chess board so as to cover/dominate every square. The rules of chess specify that in one move a queen can advance any number of squares horizontally, vertically, or diagonally as long as there are no other chess pieces in its way. In 1850 enthusiasts who studied the problem came to the correct conclusion that all the squares in an 8 x 8 chessboard can be dominated by five queens and five is the minimum such number. With very few exceptions (Rooks, Bishops), these problems still remain unsolved today. Let G = (V,E) be a graph. A set S ⊂ V is a dominating set of G if every vertex in V–S is adjacent to some vertex in D. The domination number γ(G) of G is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set.



Author(s):  
L. Shahbazi ◽  
H. Abdollahzadeh Ahangar ◽  
R. Khoeilar ◽  
S. M. Sheikholeslami

Let [Formula: see text] be an integer, and let [Formula: see text] be a graph. A k-rainbow dominating function (or [Formula: see text]RDF) of [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] from the vertex set [Formula: see text] to the family of all subsets of [Formula: see text] such that for very [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text], the condition [Formula: see text] is fulfilled, where [Formula: see text] is the open neighborhood of [Formula: see text]. The weight of a [Formula: see text]RDF [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is the value [Formula: see text]. A k-rainbow dominating function [Formula: see text] in a graph with no isolated vertex is called a total k-rainbow dominating function if the subgraph of [Formula: see text] induced by the set [Formula: see text] has no isolated vertices. The total k-rainbow domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the minimum weight of the total [Formula: see text]-rainbow dominating function on [Formula: see text]. The total k-rainbow reinforcement number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the minimum number of edges that must be added to [Formula: see text] in order to decrease the total k-rainbow domination number. In this paper, we investigate the properties of total [Formula: see text]-rainbow reinforcement number in graphs. In particular, we present some sharp bounds for [Formula: see text] and we determine the total [Formula: see text]-rainbow reinforcement number of some classes of graphs including paths, cycles and complete bipartite graphs.



2016 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650013
Author(s):  
L. Asgharsharghi ◽  
S. M. Sheikholeslami ◽  
L. Volkmann

A 2-rainbow dominating function (2RDF) of a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] from the vertex set [Formula: see text] to the set of all subsets of the set [Formula: see text] such that for any vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text], the condition [Formula: see text] is fulfilled. The weight of a 2RDF [Formula: see text] is the value [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text]-rainbow domination number of a graph [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the minimum weight of a 2RDF of [Formula: see text]. The rainbow bondage number [Formula: see text] of a graph [Formula: see text] with maximum degree at least two is the minimum cardinality of all sets [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text]. Dehgardi, Sheikholeslami and Volkmann, [The [Formula: see text]-rainbow bondage number of a graph, Discrete Appl. Math. 174 (2014) 133–139] proved that the rainbow bondage number of a planar graph does not exceed 15. In this paper, we generalize their result for graphs which admit a [Formula: see text]-cell embedding on a surface with non-negative Euler characteristic.



2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 668-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zofia Stȩpień ◽  
Lucjan Szymaszkiewicz ◽  
Maciej Zwierzchowski


2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Samodivkin

AbstractThe k-restricted domination number of a graph G is the minimum number d k such that for any subset U of k vertices of G, there is a dominating set in G including U and having at most d k vertices. Some new upper bounds in terms of order and degrees for this number are found.



2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 1750004 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Khoeilar ◽  
S. M. Sheikholeslami

Let [Formula: see text] be a finite and simple digraph. A [Formula: see text]-rainbow dominating function ([Formula: see text]RDF) of a digraph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] from the vertex set [Formula: see text] to the set of all subsets of the set [Formula: see text] such that for any vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] the condition [Formula: see text] is fulfilled, where [Formula: see text] is the set of in-neighbors of [Formula: see text]. The weight of a [Formula: see text]RDF [Formula: see text] is the value [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text]-rainbow domination number of a digraph [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the minimum weight of a [Formula: see text]RDF of [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text]-rainbow reinforcement number [Formula: see text] of a digraph [Formula: see text] is the minimum number of arcs that must be added to [Formula: see text] in order to decrease the [Formula: see text]-rainbow domination number. In this paper, we initiate the study of [Formula: see text]-rainbow reinforcement number in digraphs and we present some sharp bounds for [Formula: see text]. In particular, we determine the [Formula: see text]-rainbow reinforcement number of some classes of digraphs.



2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1269-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Csilla Bujtás ◽  
Pakanun Dokyeesun ◽  
Vesna Iršič ◽  
Sandi Klavžar

Abstract The connected domination game on a graph G is played by Dominator and Staller according to the rules of the standard domination game with the additional requirement that at each stage of the game the selected vertices induce a connected subgraph of G. If Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally, then the number of vertices selected during the game is the connected game domination number of G. Here this invariant is studied on Cartesian product graphs. A general upper bound is proved and demonstrated to be sharp on Cartesian products of stars with paths or cycles. The connected game domination number is determined for Cartesian products of P3 with arbitrary paths or cycles, as well as for Cartesian products of an arbitrary graph with Kk for the cases when k is relatively large. A monotonicity theorem is proved for products with one complete factor. A sharp general lower bound on the connected game domination number of Cartesian products is also established.



Filomat ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohyedin Falahat ◽  
Seyed Sheikholeslami ◽  
Lutz Volkmann

A 2-rainbow dominating function (2RDF) of a graph G is a function f from the vertex set V(G) to the set of all subsets of the set {1,2} such that for any vertex v ? V(G) with f (v) = ? the condition Uu?N(v) f(u)= {1,2} is fulfilled, where N(v) is the open neighborhood of v. The weight of a 2RDF f is the value ?(f) = ?v?V |f(v)|. The 2-rainbow domination number of a graph G, denoted by r2(G), is the minimum weight of a 2RDF of G. The 2-rainbow domination subdivision number sd?r2(G) is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the 2-rainbow domination number. In this paper we prove that for every simple connected graph G of order n ? 3, sd?r2(G)? 3 + min{d2(v)|v?V and d(v)?2} where d2(v) is the number of vertices of G at distance 2 from v.



2016 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650018 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Dehgardi ◽  
M. Falahat ◽  
S. M. Sheikholeslami ◽  
Abdollah Khodkar

A [Formula: see text]-rainbow dominating function (2RDF) of a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] from the vertex set [Formula: see text] to the set of all subsets of the set [Formula: see text] such that for any vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] the condition [Formula: see text] is fulfilled, where [Formula: see text] is the open neighborhood of [Formula: see text]. The weight of a 2RDF [Formula: see text] is the value [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text]-rainbow domination number of a graph [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the minimum weight of a 2RDF of G. The [Formula: see text]-rainbow domination subdivision number [Formula: see text] is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in [Formula: see text] can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the 2-rainbow domination number. It is conjectured that for any connected graph [Formula: see text] of order [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we first prove this conjecture for some classes of graphs and then we prove that for any connected graph [Formula: see text] of order [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text].



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document