scholarly journals Retrieval and Validation of Cloud Top Temperature from the Geostationary Satellite INSAT-3D

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 2811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lima ◽  
Prijith ◽  
Sesha Sai ◽  
Rao ◽  
Niranjan ◽  
...  

Investigation of cloud top temperature (CTT) and its diurnal variation is highly reliant on high spatial and temporal resolution satellite data, which is lacking over the Indian region. An algorithm has been developed for detection of clouds and retrieval of CTT from the geostationary satellite INSAT-3D. These retrievals are validated (inter-compared) with collocated in-situ (satellite) measurements with specific intent to generate climate-quality data. The cloud detection algorithm employs nine different tests, in accordance with solar illumination, satellite angle and surface type conditions to generate pixel-resolution cloud mask. Validation of cloud mask with cloud-aerosol lidar with orthogonal polarization (CALIOP) shows that probability of detection (POD) of cloudy (clear) sky is 81% (85%), with 83% hit rate. The algorithm is also implemented on similar channels of moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS), which provides 88% (83%) POD of cloudy (clear) sky, with 86% hit rate. CTT retrieval is done at the pixel level, for all cloud pixels, by employing appropriate methods for various types of clouds. Comparison of CTT with radiosonde and cloud-aerosol lidar and infrared pathfinder satellite observations (CALIPSO) shows mean absolute error less than 3%. The study also examines sensitivity of retrieved CTT to the cloud classification scheme and retrieval criteria. Validation results and their close agreements with those of similar satellites demonstrate the reliability of the retrieved product for climate studies.

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 553-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-H. Ahn ◽  
D. Han ◽  
H. Y. Won ◽  
V. Morris

Abstract. For better utilization of the ground-based microwave radiometer, it is important to detect the cloud presence in the measured data. Here, we introduce a simple and fast cloud detection algorithm by using the optical characteristics of the clouds in the infrared atmospheric window region. The new algorithm utilizes the brightness temperature (Tb) measured by an infrared radiometer installed on top of a microwave radiometer. The two-step algorithm consists of a spectral test followed by a temporal test. The measured Tb is first compared with a predicted clear-sky Tb obtained by an empirical formula as a function of surface air temperature and water vapor pressure. For the temporal test, the temporal variability of the measured Tb during one minute compares with a dynamic threshold value, representing the variability of clear-sky conditions. It is designated as cloud-free data only when both the spectral and temporal tests confirm cloud-free data. Overall, most of the thick and uniform clouds are successfully detected by the spectral test, while the broken and fast-varying clouds are detected by the temporal test. The algorithm is validated by comparison with the collocated ceilometer data for six months, from January to June 2013. The overall proportion of correctness is about 88.3% and the probability of detection is 90.8%, which are comparable with or better than those of previous similar approaches. Two thirds of discrepancies occur when the new algorithm detects clouds while the ceilometer does not, resulting in different values of the probability of detection with different cloud-base altitude, 93.8, 90.3, and 82.8% for low, mid, and high clouds, respectively. Finally, due to the characteristics of the spectral range, the new algorithm is found to be insensitive to the presence of inversion layers.


2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Reuter ◽  
W. Thomas ◽  
P. Albert ◽  
M. Lockhoff ◽  
R. Weber ◽  
...  

Abstract The Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF) is aiming to retrieve satellite-derived geophysical parameters suitable for climate monitoring. CM-SAF started routine operations in early 2007 and provides a climatology of parameters describing the global energy and water cycle on a regional scale and partially on a global scale. Here, the authors focus on the performance of cloud detection methods applied to measurements of the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on the first Meteosat Second Generation geostationary spacecraft. The retrieved cloud mask is the basis for calculating the cloud fractional coverage (CFC) but is also mandatory for retrieving other geophysical parameters. Therefore, the quality of the cloud detection directly influences climate monitoring of many other parameters derived from spaceborne sensors. CM-SAF products and results of an alternative cloud coverage retrieval provided by the Institut für Weltraumwissenschaften of the Freie Universität in Berlin, Germany (FUB), were validated against synoptic measurements. Furthermore, and on the basis of case studies, an initial comparison was performed of CM-SAF results with results derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) and from the Cloud–Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP). Results show that the CFC from CM-SAF and FUB agrees well with synoptic data and MODIS data over midlatitudes but is underestimated over the tropics and overestimated toward the edges of the visible Earth disk.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles H. White ◽  
Andrew K. Heidinger ◽  
Steven A. Ackerman

Abstract. Cloud properties are critical to our understanding of weather and climate variability, but their estimation from satellite imagers is a nontrivial task. In this work, we aim to improve cloud detection which is the most fundamental cloud property. We use a neural network applied to Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) measurements to determine whether an imager pixel is cloudy or cloud-free. The neural network is trained and evaluated using four years (2016–2019) of coincident measurements between VIIRS and the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP). We successfully address the lack of sun glint in the collocation dataset with a simple semi-supervised learning approach. The results of the neural network are then compared with two operational cloud masks: the MODIS-VIIRS Continuity Cloud Mask (MVCM) and the NOAA Enterprise Cloud Mask (ECM). We find that the neural network outperforms both operational cloud masks in most conditions examined with a few exceptions. The largest improvements we observe occur during the night over snow or ice covered surfaces in the high latitudes. In our analysis, we show that this improvement is not solely due to differences in optical depth-based definitions of a cloud between each mask. We also analyze the differences in true positive rate between day/night and land/water scenes as a function of optical depth. Such differences are a contributor to spatial artifacts in cloud masking and we find that the neural network is the most consistent in cloud detection with respect to optical depth across these conditions. A regional analysis over Greenland illustrates the impact of such differences and shows that they can result in mean cloud fractions with very different spatial and temporal characteristics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Frey ◽  
Steven A. Ackerman ◽  
Robert E. Holz ◽  
Steven Dutcher ◽  
Zach Griffith

This paper introduces the Continuity Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Cloud Mask (MVCM), a cloud detection algorithm designed to facilitate continuity in cloud detection between the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) on the Aqua and Terra platforms and the series of VIIRS (Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite) instruments, beginning with the Soumi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) spacecraft. It is based on the MODIS cloud mask that has been operating since 2000 with the launch of the Terra spacecraft (MOD35) and continuing in 2002 with Aqua (MYD35). The MVCM makes use of fourteen spectral bands that are common to both MODIS and VIIRS so as to create consistent cloud detection between the two instruments and across the years 2000–2020 and beyond. Through comparison data sets, including collocated Aqua MODIS and Cloud-Aerosol LIdar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) from the A-Train, this study was designed to assign statistical consistency benchmarks between the MYD35 and MVCM cloud masks. It is shown that the MVCM produces consistent cloud detection results between Aqua MODIS, SNPP VIIRS, and NOAA-20 VIIRS and that the quality is comparable to the standard Aqua MODIS cloud mask. Globally, comparisons with collocated CALIOP lidar show combined clear and cloudy sky hit rates of 88.2%, 87.5%, 86.8%, and 86.8% for MYD35, MVCM Aqua MODIS, MVCM SNPP VIIRS, and MVCM NOAA-20 VIIRS, respectively, for June through until August, 2018. For the same months and in the same order for 60S–60N, hit rates are 90.7%, 90.5%, 90.1%, and 90.3%. From the time series constructed from gridded daily means of 60S–60N cloud fractions, we found that the mean day-to-day cloud fraction differences/standard deviations in percent to be 0.68/0.55, 0.94/0.64, −0.20/0.50, and 0.44/0.82 for MVCM Aqua MODIS-MVCM SNPP VIIRS day and night, and MVCM NOAA-20 VIIRS-MVCM SNPP VIIRS day and night, respectively. It is seen that the MODIS and VIIRS 1.38 µm cirrus detection bands perform similarly but with MODIS detecting slightly more clouds in the middle to high levels of the troposphere and the VIIRS detecting more in the upper troposphere above 16 km. In the Arctic, MVCM Aqua MODIS and SNPP VIIRS reported cloud fraction differences of 0–3% during the mid-summer season and −3–4% during the mid-winter.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwen Wang ◽  
Youfei Zheng ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
Zeyi Niu ◽  
Jingxin Xu ◽  
...  

The use of infrared (IR) sensors to detect clouds in different layers of the atmosphere is a big challenge, especially for ice clouds. This study aims to improve ice cloud detection using Lin’s algorithm and apply it to Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS). To achieve these objectives, the scattering and emission characteristics of clouds as perceived by AIRS longwave infrared (LWIR, ~15 μm) and shortwave infrared (SWIR, ~4.3 μm) CO2 absorption bands are applied for ice cloud detection. Hence, the weighting function peak (WFP), cut-off pressure, and correlation coefficients between the brightness temperatures (BTs) of LWIR and SWIR channels are used to pair the LWIR and SWIR channels. After that, the linear relationship between the clear-sky BTs of the paired LWIR and SWIR channels is established by the cloud scattering and emission Index (CESI). However, the linear relationship fails in the presence of ice clouds. Comparing these results with collocated Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) observations show that the probability of detection of ice clouds for Pair-8 (WFP~330hPa), Pair-19 (WFP~555hPa), and Pair-24 (WFP~866hPa) are 0.63, 0.71, and 0.73 in the daytime and 0.46, 0.62, and 0.7 in the nighttime at a false alarm rate of 0.1 when ice clouds top pressure above 330 hPa, 555 hPa, and 866 hPa, respectively. Furthermore, the thresholds of the three pairs are 2.4 K, 3 K, and 8.7 K in the daytime and 1.7 K, 1.7 K, and 4.4 K in the nighttime at the highest Heike Skill Score (HSS). The error of HSS values based on thresholds of ice clouds is between 0.01 and 0.02 which is comparable with the ice cloud detection results in both day and night conditions. It is shown that Pair-8 (WFP~330hPa) can detect opaque and thick ice clouds above its WFP altitude over the tropical areas but it is unable to observe ice clouds over the mid-latitude while Pair-19 and Pair-24 can identify ice clouds above their WFP altitude.


Author(s):  
Theodore M. McHardy ◽  
James R. Campbell ◽  
David A. Peterson ◽  
Simone Lolli ◽  
Richard L. Bankert ◽  
...  

AbstractWe describe a quantitative evaluation of maritime transparent cirrus cloud detection, which is based on Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite – 16 (GOES-16) and developed with collocated Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) profiling. The detection algorithm is developed using one month of collocated GOES-16 Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Channel 4 (1.378 μm) radiance and CALIOP 0.532 μm column-integrated cloud optical depth (COD). First, the relationships between the clear-sky 1.378 μm radiance, viewing/solar geometry, and precipitable water vapor (PWV) are characterized. Using machine learning techniques, it is shown that the total atmospheric pathlength, proxied by airmass factor (AMF), is a suitable replacement for viewing zenith and solar zenith angles alone, and that PWV is not a significant problem over ocean. Detection thresholds are computed using the Ch. 4 radiance as a function of AMF. The algorithm detects nearly 50% of sub-visual cirrus (COD < 0.03), 80% of transparent cirrus (0.03 < COD < 0.3), and 90% of opaque cirrus (COD > 0.3). Using a conservative radiance threshold results in 84% of cloudy pixels being correctly identified and 4% of clear-sky pixels being misidentified as cirrus. A semi-quantitative COD retrieval is developed for GOES ABI based on the observed relationship between CALIOP COD and 1.378 μm radiance. This study lays the groundwork for a more complex, operational GOES transparent cirrus detection algorithm. Future expansion includes an over-land algorithm, a more robust COD retrieval that is suitable for assimilation purposes, and downstream GOES products such as cirrus cloud microphysical property retrieval based on ABI infrared channels.


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 8189-8222 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Wang ◽  
W. Li ◽  
Y. Zhu ◽  
B. Zhao

Abstract. The existence of various land surfaces has always been a difficult problem for researchers who study cloud detection using satellite observations, especially over bright surfaces such as snow and desert. To improve the cloud mask result over complex terrain, an unbiased daytime cloud detection algorithm for the Visible and InfRared Radiometer (VIRR) on board the Chinese FengYun-3A polar-orbiting meteorological satellite is applied over the northwest region of China. Based on the statistical seasonal threshold tests, the algorithm consists of six main channels centered on the wavelengths of 0.63, 0.865, 10.8, 1.595, 0.455, and 1.36 μm. The combination of the unbiased algorithm and the specific threshold tests for special surfaces has effectively improved the cloud mask results over complex terrain and decreased the false identifications of clouds. The visual images over snow and desert adopting the proposed scheme exhibit better correlations with true-color images than do the VIRR official cloud mask results. The validation with the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud mask product shows that the probability of detection for clear-sky regions over snow of the new scheme has increased nearly five times over the official method, and the false-alarm ratio for cloudy areas over desert has reduced by half compared with the official result. With regard to comparisons between ground measurements and cloud mask results, this approach also provides acceptable correspondence with the ground observations except for some cases, which are mainly obscured by cirrus clouds.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Z. Kotarba

Abstract. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection procedure classifies instantaneous fields of view (IFOV) as either confident cloudy, probably cloudy, probably clear, or confident clear. The cloud amount calculation requires quantitative cloud fractions to be assigned to these classes. The operational procedure used by NASA assumes that confident clear and probably clear IFOV are cloud-free (cloud fraction 0 %), while the remaining categories are completely filled with clouds (cloud fraction 100 %). This study demonstrates that this best guess approach is unreliable, especially on a regional/ local scale. We use data from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) instrument flown on the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) mission, collocated with MODIS/ Aqua IFOV. Based on 33,793,648 paired observations acquired in January and July 2015, we conclude that actual cloud fractions to be associated with MODIS cloud mask categories are 21.5 %, 27.7 %, 66.6 %, and 94.7 %. Spatial variability is significant, even within a single MODIS algorithm path, and the operational approach introduces uncertainties of up to 30 % of cloud amount, notably in the polar regions at night, and in selected locations over the northern hemisphere. Applications of MODIS data at ~10 degrees resolution (or finer) should first assess the extent of the error. Uncertainties were related to the efficiency of the cloud masking algorithm. Until the algorithm can be significantly modified, our method is a robust way to calibrate (correct) MODIS estimates. It can be also used for MODIS/ Terra data, and other missions where the footprint is collocated with CALIPSO.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 9413-9452 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-H. Ahn ◽  
D. Han ◽  
H.-Y. Won ◽  
V. Morris

Abstract. For a better utilization of the ground-based microwave radiometer, it is important to detect the cloud presence in the measured data. Here, we introduce a simple and fast cloud detection algorithm by using the optical characteristics of the clouds in the infrared atmospheric window region. The new algorithm utilizes the brightness temperature (Tb) measured by an infrared radiometer installed on top of a microwave radiometer. The two step algorithm consists of a spectral test followed by a temporal test. The measured Tb is first compared with a predicted clear sky Tb obtained by an empirical formula as a function of surface air temperature and water vapor pressure. For the temporal test, the temporal variability of the measured Tb during one minute compares with a dynamic threshold value, representing the variability of the clear sky condition. It is designated as cloud free data only when both the spectral and temporal tests confirm a cloud free data. Overall, most of the thick and uniform clouds are successfully screened out by the spectral test, while the broken and fast-varying clouds are screened out by the temporal test. The algorithm is validated by comparison with the collocated ceilometer data for 6 months, from January 2013 to June 2013. The overall proportion correct is about 88.3% and the probability of detection is 90.8%, which are comparable with or better than those of previous similar approaches. Two thirds of failures occur when the new algorithm detects clouds while the ceilometer does not detect, resulting in different values of the probability of detection with different cloud base altitude, 93.8, 90.3, and 82.8% for low, mid, and high clouds, respectively. Finally, due to the characteristics of the spectral range, the new algorithm is found to be insensitive to the presence of inversion layers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 2829-2855
Author(s):  
S. Bley ◽  
H. Deneke

Abstract. A robust threshold-based cloud mask for the high-resolution visible (HRV) channel (1 × 1 km2) of the METEOSAT SEVIRI instrument is introduced and evaluated. It is based on operational EUMETSAT cloud mask for the low resolution channels of SEVIRI (3 × 3 km2), which is used for the selection of suitable thresholds to ensure consistency with its results. The aim of using the HRV channel is to resolve small-scale cloud structures which cannot be detected by the low resolution channels. We find that it is of advantage to apply thresholds relative to clear-sky reflectance composites, and to adapt the threshold regionally. Furthermore, the accuracy of the different spectral channels for thresholding and the suitability of the HRV channel are investigated for cloud detection. The case studies show different situations to demonstrate the behaviour for various surface and cloud conditions. Overall, between 4 and 24% of cloudy low-resolution SEVIRI pixels are found to contain broken clouds in our test dataset depending on considered region. Most of these broken pixels are classified as cloudy by EUMETSAT's cloud mask, which will likely result in an overestimate if the mask is used as estimate of cloud fraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document