scholarly journals Developing an Aircraft-Based Angular Distribution Model of Solar Reflection from Wildfire Smoke to Aid Satellite-Based Radiative Flux Estimation

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 1509
Author(s):  
Tamás Várnai ◽  
Charles Gatebe ◽  
Ritesh Gautam ◽  
Rajesh Poudyal ◽  
Wenying Su
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Boreal Forests ◽  
Atmospheric Correction ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiative Flux ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Airborne Measurements ◽  
Wildfire Smoke ◽  
Wide Range

This study examines the angular distribution of scattered solar radiation associated with wildfire smoke aerosols observed over boreal forests in Canada during the ARCTAS (Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites) campaign. First, it estimates smoke radiative parameters (550 nm optical depth of 3.9 and single scattering albedo of 0.90) using quasi-simultaneous multiangular and multispectral airborne measurements by the Cloud Absorption Radiometer (CAR). Next, the paper estimates the broadband top-of-atmosphere radiances that a satellite instrument such as the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) could have observed, given the narrowband CAR measurements made from an aircraft circling about a kilometer above the smoke layer. This estimation includes both an atmospheric correction that accounts for the atmosphere above the aircraft and a narrowband-to-broadband conversion. The angular distribution of estimated radiances is found to be substantially different than the angular model used in the operational data processing of CERES observations over the same area. This is because the CERES model is a monthly average model that was constructed using observations taken under smoke-free conditions. Finally, a sensitivity analysis shows that the estimated angular distribution remains accurate for a fairly wide range of smoke and underlying surface parameters. Overall, results from this work suggest that airborne CAR measurements can bring some substantial improvements in the accuracy of satellite-based radiative flux estimates.

scholarly journals Accounting for the effects of sastrugi in the CERES clear-sky Antarctic shortwave angular distribution models

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3163-3175 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Corbett ◽  
W. Su
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Statistical Relationships ◽  
Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution

Abstract. The Cloud and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instruments on NASA's Terra, Aqua and Soumi NPP satellites are used to provide a long-term measurement of Earth's energy budget. To accomplish this, the radiances measured by the instruments must be inverted to fluxes by the use of a scene-type-dependent angular distribution model (ADM). For permanent snow scenes over Antarctica, shortwave (SW) ADMs are created by compositing radiance measurements over the full viewing zenith and azimuth range. However, the presence of small-scale wind blown roughness features called sastrugi cause the BRDF (bidirectional reflectance distribution function) of the snow to vary significantly based upon the solar azimuth angle and location. This can result in monthly regional biases between −12 and 7.5 Wm−2 in the inverted TOA (top-of-atmosphere) SW flux. The bias is assessed by comparing the CERES shortwave fluxes derived from nadir observations with those from all viewing zenith angles, as the sastrugi affect fluxes inverted from the oblique viewing angles more than for the nadir viewing angles. In this paper we further describe the clear-sky Antarctic ADMs from Su et al. (2015). These ADMs account for the sastrugi effect by using measurements from the Multi-Angle Imaging Spectro-Radiometer (MISR) instrument to derive statistical relationships between radiance from different viewing angles. We show here that these ADMs reduce the bias and artifacts in the CERES SW flux caused by sastrugi, both locally and Antarctic-wide. The regional monthly biases from sastrugi are reduced to between −5 and 7 Wm−2, and the monthly-mean biases over Antarctica are reduced by up to 0.64 Wm−2, a decrease of 74 %. These improved ADMs are used as part of the Edition 4 CERES SSF (Single Scanner Footprint) data.

scholarly journals Accounting for the effects of Sastrugi in the CERES Clear-Sky Antarctic shortwave ADMs

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 375-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Corbett ◽  
W. Su
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Azimuth Angle ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Statistical Relationships ◽  
Long Term Measurement

Abstract. The Cloud and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) Instruments on NASA's Terra, Aqua and Soumi-NPP satellites are used to provide a long-term measurement of the Earth's energy budget. To accomplish this, the radiances measured by the instruments must be inverted to fluxes by the use of a scene-type dependent angular distribution model (ADM). For permanent snow scenes over Antarctica, shortwave ADMs are created by compositing radiance measurements over the full viewing zenith and azimuth range. However, the presence of small-scale wind blown roughness features called sastrugi cause the BRDF of the snow to vary significantly based upon the solar azimuth angle and location. This can result in monthly regional biases as large as ±15 Wm−2 in the inverted TOA SW flux. In this paper we created a set of ADMs that account for the sastrugi effect by using measurements from the Multi-Angle Imaging Spectro-Radiometer (MISR) instrument to derive statistical relationships between radiance from different viewing angles. These ADMs reduce the monthly regional biases to ±5 Wm−2 and the monthly-mean biases are reduced by up to 50%. These improved ADMs are used as part of the next edition of the CERES data.

scholarly journals Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Terra Satellite. Part I: Methodology

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman G. Loeb ◽  
Seiji Kato ◽  
Konstantin Loukachine ◽  
Natividad Manalo-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Radiative Fluxes ◽  
Earth Observing System ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Terra Satellite

Abstract The Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) provides coincident global cloud and aerosol properties together with reflected solar, emitted terrestrial longwave, and infrared window radiative fluxes. These data are needed to improve the understanding and modeling of the interaction between clouds, aerosols, and radiation at the top of the atmosphere, surface, and within the atmosphere. This paper describes the approach used to estimate top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes from instantaneous CERES radiance measurements on the Terra satellite. A key component involves the development of empirical angular distribution models (ADMs) that account for the angular dependence of the earth’s radiation field at the TOA. The CERES Terra ADMs are developed using 24 months of CERES radiances, coincident cloud and aerosol retrievals from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and meteorological parameters from the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO)’s Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Data Assimilation System (DAS) V4.0.3 product. Scene information for the ADMs is from MODIS retrievals and GEOS DAS V4.0.3 properties over the ocean, land, desert, and snow for both clear and cloudy conditions. Because the CERES Terra ADMs are global, and far more CERES data are available on Terra than were available from CERES on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), the methodology used to define CERES Terra ADMs is different in many respects from that used to develop CERES TRMM ADMs, particularly over snow/sea ice, under cloudy conditions, and for clear scenes over land and desert.

scholarly journals Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from CERES instruments: methodology

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 611-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Su ◽  
J. Corbett ◽  
Z. Eitzen ◽  
L. Liang
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Continuous Functions ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Radiative Energy ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Distribution Models

Abstract. The top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes are critical components to advancing our understanding of the Earth's radiative energy balance, radiative effects of clouds and aerosols, and climate feedback. The Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instruments provide broadband shortwave and longwave radiance measurements. These radiances are converted to fluxes by using scene-type-dependent angular distribution models (ADMs). This paper describes the next-generation ADMs that are developed for Terra and Aqua using all available CERES rotating azimuth plane radiance measurements. Coincident cloud and aerosol retrievals, and radiance measurements from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and meteorological parameters from Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation version 5.4.1 are used to define scene type. CERES radiance measurements are stratified by scene type and by other parameters that are important for determining the anisotropy of the given scene type. Anisotropic factors are then defined either for discrete intervals of relevant parameters or as a continuous functions of combined parameters, depending on the scene type. Significant differences between the ADMs described in this paper and the existing ADMs are over clear-sky scene types and polar scene types. Over clear ocean, we developed a set of shortwave (SW) ADMs that explicitly account for aerosols. Over clear land, the SW ADMs are developed for every 1° latitude × 1° longitude region for every calendar month using a kernel-based bidirectional reflectance model. Over clear Antarctic scenes, SW ADMs are developed by accounting the effects of sastrugi on anisotropy. Over sea ice, a sea-ice brightness index is used to classify the scene type. Under cloudy conditions over all surface types, the longwave (LW) and window (WN) ADMs are developed by combining surface and cloud-top temperature, surface and cloud emissivity, cloud fraction, and precipitable water. Compared to the existing ADMs, the new ADMs change the monthly mean instantaneous fluxes by up to 5 W m−2 on a regional scale of 1° latitude × 1° longitude, but the flux changes are less than 0.5 W m−2 on a global scale.

scholarly journals On the determination of the global cloud feedback from satellite measurements

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Masters
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Cloud Feedback ◽  
Radiative Flux ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Flux Data ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Temporal Averaging

Abstract. A detailed analysis is presented in order to determine the sensitivity of the estimated short-term cloud feedback to choices of temperature datasets, sources of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative flux data, and temporal averaging. It is shown that the results of a previous analysis, which suggested a likely positive value for the short-term cloud feedback, depended upon combining radiative fluxes from satellite and reanalysis data when determining the cloud radiative forcing (CRF). These results are contradicted when ΔCRF is derived from NASA's Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) all-sky and clear-sky measurements over the same period, resulting in a likely negative feedback. The differences between the radiative flux data sources are thus explored, along with the potential problems with each method. Overall, there is little correlation between the changes in the CRF and surface temperatures on these timescales, suggesting that the net effect of clouds varies during this time period quite apart from global temperature changes. Attempts to diagnose long-term cloud feedbacks in this manner are unlikely to be robust.

scholarly journals Cloud_cci AVHRR-PM dataset version 3: 35 year climatology of global cloud and radiation properties

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Stengel ◽  
Stefan Stapelberg ◽  
Oliver Sus ◽  
Stephan Finkensieper ◽  
Benjamin Würzler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Radiative Flux ◽  
Surface Radiation ◽  
Digital Object Identifier ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Ice Water

Abstract. We present version 3 of the Cloud_cci AVHRR-PM dataset which contains a comprehensive set of cloud and radiative flux properties on a global scale covering the period of 1982 to 2016. The properties were retrieved from Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) measurements recorded by the afternoon (post meridiem, PM) satellites of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Polar Operational Environmental Satellites (POES) missions. The cloud properties in version 3 are of improved quality compared with the precursor dataset version 2, providing better global quality scores for cloud detection, cloud phase and ice water path based on validation results against A-Train sensors. Furthermore, the parameter set was extended by a suite of broadband radiative flux properties. They were calculated by combining the retrieved cloud properties with thermodynamic profiles from reanalysis and surface properties. The flux properties comprise upwelling and downwelling, shortwave and longwave broadband fluxes at the surface (bottom-of-atmosphere - BOA) and top-of-atmosphere (TOA). All fluxes were determined at AVHRR pixel level for all-sky and clear-sky conditions, which will particularly facilitate the assessment of the cloud radiative effect at BOA and TOA in future studies. Validation of the BOA downwelling fluxes against the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) show a very good agreement. This is supported by comparisons of multi-annual mean maps with NASA's Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) products for all fluxes at BOA and TOA. The Cloud_cci AVHRR-PM version 3 dataset allows for a large variety of climate applications that build on cloud properties, radiative flux properties and/or the link between them. For the presented Cloud_cci AVHRR-PMv3 dataset a Digital Object Identifier has been issued: https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD/ESA_Cloud_cci/AVHRR-PM/V003 (Stengel et al., 2019).

scholarly journals Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from the CERES instruments: validation

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 4489-4536 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Su ◽  
J. Corbett ◽  
Z. Eitzen ◽  
L. Liang
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Direct Integration ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Radiative Fluxes ◽  
Rms Error ◽  
Sky Conditions ◽  
Along Track ◽  
Scene Identification

Abstract. Radiative fluxes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument are fundamental variables for understanding the Earth's energy balance and how it changes with time. TOA radiative fluxes are derived from the CERES radiance measurements using empirical angular distribution models (ADMs). This paper evaluates the accuracy of CERES TOA fluxes using direct integration and flux consistency tests. Direct integration tests show that the overall bias in regional monthly mean TOA shortwave (SW) flux is less than 0.2 W m−2 and the RMS error is less than 1.1 W m−2. The bias and RMS error are very similar between Terra and Aqua. The bias in regional monthly mean TOA LW fluxes is less than 0.5 W m−2 and the RMS error is less than 0.8 W m−2 for both Terra and Aqua. The accuracy of the TOA instantaneous flux is assessed by performing tests using fluxes inverted from nadir- and oblique-viewing angles using CERES along-track observations and temporally- and spatially-matched MODIS observations, and using fluxes inverted from multi-angle MISR observations. The TOA instantaneous SW flux uncertainties are about 2.3% (1.9 W m−2) over clear ocean, 1.6% (4.5 W m−2) over clear land, and 2.0% (6.0 W m−2) over clear snow/ice; and are about 3.3% (9.0 W m−2), 2.7% (8.4 W m−2), and 3.7% (9.9 W m−2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA SW flux uncertainties are generally larger for thin broken clouds than for moderate and thick overcast clouds. The TOA instantaneous daytime LW flux uncertainties are 0.5% (1.5 W m−2), 0.8% (2.4 W m−2), and 0.7 % (1.3 W m−2) over clear ocean, land, and snow/ice; and are about 1.5% (3.5 W m−2), 1.0% (2.9 W m−2), and 1.1 % (2.1 W m−2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA instantaneous nighttime LW flux uncertainties are about 0.5–1% (< 2.0 W m−2) for all surface types. Flux uncertainties caused by errors in scene identification are also assessed by using the collocated CALIPSO, CloudSat, CERES and MODIS data product. Errors in scene identification tend to underestimate TOA SW flux by about 0.6 W m−2 and overestimate TOA daytime (nighttime) LW flux by 0.4 (0.2) W m−2 when all CERES viewing angles are considered.

scholarly journals Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Terra Satellite. Part II: Validation

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 564-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman G. Loeb ◽  
Seiji Kato ◽  
Konstantin Loukachine ◽  
Natividad Manalo-Smith ◽  
David R. Doelling
Keyword(s):  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Zenith Angle ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Bias Error ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Latitudinal Dependence ◽  
Terra Satellite

Abstract Errors in top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument due to uncertainties in radiance-to-flux conversion from CERES Terra angular distribution models (ADMs) are evaluated through a series of consistency tests. These tests show that the overall bias in regional monthly mean shortwave (SW) TOA flux is less than 0.2 W m−2 and the regional RMS error ranges from 0.70 to 1.4 W m−2. In contrast, SW TOA fluxes inferred using theoretical ADMs that assume clouds are plane parallel are overestimated by 3–4 W m−2 and exhibit a strong latitudinal dependence. In the longwave (LW), the bias error ranges from 0.2 to 0.4 W m−2 and regional RMS errors remain smaller than 0.7 W m−2. Global mean albedos derived from ADMs developed during the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) and applied to CERES measurements show a systematic increase with viewing zenith angle of 4%–8%, while albedos from the CERES Terra ADMs show a smaller increase of 1%–2%. The LW fluxes from the ERBE ADMs show a systematic decrease with viewing zenith angle of 2%–2.4%, whereas fluxes from the CERES Terra ADMs remain within 0.7%–0.8% at all angles. Based on several months of multiangle CERES along-track data, the SW TOA flux consistency between nadir- and oblique-viewing zenith angles is generally 5% (&lt;17 W m−2) over land and ocean and 9% (26 W m−2) in polar regions, and LW TOA flux consistency is approximate 3% (7 W m−2) over all surfaces. Based on these results and a theoretically derived conversion between TOA flux consistency and TOA flux error, the best estimate of the error in CERES TOA flux due to the radiance-to-flux conversion is 3% (10 W m−2) in the SW and 1.8% (3–5 W m−2) in the LW. Monthly mean TOA fluxes based on ERBE ADMs are larger than monthly mean TOA fluxes based on CERES Terra ADMs by 1.8 and 1.3 W m−2 in the SW and LW, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document