scholarly journals Nutritional and Non-Nutritional Predictors of Low Spot Urinary Creatinine Concentration in Patients with Heart Failure

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 3994
Author(s):  
Jolanta Malinowska-Borowska ◽  
Aleksandra Kulik ◽  
Marta Buczkowska ◽  
Weronika Ostręga ◽  
Apolonia Stefaniak ◽  
...  

Low spot urinary creatinine concentration (SUCR) is a marker of muscle wasting and clinical outcome. The risk factors for low SUCR in heart failure (HF) remain poorly understood. We explored the risk factors for low SUCR related to poor outcomes. In 721 HF patients (age: 52.3 ± 11 years, female: 14%, NYHA: 2.7 ± 0.7) SUCR and Dexa body composition scans were performed. BMI prior HF-onset, weight loss, and appendicular muscle mass were obtained. Each patient was classified as malnutrition or normal by GLIM criteria and three other biochemical indices (CONUT, PNI, and GRNI). Sarcopenia index (SI) as creatinine to cystatin C ratio was also calculated. Within 1 year, 80 (11.1%) patients died. In ROC curve we identified a SUCR value of 0.628 g/L as optimally discriminating surviving from dead. In low SUCR group more advanced HF, higher weight loss and catabolic components of weight trajectory (CCWT), more frequent under-nutrition by GLIM, and lower SI were observed. In multivariate analysis the independent predictors of low SUCR were SI, CCWT, and GNRI score. In conclusion: the risk of low SUCR was associated with a worse outcome. Low SUCR was associated with greater catabolism and sarcopenia but not with biochemical indices of malnutrition.

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Rosenkranz ◽  
Marius M Hoeper ◽  
Doerte Huscher ◽  
David Pittrow ◽  
Christian F Opitz

Background: While targeted therapies are available for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), evidence based treatment recommendations for pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are lacking. Methods and Results: Out of 5,935 patients in the prospective COMPERA registry, we analyzed patients with “typical” IPAH (n=421, ≤2 of the following risk factors: BMI >30 kg/m2, hypertension, CAD, diabetes and atrial fibrillation at the time of diagnosis), “atypical” IPAH (n=139, >2 risk factors) or PH-HFpEF (n=226) who received targeted PH therapies. Patients with PH-HFpEF, when compared to “typical” and “atypical” IPAH were older (73±8 vs. 62±17 and 71±9 years), had a higher BMI (30 vs. 26 and 32 kg/m2), and more comorbidities (98% vs. 73% and 100%, all p<0.001), respectively. However, mean PAP (46±9 vs. 47±13 and 44±11 mmHg), cardiac index (2.2±0.7 vs. 2,3±0,8 and 2,2±0,8 l/min), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (62±7 vs. 62±10 and 63±9%, all ns) were almost identical. As compared to “typical” and “atypical” IPAH, PH-HFpEF patients had a higher PAWP (20±4 vs. 9±3 and 10±4 mmHg), resulting in a lower calculated PVR (559±270 vs. 861±477 and 784±844 dyn.s.cm-5). Survival at 1, 2 and 3 years post diagnosis was not different between groups. PDE-5 inhibitors were the most common form of initial PH treatment in PH-HFpEF (94%), and combination therapy was less common compared to “typical” or “atypical” IPAH at 1 year (7% vs. 44% and 26%). All 3 groups responded to targeted PH therapies at 12 months, while treatment effects were less pronounced in PH-HFpEF: Compared to baseline, the median increase of the 6MWD at 1 year was 29, 50, and 60 m, respectively. Treatment discontinuations occurred more frequently in patients with PH-HFpEF than in IPAH, either because of side effects or lack of improvement. Conclusions: Despite almost identical alterations of pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output, patients with PH-HFpEF differed with respect to age, comorbidities and certain hemodynamic features when compared to “typical” or “atypical” IPAH. All groups responded to targeted PH therapy, however tolerability and efficacy of PH drugs were reduced in patients with PH-HFpEF while survival was not different.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. S391
Author(s):  
B. Hong ◽  
J. Friedland-Little ◽  
E. Albers ◽  
N. Jorgensen ◽  
R. Mazor ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I.J Lundorff ◽  
M Sengeloev ◽  
S Pedersen ◽  
D Modin ◽  
N.E Bruun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background RV dysfunction is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. Due to the complex shape and position of the RV, assessing RV function from echocardiographic images remains a challenge. Purpose We have previously found that global longitudinal strain from 2DSTE is superior to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in identifying HFrEF patients with high risk of mortality. In this study we wanted to examine RV 2DSTE in patients with HFrEF and compare its prognostic value to conventional RV measures. Methods and results Echocardiographic examinations were retrieved from 701 patients with HFrEF. RV estimates were analysed offline, and end point was all-cause mortality. During follow-up (median 39 months) 118 patients (16.8%) died. RV GLS and RV FWS remained associated with mortality after multivariable adjustment, independent of TAPSE (RV GLS: HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13, p=0.010, per 1% decrease) (RV FWS: HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.09, p=0.010, per 1% decrease). This seemed to be caused by significant associations in men as TAPSE remained as the only independent prognosticator in women. All RV estimates provided prognostic information incremental to established risk factors and significantly increased C-statistics (TAPSE: 0.74 to 0.75; RVFAC: 0.74 to 0.75; RVFWS: 0.74 to 0.77; RVGLS: 0.74 to 0.77). Conclusions RV strain from 2DSTE was associated with mortality in patients with HFrEF, independent of TAPSE and established risk factors. Our results indicate that RV strain is particularly valuable in male patients, whereas in women TAPSE remains a stronger prognosticator. RV GLS and the risk of mortality Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): PGJ reports receiving lecture fee from Novo Nordisk.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
M. Makarewicz-Wujec ◽  
M. Kozłowska-Wojciechowska ◽  
M. Naruszewicz ◽  
A. Mamcarz

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Kyeung Song ◽  
Yongjik Lee ◽  
Debra K. Moser ◽  
Rebecca L. Dekker ◽  
Seok-Min Kang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document